Windows 8/8.1 - Positive experiences, tips, and what would you have added?


Recommended Posts

I am running Windows 8 (Pro x64) on a 4+ year old Dell Studio (specs below) and it runs like silk. I love it.

My specs are nothing special. A 2.53Ghz Core 2 Duo (T9400) with 4GB RAM, 2x 500GB 7200 RPM HDD and an ATI Radeon Mobility HD 3650. If you take out "desktop graphics performance" (wtf does that even mean?!) then this machine still scores a 5.9 on the WEI :)

I love Windows 8. I love the new theme with nice sharp edges and no transparency (except in the taskbar wtf is up with that?). I like some of the new explorer features (like the quick switch between thumbnails and detailed lists in the bottom right of the explorer window). The new file copy dialogs are nice. The start screen is so great once you get it how you like and to be honest I hardly see it as once I am in the desktop I am there for good).

Start up times are about 20-30% better than 7 although as I hardly ever reboot that isn't an issue. I just sleep it all the time. Overall performance is a little quicker than 7 was which is great. The WinKey+X is my new favourite shortcut as well. So many helpful links in one place!

I don't run any kind of customisations other than what come as part of window (like disabling window effects, etc.). I run F.lux to save my eyes at night and Plumb for auto window management. Office 2013, Visual Studio 2013 and SQL Server Express 2012 all runs great on it. It does a great job managing system resources. Sadly my CPU does not have SLAT so I cannot use Hyper-V but VMware Workstation runs great so I am not missing out there. Although it would be nice to be able to run Hyper-V, will be one of the reason I upgrade in the next year or so.

I have never used a Modern UI/Metro app so I cannot really comment on that side of things. The first thing I do when I install Windows is disable UAC as it gets in the way when I am doing driver development and Modern UI apps cannot work with UAC fully disabled. As this is a laptop without touch I don't really feel I am missing out on anything though. They all look quick limited and I can't stand full screen apps.

One thing I don't like is the new way networks are connected/disconnected from as a sidebar. Kind sucks compared to the way it was done in 7.

Also settings are all over the place with some in PC Settings (from the charms bar) and other in Control Panel. Or even in both such as Windows Update!

As for app compatibility I have had no issues. Everything runs the same as it did on 7. All in all it took me about half an hour to get used to the start screen and some of the new ways to do things but other than that 8 is pretty similar to 7 but with a nicer UI theme (personal preference of course).

  • Like 2

I'll give you that just because that is somewhat subjective. But I can say that after using it since the Release Preview, I haven't had any problems with it whereas with Windows 7, I had to reboot my laptop about 4 - 5 times just to get past the BSOD.

That was due to a hardware or driver issue. Nothing to do with Windows 7.

For the average user, that's a good thing.

http://reviews.cnet....ntivirus-boats/ :)

I haven't used an AV since XP, and still don't use/need one to this day.

For the average user, having MSE auto-installed is a great thing, but it doesn't serve any benefit for my needs.

Just as I did with UAC, I'd probably disable it on my PCs.

Remember, not everyone owns an SSD. You got to think of this as the big picture. If everyone owned an SSD, then yes, that wouldn't make much difference, but hard drives are still being used and because of that, the improvement is needed.

I also forgot to mention how well it works on older hardware. Not as slow as Windows 7, since Windows 8 utilizes less RAM than 7.

I'm not exactly concerned about the big picture. All my PCs have SSDs, so my concern is what works best for me, which is 7, not 8.

Regardless, besides the hybrid boot that 8 uses, I highly doubt there is much of a performance difference between 7 and 8. Performance is largely due to the physical bottleneck, which is almost always a mechanical HDD. There's basically nothing that can be done in software to get past the physical limitations of mechanics. I'm sure 8 probably does use less RAM than 7 since there is no Aero transparency and the general UI in 8 is much simpler. Regardless of that, saving a little bit of RAM doesn't equate to a performance increase unless the RAM usage is riding towards the maximum.

?What do you not like about Windows 8?

Easier to answer with a "not" in it: I miss more costumizing for my startscreen, however, it seems they are going to fix that...

?How did you find the transition between W7 and W8?

Prety easy. Windows 7 to Windows 8 is a big jump, but when you put the Developer Preview, Consumer Preview and Release Preview between those, it's easy. However, my parents manage to use Windows 8 correctly from the first day.

?What specialist area are you(if any) using W8/ will use it for ie web design, software development etc. And how is that going?

I use Windows 8 for design, webdevelopment, and software development... and testing those things.

?Have you found any useful tips/tricks for W8?

Yes: don't start with a "I will hate it, how good it is doesn't matter" attitude.

?Advice for people who like the look of W8 and have just started using it but are finding a few things difficult.

Try and find it out by yourself, you learn more from that than asking someone else to do it for you.

?Any questions regarding W8 for the neowinians to answer for you?

No.

That was due to a hardware or driver issue. Nothing to do with Windows 7.
No, and no. I do a lot of configuring and tweaking and all the tweaks (such as the ones done to the registry) eventually made Windows 7 slower and then one day, it just stopped working. Out of curiosity, I tried the same tweaks in Windows 8, one year later, everything is working just fine. When I mean stability, I mean, how much can I do to it before it crashes. Since Windows 8 held up better to numerous tweaks than 7, It's clear that it's at least more stable as far as tweaking the system is concerned.
I haven't used an AV since XP, and still don't use/need one to this day.
Well that's a dumb move if you ask me. In that case, let's not wear seatbelts when we're driving either. No one (regardless of their knowledge of computers) is immune to viruses.
I'm not exactly concerned about the big picture.
Then instead of saying of bashing Windows 8, just say that it doesn't work for you.
I highly doubt there is much of a performance difference between 7 and 8.
Since the release of Windows 8, I've helped several people install it and they've noticed a decrease in the time it takes to load most of their programs. And I'm not just talking about small programs like Notepad or paint. I'm talking about programs that much bigger than that.
.. saving a little bit of RAM doesn't equate to a performance increase unless the RAM usage is riding towards the maximum.
Actually, since there's more available RAM in Windows, that means more for the user, which does help the performance.

Here's some more info about how Windows 8 better manages the memory than in 7. The amount of RAM that the user gets back in Windows (in comparison to 7) depends on the users' hardware, so it won't always be "a little bit" that the user gets back.

http://www.askvg.com/comparison-between-windows-7-and-windows-8-memory-management-system/

No, and no. I do a lot of configuring and tweaking and all the tweaks (such as the ones done to the registry) eventually made Windows 7 slower and then one day, it just stopped working. Out of curiosity, I tried the same tweaks in Windows 8, one year later, everything is working just fine. When I mean stability, I mean, how much can I do to it before it crashes. Since Windows 8 held up better to numerous tweaks than 7, It's clear that it's at least more stable as far as tweaking the system is concerned.

It doesn't work that way. Just because you can mess things up in the registry, doesn't mean it's less stable. There are probably 10 million new ways you can mess up 8 since it has a dual UI. That must mean it's less stable, right?

Well that's a dumb move if you ask me. In that case, let's not wear seatbelts when we're driving either. No one (regardless of their knowledge of computers) is immune to viruses.

That's a really poor analogy... I can't get physically hurt by not using an AV. Even if I do, for whatever reason, get infected, I can east get rid of it. If I can manager to not get a virus in 10+ years, I think I'll be fine going forward.

Then instead of saying of bashing Windows 8, just say that it doesn't work for you.

Umm... where am I bashing it? I've said numerous times that it doesn't work for me...

Since the release of Windows 8, I've helped several people install it and they've noticed a decrease in the time it takes to load most of their programs. And I'm not just talking about small programs like Notepad or paint. I'm talking about programs that much bigger than that.

Unless you have proof of that, it's a placebo effect...

Actually, since there's more available RAM in Windows, that means more for the user, which does help the performance.

You don't seem to understand how the basics of a PC works. More available RAM doesn't mean more performance. The difference in 4GB of RAM and 400GB of RAM is ZERO unless the usage is nearing the capacity of the 4GB. Yes, 8 probably works a little better on PCs with low amounts of RAM, but the people that have such old out-dated systems probably aren't interested in 8 anyway since better solutions are available.

Here's some more info about how Windows 8 better manages the memory than in 7. The amount of RAM that the user gets back in Windows (in comparison to 7) depends on the users' hardware, so it won't always be "a little bit" that the user gets back.

http://www.askvg.com...agement-system/

See my comment above. Available (ie un-used) RAM doesn't equate to performance.

What do you not like about Windows 8?

- Having to choose between programs, settings or files when searching for something.

- How I can't run Modern apps on both my primary monitor, and the secondary one. Right now, it's only possible to have the desktop on one screen and a Modern app on the other.

How did you find the transition between W7 and W8?

Somewhat easy. I had Windows 7 pre-installed on my laptop and I upgraded to the Consumer Preview, then the Release Preview. The only difficult part I had was upgrading the Release Preview to the RTM version. Since my dvd drive doesn't work most of the time, I had to copy the installation files to a USB drive, then modify a file that would allow it to install Windows 8, even though I was using the Release Previer. Other than that, I had no trouble with the installation itself.

What specialist area are you (if any) using W8/ will use it for ie web design, software development etc. And how is that going?

I use Windows 8 for web design, some programming, writing, virtualization (testing different OS's, such as Ubuntu 13.04 for ex.).

Have you found any useful tips/tricks for W8?

Yes. If you're using Chrome and you want your bookmarks to appear on the Start Screen, the best thing I've found is to make shortcuts pointing the websites and save them in the original Start Menu folder. Then go to the Start Screen and pin your bookmarks. It can be a p.i.ta., but it works :)

Advice for people who like the look of W8 and have just started using it but are finding a few things difficult.

Take your time. Explore around and see how it works. Don't be afraid of clicking on something. If need be, ask someone who knows how to use it to help you out. Apart from the MUI, Windows 8 is mostly Windows 7 with lots of improvements and some new features as well.

Any questions regarding W8 for the neowinians to answer for you?

Nope.

Just because you can mess things up in the registry, doesn't mean it's less stable.
Well technically it depends on what you're doing, but if an OS can't handle tweaks, then yes it is less stable. Of course, system tweaks isn't the only thing that determines an OS's stability. For me, that's my experience with Windows 7 & 8. I've modified them both a lot, and so far, Windows 8 is the one that still works great. Windows 7 on the other hand, just crashed and gave me a BSOD. Either way, that wasn't the only thing I hated about Windows 7.
There are probably 10 million new ways you can mess up 8 since it has a dual UI. That must mean it's less stable, right?
First it was 100 options for the Start Menu & Taskbar, now it's 10 million.. Geez. Because I'm nice, I made a list of some websites that mention tweaks for Windows 8. I don't think that it equates to 10 million though. /s

http://forums.mydigi...-speed-increase

http://www.computerw...ricks_and_hacks

http://www.addictive...aks-hacks-tips/

That's a really poor analogy... I can't get physically hurt by not using an AV.
Actually that's a good analogy. You seem to think that you can't get viruses and that you don't need a AV program. Just like some people who think they don't need to wear seatbelts because they're good at driving. Regardless of how much you know about computers, it's always better to have an AV. Just saying.
You don't seem to understand how the basics of a PC works.
I actually have a very great understanding.
More available RAM doesn't mean more performance.
It's not the only thing that determines it, but it does play a role.
.. Yes, 8 probably works a little better on PCs with low amounts of RAM
Actually, it works better with all PC's with low or lots of RAM. I know this from experience with installing and running Windows 8 on more than 10 different computers. but the people that have such old out-dated systems probably aren't interested in 8 anyway since better solutions are available.
RAM doesn't equate to performance.
It does play a role actually.

Well, I run a tech site. I need to check latest news/feeds/comments/tweets/likes etc in a quicker way. So I install Windows 8.

I still own Windows 7 on my primary laptop HDD that comes with my laptop, but I use Windows 8 the most depends on what I'm doing.

I got 1TB hdd to transfer stuff across when I need it.

I use ribbon disabler. Looked at Startmenus, but never thought of using it. Cuz startscreen is much way faster to access my installed games and apps in category. Also some metro apps as well.

I don't like to have 2 settings tho. Don't like ,killing the old classic control panel, but I wish that the other settings for touch only.

If they fix some of the stuff that meant to be used for desktop not for touch, than I'll be satisfied.

Well technically it depends on what you're doing, but if an OS can't handle tweaks, then yes it is less stable. Of course, system tweaks isn't the only thing that determines an OS's stability. For me, that's my experience with Windows 7 & 8. I've modified them both a lot, and so far, Windows 8 is the one that still works great. Windows 7 on the other hand, just crashed and gave me a BSOD. Either way, that wasn't the only thing I hated about Windows 7.

Umm... an OS isn't designed to prevent the user from trashing the registry... If you mess something up, it's YOUR fault. Not the OS's fault...

First it was 100 options for the Start Menu & Taskbar, now it's 10 million.. Geez. Because I'm nice, I made a list of some websites that mention tweaks for Windows 8. I don't think that it equates to 10 million though. /s

http://forums.mydigi...-speed-increase

http://www.computerw...ricks_and_hacks

http://www.addictive...aks-hacks-tips/

Do you even know what you're talking about?... You clearly don't understand the concept of simple statistics...

Actually that's a good analogy. You seem to think that you can't get viruses and that you don't need a AV program. Just like some people who think they don't need to wear seatbelts because they're good at driving. Regardless of how much you know about computers, it's always better to have an AV. Just saying.

No, it's a terrible analogy, and I already explained why... You're comparing apples to oranges, and it makes no sense whatsoever.

I never said I can't get viruses. Nice try at twisting my words though...

I actually have a very great understanding.

If you do, then your reading comprehension and understanding is extremely poor...

Your understanding of simple OS design concepts is greatly flawed... Realistically it's because you can't admit you're wrong...

It's not the only thing that determines it, but it does play a role.

Actually, it works better with all PC's with low or lots of RAM. I know this from experience with installing and running Windows 8 on more than 10 different computers. but the people that have such old out-dated systems probably aren't interested in 8 anyway since better solutions are available.

It does play a role actually.

Again, read what I said... Context plays a huge part here, and you clearly fail at comprehending any of it.

A PC with 200MB of available "unused" RAM will perform exactly the same as a PC with 2GB of available RAM. You can't magically pull performance out of nothing.

You've proven nothing in these conversations, and you refuse to comprehend common sense, so why are you even a part of these discussions?

No use losing hair over an abusive Mac user Astra ;)

For the lulz:

I do a lot of configuring and tweaking and all the tweaks (such as the ones done to the registry) eventually made Windows 7 slower and then one day, it just stopped working. Out of curiosity, I tried the same tweaks in Windows 8, one year later, everything is working just fine. When I mean stability, I mean, how much can I do to it before it crashes.
  • Like 1
If you mess something up, it's YOUR fault. Not the OS's fault...
Well most of the reason why I use Linux is because I can customize it. And I also said that it wasn't just the registry. Windows XP and even Vista (for that matter) worked well with tweaks. Windows 7 on the other hand did not. And after using Windows 8 since it's developer preview, it's worked amazingly well with tweaks. That shows that since it's able to handle tweaks that modify the registry like that, then it is really stable because it can handle it.
No, it's a terrible analogy, and I already explained why... You're comparing apples to oranges, and it makes no sense whatsoever. I never said I can't get viruses. Nice try at twisting my words though...
No, it's actually a great analogy. Just because it doesn't seem to make sense to you, doesn't mean that it's bad. And I'm not twisting words. I'm saying that it's the impression you give off.
Again, read what I said... Context plays a huge part here, and you clearly fail at comprehending any of it.
Actually, I don't.
A PC with 200MB of available "unused" RAM will perform exactly the same as a PC with 2GB of available RAM. You can't magically pull performance out of nothing.
Whether there's 200MB or 2GBs of RAM available, it still does play a role in performance because that available RAM could be used for something that the user needs/wants.

Well most of the reason why I use Linux is because I can customize it. And I also said that it wasn't just the registry. Windows XP and even Vista (for that matter) worked well with tweaks. Windows 7 on the other hand did not. And after using Windows 8 since it's developer preview, it's worked amazingly well with tweaks. That shows that since it's able to handle tweaks that modify the registry like that, then it is really stable because it can handle it.

Just because you failed to get some random tweak working, doesn't mean the whole OS is any less stable. Saying so is complete non-sense.

If you actually listed out the tweak you were trying, I'm willing to bet somebody can point out exactly where YOU went wrong with it...

No, it's actually a great analogy. Just because it doesn't seem to make sense to you, doesn't mean that it's bad. And I'm not twisting words. I'm saying that it's the impression you give off.

Do you even remember what you were talking about, or are you simply too naive to own up to your error?

You were comparing seat belts, which are a physical safety feature, to an AV program... The consequences of each are incredibly different, so once again, no your analogy was bad... Not having an AV is comparable to not doing periodic backups of your data. Both can result in loss of data, and that's it... I won't die and I won't cause physical harm to anybody else... And yes, you did twist my words. You claimed I said something that I actually didn't, and the proof of that is on the previous page. Good try though... You might as well just accept that you cornered yourself...

Whether there's 200MB or 2GBs of RAM available, it still does play a role in performance because that available RAM could be used for something that the user needs/wants.

:facepalm: Oh, so now you're changing your story and saying "could be used". Guess what? "Could be used" and "is being used" have entirely different meanings. Potential performance is the exact same thing as no additional performance. This really isn't that hard of a concept...

  • 2 weeks later...

I think Metro can be really good. I just wish it would pick up those in-line window options like Windows Media Player/Center. Mainly, the caption buttons. I wish there was an Anchor Button instead of off-screen chrome. And another thing I would really like is a the ability to switch the icon controls on the Charms Bar. Like maybe an option for the Control Panel, Registry Editor, and Shutdown?

And I know this sounds really ridiculous, but the options on the "Angry Birds" home screen. The cog that when pressed pulls out all of the other options. I think that is one of the best interface designs ever. I wish that was how Metro gave you the options for the off-screen chrome instead. A million miles away from ever happening. But I really want to see the people at Microsoft show something that people will listen to. And I'm just trying to think of anything that comes to mind that I appreciate.

I love the Desktop UI. If Metro would just take a few things from that I would be a lot happier with Windows 8. Borders. Separators. Maybe a gradient or two. I miss Aero Glass too.

I would like an option to resize it about 60% so its within the desktop. There needs to be a integrated power options as well just like the start menu. Finally,there should also be an option to put your own bacground in the start screen.

I like the Internet Explorer pic. All the options lined up perfectly in a row. I would change a few things about it. I'd make it a little more detailed. I don't particularly like all the other Sputnik8 pics because of how off-center all the icons are with the top bar.

One of my biggest complaints about the Metro interface is how much wasted space is used in doing minimal things. The Start Menu doesn't need to take up the entire screen. I don't need a full bar to come out of the side for my WiFi options. Every thing should have more minimal screen space than this. Maybe (in the case of the WiFi window) about the size of a sticky note in the top right corner?

I may relate to most complaints about the current state of Metro. With one more - "in your face" colors. This, on the other hand, presents very pleasing combinations. Doing away with borders might not be to everyone's taste as there's not enough contrast between elements (but is it necessary?). While I have turned off shadow in 7, here soft shadow looks fine. It could be a choice - soft shadow, thin line according to current color scheme or none whatsoever.

Anyway:

* most elements are easily scalable for high-DPI screens

* most elements are enough separated to be touch-friendly

* a brave take on existing, recognizable concepts

In short, all that is required for transition to mobile devices without presenting trouble of adjustment. No radical changes, just refreshing different. And could easily be complemented with Tiles of all sorts.

Of course, little things are off here and there, it's just a concept that has never saw action. But I'd actually use that.

  • 3 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!