Windows 8 - Unintuitivity at its best


Recommended Posts

so file > print wasn't a design standard and part of Microsofts UI specifications ? even on my mac it is file > print so not sure how you can describe that as unification ?

I also think ctr + p is going to be fun on a tablet - if you think about it for a second you need both hands on the keyboard or screen.

Why are you trying to do keyboard shortcuts on a tablet? Why is it so hard to swipe open the Charms menu?

Microsoft does extensive UX studies. If something wasn't working out, they'd know by now. It's how they came to the conclusion to kill the Start Menu.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....stop please, you're killing me.

The term "delusional" springs to mind.... :rolleyes:

  • Like 3

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....stop please, you're killing me.

The term "delusional" springs to mind.... :rolleyes:

Maybe I missed the humor there as well. The line you quoted is factual, irrespective of you opinion. :/

I'm very surprised that you wouldn't expect a printer to be labelled a 'device'. I would have deemed it a device, and I imagine I would have straight away looked at the Devices Charm to see if I could print something, considering I understand what the Charms are there for.

Why would he expect print to be under device.

He wants to print a file. He doesn't want to access the options of his printer. What about a direct link to print ? This action is done enough to warrant one. Apps had a printer icon in the toolbar for a reason ...

Anyone who says the file menu was illogical needs to think about it twice. The file menu contained actions you could do with a file. Print it. Save it. Access its properties. Create a new one. It's all perfectly and totally logical.

Going by the logic of some people here Save should be under Explorer. Cause when i want to access my hard disks options i open Explorer. And the file is saved to the hard disk.

  • Like 3

Why would he expect print to be under device.

He wants to print a file. He doesn't want to access the options of his printer. What about a direct link to print ? This action is done enough to warrant one. Apps had a printer icon in the toolbar for a reason ...

Anyone who says the file menu was illogical needs to think about it twice. The file menu contained actions you could do with a file. Print it. Save it. Access its properties. Create a new one. It's all perfectly and totally logical.

Going by the logic of some people here Save should be under Explorer. Cause when i want to access my hard disks options i open Explorer. And the file is saved to the hard disk.

Printing is under Devices because it's something that one of his external devices does, and that is why I would think anyone who understands the Charms should think to look under that Charm (why I believe it's intuitive). I believe it makes perfect sense for there to be a dedicated Charm for all of the functions that connected devices do, rather than a dedicated Charm or button specifically just for printing.

Printing is under Devices because it's something that one of his external devices does, and that is why I would think anyone who understands the Charms should think to look under that Charm (why I believe it's intuitive). I believe it makes perfect sense for there to be a dedicated Charm for all of the functions that connected devices do, rather than a dedicated Charm or button specifically just for printing.

Not sure what usability studies would say but I would have thought print would have enough to warrant a dedicated button in charms.

Not sure what usability studies would say but I would have thought print would have enough to warrant a dedicated button in charms.

Why, when there could be a dedicated Charm for everything connected devices do (printing the current document, printing a photo, backing up phone content, syncing files from the PC to a phone, syncing photos from a memory card to the PC etc)?

The Charms bar wouldn't be as usable and intuitive as it is if there were many more buttons on it, I don't think, and a separate button just for printing would make it less intuitive, considering printing is something a connected device does (like the other functions under the Devices Charm).

The extreme polarity of views among forum members itself tells us that Windows 8 is a failure from UI to usability. If there was not a problem, we would have had extremely less rants here. The only stuff people would be complaining would be drivers and compatibility.

I am sorry I have to say this, but in the 10+ years I have been browsing Neowin, this is the ugliest these forums have gotten with personal insults being thrown around at will. I hope the moderators take action.

I haven't seen any insults in this thread, but I haven't scanned it thoroughly, so please let me know or report any posts that you believe break our rules. I think I've seen people refer to general groups as 'morons', but not maliciously, and they haven't called each other morons, from what I saw (but as I mention, I haven't had time to read the thread thoroughly, to know for sure).

  • Like 1

I am sorry I have to say this, but in the 10+ years I have been browsing Neowin, this is the ugliest these forums have gotten with personal insults being thrown around at will. I hope the moderators take action.

If you feel so strongly, report the offending post...

Back on topic...

I would imagine they left it under devices because of some impending expansion to the functionality of that particular charm. Maybe they should have called it Send to... or something.

The extreme polarity of views among forum members itself tells us that Windows 8 is a failure from UI to usability. If there was not a problem, we would have had extremely less rants here. The only stuff people would be complaining would be drivers and compatibility.

I'm not so sure about that. I think that's just because it's a massive change and a big revolution. People are scared and assuming things that may not be true (e.g. their productivity will suffer). That's what it seems like to me, but I could be wrong, and some people's productivity may suffer (I don't know for sure, either).

People are worried that the average user won't find it usable, but if you sat an average user down in front of Windows 7 and they'd never used a computing device before, would they understand how to use it? Probably not. I don't think anyone can reasonably expect the average user to completely understand how the new experience works, just like no one can reasonably expect the average user to completely understand how Windows 7 works, if they've never used a computer before.

Why, when there could be a dedicated Charm for everything connected devices do (printing the current document, printing a photo, backing up phone content, syncing files from the PC to a phone, syncing photos from a memory card to the PC etc)?

The Charms bar wouldn't be as usable and intuitive as it is if there were many more buttons on it, I don't think, and a separate button just for printing would make it less intuitive, considering printing is something a connected device does (like the other functions under the Devices Charm).

So do you think you are more likely on a regular basis to "share" than to print ?

Maybe most of the "average users" will find it more user friendly than your parents? A sample consisting of two people isn't a good sample size. We won't know how intuitive most average users find it until it's been used by most of them and we've seen feedback :)

Once one understands the idea of the Charms bar, they should think to look there for functions that most applications have (search, settings, printing etc.). That's intuition, to me.

I don?t think you can just write off complains as simple edge cases at this point. I?m sure there were complains about the Superbar in Windows 7, but I think we can both agree that there was nowhere near this amount of animosity over Windows 7.

I am sorry I have to say this, but in the 10+ years I have been browsing Neowin, this is the ugliest these forums have gotten with personal insults being thrown around at will. I hope the moderators take action.

You should check out Real World Issues at some point :woot:

  • Like 1

[. . .]

I would imagine they left it under devices because of some impending expansion to the functionality of that particular charm. Maybe they should have called it Send to... or something.

I suspect that Charm will eventually be used for a fair few things (a few examples: backing up one's Windows Phone, syncing files to one's Windows Phone, transferring files from a memory card to the computer etc). I think it should even be used to transfer files from external hard drives; perhaps features like that will be coming for that Charm in the next major update to Windows :)

So do you think you are more likely on a regular basis to "share" than to print ?

Hopefully. I share videos, photos, and links daily or at least most days out of the week, on Facebook. I rarely print, even at work as a software developer. But even if I did print a lot in my job (as some people might), the option is easily accessible from the Devices Charm. I still think it would be unintuitive and messy if they implemented a separate Print Charm along with the Devices Charm just because some people print more than they share content.

How often do you print?

So do you think you are more likely on a regular basis to "share" than to print ?

Probably. printing is expensive these days.

I had to prep toner order forms for one of the commands I was stationed at, I vomited a little. Printing at home is even less common, between the cost and the perceived permanence of digitizing physical content.

  • Like 1

I don?t think you can just write off complains as simple edge cases at this point. I?m sure there were complains about the Superbar in Windows 7, but I think we can both agree that there was nowhere near this amount of animosity over Windows 7.

[. . .]

You're right, and I do agree with that. I'm actually worried that Windows 8 may end up provoking a terribly negative reception, because I love the direction Microsoft are going in and I'd rather the new experience evolve than be scrapped due to complaints.

I think it should even be used to transfer files from external hard drives;

Then it would make sense.

Cause the action to transfert a file to an external hd is almost the same than printing the file. Ultimately you send to file the an external device. One device store it on paper the other store it electronically.

I suspect that Charm will eventually be used for a fair few things (a few examples: backing up one's Windows Phone, syncing files to one's Windows Phone, transferring files from a memory card to the computer etc). I think it should even be used to transfer files from external hard drives; perhaps features like that will be coming for that Charm in the next major update to Windows :)

Hopefully. I share videos, photos, and links daily or at least a few times a week on Facebook. I rarely print.

How often do you print?

I get the criticism of Windows 8 over the massive UX change - I really do.

What I *don't* get are all the attempts to blow smoke up our posteriors and say that the criticism isn't about change when it most certainly is.

Even most of those that criticize Windows 8 say that it's the UX being so radically different that causes them all the grief.

With that being the case, why not simply leave it at that?

Win 8 is not the best (comparing it as a beta tester for XP, Vista, 7 and 8) but I will be purchasing it due to the cheap pricing announced for UK.

Im not happy, I would happily drop Windows 8 if there was competition that could match windows 7's catchup over vista + the enhancements to Explorer in 8, but unfortunately there isn't.

MS need to take notice of customer feedback, Win 8 is not a happy medium between Desktop and Tablet, its a compromise at best.

I don?t think you can just write off complains as simple edge cases at this point. I?m sure there were complains about the Superbar in Windows 7,

Oh damn straight... and let me tell you I howled at the superbar nonsense myself. That is, until somebody figured out how to return it to the way it was in XP..... which I continue to use, even in win8. I strongly belong in the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" camp.

I recall my favorite quote from those days, and I'll probably never forget this one... when discussing why ms had to move the "show desktop" button from the left side to the right side... some genius chimed in, and I quote, " I just fly my mouse down to the corner and bam I'm right there".... :rolleyes:

Win 8 is not the best (comparing it as a beta tester for XP, Vista, 7 and 8) but I will be purchasing it due to the cheap pricing announced for UK.

Im not happy, I would happily drop Windows 8 if there was competition that could match windows 7's catchup over vista + the enhancements to Explorer in 8, but unfortunately there isn't.

MS need to take notice of customer feedback, Win 8 is not a happy medium between Desktop and Tablet, its a compromise at best.

Yes - it IS a compromise; Dot Matrix and I (and several others) have pointed that out.

Here's the kicker - despite that, it excels in several areas where previous versions of Windows (despite being less of a compromise) stumbled or flat-out failed in by comparison.

Hardware backward compatibility - As much as some have tried (and failed) to prove otherwise, Windows 8 is actually one of the better versions in terms of backward-compatibility in terms of hardware.

Software backward compatibility - the view is actually better than in terms of hardware; Windows 8 actually has better backward compatibility with 7 than 7 did with Vista, or Vista with XP. You actually don't need newer hardware to switch to Windows 8; however, if you do, Windows 8 will take better advantage of that hardware than Windows 7 (or any earlier version of Windows, for that matter).

New APIs/applications/games - this is where the criticism and angst have set it for the winter (primarily on the app front). I get it; I remember the same sort of issues with Windows 95 and early Win32 applications. However, what the critics seem to have forgotten is that *unless* you are running WindowsRT, you DO have those Win32 applications (and a smaller number of Windows x64 applications as well) to run as alternatives. (Basically, the WinRT API and the apps thereof aren't a straitjacket.)

I am happily running Windows 8 today - on my desktop (Pro RTM x64), and it's not leaving anytime soon.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!