Recommended Posts

Ahh you mean you poke your nose into other people's business and take the law into your own hands? That explains a lot.

Sighhhh... it's not in my nature not to intercede when something's going on in front of my damned face.

Try this:

I had been asked by my neighbors to keep an eye out for their 16 y/o daughter. She had come home from her summer job and was sleeping in, but her parents had to work. At about 9 AM I look out my back door to see three males breaking in their kitchen doorwall, wearing ski masks - in August. Not good, and she could be hurt or worse before the the cops arrive.

I pull out my firearm, pocket the cordless phone, exit and get the drop on them. One has a Ka-Bar combat knife, which he very wisely drops, and all three end up face down on the ground while I call the cops. It takes them 15 minutes to arrive - time enough for the perps to have done serious damage to the neighbors daughter.

By your standards I should have called the cops and let the chips fall as regards what they could have done to her until they arrived, but that isn't in most American's DNA - and certainly not mine.

  • Like 2

No, you don't know Jack. That much is obvious.

I have only interceded when felonies were being committed in my presence and when the opening to properly intercede presented itself. That is what you learn in the carry classes, both Basic and Advanced Level. What we learn isn't that different than what a police cadet does, often from the same instructors. but on average civilians get more range time and are better shots than street cops.

You also seem to be forgetting that in 49 of 50 states citizens have the right to perform citizens arrests - a limited police power.

  • Like 1

I'm actually wishing I had a decent handgun right about now. I'm pretty sure someone followed me home and watched me go inside, and then left. No idea if something is going to happen later O_O

DocM, come protect me :laugh:

  • Like 1

So gun classes actually train people to act like vigilantes? that also explains a lot.

No, they do not. Please stop baiting him and making assumptions like that. Gun safety classes teach you how to use them SAFELY and not be as likely to freak out and cause an accident or use it unnecessarily. I do know a thing or two about this topic; my ex-husband was a cop, and while he was not a shining example of one, I did meet some who were. Modern-day heroes, some of them. Situations like the one before--if I were that 16-year-old girl, if this had happened to me when I was that age, I'd be thankful every day for a "vigilante" like him who stepped up and (peacefully, I may add) neutralised the situation. Often just having the gun and letting them see that you do is enough to stop them, as well as knowing how to handle yourself.

  • Like 1

He lies about my position to deliberately misrepresent it and I get accused of baiting him? lol. There may be the odd occasion where vigilantism may help, but conversely it can also be dangerous when you have people thinking they have the right to take the law into their own hands. It's the kind of power not everybody uses honestly, which is usually why we pay people money and train them to be cops. I'm not saying people should always be left to die, there will always be exceptional circumstances in which an intervention may be necessary, but those circumstances should be the exception not the rule.

Chjarisma;

Thank you, and you state how it really works on the ground precisely. Vigilantes go out hoping for trouble, but those who carry simply prepare for if trouble looks for and finds them. Different things entirely.

Suggestion for a ladies 'little friend': Ruger LC9, second from left in my signature.

  • Like 1

He lies about my position to deliberately misrepresent it and I get accused of baiting him? lol. There may be the odd occasion where vigilantism may help, but conversely it can also be dangerous when you have people thinking they have the right to take the law into their own hands. It's the kind of power not everybody uses honestly, which is usually why we pay people money and train them to be cops. I'm not saying people should always be left to die, there will always be exceptional circumstances in which an intervention may be necessary, but those circumstances should be the exception not the rule.

No, I didn't say that, I just mean on this particular topic I think you are reading too much into what he is saying. Some people do abuse that power, but not everyone does. That's all I am trying to say...

(and yes, those circumstances you mentioned are, thankfully, the exception.)

  • Like 1

Chjarisma;

Thank you, and you state how it really works on the ground precisely.

Suggestion for a ladies 'little friend': Ruger LC9, second from left in my signature.

Ah Doc, the ones I liked best from before were either a S&W .38 snubnose revolver or the standard issue 9mm Glock. Or maybe the 'baby Glock'. I haven't seen or used them since we divorced back in '07, but I do remember being fairly competent with those when I would accompany him to the shooting range.

Anyway, sorry, taking this thread a wee bit off topic. :)

I never claimed that everyone abuses that power, but the problem is that for every person prepared to use that kind of power scrupulously I'd wager you'd find 2 that were not. And that is why I am opposed to it, not because I want to see innocent people being harmed, I just feel uneasy about people taking the law into their own hands. It's only a couple of steps away from anarchy.

Airsoft is fun. This is not.

Air rifles are great fun for practice shooting. I don't kill animals with them, but they're the right level for me. Fun but not too dangerous.

Anarchy is what exists on a lot of city streets, and your 1:2 proportion is way off. The crime rate for concealed or open cariers is extremely low, which would not be the case if they were running around acting out as you suggest.

  • Like 1

Except my comment was with regards to vigilante types, not all concealed weapon carriers. I'm sure there are plenty of concealed weapon carriers that don't act like vigilantes

Air rifles are great fun for practice shooting. I don't kill animals with them, but they're the right level for me. Fun but not too dangerous.

I'm in an airsoft society at university. We often go to a local place which is in a forest with significant high ground at both ends. It's freaking awesome.

I'm in an airsoft society at university. We often go to a local place which is in a forest with significant high ground at both ends. It's freaking awesome.

I presume you don't shoot air rifles with metal slugs though? Airsofting does sound like a hell of a lot of fun (as does paintballing) but I don't really know enough people to partake in my local area.

Airsoft is a spring, electric or gas cartridge powered gun that fires 6mm plastic pellets, and they can be single shot, semi-auto or full-auto. Some use 2 or all 3 power systems. Velocities run 200-700 feet/second, but the energy is very low - maybe 1-2 lbf. There are targets for indoor/outdoor use, and they can be used for training in a basement.

Many are very close replicas of real weapons. Some of the pistols are so accurate a copy even the slide moves back just like a real semi-auto pistol. I have one of these that's a dead ringer for a SIG Sauer P226, which makes it a great trainer for my real SIG P226 Mk25.

A BB gun here has 'BB' meaning ball bearing. These are .177" (actual 0.172" to 0.173') steel balls, sometimes copper coated, and can be spring, pumped air or gas powered. No red tip for these as they can do real damage. The .177's often can also fire a .177" (actual) lead pellet with even more energy, and there are pellet guns that run larger - .20 (6mm), .22 or .25, which are very powerful and excellent for dispatching varmints.

We tend to call those that fire real pellets air pistols although I understand that they can sometimes crossover. I sure as hell wouldn't want a metal BB fired at me, even with low energy they still hurt. I guess the term BB gun has became somewhat bastardised in this country, as a lot of the guns can fire both metal and plastic balls.

I've seen those in airsofting shops before, I've never been able to figure out exactly what their purpose is though? I only really have any experience in the use of air rifles.

Tranq darts are usually fired from a .50 caliber (12.95 mm) gas gun. The dart has a metal ball whose inertia drives the syringe plunger forward at impact. You might be able to make one for a single-shot .25 pellet gun, but the agents are restricted so....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Blast from the past.
    • Hello, Were you using a product or service from one of the companies affected by the Klue data breach?  See https://klue.com/blog/an-update-on-recent-klue-security-incident for the company's public statement.  That blog post does not list affected customer. From looking around at reports, I created this list: Gong HackerOne Huntress Insurity Jamf LastPass OneTrust Recorded Future ReliaQuest Salesforce Snyk Sprout Social Tanium It is likely there are other companies affected as well. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers by Karthik Mudaliar SpaceX reportedly wants to sell mobile phone plans directly to consumers in the United States as part of a wider expansion of Starlink. According to a report from the Financial Times, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell discussed the plan with investors during the company’s recent IPO roadshow. The company is also said to be considering building a terrestrial mobile network to complement Starlink’s satellite coverage. The plan is quite different from how Starlink currently operates in the U.S. mobile market. SpaceX already provides satellite connectivity for T-Mobile’s T-Satellite service, but T-Mobile remains responsible for the subscription, billing, and customer support. A Starlink-branded mobile service would give SpaceX control of the customer relationship instead. It could also turn the company from a partner of traditional mobile operators into a direct competitor. T-Mobile also began testing its Starlink-powered satellite service in early 2025. The beta was initially limited to text messaging and was also available to some AT&T and Verizon customers. The service has since expanded to support limited data access through selected apps, including WhatsApp, Google Maps, AccuWeather, and AllTrails. It is designed to provide a connection in areas where normal cell towers are unavailable, rather than replace a conventional mobile network. However, if SpaceX actually has a plan to serve nationwide, it needs to do more than just satellite networks and actually support on-ground operations. It can also partner up with existing carriers and become a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). With that said, SpaceX has already spent heavily to support its mobile ambitions. Just last year, the company agreed to acquire wireless spectrum licences from EchoStar in deals worth a combined $19.6 billion. EchoStar's spectrum includes AWS-4, H-Block, and AWS-3 frequencies that could be used for both satellite and terrestrial communications. According to a SpaceX securities filing, the Federal Communications Commission approved the transaction in May 2026, although it is not expected to close until late 2027. There's no official statement by SpaceX for now. Pricing, availability, and other details remain unknown. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!