Recommended Posts

It doesn't matter on what settings you'll run the game, it still won't look as detailed.

Here's a comparison between the settings (low, ultra and everything in between): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2mJaYQhaYc

 

I think it looks great. My only concern is AA. If i am to believe this video the game supports some form of post processing AA only. This will be a major disappointment if true.

It doesn't matter on what settings you'll run the game, it still won't look as detailed.

Here's a comparison between the settings (low, ultra and everything in between): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2mJaYQhaYc

 

well, as someone said before i hope there will be a mod.     because it the video above is true, setting to ultra adds bugger all to the experience :(

  • Like 1

I won't say it looks horrible, that would be a lie, but the downgrades are VERY apparent.

I'm still shocked CDPR went the Sony and Watch Dogs deception route with the weak console hardware.

They would have known this 2 years ago when that trailer showed.

 

I think I'm going to cancel as I can't support these deceptive practices in the gaming industry anymore. Enough is enough.

I'll rebuy when there's an enhanced edition that goes beyond the console power or I see a mod that makes it look like it should.

I won't say it looks horrible, that would be a lie, but the downgrades are VERY apparent.

I'm still shocked CDPR went the Sony and Watch Dogs deception route with the weak console hardware.

They would have known this 2 years ago when that trailer showed.

 

I think I'm going to cancel as I can't support these deceptive practices in the gaming industry anymore. Enough is enough.

I'll rebuy when there's an enhanced edition that goes beyond the console power or I see a mod that makes it look like it should.

Don't preorder in general. It supports hype driven failures.

Also the system requirements are too high.

If it is feature parity with consoles than it should run on equal hardware to consoles.

  • Like 1

Wouldn't be surprised if its been moved forward a bit, street dates been broken all over the place.

 

I don't know, I sort of see the downgrade thing from all perspectives.  The low specs of the next gen consoles put devs in mid development in a bit of a bind where you either have to create 2 different products or create to the lowest denominator and then build out for the pc later. 

 

To play on ultra already has some pretty big requirements so I can only imagine the small % of people that would have actually experienced all the detail of the original vision.  When resource choices have to be made you got to look at who your markets are.

 

Plus its the Witcher series...we all know an Enhanced Edition will roll out next year with an updated engine and bells and whistles for pc.

 

Lastly, the dollars this game makes will speak for itself its going to sell a tonne of copies post launch and post this downgrade so that says about how much consumers either a) care or b) the value they put on premium graphics vs good gameplay.

No Cursing or Swear Words
We encourage you to use our communities as a forum to debate topics, but please use proper adjectives to express yourself. We do not tolerate circumvention of our word filter or abuse upon another member. As stated above, we are a forum for all ages and expect posts to be family / work friendly.

Edited by Andrew
  • Like 1

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the latest Nvidia GameWorks news regarding the game. While I know Nvidia are ###### of the highest order, I'm very disappointed CDP went with them knowing the conditions.

 

It's hard to be surprised by NV being ###### after PhysX.  A lot of devs just don't care though.

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the latest Nvidia GameWorks news regarding the game. While I know Nvidia are ###### of the highest order, I'm very disappointed CDP went with them knowing the conditions.

I love when game companies optimize their games for my GPU line. This is good news.

I won't say it looks horrible, that would be a lie, but the downgrades are VERY apparent.

I'm still shocked CDPR went the Sony and Watch Dogs deception route with the weak console hardware.

They would have known this 2 years ago when that trailer showed.

 

I think I'm going to cancel as I can't support these deceptive practices in the gaming industry anymore. Enough is enough.

I'll rebuy when there's an enhanced edition that goes beyond the console power or I see a mod that makes it look like it should.

Not directed specifically to you PD, but to everyone in this thread complaining about "downgrades":

 

How is it "deceptive" if these changes were revealed weeks before launch? There is plenty of information and videos out there to view prior to the game's release. (it still hasn't released yet!) Therefore, every potential buyer has/had plenty of opportunity to make an educated decision as to whether this game lives up to their own personal, arbitrary standard. Release Date review embargoes, intentionally misleading press materials, and sponsored fluff pieces are deceptive behavior. None of which CDPR engaged in. So how can you justify calling it "deceptive"?

 

Things change in development all the time, and not just in games. That is nature of development.You have a goal in mind when a project starts, and things get stripped or modified as the project progresses and the time/money-cost/benefit ratios change. If you don't understand that, then I would suggest you stop following pre-release software in general or else you're going to be continually disappointed.

 

As long as CDPR didn't try to hide the fact that things changed before customers purchased the game (hint: they didn't), then you have nothing to complain about.

 

And as others have said, stop pre-ordering games. It's pointless in today's market, and it reinforces awful preorder/dlc practices. If you for some reason can't control yourself and have to preorder, then do it from a place that doesn't charge you the full amount until you actually get the item. (or it ships, if it's online) That way you can cancel your preorder at the last minute if you must.

  • Like 1

it is midnight by polish time.   so it is 8pm, in north american eastern time.   even earlier in pacific. 

 

 

5 hours left!

 

 

NOW I AM SUPER MAD AT THEM.       I got GOG Galaxy, and since I preloaded it always told me a specific time the game will release.

as i said 1.5 hours ago, it was showing me 5 hours!   (i am in canada on eastern time)

 

i just logged it to search for something else, and now GOG Galaxy is showing me 10 hours. WTF?!   i have to sleep in 10 hours.

i cancelled my evening plans to get 5 hours of gaming in, since i have a busy week and i wanted to get a good start at it today

EDIT: it was a bug in Galaxy client.

I don't and and it's bad news for everyone, including owners of older (like the first Titan) Nvidia cards. Read the articles.

Omg your old GPU is terrible at a new game. What a surprise, the shock, the horror.

Omg your old GPU is terrible at a new game. What a surprise, the shock, the horror.

you are being silly now.  because you happen to have a gpu it is optimized for...

it is not just a old GPU.     it is ANY GPU outside of 9 series.    no matter how well they compare in specs.   but whatever.  you could not care less i see.

 

if you bought top of the line nvidia gtx780 just before 9 series were released, you would understand better, i bet

edit: GOG Galaxy client just updated.  now it says "waiting for release"

i guess it was a bug, Galaxy is in beta so...

 

3 more hour to play it.

 

i wonder if the site will be HAMMERED by everyone on pc wanting the patch.    witcher 3 has quite a following.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • too bad the "backend" June 2026 ESD files are still at build 26200.8653 and not at the correct build 26200.8655 release. I'll avoid using the MCT for several weeks until late July 2026
    • Qualcomm's new Snapdragon Reality Elite chip brings on-device AI to Android XR devices by Pradeep Viswanathan Qualcomm has been delivering dedicated SoCs for mixed reality and spatial computing devices for several years. The journey started with the Snapdragon XR1, followed by the Snapdragon XR2 in 2019, the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 in September 2023, and finally the Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2 in 2024. Today, Qualcomm announced a major upgrade with the new Snapdragon Reality Elite Platform, which targets premium mixed reality and spatial computing devices. OEMs can use this SoC to power both all-in-one video-see-through headsets and lightweight, tethered optical-see-through glasses. Qualcomm highlighted that the Snapdragon Reality Elite will power the next wave of Android XR devices coming later this year. These wearables will offer better visuals, improved power efficiency, and deeper on-device AI integration compared to the previous generation. The Snapdragon Reality Elite can deliver up to 48 TOPS of AI performance, allowing large language models and large vision models to run directly on the device for the first time. In addition to enabling new spatial AI experiences, these new AI capabilities will improve head and hand tracking, as well as see-through features. On the performance side, the Snapdragon Reality Elite offers up to 60% higher GPU performance, up to 30% higher CPU performance, and up to 160% higher NPU performance compared to the previous generation. The platform supports visuals of up to 4.4K per eye at 90 frames per second for sharper images and smoother motion. Qualcomm is also claiming significant efficiency improvements. The Snapdragon Reality Elite can offer up to 20% longer battery life under the same workload. More importantly, the chipset can run up to 12 degrees Celsius cooler under load, making headsets more comfortable for users to wear for longer periods. The platform also includes improvements to video see-through, featuring lower latency and better image quality. Qualcomm states that its EVA hardware block helps accelerate demanding computer vision workloads, improving how digital content blends with the real world.
    • Umm... GitHub continues to use AWS. That's the story, that's the headline. There's no "new" news here. GitHub continues to require additional capacity beyond the originally-planned Azure allocations. There's nothing special about this; nothing noteworthy. They're still using AWS' infra until the cutover is complete.
    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!