Recommended Posts

Ahh you mean you poke your nose into other people's business and take the law into your own hands? That explains a lot.

Sighhhh... it's not in my nature not to intercede when something's going on in front of my damned face.

Try this:

I had been asked by my neighbors to keep an eye out for their 16 y/o daughter. She had come home from her summer job and was sleeping in, but her parents had to work. At about 9 AM I look out my back door to see three males breaking in their kitchen doorwall, wearing ski masks - in August. Not good, and she could be hurt or worse before the the cops arrive.

I pull out my firearm, pocket the cordless phone, exit and get the drop on them. One has a Ka-Bar combat knife, which he very wisely drops, and all three end up face down on the ground while I call the cops. It takes them 15 minutes to arrive - time enough for the perps to have done serious damage to the neighbors daughter.

By your standards I should have called the cops and let the chips fall as regards what they could have done to her until they arrived, but that isn't in most American's DNA - and certainly not mine.

  • Like 2

No, you don't know Jack. That much is obvious.

I have only interceded when felonies were being committed in my presence and when the opening to properly intercede presented itself. That is what you learn in the carry classes, both Basic and Advanced Level. What we learn isn't that different than what a police cadet does, often from the same instructors. but on average civilians get more range time and are better shots than street cops.

You also seem to be forgetting that in 49 of 50 states citizens have the right to perform citizens arrests - a limited police power.

  • Like 1

I'm actually wishing I had a decent handgun right about now. I'm pretty sure someone followed me home and watched me go inside, and then left. No idea if something is going to happen later O_O

DocM, come protect me :laugh:

  • Like 1

So gun classes actually train people to act like vigilantes? that also explains a lot.

No, they do not. Please stop baiting him and making assumptions like that. Gun safety classes teach you how to use them SAFELY and not be as likely to freak out and cause an accident or use it unnecessarily. I do know a thing or two about this topic; my ex-husband was a cop, and while he was not a shining example of one, I did meet some who were. Modern-day heroes, some of them. Situations like the one before--if I were that 16-year-old girl, if this had happened to me when I was that age, I'd be thankful every day for a "vigilante" like him who stepped up and (peacefully, I may add) neutralised the situation. Often just having the gun and letting them see that you do is enough to stop them, as well as knowing how to handle yourself.

  • Like 1

He lies about my position to deliberately misrepresent it and I get accused of baiting him? lol. There may be the odd occasion where vigilantism may help, but conversely it can also be dangerous when you have people thinking they have the right to take the law into their own hands. It's the kind of power not everybody uses honestly, which is usually why we pay people money and train them to be cops. I'm not saying people should always be left to die, there will always be exceptional circumstances in which an intervention may be necessary, but those circumstances should be the exception not the rule.

Chjarisma;

Thank you, and you state how it really works on the ground precisely. Vigilantes go out hoping for trouble, but those who carry simply prepare for if trouble looks for and finds them. Different things entirely.

Suggestion for a ladies 'little friend': Ruger LC9, second from left in my signature.

  • Like 1

He lies about my position to deliberately misrepresent it and I get accused of baiting him? lol. There may be the odd occasion where vigilantism may help, but conversely it can also be dangerous when you have people thinking they have the right to take the law into their own hands. It's the kind of power not everybody uses honestly, which is usually why we pay people money and train them to be cops. I'm not saying people should always be left to die, there will always be exceptional circumstances in which an intervention may be necessary, but those circumstances should be the exception not the rule.

No, I didn't say that, I just mean on this particular topic I think you are reading too much into what he is saying. Some people do abuse that power, but not everyone does. That's all I am trying to say...

(and yes, those circumstances you mentioned are, thankfully, the exception.)

  • Like 1

Chjarisma;

Thank you, and you state how it really works on the ground precisely.

Suggestion for a ladies 'little friend': Ruger LC9, second from left in my signature.

Ah Doc, the ones I liked best from before were either a S&W .38 snubnose revolver or the standard issue 9mm Glock. Or maybe the 'baby Glock'. I haven't seen or used them since we divorced back in '07, but I do remember being fairly competent with those when I would accompany him to the shooting range.

Anyway, sorry, taking this thread a wee bit off topic. :)

I never claimed that everyone abuses that power, but the problem is that for every person prepared to use that kind of power scrupulously I'd wager you'd find 2 that were not. And that is why I am opposed to it, not because I want to see innocent people being harmed, I just feel uneasy about people taking the law into their own hands. It's only a couple of steps away from anarchy.

Airsoft is fun. This is not.

Air rifles are great fun for practice shooting. I don't kill animals with them, but they're the right level for me. Fun but not too dangerous.

Anarchy is what exists on a lot of city streets, and your 1:2 proportion is way off. The crime rate for concealed or open cariers is extremely low, which would not be the case if they were running around acting out as you suggest.

  • Like 1

Except my comment was with regards to vigilante types, not all concealed weapon carriers. I'm sure there are plenty of concealed weapon carriers that don't act like vigilantes

Air rifles are great fun for practice shooting. I don't kill animals with them, but they're the right level for me. Fun but not too dangerous.

I'm in an airsoft society at university. We often go to a local place which is in a forest with significant high ground at both ends. It's freaking awesome.

I'm in an airsoft society at university. We often go to a local place which is in a forest with significant high ground at both ends. It's freaking awesome.

I presume you don't shoot air rifles with metal slugs though? Airsofting does sound like a hell of a lot of fun (as does paintballing) but I don't really know enough people to partake in my local area.

Airsoft is a spring, electric or gas cartridge powered gun that fires 6mm plastic pellets, and they can be single shot, semi-auto or full-auto. Some use 2 or all 3 power systems. Velocities run 200-700 feet/second, but the energy is very low - maybe 1-2 lbf. There are targets for indoor/outdoor use, and they can be used for training in a basement.

Many are very close replicas of real weapons. Some of the pistols are so accurate a copy even the slide moves back just like a real semi-auto pistol. I have one of these that's a dead ringer for a SIG Sauer P226, which makes it a great trainer for my real SIG P226 Mk25.

A BB gun here has 'BB' meaning ball bearing. These are .177" (actual 0.172" to 0.173') steel balls, sometimes copper coated, and can be spring, pumped air or gas powered. No red tip for these as they can do real damage. The .177's often can also fire a .177" (actual) lead pellet with even more energy, and there are pellet guns that run larger - .20 (6mm), .22 or .25, which are very powerful and excellent for dispatching varmints.

We tend to call those that fire real pellets air pistols although I understand that they can sometimes crossover. I sure as hell wouldn't want a metal BB fired at me, even with low energy they still hurt. I guess the term BB gun has became somewhat bastardised in this country, as a lot of the guns can fire both metal and plastic balls.

I've seen those in airsofting shops before, I've never been able to figure out exactly what their purpose is though? I only really have any experience in the use of air rifles.

Tranq darts are usually fired from a .50 caliber (12.95 mm) gas gun. The dart has a metal ball whose inertia drives the syringe plunger forward at impact. You might be able to make one for a single-shot .25 pellet gun, but the agents are restricted so....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!