Recommended Posts

http://www.piriform.com/defraggler

Piriform makes some great products, defraggler has been updated to support windows 8

Wtf? You probably don't know anything. Defraggler hasnt been updated since May 2012. It doesn't support Windows 8 yet. And you can see it by the fact that when yuo clean install Windows 8 and try to defragment it using Defraggler, it says 3+ GB is fragmented. And the only file is pagefile.sys, which should be in orange and not red, thus, not fragmented. Don't post crap.

Personally, I've been using Auslogics Disk Defrag for about 3 years now. I stopped using Diskeeper when I learned

the CEO of the company was/is a hardcore Scientologist. I hope you paid nothing towards your use of Diskeeper,

due to it's links with an evil, money grabbing, brain washing cult, that masquerades as a "religion" . . .

i think you would have to stop buying MOST products in the world if you based your purchases on the peoples values/religion that own/run/work at the company

i think you would have to stop buying MOST products in the world if you based your purchases on the peoples values/religion that own/run/work at the company

I'm an agnostic-leaning-atheist; however, I'm far from a militant.

I've also read quite a bit of L. Ron Hubbard (not just "Battlefield Earth", his seminal SF work; but also the entire ten volume magnum opus "The Invaders Plan", though I've had to haunt used book shops and libraries to find volumes I hadn't purchased or read - and that was AFTER I got the Scientology connection).

I have as much (or little) opinion about Scientology as I do other religions (except for the Roman Catholic Church, for which I have mostly scorn - however, that scorn is based entirely on indisputable PUBLIC RECORD, not conspiracy theories); however, as much as I WANT to trust scientific theory, there is still way too much that science is unable to explain to make me completely comfortable.

Militancy - in anything - all too often leads to major cases of foot-in-mouth disease.

This is what I thought as well but never looked into it that much. It seems the built in option has been improved quite a bit over it's Windows 7 counterpart. I also don't see a reason to use something else, I use the built in defragger in Win7 as well.

I posted about Disk Optimizer back in the Microsoft Beta forum (specifically about the Consumer Preview) as part of my top ten new or improved features for Windows 7 users.

The fact that it mooted Diskeeper Pro Premier (both Disk Optimizer/Defragmenter and Diskeeper have come from the same company since Windows NT) was decidedly something from WAY out in Wrong Field precisely *because* of that seemingly designed-in upgrade path that's been around since - as I said before - Windows NT.

Show us a screen shot of how advanced it is side by side with one of the other tools mentioned and back it up...2...3...4!

How is a screenshot of anything proof of being advanced ? options and switches are not "advanced" it's fluff.

Have you even read the thread ? the disk optimizer in Win8 is and improved version of what is arguably the best defragmenter on the market.

Screenshots.... :no:

OK, That's fine if you don't wanna put in the effort to further prove yourself than that's ok ;)

what exactly am I supposed to prove ?

Can you please explain to me how a screenshot shows how advanced a defrag algorithm is ?

As for how it's better, as I said, it's already described earlier in in this thread. and again, it's an improved version of what is already considered the best industry defrag tool.

what exactly am I supposed to prove ?

Can you please explain to me how a screenshot shows how advanced a defrag algorithm is ?

As for how it's better, as I said, it's already described earlier in in this thread. and again, it's an improved version of what is already considered the best industry defrag tool.

Well you're the expert on windows 8 and I need more convincing it's the best OS ever... so, proceed.....

  • Like 1

The only good thing about the included defragmenter is the SSD Optimizer. Yes it does multipass on HDDs but it still (Over Time) doesn't defrag all files and it doesn't completely consolidate free space over time. And the built in defragger doesn't defrag the system files or Hibernation file or the System restore files. If you want to resize a partition, you need to defrag and consolidate free space completely; otherwise you may have trouble choosing the size you want. Anyway, Unfortunately PerfectDisk (My Favorite) is not yet ready for Windows 8. But once it is windows 8 compatible I will be sure to use it. So until then you can use Defraggler. BTW, I'm a defragging geek and I will tell you that I very much dislike diskeeper(All versions).

Well you're the expert on windows 8 and I need more convincing it's the best OS ever... so, proceed.....

So read the previous post.

and I'm still waiting on you to explain how a screenshot shows a better defrag and optimization algorithm. Especially since all the free defraggers only does defrag.

So read the previous post.

and I'm still waiting on you to explain how a screenshot shows a better defrag and optimization algorithm. Especially since all the free defraggers only does defrag.

well which has more features, a better display to give you the clearest, most concises data, and actually gives you a useable ETA????

  • Like 1

I'm an agnostic-leaning-atheist; however, I'm far from a militant.

I've also read quite a bit of L. Ron Hubbard (not just "Battlefield Earth", his seminal SF work; but also the entire ten volume magnum opus "The Invaders Plan", though I've had to haunt used book shops and libraries to find volumes I hadn't purchased or read - and that was AFTER I got the Scientology connection).

I have as much (or little) opinion about Scientology as I do other religions (except for the Roman Catholic Church, for which I have mostly scorn - however, that scorn is based entirely on indisputable PUBLIC RECORD, not conspiracy theories); however, as much as I WANT to trust scientific theory, there is still way too much that science is unable to explain to make me completely comfortable.

Militancy - in anything - all too often leads to major cases of foot-in-mouth disease.

One doesn't have to be a hardcore Atheist to recognise the dangers of Scientology anyway, even most Christians and Muslims realise how dangerous it is.

Im amazed that some of you dont use software because its CEO (the guy basically doesnt write any program code o algorithm) has relgious views different than yours.

Man, this world is ****ed up....

I don't think the issue is really the CEO's religious views. I think the issue is that he doesn't keep them separate from his business and in fact does the complete opposite, that being building the foundation of his business upon that religion. All employees are indoctrinated with the words of L. Ron Hubbard & Hubbard's works have shaped company policy.

What a person believes in is their business. However, when they take those beliefs & instruct their company to deny tech support that has been bought and paid for to companies that have developed prescription drugs then they are asking the public to judge them on their religious beliefs & company policies because they have thrust their beliefs into the public spotlight.

One doesn't have to be a hardcore Atheist to recognise the dangers of Scientology anyway, even most Christians and Muslims realise how dangerous it is.

I don't think the issue is really the CEO's religious views. I think the issue is that he doesn't keep them separate from his business and in fact does the complete opposite, that being building the foundation of his business upon that religion. All employees are indoctrinated with the words of L. Ron Hubbard & Hubbard's works have shaped company policy.

What a person believes in is their business. However, when they take those beliefs & instruct their company to deny tech support that has been bought and paid for to companies that have developed prescription drugs then they are asking the public to judge them on their religious beliefs & company policies because they have thrust their beliefs into the public spotlight.

What does your comments have to do with Win8 defragger?

well which has more features, a better display to give you the clearest, most concises data, and actually gives you a useable ETA????

And what relevance does ANY of those have to the actual quality of the defrag quality ? some of them would be just confusing, like the graphical display. I assume you mean something like the old block diagrams of the ancient defrag apps. Absolutely pointless fluff that does NOTHING. and with modern defrag apps that also optimizes data placement, and places most used files in the fastest to reach places for the head, and files that may not be related but are most often read sequentially, sequentially, This kind of display would in fact make a perfectly optimized disk appear fragmented.

As for an ETA. why would I need it. my disks are 0 to 2% fragmented at all times because the built in disk optimizer runs at least once a week, defragmenting and optimizing my disk without me noticing. so the built in might give me an ETA if I ever bother to run it manually, there's just no need to.

And since it optimizes placement of data beyong just placing them sequentially, but based on actual usage patterns, the built in is better than pretty much EVERY free program out there. and while there may be one or two expensive commercial solutions that are better, the degree to which they are better would amount to a few nanoseconds saved over an entire day.

or to sum up. YOU DON'T NEED 3RD PARTY DEFRAGGERS. At best they don't have any effect, at worst they will give you poorer performance.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!