Poll: Windows 8 Experience (How do you like it?)



Recommended Posts

Why the scrollbar buttons in IE have to be inconsistently big compared to explorer is beyond me. Do they think its there for easy press for touch screen users? Those users will swipe up and down to scroll pages. Another sign of amateurish UI design.

I like the new task manager. Looks slick. But it reports my CPU frequency as 5 Ghz when my i5 3550 can boost and reach a maximum frequency of 3.9 Ghz only.

Another of my laptop has a tendency to hang randomly which is the dynamictick issue carried forward from RP.

Thus it is clear that Windows 8 was totally rushed to be available in time for holiday season. We can expect day 1 patches on retail availability, no sh** Sherlock in that!

Unusable. Went back to 7 after a couple of days of testing. Serious compatibility with my daily use apps. Metro UI is... Something I can't even define. To sum it up in a single word: Horror.

Thanks for Windows 7 Microsoft!

  • Like 2

I've been using Win 8 Pro from Friday night and so far so good. Love the multi-monitor improvements, still trying to figure out what the point of Metro is though (on a desktop).

How do I quit Metro applications I have launched? For example, if I open Mail, the only way I can get out of it is by going back to Start and choosing Desktop... how do I stop Mail from then running?

Otherwise, mostly looks good, very fast, very slick.

Forgot to mention, also like the idea I can log into my Microsoft Account and everything is synced between PCs (well, settings wise) and everything is set up to go (i.e. if I wanted to use Mail).

I've been using Win 8 Pro from Friday night and so far so good. Love the multi-monitor improvements, still trying to figure out what the point of Metro is though (on a desktop).

How do I quit Metro applications I have launched? For example, if I open Mail, the only way I can get out of it is by going back to Start and choosing Desktop... how do I stop Mail from then running?

Otherwise, mostly looks good, very fast, very slick.

The old Alt+F4 or you can drag the upper edge all the way down.

I like nearly everything about it so far, although I'm having a strange issue where Firefox seems to crash frequently and at random times. Never had this issue on any prior Windows OS.

Why the scrollbar buttons in IE have to be inconsistently big compared to explorer is beyond me. Do they think its there for easy press for touch screen users?

The scrollbars only appear when using a mouse. They aren't present at all when using touch (it has an iOS-style mini-scroll indicator for that). So, no, that's not the reason. (The reason is actually that desktop IE10 is a shell around immersive IE, so it uses the new immersive-style scrollbars, while Explorer uses the older desktop style.

People who haven't actually tried using the OS with both mouse and touch seem to assume the interface is the same with both, while in reality, it adjusts depending on what input method you're using. The scrollbars are an example of that. I will agree that the new scrollbars look ugly though.

I just wanted to post this

http://www.theverge....-next-windows-8

Awesome review from a mac user! :) Gives an amazing image of the endless possibilities of next gen UI

The different points of view are what make the OS world so interesting!

http://tasystems.wordpress.com/2012/08/19/windows-8-released/

Have to say, I'll not be buying WIndow's 8, nor will I even install any free ones that I get access to (legitimately). I'll stick with Windows 7.

I gave the hardware part 5 of 5 and the others 4 of 5. Very seldom rate anything at max, especially with something brand new.

Windows 8 isn't bad for anyone who knew it would be slightly different to begin with, but most common users, I predict it to be unfavorable.

Personally,

I'm sticking with Windows 7 though.

I installed Windows 8 when the Release Candidate was made available. I later upgraded to the RTM. Today I have re-installed Windows 7 and I feel like I'm home again.

After nearly 3 months of using Windows 8 I can safely say the following:

  • It didn't get any easier to use. Neither Windows as a whole, nor Windows 8 on its own was more pleasant.
  • After the first couple of weeks of playing, I never used the Metro Start Desktop Menu thing again.
  • Although I spent most of my time in 'classic' desktop mode, I was always frustrated about how Windows tried to default the application use to the Metro mode. Be it a movie or PDF or even opening Chrome, if I opened a file in desktop mode I would be thrust into Metro mode. (Music was the worst; I never figured that one out)
  • I didn't like the task management between the two modes. I frequently 'lost' my running apps because some would be open in Metro mode and others would be open in desktop mode.

I started this adventure with an open mind. I understand why MS has removed the Start Menu (stats show that people rarely use it, and chose to pin apps or use their desktop to access them). But when I wanted to find an application which wasn't pinned, I didn't want to jump to Metro and then use the very busy applications screen to hunt for what I was looking.

I tried using the Metro mode to manage my time and take advantage of the dynamic content. But too many things got in the way.

  • Integration with Gmail is crap and the Mail tile was always hours or days behind what was reality. And the email application just doesn't work well with the way Gmail works.
  • Similarly for the Calendar, it was always behind the times for me.
  • The news tiles that I selected were also days behind schedule.

The worst problem, though, was the fact that I couldn't have Metro running on my second monitor and the desktop running on my primary at the same time. The moment I used something on my Metro monitor, my primary monitor would display the application and I would loose focus on what I was really doing.

The Metro screen is basically a glorified widget desktop. But I don't want widgets to be the primary focus of my life. I wanted Metro to be my 'always' on news source, which I could consult alongside actually being productive on my desktop. But I couldn't do that.

Using apps in Metro was not intuitive. Bars to the left of me, bar to the right, bars below. Maybe on a tablet this will work more efficiently, but on a PC it was confusing and slowed me down. Perhaps I'm just too used to clicking File - Print to get to my Printer dialogue. It's a simple 2 step process, versus dragging my mouse to the bottom right, clicking on Devices, click in on my printer and then going. I don't know.

I would consider myself an advanced user. I know my way around a PC. And Windows 8, despite my best efforts, did not work for me on a PC.

That said, I will be buying Surface the moment it is available. I am going to be buying a Windows Phone 8 Lumia. I see the potential with Metro, but its application on the desktop just doesn't work. Not in the way Windows 8 did it. I think that Windows 9 (or whatever they call it) will address these issues, as Win7 did for Vista and XP did for ME. Sadly, despite their best efforts, MS has produced another mid-cycle product that needs another 2 years of public outcry before they get it right.

At least they tried something new, which is good. I guess I am just not ready for the newness that they are offering.

Good bye Windows 8. I'll see you again in a couple of years.

Praise Buddah -- another Windows 8 topic :D

And you have reached the same conclusions as my intuition gave me -- not worth 'updating'.

The one silver lining: Windows 8 makes Windows 7 look great.

... and I feel like I'm home again.

Wasn't there a song like that for Windows XP ... :shifty:

  • Like 2

You know I would genuinely consider buying Neowin just so I could slap the people starting these topics.

I think we have well and truly covered whether people like or dislike the damn OS. I don't care if you like it or not, I just want the minispy to be something other than "WIndows 8 and how it murdered my entire family" or "Windows 8 saves small child".

It's beating a dead horse. Worse than that, it's beating the small stain where the horse used to be. Soon enough we will have beaten the ground where the horse was sufficiently to have dug through to China -_-

****.

EDIT::

This post is out of context as it was made prior to the thread merger.

Edited by articuno1au

Yeah the mail 'app' is a total pos! I've had it on gmail and it gives me no notifications, and even when I opened it today it sat there on 4 day old email doing nothing. The only advantage of using that metro crap might be a mail notification, and if it can't even do that it is worse than useless.

Guys sharing his opinion about how he couldn't get used to it, I'm half surprised the Rabid Win 8 koolaid drinkers havent come in and flamed you to hell.

I'm still undecided on the Start screen, it doesn't seem as bad as first thought.. and my mail app seems fine then again I'm not using Gmail

Good grief, chill out you guys. This wasn't a whinge-fest, the OP made his points very eloquently and shared his experience without much emotional bias at all. He said he was open-minded at the start, and based on the quality of the post, I believe it. I'm glad to have mature, honest evaluations like this on the site to read. Thanks, deck.

  • Like 2

Ya'll are mean. And I sniff, ever so slightly. I could have posted in a Win8 topic... but I like the who singular feel to ones opinion.

Besides, there are as many of me as there are of people who really like Win8.

I installed Windows 8 when the Release Candidate was made available. I later upgraded to the RTM. Today I have re-installed Windows 7 and I feel like I'm home again.

After nearly 3 months of using Windows 8 I can safely say the following:

  • It didn't get any easier to use. Neither Windows as a whole, nor Windows 8 on its own was more pleasant.
  • After the first couple of weeks of playing, I never used the Metro Start Desktop Menu thing again.
  • Although I spent most of my time in 'classic' desktop mode, I was always frustrated about how Windows tried to default the application use to the Metro mode. Be it a movie or PDF or even opening Chrome, if I opened a file in desktop mode I would be thrust into Metro mode. (Music was the worst; I never figured that one out)
  • I didn't like the task management between the two modes. I frequently 'lost' my running apps because some would be open in Metro mode and others would be open in desktop mode.

I started this adventure with an open mind. I understand why MS has removed the Start Menu (stats show that people rarely use it, and chose to pin apps or use their desktop to access them). But when I wanted to find an application which wasn't pinned, I didn't want to jump to Metro and then use the very busy applications screen to hunt for what I was looking.

I tried using the Metro mode to manage my time and take advantage of the dynamic content. But too many things got in the way.

  • Integration with Gmail is crap and the Mail tile was always hours or days behind what was reality. And the email application just doesn't work well with the way Gmail works.
  • Similarly for the Calendar, it was always behind the times for me.
  • The news tiles that I selected were also days behind schedule.

The worst problem, though, was the fact that I couldn't have Metro running on my second monitor and the desktop running on my primary at the same time. The moment I used something on my Metro monitor, my primary monitor would display the application and I would loose focus on what I was really doing.

The Metro screen is basically a glorified widget desktop. But I don't want widgets to be the primary focus of my life. I wanted Metro to be my 'always' on news source, which I could consult alongside actually being productive on my desktop. But I couldn't do that.

Using apps in Metro was not intuitive. Bars to the left of me, bar to the right, bars below. Maybe on a tablet this will work more efficiently, but on a PC it was confusing and slowed me down. Perhaps I'm just too used to clicking File - Print to get to my Printer dialogue. It's a simple 2 step process, versus dragging my mouse to the bottom right, clicking on Devices, click in on my printer and then going. I don't know.

I would consider myself an advanced user. I know my way around a PC. And Windows 8, despite my best efforts, did not work for me on a PC.

That said, I will be buying Surface the moment it is available. I am going to be buying a Windows Phone 8 Lumia. I see the potential with Metro, but its application on the desktop just doesn't work. Not in the way Windows 8 did it. I think that Windows 9 (or whatever they call it) will address these issues, as Win7 did for Vista and XP did for ME. Sadly, despite their best efforts, MS has produced another mid-cycle product that needs another 2 years of public outcry before they get it right.

At least they tried something new, which is good. I guess I am just not ready for the newness that they are offering.

Good bye Windows 8. I'll see you again in a couple of years.

What an idiot!!! These post are so me too...

Ya'll are mean. And I sniff, ever so slightly. I could have posted in a Win8 topic... but I like the who singular feel to ones opinion.

Besides, there are as many of me as there are of people who really like Win8.

I'm not meaning to criticise the point of view or even the absolute expression of the view. I am just sick of these threads in general.

My apologies if I offended you at all.

The worst problem, though, was the fact that I couldn't have Metro running on my second monitor and the desktop running on my primary at the same time. The moment I used something on my Metro monitor, my primary monitor would display the application and I would loose focus on what I was really doing.

Are you sure you used the Release Preview and not the consumer preview ?

because I can have metro on one pof my screen and do my desktop or any other desktop app on the other as much as I want.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!