Windows 8/8.1 - Positive experiences, tips, and what would you have added?


Recommended Posts

Windows 8 is great. It's fast, smooth, fluid, and simply simple. Thing is, the default theme for me was too simple and plain. So I made a theme :)

simplex_for_windows_8_alpha_by_link6155-d5te3gh.png

I love its Explorer Ribbon Interface. Its productive and usable. Also in totally love with the File Copying UI. Also for the fact its much faster and responsive which I guess everyone has already said.

  • 2 weeks later...

Positive experience except the missing Start button :)

Well, you can do something about that... :)

I think I've finally settled on a configuration in which I quite enjoy using Windows 8, with all hot corners disabled, task bar on the right and a button to launch Start8 in the upper right corner (yeah, I stole the Spotlight icon). I prefer the look to Windows 7 - never much of a fan of the glass windows and Microsoft's shiny UI elements.

post-5569-0-42633600-1361264507.png

post-5569-0-82920900-1361265046.png

Well, you can do something about that... :)

I think I've finally settled on a configuration in which I quite enjoy using Windows 8, with all hot corners disabled, task bar on the right and a button to launch Start8 in the upper right corner (yeah, I stole the Spotlight icon). I prefer the look to Windows 7 - never much of a fan of the glass windows and Microsoft's shiny UI elements.

Man, how did you do that? :)

Man, how did you do that? :)

Which part are you referring to? Start8 provides the start button/menu and an option that allows you to disable the hot corners. And it's easy enough to put together a start button graphic one likes. I personally kind of like the idea of having the magnifying glass up in that corner:

post-5569-0-57271600-1361266557.png

Which part are you referring to? Start8 provides the start button/menu and an option that allows you to disable the hot corners. And it's easy enough to put together a start button graphic one likes. I personally kind of like the idea of having the magnifying glass up in that corner:

I do have Start8 but I used the default settings. Didn't know that I can configure it the way you showed. Thanks.

  • 2 weeks later...

What I like:

  • New desktop look
  • Universal search
  • Lives tiles and the general idea of the new start menu
  • Sheer speed on a SSD
  • Use of Microsoft account to improve cloud connectivity and synchronisation
  • Windows RT is the best tablet OS I've used hands down

What I would have liked to see:

  • Smaller 'tile' size with no live function (dimensions same as small tile wide, but half the height) and with only the name of the app in text on it which can also be used as a folder which expands to reveal the apps within. This would appease those who do not like the new start menu by allowing them to more or less create a better version of the windows 7 start menu.
  • Ability to run metro apps in windowed mode on desktop
  • More flexible live tiles so that apps can display custom animated graphics
  • MICROSOFT IF YOU DO NOTHING ELSE DO THIS: Improved desktop usability - rather than having multiple desktops like mac or pc desktop managers (which I find annoying to cycle through) implement a system of app grouping. How this would work: if you click and drag (ie pick up) any running app from the taskbar, an 'add to group' box would appear on the right hand half of the taskbar. You could create several groups, and if you drop the app in a group it gets grouped with other apps in that group. This way that you can arrange several sets of windows to fit the screen and just switch to and from them like open apps on the taskbar just by clicking the corresponding group icon (eg group 3) on your taskbar. This would streamline productivity for me enormously, far better than multiple desktops. What's more there should be the ability to pin open app groups to the taskbar. Then, when you reboot your pc you just click the pinned group and all your programs in that group open up with their windows resized how you initially set them up. This would allow power users who have a lot running at once to rapidly set up their work environment.
  • Just put some kind of start symbol on the taskbar for those who don't like edge/corner gestures
  • Setting on first boot to set default apps between desktop or metro (so you don't have to go through and switch to desktop media player, email client, pdf reader, etc)

In windows RT:

  • Get proper touch versions of office for the metro interface
  • Allow certified 3rd party apps to run on the desktop (like image and video editing)
  • Support for high DPI screens (not sure if this currently doesn't exist or OEMs just aren't bothering to put some nice screens in their tablets)
  • Fix the embedded apps (ie give them function equivalent to old desktop apps like windows live mail) including mail, music, video and calendar

  • 3 weeks later...

I like:

the whole new Windows Experience and being a whole new OS.

the challenge of learning all the new features.

the fresh new theme look is alright and pretty clean.

the new lock screen

how the task manager has both start-up and the performance monitor all together

the split screen is pretty neat and kind of cool

dislike:

kind of being forced to use the metro touch style and I think MS should've put like an On/Off switch

no start menu for desktop power users but can use be fixed using 3rd party programs like Start8

  • 3 weeks later...

http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=34772

This is a 12 page Word document with a very nice walkthrough of the new features in Windows 8.

It would have been even nicer if they had made a video of this to be displayed automatically once installation was complete.

I like Windows 8 a lot, but I can't help thinking that this was a missed opportunity, and one that would have done much to relieve Windows 8 angst.

Well XP shipped with this demo tutorial that explained the new stuff in the OS. Not sure why they stopped doing that with Vista +

Maybe because there were no dramatic UI changes in Vista and 7.

Yeah, I really liked that demo on XP. Helped newbies a lot.

Since everyone's already went through the positives, on the "things you would have added" pile:

  1. The Metro UI should have had an interactive tutorial, not a movie.
  2. The window borders on the desktop should have customizable "tattoos" like Office 2013 alongside the blank one. Like, seriously; why can we do that on Office of all things but not Windows?
  3. Multiple workspaces (like Spaces on OS X, but implemented through the top-level screen system used for apps)
  4. A mail app that doesn't require Windows Live first.

http://windowsitpro....ales-hot-145329

According to net applications, Windows 8 sales are not doing that well (not surprisingly)! I think the best move for Microsoft to make is to market Windows 7 to desktop and laptop users and market Windows 8 toward tablet users. This is Microsofts only option now, to prevent another Vista! Microsoft should work on a Windows 7.1 and add all of the features from Windows 8 desktop and incorporate it into Windows 7. Then Microsoft should irradicate the desktop on Windows 8, and market it for tablets! It would be like Windows 2000 and Windows Me, one for actual hard core pc users and one for not so hard core pc users. The new GUi in Windows 8 is arguablly radically different, and majority of Windows users dont have touch based devices, therefore, the new interface doesnt make sense for them. I dont think Microsoft knew the consequences changing something of something thats been apart of Windows since Windows 95. Touchscreens are luxuries and majority of tablet users play games like Angry Birds, send emails, lightly surf the net, and watch videos. People who use mice and keyboards do REAL work and also play real games! It is blatantly obvious Windows 8 was soley created to compete in the tablet market!

Microsoft just needs to make 8 more customizable. If somebody doesn't like Metro, let them turn it off. If they want a start button, let them turn it back on. Forcing everybody in one direction and creating a walled garden like Apple clearly isn't making people happy.

Microsoft just needs to make 8 more customizable. If somebody doesn't like Metro, let them turn it off. If they want a start button, let them turn it back on. Forcing everybody in one direction and creating a walled garden like Apple clearly isn't making people happy.

No argument from me. I dont like being forced to do something and decisions made for me. I didnt have any problems going from 3.11 to 95 back in the day and i knew little to nothing that I do now. I am not having much problems with Windows 8 other than hard to find settings, missing features, and a change being forced upon me.

Microsoft just needs to make 8 more customizable. If somebody doesn't like Metro, let them turn it off. If they want a start button, let them turn it back on. Forcing everybody in one direction and creating a walled garden like Apple clearly isn't making people happy.

I hope the Windows 9 developers are reading your post. ;)

I really dont understand Microsofts motivation for crap everything together in one OS then attempt to put it on all devices. If Microsoft's customers dont want a particular food, they shouldn't force that food down their customer's throats like this!

Wait... According to the PR bot... Windows 8 is the best selling Windows in history. So why would Microsoft need to change anything? They are doing better than they ever have!

He wouldn't lie to me...

You're on Neowin and complaining that there's about a story about Windows being discussed in the forum? I'm thinking you're on the wrong site, son.

That's not it at all. It's the non-stop complaining about the same thing over and over. OP's "article" is just a rehash of the same thing that's been beaten to death.

And don't call me "son". That is incredibly ignorant and insulting. :angry:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!