Poll: Windows 8 Experience (How do you like it?)



Recommended Posts

Are you sure you used the Release Preview and not the consumer preview ?

because I can have metro on one pof my screen and do my desktop or any other desktop app on the other as much as I want.

To clarify, as I may have gotten my names confused, I used the Consumer Preview and the RTM. I could not have Metro run exclusively on one monitor. Whenever I used an app on my desktop monitor, Metro would disappear and the desktop would appear on the second monitor.

I wonder how many people who said "awesome" about installation were doing it on a clean machine versus an upgrade of an existing Windows 7 partition. The experience I had in both cases was night and day.

I wonder how many people who said "awesome" about installation were doing it on a clean machine versus an upgrade of an existing Windows 7 partition. The experience I had in both cases was night and day.

My upgrade process was quite good. I started the install and 30 minutes later it was done... maybe sooner. Installing RTM fresh took a little longer.

I also want to point out that at first I was very pro Win8. I argued with Windows, Linux and Mac friends about the merits of Win8 for 2 months even though I was having doubts after the first few weeks. I gave this system a good try and ran it exclusively.

I wonder how many people who said "awesome" about installation were doing it on a clean machine versus an upgrade of an existing Windows 7 partition. The experience I had in both cases was night and day.

Which is somewhat irrelevant as the same could be said of Win7/Vista/XP/... Upgrades always take longer, especially of one has many large/complex applications installed. My upgrade from Vista to 7 took 8 hours. Clean loading Vista on the same machine only took about an hour.

The Win8 install is indeed quite fast.

Which is somewhat irrelevant as the same could be said of Win7/Vista/XP/... Upgrades always take longer, especially of one has many large/complex applications installed. My upgrade from Vista to 7 took 8 hours. Clean loading Vista on the same machine only took about an hour.

The Win8 install is indeed quite fast.

What was your source and what was your destination?

We already know the preferred destination for an OS install (any OS install) is an SSD - however, sources for the install vary as much as users themselves. In all my installs (bare-metal and otherwise), I've found that the best bare-metal install to a hard drive is from a thumb drive (4GB or larger).

Okay - why *larger* than 4 GB?

Simple - I chose a larger thumb drive so I can add things like motherboard drivers, utilities, etc. to the thumb drive (since slipstreaming is a non-starter at present).

Also, there is little price difference between 4GB and 8GB thumb drives - especially when you buy more than one.

My desktop PC had a clean install of Win8 RTM, no problems, runs like a charm.

My laptop was upgraded from Win7 Ultimate to Win8Pro, A new account and my own account worked just fine, but my wife's account didn't. Couldn't start the Store app. Not even with a new profile.

Then I did a fresh install and then it worked just fine.

To clarify, as I may have gotten my names confused, I used the Consumer Preview and the RTM. I could not have Metro run exclusively on one monitor. Whenever I used an app on my desktop monitor, Metro would disappear and the desktop would appear on the second monitor.

The reason for this is that the Start screen is not really a "Metro mode", it's basically just a different UI for the Start menu. As such, it works like the Start menu always has - click anywhere outside the Start menu in Windows 7, or press the Windows key a second time, and it goes away. Click anywhere outside the Start screen in Windows 8 (i.e. on a different monitor), or press the Windows key a second time, and it goes away. Windows 8 hasn't actually changed anything in this regard, it's just the same as before - except Start now looks a lot different of course ...

5, 5, 4.

The installation and compatibility were awesome. The features are brilliant, and the operating system is great overall, but I just wish there was no need for the old Desktop mode. As there's still need for that and the transition between "Desktop" and "Metro" isn't as good as it can be, I went for option number 4 on the last question. Further, one contributing factor to me going for option 4 was the lack of toast notifications (especially for Facebook Notifications) and auto-refresh of What's New in the People app. I was pretty devastated that those features weren't included, especially because I'd like to dock the app to the side to stay updated on my Facebook News Feed and OS X has toast Facebook notifications :/

  • 3 weeks later...

5, 4, 1.

The installation was seamless. Everything worked fine out of the box including video and wireless. Almost all of the programs I use on a regular basis were working just fine. A few tossed out an error message or two saying it would not be compatible, but they worked fine anyways. I only had an issue with HIPS on ESET NOD32 (and I think that eventually got fixed) and some other obscure program. The features are doing nothing for me. Metro just does not fit in with my work flow. Sure, after using it for over a month I got used to it. However, there is nothing in Metro that I like. If we are going to have applications open there, why only a few? I would rather have all or nothing. It is very sloppy and out of place. I want nothing to do with the apps that come pre-installed. I will never use them. As I believe I have said on another thread, the search function just is not as powerful as it was on Windows 7. I do not like having the search broken down in three different categories. I know what I am looking for 100% of the time so I would rather just type in a portion of it, hit enter and go.

So while other people had issues with the default themes and the loss of Aero in window borders, I did not have a problem with that. I do? find that I am more efficient in my work on Windows 7. I finally re-installed it today, and it feels good to be home. To be honest, I think the only thing I will miss is the new Task Manager in Windows 8. The performance tweaks are nice, but if you hardly noticeable (unless you are using some seriously aging hardware). In the end, use what makes you the most comfortable. That is what I will be doing. Not because I was afraid of change (I gave it over a month, that is plenty of time), but because it better suits me.

I pretty much like everything except the Metro APPS. I don't find myself using them at all and I dislike with a passion that you have no control over the settings in the APPS. For example Solitaire I don't like the timer or keeping score. I would like to be able to right click on the app and choose the settings or be able to log out and sign in with another account.

I pretty much like everything except the Metro APPS. I don't find myself using them at all and I dislike with a passion that you have no control over the settings in the APPS. For example Solitaire I don't like the timer or keeping score. I would like to be able to right click on the app and choose the settings or be able to log out and sign in with another account.

Timer can be turned off under Settings: Win + C, Settings, Timer.

I pretty much like everything except the Metro APPS. I don't find myself using them at all and I dislike with a passion that you have no control over the settings in the APPS. For example Solitaire I don't like the timer or keeping score. I would like to be able to right click on the app and choose the settings or be able to log out and sign in with another account.

The settings option is universal on all apps and reside on the Charms bar.

5, 4, 4... It's okay but there could be improvement., and like the ATI Graphics Driver for Windows 8 is in Beta and there are bugs with firefox with it for right now., and some other things that could be improve with Windows 8.

Rated four to all. I posted my thoughts in another thread.

Beside Alt+F4 how do you close an app?

Background apps can be closed by middle clicking on the tiles in the left-edge switcher, just as you can middle click on desktop window thumbnails and browser tabs.

- Drag the upper edge down

Thanks.

Rated four to all. I posted my thoughts in another thread.

Background apps can be closed by middle clicking on the tiles in the left-edge switcher, just as you can middle click on desktop window thumbnails and browser tabs.

Aaaah.

I either ALT+F4 them or closed them by right clicking on the left-edge switcher and selecting close..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!