UK ISP BT Offers up to 76Mbps Superfast Broadband Boost for Free


Recommended Posts

Interesting, how do you interface with the openreach modem?

Mines not the HG612 though, I have the V2 I think but would be cool if I could get a faster sync

EDIT - I lied, it is a HG612, Rev.B - just found the guide :D

Just incase, everything you need should be here: http://huaweihg612hacking.wordpress.com/

Just incase, everything you need should be here: http://huaweihg612ha....wordpress.com/

Cheers, I unlocked it, I have UI access now, Line stats say (79999 / 20000 ) but I'm still getting 75/16

Need to find where it explains how to get a faster sync :)

telnet shows

Max: Upstream rate = 31364 Kbps, Downstream rate = 84876 Kbps

Path: 0, Upstream rate = 20000 Kbps, Downstream rate = 79999 Kbps

Capped at openreach modem ?

OK so I turned off QoS at the Openreach modem and things are improving

1910811571.png

Cheers, I unlocked it, I have UI access now, Line stats say (79999 / 20000 ) but I'm still getting 75/16

Need to find where it explains how to get a faster sync :)

telnet shows

Max: Upstream rate = 31364 Kbps, Downstream rate = 84876 Kbps

Path: 0, Upstream rate = 20000 Kbps, Downstream rate = 79999 Kbps

Capped at openreach modem ?

OK so I turned off QoS at the Openreach modem and things are improving

1910811571.png

Darnsight better than me!

1910857815.png

Do you happen to know what your IP profile is set at?

whats the point of QOS on a modem? it should be on a layer 3 switch... anyway I will take a look at this later on this week.

Which guide did you follow?

Followed this guide

https://huaweihg612h...ctions_v1-3.pdf

Used the firmware from here (Mine was SP10, check the back of the modem for the correct version) - The download 404s but gives a menu toolbar, use FILE > Download

https://docs.google....DNhYTNjOGJlZTBj

Apparently the firmware is stock with the exception of the firewall being lowered from BT to Standard to allow LAN2 access

Darnsight better than me!

1910857815.png

Do you happen to know what your IP profile is set at?

Its weird, I get that speed with Chrome, but all other browsers give me 75/16

Profile 17a

# xdslcmd info --pbParams
xdslcmd: ADSL driver and PHY status
Status: Showtime
Retrain Reason: 0
Max:	Upstream rate = 31368 Kbps, Downstream rate = 84876 Kbps
Path:   0, Upstream rate = 20000 Kbps, Downstream rate = 79999 Kbps

Discovery Phase (Initial) Band Plan
US: (0,95) (868,1207) (1972,2783)
DS: (32,859) (1216,1963) (2792,3959)
Medley Phase (Final) Band Plan
US: (0,95) (868,1207) (1972,2783)
DS: (32,859) (1216,1963) (2792,3959)
	   VDSL Port Details	   Upstream		Downstream
Attainable Net Data Rate:	  31368 kbps		 84876 kbps
Actual Aggregate Tx Power:		2.4 dBm		  13.6 dBm
============================================================================
  VDSL Band Status		U0	  U1	  U2	  U3	  D1	  D2	  D3
  Line Attenuation(dB):  2.8	 14.8	22.0	 N/A	8.1	 18.8	29.2

Signal Attenuation(dB):  7.7	 14.1	21.3	 N/A	8.1	 18.8	29.2

		SNR Margin(dB):  14.6	15.0	15.0	 N/A	7.3	 7.3	 7.4

		 TX Power(dBm): -12.1   -35.4	2.1	  N/A	10.9	7.6	 7.1

Followed this guide

https://huaweihg612h...ctions_v1-3.pdf

Used the firmware from here (Mine was SP10, check the back of the modem for the correct version) - The download 404s but gives a menu toolbar, use FILE > Download

https://docs.google....DNhYTNjOGJlZTBj

Apparently the firmware is stock with the exception of the firewall being lowered from BT to Standard to allow LAN2 access

Its weird, I get that speed with Chrome, but all other browsers give me 75/16

Profile 17a

# xdslcmd info --pbParams
xdslcmd: ADSL driver and PHY status
Status: Showtime
Retrain Reason: 0
Max:	Upstream rate = 31368 Kbps, Downstream rate = 84876 Kbps
Path:   0, Upstream rate = 20000 Kbps, Downstream rate = 79999 Kbps

Discovery Phase (Initial) Band Plan
US: (0,95) (868,1207) (1972,2783)
DS: (32,859) (1216,1963) (2792,3959)
Medley Phase (Final) Band Plan
US: (0,95) (868,1207) (1972,2783)
DS: (32,859) (1216,1963) (2792,3959)
	   VDSL Port Details	   Upstream		Downstream
Attainable Net Data Rate:	  31368 kbps		 84876 kbps
Actual Aggregate Tx Power:		2.4 dBm		  13.6 dBm
============================================================================
  VDSL Band Status		U0	  U1	  U2	  U3	  D1	  D2	  D3
  Line Attenuation(dB):  2.8	 14.8	22.0	 N/A	8.1	 18.8	29.2

Signal Attenuation(dB):  7.7	 14.1	21.3	 N/A	8.1	 18.8	29.2

		SNR Margin(dB):  14.6	15.0	15.0	 N/A	7.3	 7.3	 7.4

		 TX Power(dBm): -12.1   -35.4	2.1	  N/A	10.9	7.6	 7.1

By IP profile I mean the max speed your line is capped at. You can find that out here under the results section: http://www.speedtester.bt.com/

Although I just tried to run it and there was an error so it may not be working at the moment.

By IP profile I mean the max speed your line is capped at. You can find that out here under the results section: http://www.speedtester.bt.com/

Although I just tried to run it and there was an error so it may not be working at the moment.

Yea its been broken for ages, even BT advise not to use it, I am on the 80/20 connection though

EDIT - Works with IE9 but slow

IP Profile for your line is - 77.43 Mbps

Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 20 Mbps

Yea its been broken for ages, even BT advise not to use it, I am on the 80/20 connection though

EDIT - Works with IE9 but slow

IP Profile for your line is - 77.43 Mbps

Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 20 Mbps

Just worked on my third try. My downstream IP profile is stuck at 55mbps! Rubbish!

Just worked on my third try. My downstream IP profile is stuck at 55mbps! Rubbish!

I wouldn't trust the BT speedtest site anyway, while I was on the BT forums waiting for my upgrade there were loads of complaints about it and the mods advised to use the Lite version linked to from the main test page once you tick the accept button, but even that is broken, giving me 11meg down lol

Speed does seem to be improving though, with FF I could never get over 74999 down, but its hitting 76xxx ish now and turning off QoS has given me an extra 1meg up at least too

I wouldn't trust the BT speedtest site anyway, while I was on the BT forums waiting for my upgrade there were loads of complaints about it and the mods advised to use the Lite version linked to from the main test page once you tick the accept button, but even that is broken, giving me 11meg down lol

Speed does seem to be improving though, with FF I could never get over 74999 down, but its hitting 76xxx ish now and turning off QoS has given me an extra 1meg up at least too

It gave me something like 40mbit down but the max ip profile is set at 55... that's lower than when I initially upgraded. I imagine it's something to do with dynamic line management and the fact my line is most likely made of aluminium - the max achievable speed that they've "determined" for my line is 55mbit.

Just checked again - ignore the download speed that's a load of rubbish. But you'll notice the line is capped off at 55:

post-33944-0-84782000-1335197033_thumb.j

Might call BT and query it... not sure if it'll do any good though.

What attenuation did you guys have on ADSL2?

Can't remember exactly but I had endless problems with the line dropping to Interleaved EC, the router would sync at 8000kbps and I'd get 300KB/s max - I spent more time trying to get the line stable than I did using the net, 2 different ISPs both incompetent and clueless to what I was telling them.

Got my upgrade done over night. Re-synced at 76MB down and 16mb up (wondering why its no at full 20mb up).

BT is 76mb down 18mb up. So 16mb isn't that far off it. companies were advertising as 80/20 but Ofcom forced them to advertise with their real speeds.

BT is 76mb down 18mb up. So 16mb isn't that far off it. companies were advertising as 80/20 but Ofcom forced them to advertise with their real speeds.

This is true, I forgot about that, just goes to show that Chrome speedtest results are false then considering all other browsers hit the line cap more or less and chrome shows 80meg

Same... the absolute fastest we can get here is 22Mbps and it's like 90-120/mo I pay 55 for a 11mbps down and 1.2mbps up.

BTW any of you guys use the AMPED WIRELESS R10000G with any of the provided homehub/superhub routers???

was wondering as some people said they had issues with that and wanted to confirm this...

This is true, I forgot about that, just goes to show that Chrome speedtest results are false then considering all other browsers hit the line cap more or less and chrome shows 80meg

When I had a problem with a client leased line I spoke to a guy at BT who said not to put to much faith in speed tests, he gave me a ftp server with 10 and 100mg files and a script to run which pulls down the files and uploads them several times and reports the speed.

As it turned out I missed a setting and the speeds shown on speedtest.net were very near what I had from his test.

This is true, I forgot about that, just goes to show that Chrome speedtest results are false then considering all other browsers hit the line cap more or less and chrome shows 80meg

What are you on about? Chrome doesn't show false anything:-

Chrome:-

1911888506.png

IE9:-

1911889203.png

B.T, have cheesed me off.

I signed up for double bubble and they said as of Tuesday 00:00 it will be activated.

Today it has not happened and B.T. now tell me I have to wait a further 10 days.

All this on the fact that infinity did not arrive in March 2011 when it did not happen but April 2012.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like Tidal, but it still does not control devices from the mobile/app and still no surround support. And yeah re: above comment I still get a lot of network errors and I am on a 4/4 Gbit Fiber connection.
    • Aren`t "security features" and "AI model that can see your screen" a tad diametric!
    • Samsung, Amazon extend 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD deal beyond Prime Day 2026 by Sayan Sen Recently, we had Amazon's Prime Day 2026 sales wherein there were several great deals including on SSDs. One of those discounted components was the Samsung 990 PRO SSD as the 2TB variant of it was selling for $370, a very good price after a long time. Although that deal was supposed to expire today, Amazon has now extended that sale further (purchase link under the specs table down below). The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $400. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The technical specs of the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB are given in the table below: Specification Value Form Factor M.2 2280 Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 NAND Flash Samsung V-NAND TLC Controller Samsung In-house Controller Cache Memory Samsung 2GB Low Power DDR4 SDRAM Sequential Read Speed Up to 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS Random Read (4KB, QD1) Up to 22,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD1) Up to 80,000 IOPS Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Reliability (MTBF) 1.5 Million Hours Endurance 1,200 TBW (Total Bytes Written) Get it at the link below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB NVMe SSD (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Glad im on the right boat. Tidal has lots of issues in terms of app and music mix, its worst than spot but its honest. Spot algo is very tendentious and they pess less to artists, so im comfortable with the tidal errors, for now.
    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says by David Uzondu Image via Tidal Tidal has announced an AI policy aimed at protecting artists and their crafts, as AI music generation tools continue to improve both in speed and quality. According to the music streaming platform, AI-generated music will be accepted, but these tracks will be held to a "higher standard" of content integrity. Next month, the company plans to auto-identify and tag these uploads. Listeners will spot a special icon next to content that algorithms flag as 100% AI-generated starting mid-July, and the platform hopes to expand this tag to partially generated songs as detection tech improves. Any AI music that exploits an artist's voice or likeness will be taken down, and Tidal will immediately block tracks associated with fraudulent activity, which includes artificial streaming and deceptive content that interferes with real creators. And finally, music that's 100% AI-generated will not be monetized. Tidal said there is "ongoing debate" about whether certain licensed synthetic models deserve payouts, so it's possible that this part will change in the future. Streaming platforms are absolutely getting flooded with AI-generated music because of how easy it is to pump out endless tracks every minute. To give you an idea of how "bad" it is, Deezer alone reported that synthetic uploads now make up about 44% of its daily intake, which translates to roughly 75,000 automated tracks hitting its servers every single day. Interestingly, Deezer found most people cannot tell the difference between human and machine creations, with an Ipsos study revealing that 97% of listeners failed to spot the AI-generated tracks. Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music. The Swedish platform partnered with Universal Music Group to test "legal and controlled" generative AI tools that let subscribers remix songs with AI.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!