What is your opinion on Skrillex?


Recommended Posts

if you go by cricaflex's definition of a DJ there isn't a single DJ in the world that any one has heard of that exists anymore, but then i don't necessarily agree with people calling skrllex or deadmau5 or whomever (unless it's steve angello, he's a fake, and guetta) fake DJs. the game is different. The days of swapping between vinyl's and doing the fading and what not with a soundboard are done. No one does that anymore. when you say the guys computer died and he can't do a show and that makes him a fraud, that's bull ****. that's yesterday's equivalent of losing your record player and all your vinyl because essentially that's what the laptop has replaced, not all the other stuff.

deadmau5-dj.jpg

look at all the **** deadmau5 is using as well as his laptop. He is still dj'ing. it's just that instead of flipping through vinyls, he clicks on his trackpad. he still does all the live mixing, the creating and effing around that dj's to with synthesizers and what not, he just doesn't flip between vinyls to do it. DJ's still exist, you go to any DJ show (i go to a lot of them) and you will see that a lot of these guys are working their asses off back there making ish happen (michael woods pours his heart into his shows, i fully recommended going to see him if you get a chance).

example of fraud

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSB0XWiA3As

example of a real modern dj

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/9584387

if you go by cricaflex's definition of a DJ there isn't a single DJ in the world that any one has heard of that exists anymore, but then i don't necessarily agree with people calling skrllex or deadmau5 or whomever (unless it's steve angello, he's a fake, and guetta) fake DJs. the game is different. The days of swapping between vinyl's and doing the fading and what not with a soundboard are done. No one does that anymore. when you say the guys computer died and he can't do a show and that makes him a fraud, that's bull ****. that's yesterday's equivalent of losing your record player and all your vinyl because essentially that's what the laptop has replaced, not all the other stuff.

deadmau5-dj.jpg

look at all the **** deadmau5 is using as well as his laptop. He is still dj'ing. it's just that instead of flipping through vinyls, he clicks on his trackpad. he still does all the live mixing, the creating and effing around that dj's to with synthesizers and what not, he just doesn't flip between vinyls to do it. DJ's still exist, you go to any DJ show (i go to a lot of them) and you will see that a lot of these guys are working their asses off back there making ish happen (michael woods pours his heart into his shows, i fully recommended going to see him if you get a chance).

example of fraud

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSB0XWiA3As

example of a real modern dj

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/9584387

*press play*

*light cigarette*

*make sure EQs aren't accidentally turned down*

*move hair out of glasses*

*talk to hipster friends*

*check EQs again*

*make hand movements to the crowd*

*triple check EQ knobs*

*adjust alcoholic beverage*

*dance with hipster friends*

*move hair out of face*

*more hand movements*

*yell in mic*

*drink, smoke*

*repeat above steps 3 times*

*RANDOMLY TRANSITION TO A TRACK THAT IS ALREADY HALF WAY PLAYED WITH NO MIXING WHATSOEVER*

*randomly cut power, music stops*

*CROW GOES INSANE!!!!!*

THIS IS THE GREATNESS THAT IS SKRILLEX

Random sampling of what I like:

Rocco * Bass-t

ATB

Markus Schulz

PUSH/MIKE

MASTER BLASTER

Cosmic Gate

dash Berlin

Groove Coverage

Sylver

Milk Inc

  • Like 3

I like a couple of his songs, find most of the them listenable and think a few are poo but on the whole I think he's okay... looks a bit like a lesbian but looks have nothing to do with music :)

The videos of him supposidally DJ'ing live are some of the best sources of comedy on youtube. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XtNbmMt-OY)

I like some of his older stuff, his new stuff all sounds like tosh to my ears.

  • Like 2

Somehow I like him (his personality). He seems like a kid that got heavily bullied at school.

I just cant stand his music.

I think someone mentioned (Jonathan from Korn I believe) he was treated like **** in FFTL, so yeah, I'm glad for his success, he was a kid when he joined that band and that had to be hard in and of itself.

Regarding the music, he's definitely got some talent (I even think Toshin Abasi quoted him and some other DJs as the source of inspiration in terms of how they layer and produce their tracks), but I think we're really going to see what he's got in him after the dubstep fad fades away, if he's any smart he's gonna capitalize on his current success in a way to secure a future where he can still do music with complete freedom and no financial limitations.

I like a couple of his songs, find most of the them listenable and think a few are poo but on the whole I think he's okay... looks a bit like a lesbian but looks have nothing to do with music

I'm very selective on my music. Not even my favorite group rates more than a few songs on my playlist. I think Skillrex has 3 songs currently on my playlist, which rates him decent. I like very few songs that artists do.

As for his looks, I agree. I hate the haircut.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!