Poll: Windows 8 Experience (How do you like it?)



Recommended Posts

Are you sure you used the Release Preview and not the consumer preview ?

because I can have metro on one pof my screen and do my desktop or any other desktop app on the other as much as I want.

To clarify, as I may have gotten my names confused, I used the Consumer Preview and the RTM. I could not have Metro run exclusively on one monitor. Whenever I used an app on my desktop monitor, Metro would disappear and the desktop would appear on the second monitor.

I wonder how many people who said "awesome" about installation were doing it on a clean machine versus an upgrade of an existing Windows 7 partition. The experience I had in both cases was night and day.

I wonder how many people who said "awesome" about installation were doing it on a clean machine versus an upgrade of an existing Windows 7 partition. The experience I had in both cases was night and day.

My upgrade process was quite good. I started the install and 30 minutes later it was done... maybe sooner. Installing RTM fresh took a little longer.

I also want to point out that at first I was very pro Win8. I argued with Windows, Linux and Mac friends about the merits of Win8 for 2 months even though I was having doubts after the first few weeks. I gave this system a good try and ran it exclusively.

I wonder how many people who said "awesome" about installation were doing it on a clean machine versus an upgrade of an existing Windows 7 partition. The experience I had in both cases was night and day.

Which is somewhat irrelevant as the same could be said of Win7/Vista/XP/... Upgrades always take longer, especially of one has many large/complex applications installed. My upgrade from Vista to 7 took 8 hours. Clean loading Vista on the same machine only took about an hour.

The Win8 install is indeed quite fast.

Which is somewhat irrelevant as the same could be said of Win7/Vista/XP/... Upgrades always take longer, especially of one has many large/complex applications installed. My upgrade from Vista to 7 took 8 hours. Clean loading Vista on the same machine only took about an hour.

The Win8 install is indeed quite fast.

What was your source and what was your destination?

We already know the preferred destination for an OS install (any OS install) is an SSD - however, sources for the install vary as much as users themselves. In all my installs (bare-metal and otherwise), I've found that the best bare-metal install to a hard drive is from a thumb drive (4GB or larger).

Okay - why *larger* than 4 GB?

Simple - I chose a larger thumb drive so I can add things like motherboard drivers, utilities, etc. to the thumb drive (since slipstreaming is a non-starter at present).

Also, there is little price difference between 4GB and 8GB thumb drives - especially when you buy more than one.

My desktop PC had a clean install of Win8 RTM, no problems, runs like a charm.

My laptop was upgraded from Win7 Ultimate to Win8Pro, A new account and my own account worked just fine, but my wife's account didn't. Couldn't start the Store app. Not even with a new profile.

Then I did a fresh install and then it worked just fine.

To clarify, as I may have gotten my names confused, I used the Consumer Preview and the RTM. I could not have Metro run exclusively on one monitor. Whenever I used an app on my desktop monitor, Metro would disappear and the desktop would appear on the second monitor.

The reason for this is that the Start screen is not really a "Metro mode", it's basically just a different UI for the Start menu. As such, it works like the Start menu always has - click anywhere outside the Start menu in Windows 7, or press the Windows key a second time, and it goes away. Click anywhere outside the Start screen in Windows 8 (i.e. on a different monitor), or press the Windows key a second time, and it goes away. Windows 8 hasn't actually changed anything in this regard, it's just the same as before - except Start now looks a lot different of course ...

5, 5, 4.

The installation and compatibility were awesome. The features are brilliant, and the operating system is great overall, but I just wish there was no need for the old Desktop mode. As there's still need for that and the transition between "Desktop" and "Metro" isn't as good as it can be, I went for option number 4 on the last question. Further, one contributing factor to me going for option 4 was the lack of toast notifications (especially for Facebook Notifications) and auto-refresh of What's New in the People app. I was pretty devastated that those features weren't included, especially because I'd like to dock the app to the side to stay updated on my Facebook News Feed and OS X has toast Facebook notifications :/

  • 3 weeks later...

5, 4, 1.

The installation was seamless. Everything worked fine out of the box including video and wireless. Almost all of the programs I use on a regular basis were working just fine. A few tossed out an error message or two saying it would not be compatible, but they worked fine anyways. I only had an issue with HIPS on ESET NOD32 (and I think that eventually got fixed) and some other obscure program. The features are doing nothing for me. Metro just does not fit in with my work flow. Sure, after using it for over a month I got used to it. However, there is nothing in Metro that I like. If we are going to have applications open there, why only a few? I would rather have all or nothing. It is very sloppy and out of place. I want nothing to do with the apps that come pre-installed. I will never use them. As I believe I have said on another thread, the search function just is not as powerful as it was on Windows 7. I do not like having the search broken down in three different categories. I know what I am looking for 100% of the time so I would rather just type in a portion of it, hit enter and go.

So while other people had issues with the default themes and the loss of Aero in window borders, I did not have a problem with that. I do? find that I am more efficient in my work on Windows 7. I finally re-installed it today, and it feels good to be home. To be honest, I think the only thing I will miss is the new Task Manager in Windows 8. The performance tweaks are nice, but if you hardly noticeable (unless you are using some seriously aging hardware). In the end, use what makes you the most comfortable. That is what I will be doing. Not because I was afraid of change (I gave it over a month, that is plenty of time), but because it better suits me.

I pretty much like everything except the Metro APPS. I don't find myself using them at all and I dislike with a passion that you have no control over the settings in the APPS. For example Solitaire I don't like the timer or keeping score. I would like to be able to right click on the app and choose the settings or be able to log out and sign in with another account.

I pretty much like everything except the Metro APPS. I don't find myself using them at all and I dislike with a passion that you have no control over the settings in the APPS. For example Solitaire I don't like the timer or keeping score. I would like to be able to right click on the app and choose the settings or be able to log out and sign in with another account.

Timer can be turned off under Settings: Win + C, Settings, Timer.

I pretty much like everything except the Metro APPS. I don't find myself using them at all and I dislike with a passion that you have no control over the settings in the APPS. For example Solitaire I don't like the timer or keeping score. I would like to be able to right click on the app and choose the settings or be able to log out and sign in with another account.

The settings option is universal on all apps and reside on the Charms bar.

5, 4, 4... It's okay but there could be improvement., and like the ATI Graphics Driver for Windows 8 is in Beta and there are bugs with firefox with it for right now., and some other things that could be improve with Windows 8.

Rated four to all. I posted my thoughts in another thread.

Beside Alt+F4 how do you close an app?

Background apps can be closed by middle clicking on the tiles in the left-edge switcher, just as you can middle click on desktop window thumbnails and browser tabs.

- Drag the upper edge down

Thanks.

Rated four to all. I posted my thoughts in another thread.

Background apps can be closed by middle clicking on the tiles in the left-edge switcher, just as you can middle click on desktop window thumbnails and browser tabs.

Aaaah.

I either ALT+F4 them or closed them by right clicking on the left-edge switcher and selecting close..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!