Here's What Windows 8 Would Look Like Without Metro


Recommended Posts

Please. This is such a lousy argument. If you have invested lots of monies in Windows then you are forced to use whatever you have now. You can stay with Windows 7 as long as you want. All your existing stuff will continue to work.

Bored of apologists.

My point is if you want to keep up with hardware and software in the future and don't want to use Metro means you have to either go to Linux or get a Mac, which means your existing software collection will be incompatible.

That's completely ignoring the fact that eventually Windows 7 will become obsolete, just like games/apps don't work on XP eventually Windows 7 will be phased out.

  • Like 3

I think people are just going to start recognizing the trend from Microsoft and get tired of it.

3.0 - Stability issues, major headaches for admins

3.11 - Stable much better for admins

95 - Completely new UI - Stability issues, major headaches for admins

98 - Stabler - better for admins

ME - Nightmare for everyone

XP - Small issues at the start, extremely stable once SP1 came out due to the NT Kernel transition

Vista - Nightmare for business admins or advanced users - people that "just surfed the web" didn't have many problems

7 - Excellent OS out the door, getting even better with SP's

8 - Has been highly criticized since October even forcing Microsoft to release a statement -> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/10/11/reflecting-on-your-comments-on-the-start-screen.aspx

and from what I've been reading on here and my own first hand experiences, there are tons of stability and random error issues that did NOT occur in Windows 7 during Beta / RC, so don't even try to pull the "its a beta card" crap.

I think people are just going to start recognizing the trend from Microsoft and get tired of it.

3.0 - Stability issues, major headaches for admins

3.11 - Stable much better for admins

95 - Completely new UI - Stability issues, major headaches for admins

98 - Stabler - better for admins

ME - Nightmare for everyone

XP - Small issues at the start, extremely stable once SP1 came out due to the NT Kernel transition

Vista - Nightmare for business admins or advanced users - people that "just surfed the web" didn't have many problems

7 - Excellent OS out the door, getting even better with SP's

8 - Has been highly criticized since October even forcing Microsoft to release a statement -> http://blogs.msdn.co...art-screen.aspx

and from what I've been reading on here and my own first hand experiences, there are tons of stability and random error issues that did NOT occur in Windows 7 during Beta / RC, so don't even try to pull the "its a beta card" crap.

98 was nowhere near stable until 98SE came out :laugh:

XP wasn't good until SP2. Pre-SP2 it was just a malware honeypot.

Vista as an OS wasn't bad and post SP1 it was as good as 7 on my system.

7: When I installed 7 RTM on my system, boot time and general usage perf. was pretty much same as Vista. :) 7 was highly criticized for removing quicklaunch and labels and classic-start-menu etc.

  • Like 2

I think you misunderstand what "under the hood" means.

I'm not even going to touch the ridiculously off the mark analogy.

I honestly want to understand. What else of "under the hood" do you mean.

I think my analogy was spot on... When they made the desktop they put DOS on windows as an application, and in windows 8 they put the desktop as an application in Metro.

For everyone who wants Windows 8 without Metro this is pretty much the best solution:

I thought the best solution was Win8 with the classic shell thing. Didn't that have an update that let users boot directly to the desktop? That way the user gets all the lower level enhancements of Win8, but jumps directly to the desktop, where things like pinning apps to the taskbar lets them avoid most of the Metro.

I thought the best solution was Win8 with the classic shell thing. Didn't that have an update that let users boot directly to the desktop? That way the user gets all the lower level enhancements of Win8, but jumps directly to the desktop, where things like pinning apps to the taskbar lets them avoid most of the Metro.

The sheer thought of Metro still lurking around the system, albeit hidden from view, might proof to be too much for some.

So basically as much as people hate Metro, it does indeed look much better

This is all very subjective; the actual aesthetics of an OS that is. Functionality is a different story.

This video demonstrates well what windows with metro does welll; that is the explorer ribbon; lots of options, even though it me be too cluttered for some people. And live tiles on the metro screen, along with big sized icon tiles of your apps (Although that?s what the desktop is for imo), the task manager initially looks very good, however some additional views are gone. On the flip side, windows without metro; i.e. "classic shell" start menu is more functional, searching is better, not to mention it doesn?t take up the full screen. Tthe network connectivity balloon is also better, doesn't take up 1/5th of the screen, there's no need for it.

I wouldn't say either of them had to be mutually exclusive.

I'm just hoping a pro/enterprise version won't have the Metro start screen.

It would be nice if MS, just said: "hey business guys! we're just kidding with all this metro stuff for you. Here, take Windows 8 Business instead, with all that nonsense turned off" :p

If Microsoft listened to people, XP will be still on sale.

I think you're twisting peoples desire to stay with XP because it works, for an imaginary desire in not wanting to embrace Windows Vista / Windows 7 because they had some goofy UI elements;

In other words, you?re trying to draw the same parallel as in the case of the current move from windows 7 to Windows 8; which has many nice benefits, but people see the UI as being genuinely goofy? lol.

I get the blowback from some, but really this is just the first stage of a shift for the OS as a whole. When they start to better merge the "desktop" with the start screen and metro apps together, probably in Windows 9, then I bet most of these "issues" will be gone. Throughout the lifetime of Windows everytime MS makes some sort of big UI change there's this group that down right hates it. That's just the way it is, they know it, and this time, like the other times as well, they're doing what they want and changing it.

  • Like 1

I think you're twisting peoples desire to stay with XP because it works, for an imaginary desire in not wanting to embrace Windows Vista / Windows 7 because they had some goofy UI elements;

In other words, you?re trying to draw the same parallel as in the case of the current move from windows 7 to Windows 8; which has many nice benefits, but people see the UI as being genuinely goofy? lol.

I have no idea what you are trying to say there.. :wacko:

Ok, I admit that they aren't "forcing me" to use Windows 8 and Metro. What I meant to say is that if I wanted to upgrade my OS to Windows 8 then I am stuck with Metro, and my whole original point was that it would have been nice if they had left the choice there rather than removing it.

You're also right about it being Microsoft's OS, they can do what they want. I'm thinking from a business perspective though, and given the obvious divide between people and Metro, I was just thinking that it would have made better business sense to allow people to choose.

Fragmentation is a bad thing, right? Android has shown as much. Surely by removing the choice Microsoft are increasing the level of fragmentation that already occurs? And let's not forget how stubborn Windows XP has been when it comes to retirement. Making this move with Windows 8, are they trying to make Windows 7 have a similar retirement process?

It was no different to users who upgrade from Win3.1 to 95 or whatever, they were also "forced" into using the Start Menu. And the drama we have today was also seen back then. But now no one wants to let go of it, even though it is outdated, messy, and also inferior to what the Start Screen delivers.

Win7 is also supported until 2020. But with the way things are changing with tablets and phones, I doubt we will still be using Windows 7 at that point. Who know what machines will look like then. For all we know Transformers will have taken over like desktop PCs have today.

  • Like 1

Actually, people flocked to Win95, because it was the only supported OS for many of the ways to get into this awesome new thing called the "internet" through AOL or Netscape. They didn't complain that much about the start menu, but they did complain a ton about the crashes ... lol

Actually, people flocked to Win95, because it was the only supported OS for many of the ways to get into this awesome new thing called the "internet" through AOL or Netscape. They didn't complain that much about the start menu, but they did complain a ton about the crashes ... lol

The majority probably didn't complain but there was a group that didn't like explorer and wanted to use program manager still. Plus there was that whole thing about "wut? you have to click start to shutdown?? lolwut?" You know how it goes. Even though the first Win95 beta, or maybe early alpha, had two buttons down there, start and a 2nd one for shutdown as well from what I remember.

The majority probably didn't complain but there was a group that didn't like explorer and wanted to use program manager still. Plus there was that whole thing about "wut? you have to click start to shutdown?? lolwut?" You know how it goes. Even though the first Win95 beta, or maybe early alpha, had two buttons down there, start and a 2nd one for shutdown as well from what I remember.

If I remember right, you could setup Windows 95 to have a program manager like 311.. but it's been years since I've checked, so I could be mistaken..

But regardless, Metro unlike the 3.11->95 isn't the same kind of improvement..

Metro, without the "Legacy desktop support" kills off true multitasking, as when you switch between apps, the other one(s) get suspended. It's no more efficient that a properly managed start menu, and takes up far more space, and by that I mean the whole screen.

As for the people that just say don't upgrade.. your right.. never complain about anything. Don't like what a company is doing, go stay in the past.. Don't like your gov't, move. But for gods sake, don't dare voice your disapproval.

Okay, so this thread is for those of you that haven't had a chance to try and turn off Metro in Windows 8 Developer Preview. Well, basically, in Windows 8 Developer Preview, it was possible to completely turn off Metro in. What you got was basically a faster and snappier version of Windows 7 with a refined Aero Glass UI.

This video compares what changed when Metro was turned off.

Note: this hack is no longer possible with current releases of Windows 8, sorry.

Okay, so this thread is for those of you that haven't had a chance to try and turn off Metro in Windows 8 Developer Preview. Well, basically, in Windows 8 Developer Preview, it was possible to completely turn off Metro in. What you got was basically a faster and snappier version of Windows 7 with a refined Aero Glass UI.

This video compares what changed when Metro was turned off.

Note: this hack is no longer possible with current releases of Windows 8, sorry.

is this video complete trolling? it's basically windows 7 haha

Metro IS the "under the hood" improvement. The desktop is the legacy part.

Legacy is necessary and Microsoft is doing an impressive job to support legacy software since forever, but somewhere they have to draw the line.

If you prefer DOS, you cannot expect Microsoft to keep building versions of windows that boot into DOS automatically. It makes no sense.

If you enjoy DOS, the windows desktop, the old startmenu and stuff like that that's OK, but you cannot expect Microsoft to keep investing in this.

This kills innovation.

You don't know anything about OS design do you?

No it really isn't as you don't get any of the "under the hood" improvements that are brought to Windows 8.

Getting sick of people saying "just stick with Windows 7 then"

"just stick with windows 7" is ALOT less annoying then the metro whiners

  • Like 2

As for the people that just say don't upgrade.. your right.. never complain about anything. Don't like what a company is doing, go stay in the past.. Don't like your gov't, move. But for gods sake, don't dare voice your disapproval.

There's a fine line between "Metro sux. Lolz." and "I know things need to change, but I feel that Microsoft could be doings things differnetly, here's why...".

The majority probably didn't complain but there was a group that didn't like explorer and wanted to use program manager still. Plus there was that whole thing about "wut? you have to click start to shutdown?? lolwut?" You know how it goes. Even though the first Win95 beta, or maybe early alpha, had two buttons down there, start and a 2nd one for shutdown as well from what I remember.

I thought they didn't complain because most of them didn't have the internet and thus they weren't on it spending all their evenings moaning about it or reading about other people moaning about it and jading their impressions of it, and just assumed this is how things are going to work from now on and missed out on most of the negative opinion :p

It was no different to users who upgrade from Win3.1 to 95 or whatever, they were also "forced" into using the Start Menu. And the drama we have today was also seen back then. But now no one wants to let go of it, even though it is outdated, messy, and also inferior to what the Start Screen delivers.

you made that up btw .... again .... windows 95 was well received...

Sorry, i still can't get used to it, i'm trying cause I have to but if I didn't, I wouldn't.

And I have to cause I repair computers, phone support will be a bitch

I have it on 2 out of 3 of my personal computers but I don't see myself putting it on any office computer, for two reasons, it will reduce productivity and no one likes it anyways..

There's a fine line between "Metro sux. Lolz." and "I know things need to change, but I feel that Microsoft could be doings things differnetly, here's why...".

You're right again on this one, except when we do site the inadequacies of the current CP Win8, we get the no one is forcing you to upgrade, or just stay with windows 7 Ha! you guys are funny. Or a blatant superiority complex of; Windows 8 is just better for "X" reason. However there is more then one way to skin a fish :D

I'm firmly in the, "Metro hasn't affected my productivity and I actually like it and can see the potential," camp.

But, I do understand that there will be people who don't like it. I like the look of the various Aston Martins. Others may not. I like chocolate cake, but have several cousins and a sister-in-law that don't. Although, weirdly, they like red velvet which is dyed chocolate.

All of that is subjective and comes down to personal preference, eye of the beholder, one man's garbage, and all that. What I have yet to understand is the whole, "The Start Screen kills my productivity," argument. Now, don't get me wrong, I completely understand that we all use our computers differently be that productivity-wise, or leisurely.

Providing we all are using the same definition of kills when it comes to how the Start Screen affects work on the PC, I'm trying to figure out is how it prevents people from doing what they do. Or, how it significantly slows you down.

For example, I'd like to see a scenario on what your normal usage in any given day was in 7 and how exactly that's changed in 8. This can be a whole day's list or just a short list of activities performed.

Here's a sample of a few uses for me in 7 vs 8:

Windows 7 -

1. Turn on monitor (my computer stays on 24/7)

2. Open internet explorer

3. Open up Pidgin

4. Open Bit Torrent

5. Open Final Draft

6. Open Sony Vegas (haven't reinstalled Avid)

7. Read through news, tech blogs, forums

8. Read/Write scripts

9. Chat with my associate on the direction of certain films

10. Download/Upload torrents

11. Visual Studio to check some things for my brother's apps

12. Do some editing on a couple film projects

13. Convert some video into other formats

Some of this is done while listening to music on Zune, except where I need to listen to sound inside another program.

Windows 8 -

All the above the exact same way except... I don't open Pidgin anymore I use Metro Messenger. I also use IE Metro more than IE desktop (takes up less memory and you can Share from it). I stay on the desktop when I need to and always have something snapped, usually Tweetro.

The Start Screen has now become infinitely more useful to me. Things I use to have multiple websites open for, I don't need to do that now resulting in fewer tabs being open.

When I do need to search for something, I use the Search Charm if I'm inside another app/program then switch back to what I was doing via the switcher, or win + tab or alt+tab. Example: If I need to look up a word while writing, I pull up Charms>Search>Type word>Select Dictionary.com. This gets my definition and then I jump back to where I was. Seriously, takes like 3 or 4 seconds.

So, for all intents and purposes, I use 8 just like I did 7 with nary a hiccup. Seems exactly the same except the Start Screen enhances things for me and saves time in some respects.

Oh yeah. Some of this is done while listening to music in the Metro music player. I love Snap View of this thing, though it's a bit finicky with current Zune library.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!