Windows 8 - Unintuitivity at its best


Recommended Posts

so file > print wasn't a design standard and part of Microsofts UI specifications ? even on my mac it is file > print so not sure how you can describe that as unification ?

I also think ctr + p is going to be fun on a tablet - if you think about it for a second you need both hands on the keyboard or screen.

Why are you trying to do keyboard shortcuts on a tablet? Why is it so hard to swipe open the Charms menu?

Microsoft does extensive UX studies. If something wasn't working out, they'd know by now. It's how they came to the conclusion to kill the Start Menu.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....stop please, you're killing me.

The term "delusional" springs to mind.... :rolleyes:

  • Like 3

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....stop please, you're killing me.

The term "delusional" springs to mind.... :rolleyes:

Maybe I missed the humor there as well. The line you quoted is factual, irrespective of you opinion. :/

I'm very surprised that you wouldn't expect a printer to be labelled a 'device'. I would have deemed it a device, and I imagine I would have straight away looked at the Devices Charm to see if I could print something, considering I understand what the Charms are there for.

Why would he expect print to be under device.

He wants to print a file. He doesn't want to access the options of his printer. What about a direct link to print ? This action is done enough to warrant one. Apps had a printer icon in the toolbar for a reason ...

Anyone who says the file menu was illogical needs to think about it twice. The file menu contained actions you could do with a file. Print it. Save it. Access its properties. Create a new one. It's all perfectly and totally logical.

Going by the logic of some people here Save should be under Explorer. Cause when i want to access my hard disks options i open Explorer. And the file is saved to the hard disk.

  • Like 3

Why would he expect print to be under device.

He wants to print a file. He doesn't want to access the options of his printer. What about a direct link to print ? This action is done enough to warrant one. Apps had a printer icon in the toolbar for a reason ...

Anyone who says the file menu was illogical needs to think about it twice. The file menu contained actions you could do with a file. Print it. Save it. Access its properties. Create a new one. It's all perfectly and totally logical.

Going by the logic of some people here Save should be under Explorer. Cause when i want to access my hard disks options i open Explorer. And the file is saved to the hard disk.

Printing is under Devices because it's something that one of his external devices does, and that is why I would think anyone who understands the Charms should think to look under that Charm (why I believe it's intuitive). I believe it makes perfect sense for there to be a dedicated Charm for all of the functions that connected devices do, rather than a dedicated Charm or button specifically just for printing.

Printing is under Devices because it's something that one of his external devices does, and that is why I would think anyone who understands the Charms should think to look under that Charm (why I believe it's intuitive). I believe it makes perfect sense for there to be a dedicated Charm for all of the functions that connected devices do, rather than a dedicated Charm or button specifically just for printing.

Not sure what usability studies would say but I would have thought print would have enough to warrant a dedicated button in charms.

Not sure what usability studies would say but I would have thought print would have enough to warrant a dedicated button in charms.

Why, when there could be a dedicated Charm for everything connected devices do (printing the current document, printing a photo, backing up phone content, syncing files from the PC to a phone, syncing photos from a memory card to the PC etc)?

The Charms bar wouldn't be as usable and intuitive as it is if there were many more buttons on it, I don't think, and a separate button just for printing would make it less intuitive, considering printing is something a connected device does (like the other functions under the Devices Charm).

The extreme polarity of views among forum members itself tells us that Windows 8 is a failure from UI to usability. If there was not a problem, we would have had extremely less rants here. The only stuff people would be complaining would be drivers and compatibility.

I am sorry I have to say this, but in the 10+ years I have been browsing Neowin, this is the ugliest these forums have gotten with personal insults being thrown around at will. I hope the moderators take action.

I haven't seen any insults in this thread, but I haven't scanned it thoroughly, so please let me know or report any posts that you believe break our rules. I think I've seen people refer to general groups as 'morons', but not maliciously, and they haven't called each other morons, from what I saw (but as I mention, I haven't had time to read the thread thoroughly, to know for sure).

  • Like 1

I am sorry I have to say this, but in the 10+ years I have been browsing Neowin, this is the ugliest these forums have gotten with personal insults being thrown around at will. I hope the moderators take action.

If you feel so strongly, report the offending post...

Back on topic...

I would imagine they left it under devices because of some impending expansion to the functionality of that particular charm. Maybe they should have called it Send to... or something.

The extreme polarity of views among forum members itself tells us that Windows 8 is a failure from UI to usability. If there was not a problem, we would have had extremely less rants here. The only stuff people would be complaining would be drivers and compatibility.

I'm not so sure about that. I think that's just because it's a massive change and a big revolution. People are scared and assuming things that may not be true (e.g. their productivity will suffer). That's what it seems like to me, but I could be wrong, and some people's productivity may suffer (I don't know for sure, either).

People are worried that the average user won't find it usable, but if you sat an average user down in front of Windows 7 and they'd never used a computing device before, would they understand how to use it? Probably not. I don't think anyone can reasonably expect the average user to completely understand how the new experience works, just like no one can reasonably expect the average user to completely understand how Windows 7 works, if they've never used a computer before.

Why, when there could be a dedicated Charm for everything connected devices do (printing the current document, printing a photo, backing up phone content, syncing files from the PC to a phone, syncing photos from a memory card to the PC etc)?

The Charms bar wouldn't be as usable and intuitive as it is if there were many more buttons on it, I don't think, and a separate button just for printing would make it less intuitive, considering printing is something a connected device does (like the other functions under the Devices Charm).

So do you think you are more likely on a regular basis to "share" than to print ?

Maybe most of the "average users" will find it more user friendly than your parents? A sample consisting of two people isn't a good sample size. We won't know how intuitive most average users find it until it's been used by most of them and we've seen feedback :)

Once one understands the idea of the Charms bar, they should think to look there for functions that most applications have (search, settings, printing etc.). That's intuition, to me.

I don?t think you can just write off complains as simple edge cases at this point. I?m sure there were complains about the Superbar in Windows 7, but I think we can both agree that there was nowhere near this amount of animosity over Windows 7.

I am sorry I have to say this, but in the 10+ years I have been browsing Neowin, this is the ugliest these forums have gotten with personal insults being thrown around at will. I hope the moderators take action.

You should check out Real World Issues at some point :woot:

  • Like 1

[. . .]

I would imagine they left it under devices because of some impending expansion to the functionality of that particular charm. Maybe they should have called it Send to... or something.

I suspect that Charm will eventually be used for a fair few things (a few examples: backing up one's Windows Phone, syncing files to one's Windows Phone, transferring files from a memory card to the computer etc). I think it should even be used to transfer files from external hard drives; perhaps features like that will be coming for that Charm in the next major update to Windows :)

So do you think you are more likely on a regular basis to "share" than to print ?

Hopefully. I share videos, photos, and links daily or at least most days out of the week, on Facebook. I rarely print, even at work as a software developer. But even if I did print a lot in my job (as some people might), the option is easily accessible from the Devices Charm. I still think it would be unintuitive and messy if they implemented a separate Print Charm along with the Devices Charm just because some people print more than they share content.

How often do you print?

So do you think you are more likely on a regular basis to "share" than to print ?

Probably. printing is expensive these days.

I had to prep toner order forms for one of the commands I was stationed at, I vomited a little. Printing at home is even less common, between the cost and the perceived permanence of digitizing physical content.

  • Like 1

I don?t think you can just write off complains as simple edge cases at this point. I?m sure there were complains about the Superbar in Windows 7, but I think we can both agree that there was nowhere near this amount of animosity over Windows 7.

[. . .]

You're right, and I do agree with that. I'm actually worried that Windows 8 may end up provoking a terribly negative reception, because I love the direction Microsoft are going in and I'd rather the new experience evolve than be scrapped due to complaints.

I think it should even be used to transfer files from external hard drives;

Then it would make sense.

Cause the action to transfert a file to an external hd is almost the same than printing the file. Ultimately you send to file the an external device. One device store it on paper the other store it electronically.

I suspect that Charm will eventually be used for a fair few things (a few examples: backing up one's Windows Phone, syncing files to one's Windows Phone, transferring files from a memory card to the computer etc). I think it should even be used to transfer files from external hard drives; perhaps features like that will be coming for that Charm in the next major update to Windows :)

Hopefully. I share videos, photos, and links daily or at least a few times a week on Facebook. I rarely print.

How often do you print?

I get the criticism of Windows 8 over the massive UX change - I really do.

What I *don't* get are all the attempts to blow smoke up our posteriors and say that the criticism isn't about change when it most certainly is.

Even most of those that criticize Windows 8 say that it's the UX being so radically different that causes them all the grief.

With that being the case, why not simply leave it at that?

Win 8 is not the best (comparing it as a beta tester for XP, Vista, 7 and 8) but I will be purchasing it due to the cheap pricing announced for UK.

Im not happy, I would happily drop Windows 8 if there was competition that could match windows 7's catchup over vista + the enhancements to Explorer in 8, but unfortunately there isn't.

MS need to take notice of customer feedback, Win 8 is not a happy medium between Desktop and Tablet, its a compromise at best.

I don?t think you can just write off complains as simple edge cases at this point. I?m sure there were complains about the Superbar in Windows 7,

Oh damn straight... and let me tell you I howled at the superbar nonsense myself. That is, until somebody figured out how to return it to the way it was in XP..... which I continue to use, even in win8. I strongly belong in the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" camp.

I recall my favorite quote from those days, and I'll probably never forget this one... when discussing why ms had to move the "show desktop" button from the left side to the right side... some genius chimed in, and I quote, " I just fly my mouse down to the corner and bam I'm right there".... :rolleyes:

Win 8 is not the best (comparing it as a beta tester for XP, Vista, 7 and 8) but I will be purchasing it due to the cheap pricing announced for UK.

Im not happy, I would happily drop Windows 8 if there was competition that could match windows 7's catchup over vista + the enhancements to Explorer in 8, but unfortunately there isn't.

MS need to take notice of customer feedback, Win 8 is not a happy medium between Desktop and Tablet, its a compromise at best.

Yes - it IS a compromise; Dot Matrix and I (and several others) have pointed that out.

Here's the kicker - despite that, it excels in several areas where previous versions of Windows (despite being less of a compromise) stumbled or flat-out failed in by comparison.

Hardware backward compatibility - As much as some have tried (and failed) to prove otherwise, Windows 8 is actually one of the better versions in terms of backward-compatibility in terms of hardware.

Software backward compatibility - the view is actually better than in terms of hardware; Windows 8 actually has better backward compatibility with 7 than 7 did with Vista, or Vista with XP. You actually don't need newer hardware to switch to Windows 8; however, if you do, Windows 8 will take better advantage of that hardware than Windows 7 (or any earlier version of Windows, for that matter).

New APIs/applications/games - this is where the criticism and angst have set it for the winter (primarily on the app front). I get it; I remember the same sort of issues with Windows 95 and early Win32 applications. However, what the critics seem to have forgotten is that *unless* you are running WindowsRT, you DO have those Win32 applications (and a smaller number of Windows x64 applications as well) to run as alternatives. (Basically, the WinRT API and the apps thereof aren't a straitjacket.)

I am happily running Windows 8 today - on my desktop (Pro RTM x64), and it's not leaving anytime soon.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Happens to the best of us, bro. 😛 
    • Thanks to some of the other recent Windows improvements, I'm optimistic about this one. My quick wishlist would be: perf like the older menu, merge both menus or at the very least, the older menu should be a flyout, not a simulated click to the old menu, and lastly, a customization window to let users move items from one menu to another, so I could bring Send To back to the main menu, and the OneDrive settings to the older.
    • This Gigabyte AMD RX 9070 XT is very good deal despite the launch of 9070 GRE by Sayan Sen Recently we reviewed AMD's latest 1440p gaming card, the Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12GB, for $549. The card is in stock too at that price, though if you want significantly better performance and don't mind spending a bit more, the Gigabyte Gaming model of RX 9070 XT is currently on sale for just $650 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The card employs Gigabyte's WINDFORCE cooling system which combines multiple design elements such as alternate-spinning Hawk fans, a vapor chamber, and composite heat pipes to manage heat dissipation. The Server-grade Thermal conductive gel further helps in this department. The inclusion of a semi-passive cooling mode allows the fans to remain inactive under low workloads, which allows for reduced noise operation during lighter usage. There is dual BIOS switch that allows toggling between performance and silent modes. The technical specifications of the Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 XT GAMING OC 16G are given in the table below: Specification Value Core Clock Boost Clock: up to 3060 MHz Game Clock: up to 2520 MHz Stream Processors 4096 Memory Clock 20 Gbps Memory Size 16GB Memory Type GDDR6 Memory Bus 256-bit Card Bus Interface PCI Express 5.0 Maximum Resolution 7680 × 4320 Multi-View Support 4 displays Card Dimensions L=288 mm, W=132 mm, H=56 mm Recommended Power Supply 750W Power Connectors 3 × 8-pin Video Outputs 2 × DisplayPort 2.1a 2 × HDMI 2.1b Get it at the link below: GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC 16GB Graphics Card, GV-R9070XTGAMING OC: $649.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $740) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Why does this kind of tactic not surprise me?
    • They used AI based TOOLS to convert the JavaScript engine (the main rendering engine is still C++) and it was not fully automated but was human reviewed. Other subsystems will be looked into to also be converted to Rust in the future. I have no problem with any of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      80
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      63
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!