Recommended Posts

Last time I checked a semi automatic pistol couldn't empty a 30 shot chamber in 4 seconds. A pistol is still a pistol, and an SMG is still an SMG regardless of how many shots their chambers hold. And walking around the streets with an SMG is absolutely insane.

Basically. It doesn't seem to be the cops fault.

By confronting the person in the first place, the cops instigated the confrontation. They should have observed out of site and tried not to confront the person.

This happens way too often. Someone calls the cops and says someone has a gun. 9 times out of 10 that person is not actually going to use it, but when confronted by cops yelling at them, the cops are the ones instigating it. It most cases, if the cops were never there, the person with the gun would have just gotten bored and put it away.

Cop points a gun at me, I have the same right to defend myself as the cop does. Cops are in the wrong way too often, busting into the wrong house more times than you think.

People give cops way too much credit, especially in this thread. They are way too anxious to get a kill shot.

Last time I checked a semi automatic pistol couldn't empty a 30 shot chamber in 4 seconds. A pistol is still a pistol, and an SMG is still an SMG....

1) my friends Uzi pistol is a semi-auto, not an SMG. I stated this upthread.

2) even so, with the proper ATF papers filled out, $200 tax and background check an SMG would still be legal under Federal law - though each state can still regulate this.

I wasn't disputing that it wasn't legal I just said that I think it's absolutely insane. But given how nutty America is for gun violence it probably shouldn't shock me as much as it does.

By confronting the person in the first place, the cops instigated the confrontation. They should have observed out of site and tried not to confront the person.

This happens way too often. Someone calls the cops and says someone has a gun. 9 times out of 10 that person is not actually going to use it, but when confronted by cops yelling at them, the cops are the ones instigating it. It most cases, if the cops were never there, the person with the gun would have just gotten bored and put it away.

Cop points a gun at me, I have the same right to defend myself as the cop does. Cops are in the wrong way too often, busting into the wrong house more times than you think.

People give cops way too much credit, especially in this thread. They are way too anxious to get a kill shot.

Seriously, you're saying I should be able to go down and rob a bank and because I might use the gun in a naughty way, the police should just hang back and give me a good chance at getting away?? LOL

Or what about if the cops just hung back and the POS kills some innocent bystander down the road?

You schmucks would then be whining "how come the cops didn't stop the luncatic with the gun?"

  • Like 1

No, what they're saying is that the police shouldn't go in guns blazing in situations where it's not merited. I know this is a thought foreign to most gun nuts but people dying is bad.

Perps etc. dying is never the preferred outcome, but sometimes it is the only option. In this case there was no way to tell if the guy's weapon was real or not other than a voice on the phone. Also, spoofing is common - painting over or removing the red tip, or painting one on a real weapon - so that's iffy. In the end the cops want to finish their shift without getting killed themselves, so presented with a deranged person that appears armed....

Another scenario: thug points his (illegal) weapon at a young teller/clerk/whatever, then a person with a carry permit puts one through his brain stem. Problem solved.

No, what they're saying is that the police shouldn't go in guns blazing in situations where it's not merited. I know this is a thought foreign to most gun nuts but people dying is bad.

The cops didn't go "guns blazing". Its not just cops who would've fired, even private citizens. You point something at me that looks VERY much like a real gun, I am going to shoot. Last time I checked, we humans have not developed the ability to read minds and know for 100% certain that it is not a real gun.

I am not immortal like Duncan McLeod on Highlander, I cannot take the chance it is a real gun or not. If it looks like it, I am going to defend myself.

  • Like 2

A third scenario: People have sensible attitudes towards lethal weapons, don't live like a bunch of yahoos with bloodlust, and make it harder for the criminal to get said weapon. Nobody dies. And to be honest DocM your attitude is telling anyway. You don't see the idea of killing a person in self defence as an unfortunate necessity, you seem to actually revel in the violence. From my experiences with American gun culture the only difference between a sensible and non sensible gun owners is the corpse count, "sensible" gun owners still seem to take delight in the violence of taking someone's life.

Seriously, you're saying I should be able to go down and rob a bank and because I might use the gun in a naughty way, the police should just hang back and give me a good chance at getting away?? LOL

Or what about if the cops just hung back and the POS kills some innocent bystander down the road?

You schmucks would then be whining "how come the cops didn't stop the luncatic with the gun?"

it's called reading the situation ....

A third scenario: People have sensible attitudes towards lethal weapons, don't live like a bunch of yahoos with bloodlust, and make it harder for the criminal to get said weapon. Nobody dies.

You assume that criminals get most of their weapons legally. They don't - gunrunning from overseas is alive & well in the US, and if you can't do that it's easy to make a SMG from metal stock found in most hardware stores.

As for the criminals - if they don't threaten or attack people, no one dies. And if someone is going to die, which is often their intent, better them than their victim(s.)

And to be honest DocM your attitude is telling anyway. You don't see the idea of killing a person in self defence as an unfortunate necessity, you seem to actually revel in the violence.

I don't revel in it, that's your mental invention, but I do see it as a necessary consequence of the actions of others. I most certainly won't shed tears over them, though I would feel bad for their relatives. That I don't have a "bloodlust" is that I've only had to fire on someone once in over 45 years, and that was to save my fathers life. The rest of the time I've made citizens arrests - something else that probably grinds you as being possible.

From my experiences with American gun culture the only difference between a sensible and non sensible gun owners is the corpse count, "sensible" gun owners still seem to take delight in the violence of taking someone's life.

That you can't tell the difference says more about your inflexibilty than about us.

  • Like 2

Your attitude portrays a very different story to what you're saying here, I've seen you talk without a great deal of glee about the damage your guns could do to a human body, sensible people don't do things like that. To a normal person, killing in self defence would be something that's viewed as unfortunate but unnecessary. You enjoy the thought of the amount of damage your guns could do so, and those simply aren't the words of a sensible person.

I have often tried to explain wound and firearms ballistics, combat tactics, US gun laws, etc. in terms people can understand. Often this is to explain current events, discount FUD, or correct misconceptions. If I add a tad of irony or even humor to lighten the subject and you don't like it too bad. Sue me. You don't like Americans or how we live? Fine, just don't expect anyone to take your apparent trolling seriously anymore.

Your attitude portrays a very different story to what you're saying here, I've seen you talk without a great deal of glee about the damage your guns could do to a human body, sensible people don't do things like that. To a normal person, killing in self defence would be something that's viewed as unfortunate but unnecessary. You enjoy the thought of the amount of damage your guns could do so, and those simply aren't the words of a sensible person.

So how is that any different than a guy who likes to talk about how his motorcycle can go 170 mph?? That's illegal everywhere in the US except on a track.

People like to talk about stats. They brag about the power their computer has, the power their cars have, and the power their gun has. It's not that difficult to understand. His hobby is guns, your hobby may be computers or cars or boats. Live with it.

By confronting the person in the first place, the cops instigated the confrontation. They should have observed out of site and tried not to confront the person.

This happens way too often. Someone calls the cops and says someone has a gun. 9 times out of 10 that person is not actually going to use it, but when confronted by cops yelling at them, the cops are the ones instigating it. It most cases, if the cops were never there, the person with the gun would have just gotten bored and put it away.

Cop points a gun at me, I have the same right to defend myself as the cop does. Cops are in the wrong way too often, busting into the wrong house more times than you think.

People give cops way too much credit, especially in this thread. They are way too anxious to get a kill shot.

Amen! There are far too many "god complex" cops these days.

So who is to blame then if that person runs in to a nearby home and kills 2 or 3 people because the police are "observing from out of site" and couldn't react in time?

That doesn't even begin to make sense. Remember the person they were dealing with is mentally unstable so they already would not be reacting as normal person would to police presence.

  • Like 1

If you are walking down a street with a gun, then you have already taken the first act.

You can't ask police to just sit back and wait for him to open fire. Once the police showed up, you have the option to drop the gun, hands on your head, etc. If you don't then police only option is to think that you are able and willing to use it, as such they have to render you inert. If they don't, and you open fire, and hit innocents, then the police are at fault.

I'm sorry the guy is dead, but he is the fraction of a percent that lives outside of the norm. The police need to operate by doing what is usually the best course of action, for most situations. Sometimes you meet someone outside of that, mentally disabled, idiots who pull out stuff from their pockets when the police tell them to freeze, etc.. But Most of the time the ones that aren't a thread surrender the second the police show up, and the ones that don't are a danger to everyone around.

Also, it's all nice that we can talk about it now, but when it happened, it happened in a fraction of a second.. I best most of the most liberal people would, in the same situation, seeing a man with what looks like a real gun starting to aim it your way, not decide to just wait and see what happens.

So how is that any different than a guy who likes to talk about how his motorcycle can go 170 mph?? That's illegal everywhere in the US except on a track.

People like to talk about stats. They brag about the power their computer has, the power their cars have, and the power their gun has. It's not that difficult to understand. His hobby is guns, your hobby may be computers or cars or boats. Live with it.

Those people don't take pride in their ability to kill.

Those people don't take pride in their ability to kill.

Neither does he, he merely talks about stats like anyone else with a hobby, everything else is simply your projection on him.

I particularly like where you project "glee" into his posts, how one can garner that from him talking about statistical analyses is beyond me, you must have some superhuman ability to read emotion from text that no one else on the planet has.

  • Like 2

I don't get him either, other than he's so rabidly anti-gun carry that he internally demonizes those who aren't.

My discussion of why wounding or warning shots are problematic, and even dangerous to others than the perp, is a good example. That knowledge comes from training, discussions with others who have 'been there' and experience with patients who were hit by supposed warning shots and attempts to wound. How he can get 'glee' out of that I don't know. Being up to your elbows in blood from one of those incidents is anything but gleeful.

As for perps - I have no sympathy for them because they are the victims of their own actions. That they ran head-on into someone who was prepared to defend themselves is their problem.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!