[BREAKING] Apple V. Samsung Jury reaches verdict.


Recommended Posts

I don't have personal stake in this.. but nobody should rejoice at this. It's very bad for consumers.

Apple offered them the choice to license the patents for $20 per phone. Samsung turned it down and continued to infringe. So now everyone has to suffer because of Samsungs infringement. You shouldn't blame Apple for protecting their investment, you know what phones were like before the iPhone, they sucked. Even Googles own Android devices before the iPhone looked more like Treos and Blackberrys and after the iPhone all had large encompassing touch screens. The influence of the iPhone has been massive and Apple as the inventor of the whole package deserves to protect their investment.

The jury who are made up of normal people seem to agree.

I think the part that really sunk Samsung was that huge 143 page document that detailed every little piece of the iPhone's hardware, software and iTunes companion software so that Samsung could rip it off in every way possible. It was like a "how to build an iPhone clone" guide and was definitely a devastating blow in this trial in my opinion.

So thats it. Expect an appeal from Samsung or whatever and shall see if they are granted one. I am betting Apple will be going after more companies now and there will be more people patent trolling as well. Hopefully this will be a wakeup call to reform the patent system.

doesn't samsung supply parts to apple? I think samsung needs to play dirty if apple is.

Poop on their parts. Apple won't know until iPhone owners start complaining about a smell. Then Samsung can just say "Patent THAT!"

Sure.. and they didn't pay anything to each other because Microsoft is one of the biggest patent trolls. Yes, they are in cahoots.

And Apple asking for insane amounts of money for licensing agreement is not reasonable at all especially on such generic patents. Nobody would have accepted that.

You clearly need to grab a dictionary and look up the word cahoots. What Apple and Microsoft have a free cross licensing agreement because they both innovate lots and as such both hold significant patent portfolios. Totally within the letter of the law and mutually beneficially to both organizations.

(sent from my *innovative* iPhone)

Poop on their parts. Apple won't know until iPhone owners start complaining about a smell. Then Samsung can just say "Patent THAT!"

LOL best idea evarrrr

Shame there weren't any OBJECTIVE people on the jury.

So, there's just no possibility at all then that actually, Samsung were just plainly ripping them off? Even with the internal Samsung document where they explain how they will plainly rip them off? Anyone's who looked through all the evidence could have told you this outcome beforehand - it was fairly obvious.

So, there's just no possibility at all then that actually, Samsung were just ripping them off,and Apple was far ahead doing their own thing and not infringing on anything? Anyone's who looked through all the evidence could have told you this outcome beforehand - it was fairly obvious.

Agreed. I was pretty confident this would be the outcome. All you had to do was look at the hardware Samsung was pushing out pre and post iPhone and the user interfaces they released on the post iPhone phones to come to that conclusion. Lots of the apps were similar that they included, even going so far as to use the same colour palettes and button placements on the screen but heck even the home screen used the little dots like the iPhone did to switch between pages of apps.

Samsung made the worlds best knock off but this time it wasn't Chinese it was South Korean.

So, there's just no possibility at all then that actually, Samsung were just ripping them off,and Apple was far ahead doing their own thing and not infringing on anything? Anyone's who looked through all the evidence could have told you this outcome beforehand - it was fairly obvious.

for a lot of the hardware side stuff (not including the galaxy tabs) I'll give it to apple, samsung blatantly copied a lot of stuff

but for the software side, it's just stupid, and Apple should never have even been allowed to patent half of it

Eh what I bet will happen is that Samsung and Apple enter a cross-licensing agreement.

Nope.. Apple's proposal was insane in the first place because they knew Samsung wouldn't accept it. Apple has zero reasons now to enter cross-licensing agreement with them. Not only that, but you can fully expect Apple going after everyone (but Microsoft) who uses these obvious and natural gestures and UI designs.

The only thing we can hope is that Google wins against Apple in the US with the latest lawsuit and bans all their products in US and forces Apple to cross-license everything at a reasonable terms. But that's doubtful it will happen.

Eh what I bet will happen is that Samsung and Apple enter a cross-licensing agreement.

Yep - but something tells me the per device cost of this agreement might have just gone up. Or Sansung have a significant re-engineering project to start.

NOT saying Apple bought the court, but wouldnt be the first time a court was bought. I kept up to date on this trial and Samsung made to many mistakes and really was unprepared.

Maybe Apple bought the Samsung lawyers? :laugh:

  • Like 3

NOT saying Apple bought the court, but wouldnt be the first time a court was bought. I kept up to date on this trial and Samsung made to many mistakes and really was unprepared.

It is very strange that the Apple lawyers smiled as they entered the courtroom.. it's like they "knew" the verdict and had inside knowledge which should be actually illegal.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!