Poll: Windows 8 Experience (How do you like it?)



Recommended Posts

I have given Windows 8 the benefit of the doubt, but as of today I have taken it off of my system completely. Don't get me wrong here, the underlying system is stable, there are some good improvements compared to Windows 7, but the UI continues to be, in my opinion, the most horrid UI ever developed.

But the real reason for taking it off was network usage. No one has commented about how on a desktop that Windows 8 is constantly updating all those "Live Tiles" and sucking down your bandwidth (not to mention pushing the limits of your usage caps). And there does not seem to be any way to a) disable the live tiles completely or b) limit the network usage for those live tiles on a wired connection. This makes me think that there will be a number of users who'll be discovering in the next month or so that Windows 8 isn't so great after that letter from their ISP advising them that they've exceeded their data cap comes in.

So no, Windows 8 isn't the greatest OS to come from Microsoft, it's not better than sliced bread, and it's not going to be the OS that saves Microsoft. And until Microsoft fixes the network issue on a wired connection, I will keep Windows 8 off of my system for now.

No good. That works only with wireless connections. On a wired link, you do not have that option, by design.

Funny. I'm on a wired connection, and I just turned off a few live tiles on my PC...

I have given Windows 8 the benefit of the doubt, but as of today I have taken it off of my system completely. Don't get me wrong here, the underlying system is stable, there are some good improvements compared to Windows 7, but the UI continues to be, in my opinion, the most horrid UI ever developed.

But the real reason for taking it off was network usage. No one has commented about how on a desktop that Windows 8 is constantly updating all those "Live Tiles" and sucking down your bandwidth (not to mention pushing the limits of your usage caps). And there does not seem to be any way to a) disable the live tiles completely or b) limit the network usage for those live tiles on a wired connection. This makes me think that there will be a number of users who'll be discovering in the next month or so that Windows 8 isn't so great after that letter from their ISP advising them that they've exceeded their data cap comes in.

So no, Windows 8 isn't the greatest OS to come from Microsoft, it's not better than sliced bread, and it's not going to be the OS that saves Microsoft. And until Microsoft fixes the network issue on a wired connection, I will keep Windows 8 off of my system for now.

save microsoft from what? go over data cap from live tiles, wtf?? who is forcing you to use the live tiles? unpin or disable live tile. don't know how to do it, use google. utterly clueless....

save microsoft from what? go over data cap from live tiles, wtf?? who is forcing you to use the live tiles? unpin or disable live tile. don't know how to do it, use google. utterly clueless....

I have googled it, and I still see network traffic for Store, Bing and others.

So come up with something constructive that counters my experience, or just keep doing the name calling. I do tech support for a living, and probably have far more experience than you in a wider variety of OSes here.

I think its important that we keep file explorer accessible through the desktop right now. Im all for innovation but right now 'Metro' apps are basic and not something I would consider to be an actual application worthy of getting things done.

The apps are great, if I was using a tablet then they would be all I need but the main difference here is Im using a desktop. Im using a desktop as most people do, as the detailed interface to their tablet device for backups and file management.

Right now, I cant see a touch screen giving me so much control over my systems and applications - the hub of my digital world.

MS shouldn't pull things until they have proved themselves with something else.

One last thing - Im using 8 but omg Im having to move my mouse round the screen so much to get things done and why do photos and other items from the desktop open in the new metro picture viewer, its so limited and takes too many clicks to get back!!!! Ive changed the default program but feel for those who dont realise it can be done.

I have googled it, and I still see network traffic for Store, Bing and others.

So come up with something constructive that counters my experience, or just keep doing the name calling. I do tech support for a living, and probably have far more experience than you in a wider variety of OSes here.

right... with all your experience you're telling everyone that live tiles will bust your cap. don't want to see store traffic? turn off updates. turn off windows updates while you at it. please tell us which apps are still using traffic if you turned off their live tiles. take a screen shot of whatever program you're using to show us the network traffic and what processes.

right... with all your experience you're telling everyone that live tiles will bust your cap. don't want to see store traffic? turn off updates. turn off windows updates while you at it. please tell us which apps are still using traffic if you turned off their live tiles. take a screen shot of whatever program you're using to show us the network traffic and what processes.

Well any background traffic runs the risk of busting a data cap. Data caps aren't universal around the world and to assume that they are all huge would be a very big mistake.

Any background traffic can be a problem. It all depends on the user's usage, the cap, and the overage penalties.

You can instruct the user on how to limit the background data use by the OS, but to chastise him as if there is no risk of a live tile, or other background tasks, pushing him over a cap is illogical. Especially since any data use runs the risk of causing a user to exceed a cap and live tiles and background tasks may ever well transmit and/or receive data.

Almost every cap I've seen, and I haven't seen them all, will charge you for an extra GB, at whatever that rate is, even if your overage is only 1KB.

Well any background traffic runs the risk of busting a data cap. Data caps aren't universal around the world and to assume that they are all huge would be a very big mistake.

Any background traffic can be a problem. It all depends on the user's usage, the cap, and the overage penalties.

You can instruct the user on how to limit the background data use by the OS, but to chastise him as if there is no risk of a live tile, or other background tasks, pushing him over a cap is illogical. Especially since any data use runs the risk of causing a user to exceed a cap and live tiles and background tasks may ever well transmit and/or receive data.

Almost every cap I've seen, and I haven't seen them all, will charge you for an extra GB, at whatever that rate is, even if your overage is only 1KB.

we'll i think we are in agreement, live tiles alone will not bust anybodys cap.

we'll i think we are in agreement, live tiles alone will not bust anybodys cap.

Yes, I would find it hard that live tiles alone would push a user over their cap, unless it is so small to not be worth considering.

During installation on a Dell XPS L702X I have to physically remove the 2x500GB SATA drives or it will not install on my 128GB SSD "unable to create or locate primary partition". Something about a dislike of GPT formatted HDD's + an SSD from what I have read and supposedly affected Windows 7 although I can install Windows 7 x64 without this issue.

It's probably done for a reason. I don't quite understand why you formatted them as GPT. From what I have read it is only necessary for drives bigger than 2TB (because MBR is limited that way) but offers no real other advantages in way of performance or usable features. Can you enlighten me on this?

It's probably done for a reason. I don't quite understand why you formatted them as GPT. From what I have read it is only necessary for drives bigger than 2TB (because MBR is limited that way) but offers no real other advantages in way of performance or usable features. Can you enlighten me on this?

GPT is necessary to create a Windows NT 6.1+ based software RAID. I have the two 500GB SATA disks in RAID 0.

  • 3 weeks later...

Windows 8 requires its Firewall service running in order to install / update metro applications - to spit in the face of users who use router firewall or software firewall.

And the metro applications are mostly useless, still.

  • 2 weeks later...

The experience was great, but sadly I'm already using Start Menu 8.

I'm also fed up royal with inane slogans blaring out at me every time I venture onto the Windows 8 site. Do they ever consult users before designing a new OS?

Pastel colours, toy town graphics and, of course; carefully posed models. Please get them to stop it!

What does,

'Get Windows 8 apps

The more you have, the more you can do'

actually mean?

Otherwise a good effort all round .....

Windows 8 requires its Firewall service running in order to install / update metro applications - to spit in the face of users who use router firewall or software firewall.

And the metro applications are mostly useless, still.

Thing is W8 is future proofed, how is your router going to help you when you have IPv6 enabled or IPv6 tunneling on. or when your UPnP lets something in ? that's right, it doesn't.

Ugh...

Problems with media centre (it would randomly just stop accepting input from my remote). Then for absolutely no reason (made no configuration changes) the USB 3.0 ports on my motherboard started to malfunction and it wouldn't pick up my wifi adapter or any USB storage devices I plugged in (the annoying thing is I didn't even make any configuration changes to prompt it). Tried disabling the USB 3.0 ports and falling back to USB 2.0, but after a couple of boots those started malfunctioning in the same way. Tried every tip I saw on the Internet to get them working and none of those worked either. So I put all the settings back the way they were with the aim of booting back into the OS to back up my data and reinstall 7 and hey presto the OS won't boot either, just sticks on a black screen and won't even boot into safe mode. Managed to recover the files I wanted with Acronis, and after restoring my Windows 7 image everything is working properly again.

I've given Windows 8 2 cracks of the whip now and it's failed me both times. It's a buggy, unstable, and frustrating piece of crap.

Completely wrong, I installed them... for both chipsets. In fact it took a week before the devices even started to malfunction. Did you even bother to read my post before jumping to a stupid conclusion?

  • Like 1

I have yet to find one thing to make me want to reinstall Windows 7. I pretty much live in the desktop fulltime and have little reason to go to the modern start menu unless I choose to.

Sure, I had to set Media Player & Desktop picture viewer as default and install Adobe Reader. I made some tiles with Obly Tile, but rarely use them since I'm rarely use the Start menu.

Completely wrong, I installed them... for both chipsets. In fact it took a week before the devices even started to malfunction. Did you even bother to read my post before jumping to a stupid conclusion?

I did, and I still don't think you installed the filter drivers, because the error you describe, down to the delayed effect, fits perfectly with missing or faulty filter driver. Never mind the fact you never said you installed the filter driver in your post.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!