Recommended Posts

They can't give an option, though. It just wouldn't work out well. They didn't give an option in Windows 95 for people to use the previous interface, just like they didn't provide an option in Windows Phone 7 for people to use the Windows Mobile 6.5 interface. I'm aware that Windows Phone is a different operating system to Windows Mobile, but essentially, the Metro experience of Windows 8 is a different operating system to Windows 7. There are valid reasons why companies don't forever allow users to use the previous interfaces of their products. There are reasons Facebook will ensure everyone uses Timeline, and there are reasons Microsoft didn't allow people to switch back to the MSN Hotmail version of Hotmail. It is not as easy as them just "giving users the option," like some people seem to think it is. One has to consider the possible technical support overheard, among many other factors.

Cool story, only it's pretty much false.

Windows 95 had the Program Manager, hell Windows ME did too.

And you could change to the old MSN Hotmail interface for quite some time also, sooo, there you go.

Facebook is a completely different company so it's not really relevant to what Microsoft does.

I don't like it. It reminds me of those Longhorn concept videos. I much prefer the interface of Windows 8.

Cool story, only it's pretty much false.

Windows 95 had the Program Manager, hell Windows ME did too.

So did Windows XP RTM and SP1. It was disabled in SP2.

I find re-learning how to use a system I've used since 1995 complicated. The fact that MS has said they will have tutorials proves I'm not alone.

Anyway, other than that, arguing with you about Windows 8 is pointless, you clearly love it, I clearly hate it. The difference is, I accept that some people do actually like Windows 8 and how it works for them. You just seem to think everyone should like it because you do. Before you disagree, take a look at your posts.

Liking it or not liking it isn't what I was getting at. I was simply stating that Windows 8 is no more complicated than Windows 7 is. If you can use Windows 7, you can use Windows 8.

The way I see it, Windows 7 is awesome enough to skip over any future Windows Versions that go with the tiled interface. I am using a computer, not a tablet. I want to multi-task (which I do every single day in a high capacity) Copying and pasting to multiple locations and folders at a time. Pulling files from multiple locations and directories at one time. Having the start menu be a small little box on the side of my screen.

Windows 8 and the immersive (aka full screen, horrible multi-tasking) environment, and the full screen start page. Just doesn't work for me, and unless I become crippled and forget how to use a computer properly it never will. I do hope Windows 9 will go back to the Windows 7 styling, though I would much prefer Longhorn (4074 styling), I hope that Windows 8 is a one off. Otherwise I will run Windows 7 into the ground, and hope that one of the other OS makers continues on the classic, non-mobile, desktop styling.

I'm not opposed to changes, just changes that I see no benefit from. I gladly went from 2000 to XP, XP to Vista, Vista to 7, between XP and Vista I tested every single leak and release. I am not opposed to change.

If Microsoft listened to half the people on Neowin, Windows 8 would be this.

Followed up by Windows 9

(Classic shell & start menu on by default of course)

No, no, if Microsoft listened to us, Windows 8 would be this:

Command_prompt_on_windows_vista.png

No, no, if Microsoft listened to us, Windows 8 would be this:

Command_prompt_on_windows_vista.png

No, I am pretty sure if they listened to us, it would be Windows 7's look, and functionality with the Windows 8 background improvements (speed, file transfers, etc) not the stupid interface they stuck on it.

  • Like 1

Nah that was Netspace ages ago, now its Chemist Warehouse. Many more things to do now! All those computers in every store don't run on sunshine and happiness.

I think that you would find that bad UIs are in your best interest. Bad UIs = More Stress. More Stress = More Prescription meds, More Prescription Meds = More Sales for Chemist Warehouse. More Sales = More Profit Share! I think Chemist Warehouses would have seen a major growth in prescription meds sales following every Siebel rollout.

No, I am pretty sure if they listened to us, it would be Windows 7's look, and functionality with the Windows 8 background improvements (speed, file transfers, etc) not the stupid interface they stuck on it.

Just give it time to mature. We know little to nothing about the Release Preview or Windows 9. I'll bet by that time most will be like "Classic what?".

If you are 12... maybe.

I'm 26, and currently using Windows 8 day in and day out at school and at home, and have yet to hit any sort of productivity roadblock. I'm mainly on the desktop working in Office, but I have been running a few of the more complete Metro apps on the side of the screen while I work. Music, calendar, mail, and weather all work nicely next to the desktop.

I'm 26, and currently using Windows 8 day in and day out at school and at home, and have yet to hit any sort of productivity roadblock. I'm mainly on the desktop working in Office, but I have been running a few of the more complete Metro apps on the side of the screen while I work. Music, calendar, mail, and weather all work nicely next to the desktop.

What works for you doesn't work for me. I have Weather, Music, Clock, Email all running on the desktop in the foreground while I am working, no need to switch to another screen to see it. I prefer it that way, but that's just me.

Also the 12 comment was for anyone who doesn't know what classic desktop environment meant when windows 9 came out.

I find re-learning how to use a system I've used since 1995 complicated.

Lot's of people used that argument going from DOS to a GUI.

No, I am pretty sure if they listened to us, it would be Windows 7's look, and functionality with the Windows 8 background improvements (speed, file transfers, etc) not the stupid interface they stuck on it.

People have bitched and moaned about every version of Windows, "Why can't it be the same as the last version!!"

There are still communities out there full of people trying to make Windows 95 and 98 work in modern life.

The people who did that video have 0 talent for design. It's just horrible everything is mashed together in a cluster-**** of a mess. I think I just vomited a little while watching the video and I hope that person now works picking up garbage because that's pretty much what I see.

The people who did that video have 0 talent for design. It's just horrible everything is mashed together in a cluster-**** of a mess. I think I just vomited a little while watching the video and I hope that person now works picking up garbage because that's pretty much what I see.

It's not horrible, but it's ot great either. Another mouse UI.

Cool story, only it's pretty much false.

Windows 95 had the Program Manager, hell Windows ME did too.

And you could change to the old MSN Hotmail interface for quite some time also, sooo, there you go.

Facebook is a completely different company so it's not really relevant to what Microsoft does.

It isn't false. Windows 95 included the Program Manager, just like Windows 8 includes the Desktop experience. Was there an official option to set the Program Manager as the default shell in Windows 95, completely turning off the Windows Explorer shell? I don't believe there was. The situation regarding that seems to be very similar to the situation with Windows 8.

As I mentioned in the post you quoted, the option to revert back to the MSN Hotmail interface wasn't there forever, and it certainly wasn't there for long.

Mentioning Facebook is relevant because they are a company who develop and release software and web services, just like Microsoft. I was pointing out why software companies don't provide these options, not just why Microsoft doesn't. The fact most, if not all. software companies follow this idea should indicate to you that it's just not a good move for Microsoft to do this.

So instead of learning to manage how you work on your own you want forced restrictions? Seems kind of silly to me and doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but hey.. whatever floats your boat.

It's becoming "this is how you *have* to do something" instead of "this is how you *can* do something". Having options doesn't hurt anyone.

If it was possible for Microsoft to not impose those restrictions, I'd probably say they shouldn't, but the Metro experience just wouldn't work as well without those restrictions. For example. in order to be able to have more than two apps open on one screen at once, Microsoft would have to implement some way of resizing Metro apps. The Metro experience would essentially become as flawed, cumbersome, and inefficient as the Desktop experience.

It's not horrible, but it's ot great either. Another mouse UI.

Which is what most users using a computer use... I want a mouse UI, I want a UI designed around the mouse, not a UI that *works* with a mouse.

[. . .]

Windows 95 had the Program Manager, hell Windows ME did too.

[. . .]

On further research, it appears that Windows 95 provided no way to disable the new Windows Explorer shell and use the Program Manager in the same way that shell was used in Windows 3.1. It appears the Program Manager was merely an application in Windows 95 through to Windows Me, rather than a completely different shell that could have been used instead of the newly introduced Windows Explorer shell: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_95 ("Build 58s still included Program Manager as found in Windows 3.1, although this application was supplemented by the new desktop and taskbar/Start menu designs.")

Thus, my point still stands.

What works for you doesn't work for me. I have Weather, Music, Clock, Email all running on the desktop in the foreground while I am working, no need to switch to another screen to see it. I prefer it that way, but that's just me.

[. . .]

The Start Screen provides a way for you to see all of that information on one screen, due to what can be shown on tiles.That's the beauty of it. You could have your Start Screen up on one screen, with all of that, and then another screen free for a couple of applications.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!