Recommended Posts

Also I looked up the laws on airsoft guns in that city. You are allowed to have them on your own property BUT in that city its illegal to have them on you once you step foot off your property.

Really? As noted, around here you could walk around with an AK on each shoulder and pistols to boot.

Really? As noted, around here you could walk around with an AK on each shoulder and pistols to boot.

http://www.broomfield.org/police/i/nw-springsummer2011.pdf

link to a police newsletter with an airsoft section.

9-72-020 - Possession and use of

weapons

In short, it is illegal for any person to

possess, other than in a person's

dwelling, a gas or mechanically

operated gun, a bow and arrow,

crossbow, a nunchaku or throwing

star.

"We are often asked, "what if my

son/daughter shoots their air soft

guns in the backyard with friends?"

The police officers do not seek out

these types of situations, but are

often called to respond to such calls,

from surrounding neighbors, when

pellets are striking their homes or

landing on their property. Therefore, we encourage you to locate an

establishment that is designed for

the specific use of air soft gun activities where you and your children

can enjoy their use in a safe and legal

environment.

The intention of this is not to ruin

anyone's fun, but to better educate

each of you. If you have any questions always feel free to contact the

Broomfield Police Department at

303-438-6400 to speak with a police "

So let me get this straight. Some people in here are implying Police should go into the scene of a mentally unstable person armed with an "alleged" airsoft gun which is described as a rifle which by definition has a longer range, trusting just a stranger's voice on the phone saying it's not a real gun and going against all training that direct to treat any gun as if it is loaded, real and an imminent threat to them and other citizens ? Furthermore, this person does not obey commands to drop the weapon when instructed to and even go as far as pointing the gun at officers and even so you people want officers to just stand there and ask the guy, " Hey mister is that a real gun or just a toy ? Are you planing to shoot us or just being a jerk ?". What if this was just a set up to ambush Police and the airsoft story just a ruse to have them lower their guard ? What if the gun was real and this moron went on shooting anyone on sight ? What if this guy goes in the middle of traffic pointing his "toy" at drivers and causes a collision and innocent people die ? I am sure that you will be the first to attack Police for doing nothing to stop the guy and neutralize him before he could cause damage. It is easy for people to criticize without being at the scene.

This is what I was thinking, there was no way to know it wasn't real, although it would be good if the cops were trained to shoot somewhere like the legs first, better chance of survival and I'm pretty sure it would still put someone on the floor

This is what I was thinking, there was no way to know it wasn't real, although it would be good if the cops were trained to shoot somewhere like the legs first, better chance of survival and I'm pretty sure it would still put someone on the floor

As posted before, bad idea. A perp on the flloor that still has his wits and his weapon is still combat effective. Also, studies of shooting incidents show that a leg hit is both 1) a very low probability shot (abt. 10%), and 2) a miss or through-and-through shot can enter a home, business or strike a bystander, putting others in danger. My very experienced instructors said shoot to kill, period.

As posted before, bad idea. A perp on the flloor that still has his wits and his weapon is still combat effective. Also, studies of shooting incidents show that a leg hit is both 1) a very low probability shot (abt. 10%), and 2) a miss or through-and-through shot can enter a home, business or strike a bystander, putting others in danger. My very experienced instructors said shoot to kill, period.

^^This^^

In a defense situation, its VERY hard to hit anything other than center mass effectively, even training for 2 center mass taps, check, then head tap if the threat is still active over and over is no guarantee, but building it into muscle memory helps the odds.

i don't know, that red tip on the end of an airsoft gun is usually a pretty big give away to me

That means nothing. I can take the flash hider on my real AR15 and paint it red. Does that mean I should be able to point it at police and they won't shoot?

Along the same lines, many people repaint the red tip or just remove it from Airsoft gun

http://www.broomfiel...gsummer2011.pdf

link to a police newsletter with an airsoft section.

9-72-020 - Possession and use of

weapons

In short, it is illegal for any person to

possess, other than in a person's

dwelling, a gas or mechanically

operated gun, a bow and arrow,

crossbow, a nunchaku or throwing

star.

"We are often asked, "what if my

son/daughter shoots their air soft

guns in the backyard with friends?"

The police officers do not seek out

these types of situations, but are

often called to respond to such calls,

from surrounding neighbors, when

pellets are striking their homes or

landing on their property. Therefore, we encourage you to locate an

establishment that is designed for

the specific use of air soft gun activities where you and your children

can enjoy their use in a safe and legal

environment.

The intention of this is not to ruin

anyone's fun, but to better educate

each of you. If you have any questions always feel free to contact the

Broomfield Police Department at

303-438-6400 to speak with a police "

I could see a constitutional lawyer having a field day with that one!

The constitution guarantees you the right to own guns, not have them in public. Each jurisdiction can set their own rules on that one, hence the fact that whether you can or cannot carry concealed varies state to state.

The constitution guarantees you the right to own guns, not have them in public. Each state jurisdiction .....

The entire McDoinald v. Chicago SCOTUS case was over the supremacy of Federal and State law re: firearms over local jurisdictions, which is why my distinction, and the current law is that only one State, Illinois, does not issue permits to carry a handgun. The other 49 States allow the carrying of a handgun with a permit or are unregulated. Michigan is a hybrid: carrying openly (firearm visible) requires no permit, but carrying concealed does.

Of those States that require carry permits some are May Issue (at the discretion of the issuer, often the County Sheriff) while the vast majority are Shall Issue (automatic if you pass the background check & take classes.)

There is also carry permit reciprocity - most states that issue them allow licensees from other states to carry as well. These agreements are negotiated on a State by State basis.

Map as of 2011 below -

post-347280-0-46538400-1342229811_thumb.

Doesn't really change my point at all, there's no wording in the constitution that gives people the right to carry their weapons in public.

The States use their home-rule regulatory powers under the 10th Amendment to allow public carry, however it is licensed or unregulated, or not.

The DC v. Heller SCOTUS decision confirmed the right to bear arms under the 2nd Amendment, something that had been presumed but not directly ruled on, and to use them for self-defense within Federal enclaves and the home.

McDonald v. Chicago confirmed that the rights under the 2nd Amendment are incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment and apply to the States. This also had the effect of confirming the States as the local regulating authority, not individual municipalities which is what got DC, Chicago and soon NYC in trouble. GOTO State's rights under the 10th again.

Last I checked, the 2nd, 10th and 14th Amendments are part of the Constitution.

Doesn't really change my point at all, there's no wording in the constitution that gives people the right to carry their weapons in public.

Yes there is: "Shall not be infringed"

There is no wording in the Constitution however, that limits the second to applying ONLY in the home.

That whole "Shall not be infringed" part is pretty absolute on the limitations that may be placed on the right to keep and bear.

Just because the states choose to violate the Constitution doesnt mean it wont get challenged and struck down in SCOTUS

There's no wording that implies that the states have to allow people to carry them either. I suppose morticians would like people to carry concealed weapons everywhere though, after all more corpses does wonders for their business.

What drives the states is that their citizens support carry, and that under the 10th Amendment this is theirs to act on.The SCOTUS decisions affirmed the right to use a firearm in self defense in the home & environs, and the states extended that to the streets. The most convenient carry is a handgun so that is how they implemented it - though many states like Michigan allow the carrying of any legally obtained handgun or long gun. I know a guy who carries an Uzi Pistol - the semi-auto Micro-Uzi PDW.

post-347280-0-52968300-1342391694.jpg

It's a 9mm handgun by anything other than style and the abily to take a suppressor and a shoulder strap.

Suppressors (silencers) became legal in Michigan last September, making 37 states that now permit them so long as the citizen complies with Federal regs; apply, pass a background check, and pay a $200 tax.

Why is that relevant? The guy's clearly an absolute fruitcake. Still, you can cap quite a lot of asses with a 30 shot chamber, it's little wonder the gun nuts love him.

He's used to how it feels, and most any semi-auto pistol can take an extended magazine, even my little SIG. There's this place called the internet where you can legally buy one for most any weapon. Several places make 20-50 round drum magazines for my IZHMASH Saiga-12 tactical shotgun (based on the AK mechanism.)

Before you make a snide remark, the Saiga is for swamp deer hunting - you can drop an AK mechanism in water or mud and it'll still fire. Handy if you're in a swamp and run into a bear or 400+ lb hog and they get territoriual. The lower half of Michigan's lower peninsula is shotgun deer hunting only - no rifles except for black powder.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!