Here's What Windows 8 Would Look Like Without Metro


Recommended Posts

It's a shame that they removed this hack in the later versions. A lot of people would probably be happier to have the choice of switching it on or off.

the only reason that the "hack" worked was because the old code wasn't removed yet in the DP
the only reason that the "hack" worked was because the old code wasn't removed yet in the DP

Oh I understand why it doesn't work anymore. I'm just saying that if the choice was still there we wouldn't have half of these Windows 8 threads with people complaining about Metro. Everyone would be happy.

No it really isn't as you don't get any of the "under the hood" improvements that are brought to Windows 8.

Getting sick of people saying "just stick with Windows 7 then"

Metro IS the "under the hood" improvement. The desktop is the legacy part.

Legacy is necessary and Microsoft is doing an impressive job to support legacy software since forever, but somewhere they have to draw the line.

If you prefer DOS, you cannot expect Microsoft to keep building versions of windows that boot into DOS automatically. It makes no sense.

If you enjoy DOS, the windows desktop, the old startmenu and stuff like that that's OK, but you cannot expect Microsoft to keep investing in this.

This kills innovation.

If it was not for Tablet, we would probably not be dealing with a Win 8 Start Screen. MS moved in this direction for touch device, that's all there is to it.

What if Win XP or Win 7 are still good enough for "the people"? This is only bad because MS is not making enough money, so they have to push out new version of Windows/Office. It's the cash cow of MS...

That doesn't make sense. Of course Microsoft is making newer OS/Office versions. It's what they do. If you don't want it, don't buy it.

Metro IS the "under the hood" improvement. The desktop is the legacy part.

Legacy is necessary and Microsoft is doing an impressive job to support legacy software since forever, but somewhere they have to draw the line.

If you prefer DOS, you cannot expect Microsoft to keep building versions of windows that boot into DOS automatically. It makes no sense.

If you enjoy DOS, the windows desktop, the old startmenu and stuff like that that's OK, but you cannot expect Microsoft to keep investing in this.

This kills innovation.

I think you misunderstand what "under the hood" means.

I'm not even going to touch the ridiculously off the mark analogy.

Nobody is forcing you to upgrade to Windows 8 either.

A fair point, and thanks to Microsoft's decision to force Metro on me it is the option I will go for. I'll either get Windows 7 or another Mac. Heck, maybe even both and dual boot.

A fair point, and thanks to Microsoft's decision to force Metro on me it is the option I will go for. I'll either get Windows 7 or another Mac. Heck, maybe even both and dual boot.

Here we go again with the "forcing" issue. Last I checked, they're not. You even admit as much, so why do you keep saying it? If you're that much ****ed about using Microsoft's OS, why not make your own?

  • Like 2

Nobody is forcing you to upgrade to Windows 8 either.

I have two issues with this.

1) Any future Windows OS is also going to be geared for Metro so you will be forever stuck on Windows 7

2) If you don't speak up about it then Microsoft won't know theres a large portion of people who dont like Windows 8, which is why I'm sick of people telling me to shut up and put up with it.

Here we go again with the "forcing" issue. Last I checked, they're not. You even admit as much, so why do you keep saying it? If you're that much ****ed about using Microsoft's OS, why not make your own?

Because Microsoft has the monopoly on the desktop OS. If you don't want to lose compatibility of your hundreds if not thousands of dollars/pounds worth of software and games then you are pretty much FORCED to buy another Windows OS.

Support for Windows 7 won't last forever, once 8 is out and the focus turns to 9, 7 will be an afterthought for developers and things won't get backported just like a lot of stuff doesn't support XP thesedays.

Use your common sense instead of being all defensive because someone doesnt like your precious Windows 8.

The smarta** attitude of "buy or don't buy, but let's not talk about "what if"s if we cannot change them" is what drives me out from these threads as of late.

I used to be passionate about discussing, now I realize that everyone has a set of opinions they subscribe to and some even go to lengths to tell people how they must accept or not buy.

It's ridiculous, because eventually everyone will have to upgrade their OS, you can't expect me to run Windows 7 for the next 20 years for example.

Alternative OS? I run a Mac, so it's not even my main OS anymore, but I definitely still have to deal with Windows in several occasions.

My crazy belief is that companies try to serve customers, so talking about their paths and maybe trying to influence their decisions seems perfectly okay to me.

Even needed by concept. Hell, companies PAY to know my wishes...

You could debate how effective all the talk is, but don't belittle people who "are stuck in the past". That point I don't even want to start arguing about.

I don't know what motivated me to write this, as all of this is for nothing, I won't convince ONE SINGLE person who doesn't already feel like this already, but maybe there is one point I want to get across:

The attitude of some on here drives me away from forums or actually the metro debates and many more topics I just don't bother about anymore, which ultimately seems to be the case for many more and affect the health of this forum.

That's my motivation I guess, to post a reminder of why this forum is on the decline.

So I guess, I'm just off-topic, carry on people...

Glassed Silver:mac

My plans, long term, are to migrate many of my clients over to a linux OS that use RDS for their main day to day operations. It will fix so many sides of this entire debate, and hopefully send a clear messages to Microsoft. You don't listen, we don't purchase.

Here we go again with the "forcing" issue. Last I checked, they're not. You even admit as much, so why do you keep saying it? If you're that much ****ed about using Microsoft's OS, why not make your own?

Ok, I admit that they aren't "forcing me" to use Windows 8 and Metro. What I meant to say is that if I wanted to upgrade my OS to Windows 8 then I am stuck with Metro, and my whole original point was that it would have been nice if they had left the choice there rather than removing it.

You're also right about it being Microsoft's OS, they can do what they want. I'm thinking from a business perspective though, and given the obvious divide between people and Metro, I was just thinking that it would have made better business sense to allow people to choose.

Fragmentation is a bad thing, right? Android has shown as much. Surely by removing the choice Microsoft are increasing the level of fragmentation that already occurs? And let's not forget how stubborn Windows XP has been when it comes to retirement. Making this move with Windows 8, are they trying to make Windows 7 have a similar retirement process?

  • Like 2

If it was not for Tablet, we would probably not be dealing with a Win 8 Start Screen. MS moved in this direction for touch device, that's all there is to it.

What if Win XP or Win 7 are still good enough for "the people"? This is only bad because MS is not making enough money, so they have to push out new version of Windows/Office. It's the cash cow of MS...

While tablets may have been the driving force behind the touch-enabling of Windows 8 (since the existing touch-enabled devices for Windows 7 didn't seem to be) why is that necessarily bad?

Here's how I see where the various Windows 8 *announced* SKUs compare to Windows 7 SKUs:

Windows 7 Starter is replaced by WindowsRT - as opposed to being just emerging markets, it's available everywhere - just not on x86.

Windows 7 Home Basic/Premium *and* Windows 7 Business - replaced by Windows 8 Core. This is the lowest level of Windows 8 for x86, and thus the start of the Win32/WinRT tag-team. Unlike WindowsRT, neither is exclusive; thus Windows 8 Core is a true superset of WindowsRT.

Windows 8 Pro - replaces Windows 7 (both Professional and Ultimate). Unlike Windows 8 Core, Windows Media Center is a no-cost option.

Windows 8 Enterprise - replaces Windows 7 Enterprise. Unlike Windows 7 Enterprise (which actually lacked some features that Windows 7 Professional included), Windows 8 Enterprise is a superset of Windows 8 Pro.

Microsoft literally had to (no choice) deal with tablets - as you correctly pointed out, Windows and Office are Microsoft's cash cows; for the inroads tablets (both iOS and Android) are making at the low end and in niches, staying put (and repeating the mistake made with that five year lag between XP and Vista) is not an option - wait another four years and the combo of iOS and Android will have completely eaten Windows' lunch. The problem Microsoft faces with the WinRT API is that it is late - compared to iOS and Android. If Microsoft had done with those that wanted a one-API OS wanted (kept RT touch-only), who would develop for it, especially as an alternative to Android or iOS, which are far more mature? Developers are another cash cow for Microsoft; after all, Visual Studio isn't exactly small beer. Thanks to the expiration of all those "thou shalt add nothing" uber diktats that hobbled Microsoft, the road for Microsoft to take was quite obvious - and actually doable.

However, those that are unhappy with the inclusion of the WinRT API seem to be forgetting that said inclusion is NOT responsible for *any* of the issues Windows 8 has had. While there have been issues with WinRT apps (compared to Win32 counterparts, where they exist) said issues are entirely due to the features or lack thereof of each API - in particular that WinRT's API is extremely limited featurewise compared to Win32. However, other than core parts of WinRT included with the OS itself, you can ignore it as far as apps go - in fact, I largely have outside of games. Just because a new API exists does not mean that you HAVE to use it.

Are you saying that it is impossible to install Windows XP now? Last time I checked (which was this morning at work) I found that I could install Windows XP on any of our computers.

This is my point. While it may not come as standard on a computer anymore, there is still the choice to install Windows XP or not. However, there is no longer a choice with Metro, but there was one before.

No. I said, you can't buy XP anymore, all you can buy today is Windows 7.

You never had a choice of Metro or not-Metro in Windows 8. The hack was possible in an early-alpha/beta build and not a released Windows version.

Because Microsoft has the monopoly on the desktop OS. If you don't want to lose compatibility of your hundreds if not thousands of dollars/pounds worth of software and games then you are pretty much FORCED to buy another Windows OS.

Please. This is such a lousy argument. If you have invested lots of monies in Windows then you are forced to use whatever you have now. You can stay with Windows 7 as long as you want. All your existing stuff will continue to work.

Ok, I admit that they aren't "forcing me" to use Windows 8 and Metro. What I meant to say is that if I wanted to upgrade my OS to Windows 8 then I am stuck with Metro, and my whole original point was that it would have been nice if they had left the choice there rather than removing it.

You're also right about it being Microsoft's OS, they can do what they want. I'm thinking from a business perspective though, and given the obvious divide between people and Metro, I was just thinking that it would have made better business sense to allow people to choose.

Fragmentation is a bad thing, right? Android has shown as much. Surely by removing the choice Microsoft are increasing the level of fragmentation that already occurs? And let's not forget how stubborn Windows XP has been when it comes to retirement. Making this move with Windows 8, are they trying to make Windows 7 have a similar retirement process?

Fragmentation was always a problem with Windows but unlike Android, the core OS has been stable in terms of feature set and users are not at the mercy of hardware makers to upgrade/downgrade.

I think one of the reason Microsoft is making this bold change is how solid 7 is. They know that most of their cash-cow customers (i.e. enterprise) have just moved to 7 and are likely to skip 8 regardless of the new UI.

What if Win XP or Win 7 are still good enough for "the people"? This is only bad because MS is not making enough money, so they have to push out new version of Windows/Office. It's the cash cow of MS...

mmm I don't know but last time I checked most companies work to make money, that's what they exist for in the first place, they are not here to make anyone a favor, don't like it, don't buy it, as simple as that.

I think one of the reason Microsoft is making this bold change is how solid 7 is. They know that most of their cash-cow customers (i.e. enterprise) have just moved to 7 and are likely to skip 8 regardless of the new UI.

This is a very good point and one that I hadn't thought of before.

You're also right about it being Microsoft's OS, they can do what they want. I'm thinking from a business perspective though, and given the obvious divide between people and Metro, I was just thinking that it would have made better business sense to allow people to choose.

The thing is, there is no such divide. There's the echo chamber of forums like this one, and then there's the real world :-) The latter being full of people who have never and probably will never hear the term "Metro" in reference to Windows. They'll be just as "divided" over Metro as they were "divided" over Luna or the old XP "bring back the Start menu, we don't like the Start panel" debates.

  • Like 3

Here we go again with the "forcing" issue. Last I checked, they're not. You even admit as much, so why do you keep saying it? If you're that much ****ed about using Microsoft's OS, why not make your own?

He's considering switching to OS X.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!