Windows 8/8.1 - Positive experiences, tips, and what would you have added?


Recommended Posts

Some tips for Xbox Music and Video.

If you want to store your files on a server it needs to be running windows or windows server (with the indexing feature enabled and the drive added to the indexing options on the server)

Don't add mapped network drive to the music library (doh) add the full \\\myserver\media

There's no option to rebuild the database but you can uninstall/reinstall as a workaround

Well, who here has updated to Windows 8.1? What are your thoughts, first impressions, etc.?

Personally, this is the update Windows 8 deserves. A great addition to a solid base set with RTM.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I've already posted to this before, but here is what I would have added to Windows 8.1, in addition to boot to desktop and the option to disable edge shortcuts:

10 Things MS can improve on with Windows 8.1

 

See, I've listed exactly which pieces of functionality I'd like to see return, and it doesn't involve "bring back the start menu". These are concrete features that can be added without removing the Start Screen or disrupting what MS is trying to do with their unified UI approach.

 

This is a far cry from posters here and elsewhere who will simply insult and dismiss you for refusing to use Windows 8 for its lack of functionality.

Personally I don't miss Aero, I like the new desktop skin, it's simple and effective and doesn't need much customisation,while not looking as horrible as Aero Basic. (I cannot stand transparency, while it looks nice it adds nothing functional to the OS). I agree that Modern Mix is better than the start screen, since I have anything from 20 - 50 windows open at any one time. 

 

Otherwise I've found the windows 8 experience positive, the desktop is fast and snappy, the OS pretty much worked out of the box (apart from drivers for my graphics card, I had far less to install than I did with Windows 7 / XP to get the system working.) The lock screen can be configured to vanish if you press ctrl+alt+del, making it a more attractive & more functional version of the Welcome screen in Windows 7. 

 

Using an Ethernet connection I've had no need at all to change anything in the networking dialog, however I found it no different to the one in Windows 7 unless I clicked on the taskbar icon for network connections, an icon that can stll be disabled. 

 

I have the windows 8 pro 64bit OS, so I was thrilled to find that many of the older apps and games I have still work fine, some apps I had (for example version 1.0 of Dance E-jay and the software for programming Lego robotics, (both programs designed for Windows 95) which didn't run at all under XP 64 work perfectly fine now. 

 

The only modification I've made to Windows 8 is to install startisback for $3. Configured to still allow access to the start screen with a different hotkey (ctrl + winkey) it seems to meet most my needs. 

 

In summary Windows 8 has made some great improvements to the classic desktop, including the new non transparent UI, the ribbon explorer is neat, and I like how I can set the theme to change colour automatically when the picture changes. (I have the 30 minute slideshow mode enabled). Backwards compatibility is impressive for a 64bit system and the system is refreshingly snappy. My computer feels like I've made a hardware upgrade rather than just an OS upgrade comparing desktop performance from Windows 7 to Windows 8. 

 

I've yet to try 8.1 but I'm hoping most of what I've said here is still true.

I would of liked it if. they would of just used everything from windows 7 and add then a modern apps section to it along with the enhancements and tweaks they made.

 

like how windows 7 has the game section, that way the could keep the start menu, but then alas it wouldnt be cross platform like they want it. 

  • Like 1

I like the memory usage in windows 8 compared to windows 7.

 

in windows 7 with all my services running at startup and with chrome and steam running, memory usage is close to 4gb

 

in windows 8 and doing the same memory usage is almost 3gb.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

I'm primarily a Mac user and I recently obtained a laptop with Windows 8 on it, and while at first I had to sit down and think of where everything was (including how to do Windows Update, access the Control Panel and Shut Down / Restart of all things!), 

 

I gotta say I quite like it actually. But it seems to take ages to wake up from sleep compared to the Mac. Is that common?

Windows has always been slower than Mac at waking from sleep, WIndows 8 is actually faster at it than previous versions, this is one of the few things that will cause a jarring effect going from OSX to Windows, I've often found that using the new hybrid boot option is faster than allowing the computer to go to sleep.

  • 1 month later...

What would I add? I'd give the option to integrate desktop apps into Metro, simulating a Metro version of that application. Effectively, a mini-desktop running a single application, so that each running application shows up in the running apps on the left. Or at the very least, the ability for programs running on the desktop to show up on that list/previews. I'd like Metro to be aware of the programs running on the desktop. I use a mix of desktop and Metro, and a minor annoyance is having to remember if the program is Metro or desktop. It'd be nice to be able to manage both in one location.

  • 4 weeks later...

I would implement during installation, a total system analysis to determine whether a system were touchscreen enabled or not and if not, insert the legacy start menu for those of us who have no touchscreen abilities and needs.

 

8.1 in general is nice, boots fast as heck. my experience is the way I want it. I simply added a 3rd party app, classic shell.

 

my personal opinion is, as long as MS drives windows in the direction it is with regards to win 8/8.1 and they make it possible for 3rd parties to create apps for us legacy users, I think we could find a happy medium as a whole.

 

so in other words, when MS gives you lemons, make lemonade!

  • 1 month later...

I just wish other company could keep up and make working drivers..

 

 

I bought a new soundblaster ZxR and it sound great except for midi music when not using windows default midi. 

 

Im using bassmidi driver and Im getting static and skips in midi music.

I would implement during installation, a total system analysis to determine whether a system were touchscreen enabled or not and if not, insert the legacy start menu for those of us who have no touchscreen abilities and needs.

 

8.1 in general is nice, boots fast as heck. my experience is the way I want it. I simply added a 3rd party app, classic shell.

 

my personal opinion is, as long as MS drives windows in the direction it is with regards to win 8/8.1 and they make it possible for 3rd parties to create apps for us legacy users, I think we could find a happy medium as a whole.

 

so in other words, when MS gives you lemons, make lemonade!

 

Why does wveryone want to go back to such a dated UI? How is Microsoft add features to its UI and cling to a 90's era interface at the same time? That just doesn't work.

Why does wveryone want to go back to such a dated UI? How is Microsoft add features to its UI and cling to a 90's era interface at the same time? That just doesn't work.

 

Because not everyone is into bells and whistles. We all don't work a certain way. As a Photographer, I need the desktop for my Adobe Photoshop CC subscription. I'm not going to take the same route you are by asking why do people have a problem with a legacy or dated UI when it has worked for a very long time?

Because not everyone is into bells and whistles. We all don't work a certain way. As a Photographer, I need the desktop for my Adobe Photoshop CC subscription. I'm not going to take the same route you are by asking why do people have a problem with a legacy or dated UI when it has worked for a very long time?

There is nothing preventing Adobe from porting over Photoshop to the new API. Having Windows scan your system and install outdated components is a waste of time, energy, and resources. Not only that, it raises support costs, and deters interest in the new environment.

 

Just put it this way: If 20 years ago you heard someone say "Windows should scan my system, and if it doesn't detect a mouse, install a CLI as opposed to the ugly and unintuitive GUI," what would you say?

I installed it on my wife's computer, and it's ok.  I does seem a little faster than my win7 computer, but that might just be that it's a fresh install.  some of the metro apps are nice, but nothing special.

 

I do wish they would put an option in to make the metro app screen scroll up and down, vs left and right.   It's like having to view web pages that only scroll right and left!  it doesn't make any sense for a desktop computer.

Has anyone had issues with Printer/Scanner devices on Windows 8.1?

I have tried finding the "right click to scan on this device" option that was present on Windows 7 but 8 seems to have removed this ability.

The metro app didn't pick up my printer/scanner (Canon).

Kind of a shame since I haven't set up the Canon device onto the network and only use it through USB on occasion. Probably my only complaint.

Otherwise 8.1 is a huge improvement over 8 and 7 with my switchable graphics.

I would implement during installation, a total system analysis to determine whether a system were touchscreen enabled or not and if not, insert the legacy start menu for those of us who have no touchscreen abilities and needs.

 

 

I would hope if that were implemented at some point, the decision could be overridden. I never want to see a Start Menu on a computer I own ever again. I'd seriously rather have Program Manager back.

 

At the very least, if Modern were removed from the main 8.x system, I'd hope we'd get a desktop version of the Start Screen. The Menu needs to stay dead.

Also accept change :D People find it very hard to accept changes !

And there is one thing that the critics seem to have forgotten - like Vista, Windows 8 was targeting the new PC market.  Problem is, how many people are buying new PCs?

 

Guess what - it's actually far fewer than bought new PCs in the Vista era - because the economy has been far worse.

 

Contrariwise, Windows 8 is doing better in the upgrade arena than Vista did (and on par with 7, oddly enough) because the actual hardware requirements (compared to 7) went nowhere.

 

I've been pointing out that my own hardware dates back either to the launch of 7 or earlier.  Here's something else for you to chew on - exactly NONE of my hardware upgrades since the launch of Windows 8 were OS-driven.  (None.  Zero.  Zip.  Nada.  Even if I had stayed put with 7, the upgrades would still have taken place.)  Even the major upgrades left on the plate - CPU and motherboard - not only predate Windows 8 as OS, but are ALSO not OS-driven.  (The upgrades had been planned going back to the first anniversary of Windows 7 - prior to the Windows 8 Developer Preview.  Money - lack of it, that is - is why the upgrades haven't happened yet.  While Windows 8 does take better advantage of certain hardware features - specifically, Second Level Address Translation support via Hyper-V - that is an outlier. (I'm not going to blow smoke up anybody's posterior and say that it's not an outlier - I know better than that.)

 

So, if none of the upgrades - hardware or software - are OS drivers, why upgrade the OS?

 

That's actually the easiest question to answer - better utilization of the hardware AND applications I have now, and better utilization of future hardware and applications down the road.

 

Isn't that, after all, the entire point of changing - either whole-hog or as an upgrade - the OS on your computer in the first place?

Has anyone had issues with Printer/Scanner devices on Windows 8.1?

I have tried finding the "right click to scan on this device" option that was present on Windows 7 but 8 seems to have removed this ability.

The metro app didn't pick up my printer/scanner (Canon).

Kind of a shame since I haven't set up the Canon device onto the network and only use it through USB on occasion. Probably my only complaint.

Otherwise 8.1 is a huge improvement over 8 and 7 with my switchable graphics.

Are the drivers up to date from Canon?

I would implement during installation, a total system analysis to determine whether a system were touchscreen enabled or not and if not, insert the legacy start menu for those of us who have no touchscreen abilities and needs.

 

8.1 in general is nice, boots fast as heck. my experience is the way I want it. I simply added a 3rd party app, classic shell.

 

my personal opinion is, as long as MS drives windows in the direction it is with regards to win 8/8.1 and they make it possible for 3rd parties to create apps for us legacy users, I think we could find a happy medium as a whole.

 

so in other words, when MS gives you lemons, make lemonade!

chrisj - I don't have a touch screen.  I've only used ONE PC with such a screen (that was running Windows 8) - the HP TouchSmart 310 that I upgraded to 8.1 (from 7).  If you are addicted to the Start menu, that is a user preference - not a StartScreen issue.  I find the StartScreen perfectly usable - not merely without touch support, but even without a mouse.  (On the other hand, how usable is the Start menu - or any of the Start menu bringbacks - without a pointing device of some sort?)

 

By definition, I am the very epitomy of a legacy user - standard desktop formfactor, standard flat-panel SINGLE display, and mostly desktop applications.  Yet I have had no problems whatever adopting the StartScreen as my preference, and especially compared to the Start menu.

 

Not all users of legacy software are "married to their pointing devices".

I know I can use it, I just have no desire to use the modern UI much. I'm 99.95% of the time on the desktop. to boot; I installed classic shell to get windows 8.1 as I want it.

 

hey, simply put, use windows 8.1 as it pleases you. My entire point in, not everyone is on board with the new UI. That is the way MS designed it to be. I personally enjoy the same UI I have always used.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!