Recommended Posts

I wont lose any sleep over it, Ill just install my PowerDVD deluxe for DVD/blu-ray playback like Ive always done in the past........sorted!

Which has been the case since Windows XP. Software like PowerDVD has been part of the bundleware with new PCs (desktops and portables alike) and motherboards (for the DIY crowd) for at least that long. That is NOT going away. (Cyberlink has bundling deals with *all* the major North American PC and motherboard OEMs, and quite a few of the minor ones; impact of this on North America - none. The same also applies to the EMEA (thus impact there is also nil). Why should Microsoft duplicate what is already included with the hardware?)

  • 1 month later...

hi giantpotato i would like to know how microsoft arrived at the 6% figure, its also nice to see that you dont care about spending money on something that used to be bundled with the system, it must be nice to have lots of money to throw around, unfortunatly not all of us are affluent like you and perhaps that is probably why we are quick to complain, so spare a thought for those of us who dont have money to throw around, and yes linux is looming as a genuine contender for microsoft.

hi remixedcat, i would like to know how microsoft arrived at the 6% figure, its also nice to see that you dont care about spending money on something that used to be bundled with the system, it must be nice to have lots of money to throw around, unfortunatly not all of us are affluent like you and perhaps that is probably why we are quick to complain, so spare a thought for those of us who dont have money to throw around, and yes linux is looming as a genuine contender for microsoft.

No it isn't.. Linux as a Desktop OS is still less market share than the OS on my Phone.. And that won't change.. Plus the same fees that MS needs to pay for MPEG-2 playback in windows, you'd be legally required to in Linux too.. it's all patent law..

MS gets the figures from the statistics sent back to MS.. and I'd still see 6% as high.. I can only think of a handful of people that use it that I know of, most use other programs like XBMC and the like.. and even if you add all the people that use all those together, I'd still be under the 6% mark of people I know with windows that would just look at me funny if I mentioned it..

Don't get me wrong, I'd like them to keep it, I HAVE used it.. but it's a very niche market, and there are better things their programmers can be doing for More of the market.. And if it's a viable market, then someone else will pickup where MS left off and make a product to do it..

Oh and I saw lots of people posting about codec packs and crap.

VLC is crap, I mean it'll play anything, but is very meh on the quality.

MPC is old.

k-lite codec pack might as well be a virus.

If you want a solution, look at MPC-HC [ Media Player Classic - Home Cinema -- http://xvidvideo.ru/ ] .. You don't NEED any codecs for it to work with 99.9% of stuff [ but if you want, you can install a codec and make sure it's preferred/used instead of the internal one.. ].. It's wonderful. It's got all the install and go of VLC, but with the ability to customize what codes are used, what splitters are used, renderers, etc.

xmbc, media portal for substitutes of media center, they both do the same thing, serve the same purpose.

media player classic or vlc also. for me it's a thing that should have been done for quite some time. wmc and media center are bloatware.

None of those media programs even come close to Windows Media Center for DVR and TV capabilities.

However, hardly anyone uses a PC as a HTPC. Cable networks in the US have made this near impossible anyways.

People do use their laptops for streaming Netflix and sometimes connecting it to their TV, which of course doesn't require a DVD.

I'd say cue the trolls, but what exactly is the past tense version of the word cue?

Let's just look at this though shall we.... your beloved XP didn't include DVD playback either. It was introduced in Windows Vista, an OS which you no doubt hated. It wasn't free, you paid for it in the cost of the OS as there was a license fee Microsoft had to pay.

Giving people back the choice of which DVD playback app they want to use, and lowering the cost of the OS as a byproduct is a good thing. (assuming of course it does result in a price reduction for the OS. If it doesn't, then BOOO to Microsoft :) )

First post nails it. I don't want to have to pay for the cost of DVD codecs when I have no intention of playing DVDs in my computer. Thats what I got a TV for. People who want it can go find the DVD player they love and buy it!

First post nails it. I don't want to have to pay for the cost of DVD codecs when I have no intention of playing DVDs in my computer. Thats what I got a TV for. People who want it can go find the DVD player they love and buy it!

You realize the cost for the DVD Codec on your purchase price is probably 5cents.. Just saying, it's not cutting your purchase price by $20 or anything lol

actually the license is 2 or 2.5 dollars.

Still, hardly enough to get worked up about.. They will remove the codec, but are still gonna charge the same amount, and everyone knows it. MS is not gonna lower the price by $2 because it's gone..

hi ryoken, it amazes me how you or anyone can say only 6% use a product i mean have you asked all computer users in the world what they use how on earth can you say that?, did you ASK EVERYONE?. your next statement regarding linux and i quote "and that wont change" unquote,it amazes me that you can say that, how do you know that it will never happen, perhaps you are a prophet.lol.

hi ryoken, it amazes me how you or anyone can say only 6% use a product i mean have you asked all computer users in the world what they use how on earth can you say that?, did you ASK EVERYONE?. your next statement regarding linux and i quote "and that wont change" unquote,it amazes me that you can say that, how do you know that it will never happen, perhaps you are a prophet.lol.

I think you need to look closer at the general population..

If you had a Browser, and a Word Program, and Solitaire, you have an OS that probably 70% of the population would never outgrow.

I mean I'm in IT, I know a LOT of techsavy people.. But I also know they are NOT the norm.. I would be SHOCKED if even 10% of Windows Users would know how to even launch MCE, much less use it. It is a Niche market. Accept it.

Hell I know what MCE is, I'm techy, and I have ~14TB of content on hand.. And I don't even use it.. it's more trouble than it's worth.. it looks nice and all, but I can do most things it does faster and easier with a wireless mouse and keyboard from my couch.. Only thing it's really any good for is as a DVR.. And I have no need for that..

Most people I know either don't keep their movies downloaded [ watch and delete ]. or stream it.. They have no interest in watching TV through a computer, and they are quite happy with the DVR's that their cable/dish co provide..

I can honestly say I know more people that have purchased a setup box for playback than use MCE or one of it's alternatives..

As for How MS gathers it's information.. Well my bet would be through Windows Update and other systems that provide anonymous [ but accurate ] information on your system.. Add to that only Home Premium+ even includes it, and a lot of comps are sold with Home Basic.

And as for Linux.. It's been around since the early 90's and what's it marketshare again ?

Despite it growing, Slowly, it's got no chance of a sudden growth.. Business wouldn't adopt it cause the masses know windows, and they don't want to retrain to use new OS's, and new Programs.

Home users aren't gonna change because their computer comes with Windows and they don't know any better..

And the PC Makers aren't gonna change cause people don't know what it is, how to use it, and as such, will go for a Windows box even if given a choice between the two..

You don't need to be a prophet to understand human nature.

And this is all above and beyond the fact that Linux, you get what you pay for.. it's free, and as such has **** support.. Even if you do install it, there's no real support for most distros, and asking for help leads to you being attacked for being too stupid to know how to use it, and go back to Windows/Mac.. Not to mention there's buggy hardware support, and software it hit and miss.. Some is as good as it's Windows/Mac Counterparts, and a lot of it is crap..

Linux is the Android Marketplace.. no standards, means a few gems, and a LOT of crap.. It's only chance is for a big company to come in and invest a LOT into a single distro, and build it up, with software, keeping a consistent UI, etc.

And I say all of this as someone who has used various Linux distros since late 90's till now.. Different is I'm not an idiolog.. I see all the falts that exist in it, which so many Open Source peeps tend to forget about because they simply hate Windows/Mac/whatever..

hi ryoken, it amazes me how you or anyone can say only 6% use a product i mean have you asked all computer users in the world what they use how on earth can you say that?, did you ASK EVERYONE?. your next statement regarding linux and i quote "and that wont change" unquote,it amazes me that you can say that, how do you know that it will never happen, perhaps you are a prophet.lol.

Actually the 6% is microsofts own numbers, from their own analytics received from millions upon millions of computers around the world. (remember that question when you fist start your computer? yeah that one). Also the actual number was far lower, 6% was the amount of people who actually started MC and used it for a few minutes only, people who used it actively was a fraction of that again.

Actually the 6% is microsofts own numbers, from their own analytics received from millions upon millions of computers around the world. (remember that question when you fist start your computer? yeah that one). Also the actual number was far lower, 6% was the amount of people who actually started MC and used it for a few minutes only, people who used it actively was a fraction of that again.

6% of 500 million is still 30 million, (or over 60 million of the current 1.25 Billion Windows users) and that's still quite a few boat loads of people using it whatever way you cut it. Even a fraction of that is still millions of people. I'd wager only 5% of Windows users use the command line or the run box, but they're not going to cut those. :p Still a daft idea to cut it - I can understand removing it from Enterprise versions of Windows and Windows On ARM, but what they've done is just lousy. If you wanted people to use it they could easily advertise it / more prominently place it.

The goal they had with Media Center is done, it's been replaced by the Xbox. Honestly guys, it's not that complicated, they're not going to update MC after this probably so it's dead end. MS's "media center" idea was a HTPC, but now it's the Xbox. And the Xbox is the way more successful product for them at this point. Just add DVR to the next Xbox and you've got a solid media center/HTPC replacement unless you have issues with some formats, mostly MKV. But there are ways around those as well.

  • Like 1

6% of 500 million is still 30 million, (or over 60 million of the current 1.25 Billion Windows users) and that's still quite a few boat loads of people using it whatever way you cut it. Even a fraction of that is still millions of people. I'd wager only 5% of Windows users use the command line or the run box, but they're not going to cut those. :p Still a daft idea to cut it - I can understand removing it from Enterprise versions of Windows and Windows On ARM, but what they've done is just lousy. If you wanted people to use it they could easily advertise it / more prominently place it.

I think you missed the fact about only a fraction of those 6% actually using MC and not just starting it for a few seconds/minutes.

6% of 500 million is still 30 million, (or over 60 million of the current 1.25 Billion Windows users) and that's still quite a few boat loads of people using it whatever way you cut it. Even a fraction of that is still millions of people. I'd wager only 5% of Windows users use the command line or the run box, but they're not going to cut those. :p Still a daft idea to cut it - I can understand removing it from Enterprise versions of Windows and Windows On ARM, but what they've done is just lousy. If you wanted people to use it they could easily advertise it / more prominently place it.

Also to cut it the other way, that is 1.2 billion MPEG2 licenses MS doesn't need to pay for, 1.2Billion x $2.5, seems like a lot :)

Yes there's a few million peopel actually using MC. But they're still a severely minor fraction, and the command line have to be there anyway, and resource wise isn't even close to MC.

I use media centre all the time, but with the xbox as an extender, never on the actual PC. That is because my TV ariel comes into the room where the PC is, the ariel next to the TV is about 30 years old and is terrible.

hi ryoken, i am a retired IT developer just to get that out of the way, microsoft can only get figures if people are on the internet, what about the countless people who never use the net, my point is that nobody can put precise figures on what the population is doing on their computers and as for business not wanting to adopt LINUX, you obviously have not heard that the american DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ( BIG BUSINESS ) has awarded 28 million dollars to the LINUX comunity for a program to run their unmanned drones because the program they were using ( WINDOWS ) was unacceptable, i digress, the point of this forum is that microsoft has removed a feature from windows and in some cases forcing users to pay for third party applications depending whers they live and as johnny pointed out microsoft will make huge savings without passing them on to us.

Given that Microsoft haven't announced pricing, your assertion is baseless and inflammatory.

Feel free to think before posting.

I use media centre all the time, but with the xbox as an extender, never on the actual PC. That is because my TV ariel comes into the room where the PC is, the ariel next to the TV is about 30 years old and is terrible.

You are, fairly unfortunately, a fringe case.

XBMC would be your best bet (and far better bet tbh).

Well, go from Windows 95 (the first on the NT based consumer OS's) cost point and account for inflation alone.

Microsoft's operating system is MILES below inflationary costs.

Even ignoring that, there was a price drop from the release price of Vista to the release price of 7. It's one of the sales points we pushed it out with.

hi +articuno1au,ask somebody in india if windows is MILES below inflationary costs, your telling me that windows 7 is cheaper than vista, not where i live lets face it microsoft is a business and its out to make money and i think that another poster here ( JOHHNY )has hit the nail on the head, i will end my post and thank you for your points of view.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!