Recommended Posts

When that day comes I will no longer be using Windows (and that's not an over dramatization, I just wont). I cannot imagine Metro in any productive sense (at least not on a desktop). Personally I like simplicity but I really do hate this degradation of the UI experience. Its minimal for the sake of being minimal. We have spent years getting to the point of Windows 7, now its all been thrown away in favour of flat mono coloured icons/flat boxs and wasted space. I cannot get my head around it. I just installed Office 2013 today, and I just held my head in my hand and sighed. Is that the future? It's hideous.

The nicest thing I have found so far with Metro apps is that I can dock them, so things like messenger work quite well for that. But as the article mentions the core apps are missing functionality. Messenger is a primary example, for one I cannot sign out of the bloody thing.... ever (If there is a way someone please tell me!!). Which means (amongst other things) if I run the WLM desktop app (because the metro app has no support for Webcam or image sharing) I see the messages in the Windows Messenger App and in a notification for the Metro Messenger. Trying to contact someone boots you to People which (if you have linked with Facebook and Twitter) provides you a huge list of nonsense.

There are some nice desktop enhancements. Task manager is very sexy. File transfer looks great (other than the replace file dialog). The reduced shadows on Windows is perfect! The removal of Aero glass I don't mind, makes things cleaner. There are many things on the desktop I like and the reason I continue to use it, but there are also things that (some mentioned above) are starting to make me question if this is how I want my Windows experience to be - from here on out.

My biggest gripe at the moment is that I feel that I am having to 'work around' the OS instead of 'with' it. It's the return of desktop icons, and keyboard shortcuts. Never in my life have I had to resort to so much keyboard shortcutery (yes I just made up a word :rofl: ). Is this the mark of a well designed user experience Microsoft? Is it? :/

Indeed, and as I pointed out above, people thought the GUI was created just for the sake of being pretty. People were amazingly upset that instead of being able to just type doom.exe to start their game that they now had to open up a command line window...or horror of horrors had to click around these windows and open them up and find where the game was hidden.

These are the same type of complaints that come around EVERY single time user interfaces are changed in the computing world. People just tend to forget that. I crack up when people do the whole 'Fisher-Price' joke about Windows 8 seemingly forgetting that it is what people used to call the Windows XP interface. Their beloved old OS that they now cherish they once mocked in the same way. It's cute, hilarious, and maddening how short memories are. ;)

The mark of a well designed UI is how quickly you can accomplish tasks once you are up to speed on it. In the last 2 weeks I've gotten faster at completing tasks in Windows 8 than I was in Windows 7. I was much faster in 7 than I was in Vista...but I was faster in XP than I was in Vista so that was almost a wash. So for me 8 is an improvement since I can use the keyboard faster than I can the mouse in many cases. ;)

If you expect to be mousing around computers for the rest of forever, that's not going to happen.

Indeed, the mouse was meant to be used as a computing metaphor for our hands. It was meant as a step towards a more natural interaction. It's actually taken longer to reach this point than many thought it would. I think most of that is due to a lot of resistance because people have gotten set in their ways & don't want to open their minds to more natural interactions.

In a way it's like how some people can't stand 3D entertainment or games that look too realistic. It presents the mind with the difficulty of working in a familiar way with something it knows is artificial. There's been several studies about this and it's interesting to read up on how the brain sometimes just can't cope with certain things.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127683
Share on other sites

Apps do suck in Metro, reasons

- Slower Startup than Non-Metro Apps

- XBOX - more needed to avoid XBOX and go to your library and stuff

- No desktop equivalent

One thing that irks me is that

Windows Photo Viewer and Windows Media Player on Desktop have NOT been changed from the W7 counterparts. They look out of place!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127719
Share on other sites

When that day comes I will no longer be using Windows (and that's not an over dramatization, I just wont). I cannot imagine Metro in any productive sense (at least not on a desktop). Personally I like simplicity but I really do hate this degradation of the UI experience. Its minimal for the sake of being minimal. We have spent years getting to the point of Windows 7, now its all been thrown away in favour of flat mono coloured icons/flat boxs and wasted space. I cannot get my head around it. I just installed Office 2013 today, and I just held my head in my hand and sighed. Is that the future? It's hideous.

Why? Looking at how functional Windows 7 is, you can see that all the visual "bling" adds nothing. Take it away, and Windows 7 would still be Windows 7. Quite honestly, for how much I liked the glass back in the day, I've outgrown it. I'm in love with how minimal the UI is now. There's no more distractions going on. The UI remains out of the way until you need it.

One thing that irks me is that

Windows Photo Viewer and Windows Media Player on Desktop have NOT been changed from the W7 counterparts. They look out of place!

Depreciated apps. Windows Photo Gallery and Zune are the modern replacements.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127725
Share on other sites

Apps do suck in Metro, reasons

- Slower Startup than Non-Metro Apps

- XBOX - more needed to avoid XBOX and go to your library and stuff

- No desktop equivalent

One thing that irks me is that

Windows Photo Viewer and Windows Media Player on Desktop have NOT been changed from the W7 counterparts. They look out of place!

There are actually certain guidelines that apps have to follow as regards performance in Metro that they don't have to meet for desktop. In fact the Kindle metro app opens faster than the desktop one on my machine. About 1/2 a second vs 5-7 seconds. Fruit Ninja opens in about a half second. There's a requirement that the app must load and be on the first 'page' of the app within less than 5 seconds at all times.

I can pin my user folder for access to all my user data to the start screen. Unless you're speaking specifically about the Xbox app when you say library. In that case can you clarify what you mean by library?

No desktop equivalent? You can install Windows Essentials for equivalents of a ton of the apps, and install other apps for other types of functionality just like you could in earlier versions of Windows.

So how does a Metro/Modern/Whatever app suck for not having a desktop version? That's like saying this movie in the theater sucks because I don't have a way to watch it at home right now...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127731
Share on other sites

Depreciated apps. Windows Photo Gallery and Zune are the modern replacements.

What the hell are those? And are they really desktop apps and not metro apps?

I mean there is nothing really wrong with WMP - it is just got remove gradient and do some minor changes like that.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127737
Share on other sites

What the hell are those? And are they really desktop apps and not metro apps?

I mean there is nothing really wrong with WMP - it is just got remove gradient and do some minor changes like that.

They are desktop apps. Zune is a far better application for handling music & video collections than WiMP. Same with Windows Photo Gallery, it's a much better desktop application experience than the default Windows Photo Viewer.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127747
Share on other sites

Depreciated apps. Windows Photo Gallery and Zune are the modern replacements.

I miss the XP "photo and fax viewer" at least it would show .gif images correctly, animation and all (still have no idea why microsoft decided to remove that functionality)
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127755
Share on other sites

Seriously?

Well I have Windows 8 installed. Don't have anything with either name - searched start menu.

I think there is some confusion going on.

Oh and rebooting is not a common occurrence. Bitching about it makes no sense. :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127767
Share on other sites

The Metro/Modern/Whatever photo app shows them correctly as well :)

cool :), i haven't messed much with the photo, music, and video modern apps much yet

Well I have Windows 8 installed. Don't have anything with either name - searched start menu.

I think there is some confusion going on.

Oh and rebooting is not a common occurrence. Bitching about it makes no sense. :)

they're seperate microsoft apps you have to download, the photo gallary is from the (former) live essentials suite and the zune player was originally just meant for the zune mp3 player but ended up as a full media player app that people really like
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127771
Share on other sites

Well I have Windows 8 installed. Don't have anything with either name - searched start menu.

I think there is some confusion going on.

Oh and rebooting is not a common occurrence. Bitching about it makes no sense. :)

They are apps you install separately. Zune can be obtained from http://www.zune.net & Windows Photo Gallery is part of Windows Essentials which can be obtained here: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-live/essentials-home

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127789
Share on other sites

Well I have Windows 8 installed. Don't have anything with either name - searched start menu.

They're separate apps. You need to go download them. They're not new either, which is why I am confused as to why you've never heard of them.

EDIT. Crap. Just saw I was beat to the punch. Twice. :/

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127813
Share on other sites

They are apps you install separately. Zune can be obtained from http://www.zune.net & Windows Photo Gallery is part of Windows Essentials which can be obtained here: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-live/essentials-home

Ah.

Mmm... sorry, I don't feel like trying them.

But thanks for the explanation :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127819
Share on other sites

Metro apps are infuriating. I tried for probably 10 damn minutes trying to figure how to make myself not invisble on facebook in the people app to message somebody. There is no back button most of the time. There is no windows management. Never did figure it out. Microsoft moved key windows apps to metro and only offer metro versions. Its ridiculous.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127839
Share on other sites

Ah.

Mmm... sorry, I don't feel like trying them.

But thanks for the explanation :)

No problem. Can't complain later on though when you say there's no better apps. ;)

Metro apps are infuriating. I tried for probably 10 damn minutes trying to figure how to make myself not invisble on facebook in the people app to message somebody. There is no back button most of the time. There is no windows management. Never did figure it out. Microsoft moved key windows apps to metro and only offer metro versions. Its ridiculous.

Umm... Windows Live Messenger is still available. I already posted about Windows Essentials up above...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595127845
Share on other sites

if you cant figure out how to shutdown the pc in 2 mins its best to uninstall win8... no offense to win8 :rolleyes:

So that is the attitude now? Cant click the hidden start screen? Uninstall Windows 8 because you are a horrible person!

I was on the phone once for 20 minutes trying to help a grandma find the start button on Windows XP. Even with the visual cue of the word "Start", she still could not find it.

Now we do not have visual cues, can you imagine how horrible support will be? You tell them to move to the bottom left of the screen to get to the start menu, but with no visual cues, they can be just a single pixel outside the hot corner detection box.

In terms of general users, you never want to make invisible menus or hidden panels for them to find. Some people absolutely need a visual cue to know where to go.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595129955
Share on other sites

So that is the attitude now? Cant click the hidden start screen? Uninstall Windows 8 because you are a horrible person!

I was on the phone once for 20 minutes trying to help a grandma find the start button on Windows XP. Even with the visual cue of the word "Start", she still could not find it.

Now we do not have visual cues, can you imagine how horrible support will be? You tell them to move to the bottom left of the screen to get to the start menu, but with no visual cues, they can be just a single pixel outside the hot corner detection box.

In terms of general users, you never want to make invisible menus or hidden panels for them to find. Some people absolutely need a visual cue to know where to go.

with you one this. some just need such a clue.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595129963
Share on other sites

It took me 15 mins to find the turn off I'll admit xD I disagree with what he says about the Ribbon (<3 scenic ribbon) but I agree with a lot of what he's saying. The OS feels so rushed and needs to be delayed by six months to finish the Email app and other bundled apps. Also Gadget support should make a come back as an Optional Windows component.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1101509-why-i/page/2/#findComment-595130005
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!