Windows 8 adoption rate almost at a standstill, far behind Windows 7


Recommended Posts

Also the problem with Win 8 is the schizophrenic behavior between Modern UI en the classic desktop.

Even Office 2013 behaves this way when clicking on a Word/Excel etc tile the desktop is coming up...

I guess a FULLY - and 100% - Modern UI environment where you can stay in would be very convenient, and also the same for the ol' desktop.

these are the same people that say an ipad with a keyboard can replace your computer(hypocrites)

Yet that is essentially what Microsoft is doing to the desktop, dumbing it down into a Windows RT style experience with full screen Metro apps as a default means of interfacing with your PC, and you think that it's great? (hypocrites)

  • Like 1

The article does not quote any sources and was posted on a site known for it's anti Windows 8 attitude. I would be very suspicious of the information being accurate and based on proper data.

That said. It would seem a vast number of people here make statements and claims based on not actively using the OS anyway. Having been on WIN8 since the Release preview I have no issues with it at all. It's much better then WIndows 7 in many ways. It's quite noticeable that the under the hood'changes are far more important then the UI ones and my Start Screen is my perfect goto place for my often used apps, tools, links and cloud storage.

Modern Ui being the default for any type of device was just a huge mistake. Win 8 had some great desktop improvements but chose to go one way, great if your on a tablet but on a desktop its a pain. I bought 3 copies of Win 8, I dont use mine anymore, my Dad even asked me to restore his PC!!

MS need to stop all these stupid competitions with medern apps and concentrate on a great OS along the lines of 7. I cant believe such a big company made such a stupid mistake and wont stop throwing money at it,

  • Like 1

Every argument concludes the same way. If Metro UI had been an OPTION instead of the standard, then nobody would be arguing about anything. Under the hood, Windows 8 is superior to Windows 7, but by making the Metro UI the default interface, the whole experience fails. The Metro UI should have been a selectable option chosen during the upgrade/installation procedure. That way folks that like it can enjoy the tablet interface, and those that don't like it can get back to work as usual. Win - Win situation!!

Tim

The voice of reason :)

I'm sure metro is great on tablets, but the interfaces on tablets and desktops SHOULD NOT be unified. Mouses and fingers are different and the interfaces for them have always been different. For example, if I grab a scrollbar and drag it downwards with my mouse, I will see content below what is currently on screen, but if I drag a list downwards with my finger, I will see content ABOVE what is currently on screen.

I don't personally see how the start screen has improved anything either. Live Tiles are kinda implemented in Windows 7 in the guise of the sidebar.

I'm all for change as long as it improves something, but I don't think Metro brings improvements to the desktop experience.

Its not ok when Microsoft does it but everyone else can :rolleyes: Its an appalling practice but hypocrisy to cry about it here but ignore when Mozilla,Google,Apple etc do the same fricking thing,

Crapstores aside its a shame because the hand-me-down's from server 2012 make this one of the best releases in recent years.

Hyper-V, Windows To Go, Storage Spaces, Native ISO & VHD mount, Metered Networks, PowerShell 3, REFS etc put it head and shoulders above windows 7.

Mozilla, Google and Apple can do whatever they want; I don't use desktop OSes made by any of those companies, so they don't concern me.

  • Like 1

The article does not quote any sources and was posted on a site known for it's anti Windows 8 attitude. I would be very suspicious of the information being accurate and based on proper data.

That said. It would seem a vast number of people here make statements and claims based on not actively using the OS anyway. Having been on WIN8 since the Release preview I have no issues with it at all. It's much better then WIndows 7 in many ways. It's quite noticeable that the under the hood'changes are far more important then the UI ones and my Start Screen is my perfect goto place for my often used apps, tools, links and cloud storage.

Spoken like a true fanboy with his eyes shut and ears plugged. You conveniently ignored all of the posts throughout this thread where multiple folks have explained how they've used Windows 8 and do not like it. You're just incapable of understanding that someone would have a different opinion than your own. Just because you use it and have no issues does not mean the same for every other person on the planet. I'm glad we established the world revolves around you though.

Personally, I don't like Windows 8. There's no point in rehashing the multitude of reasons. Oh and I might as well note that my HTPC runs Windows 8 and is used for several hours of the day by myself and the other half. Guess what? Still don't like it! Oh but wait....I don't actively use Windows 8! :rolleyes:

  • Like 2

People are now going mobile. Mobile computing is where it's at now.

Desktop computing is now considered ancient. tablets and mobile phones are the computers of today.

Desktop computers are best suited for offices.

  • Like 2

People are now going mobile. Mobile computing is where it's at now.

Desktop computing is now considered ancient. tablets and mobile phones are the computers of today.

Desktop computers are best suited for offices.

I agree with your sentiment, but a desktop OS is still better suited to a desktop than a mobile/tablet OS.

If you're actually going to sit down and do some work at home/work, then a desktop is still by far the best way of getting something done. An on screen or small touch keyboard doesn't quite cut it when compared to a normal physical keyboard, and a touch interface doesn't cut it compared to a windowed OS.

Tablets are great because they're portable and we do work when we otherwise wouldn't, such as on the bus, etc, but they are not better than a desktop OS when a desktop is available.

Yay!!

This is almost the best news I've read today!!

Windows 8 is such a shock to anyone that's ever used a computer before, they look at and say WTF?!!

I also knew the day would come when it was compared to Vista's TOTALLY S****Y growth rate! I think I'd even prefer Vista over Windows 8 and I TOTALLY despised Vista from day one and NEVER even used it for more than 1 day, although I tried several times to like it.

That time frame (Vista) was probably the longest I ever stayed with Linux at a stretch!! :)

  • Like 2

this thread where multiple folks have explained how they've used Windows 8 and do not like it.

I'm glad we established the world revolves around you though.

This thread isn't the world.

You're just incapable of understanding that someone would have a different opinion than your own.

I don't think so, he just posted his opinion and placed counterarguments for those against it. His argument ("unreliable source") seems more convincing than yours ("multiple people don't like it") anyway.

  • Like 1

I think we're saying the same thing, there's great OS enhancements overshadowed by the UI. I think we disagree on the level of OS (Desktop Environment Enhancements). There's a lot more than most people see. Unfortunately, many can't get past the UI. Here's a few you may not be aware of:

Native UASP - USB Attached SCSI Protocol (in fairness, OS X Lion has this as well), significant boost to USB 3.0 throughput.

Settings Roam - allows for preferences to sync across a user's Windows 8 devices

Hyper-V - Hyper-V virtualization software comes pre-loaded on Windows 8

R&R - New "Reset and Refresh PC" functions enable simplified system wipe and restore

App Suspend - Refreshed Windows Task Manager suspends apps when they're not running on-screen

Logins - Photo, PIN (love the PIN), Microsoft Account Integration

Printing - Many, Print Class Driver Framework, Print apps no longer allowed to be part of driver

Graphic Hardware Acceleration - Just about everything, vastly improved

Explorer Ribbon - Thank God!

SMB 3 - If you don't network much, disregard, if you do, it's beyond scope of this post but look it up.

Secure Boot w/UEFI - a feature which disallows the loading of unauthorized firmware, operating systems, and drivers at boot time.

Improved Multi Monitor support - Yes, Metro kind of nullifies this :/

Windows to Go - Very fantastic enterprise feature. If you work in corporate IT, I suggest you read up on it

Large Disk Support - Self explanatory

Storage spaces - few are aware of this, good stuff. Storages Spaces allow you to combine multiple disks into one storage pool. The new technology is comparable to RAID, but it is more flexible and easier to configure. Probably the coolest thing is that disks can be of different size and connected through USB, SATA, and SAS (Serial Attached SCSI). Storage pools support thin provisioning (physical space is only used when the capacity is needed) and resiliency (mirroring for fault tolerance).

Power Management - Just works. On same hardware Win 7 was flaky on.

NTFS - Many many, NTFS file system enhancement including self-monitoring/repair and enhanced TRIM support for SSDs. Many very technical improvements to improve reliability of SATA and SCSI.

Global Screenhots - lol, yes, Win+PrtScr

Keyboard Enhancements - Though I have not seen a single Win 8 keyboard, let alone one to take advantage of these

There's more. Anyway, Win 8 Desktop Environment is unquestionably superior to Win 7. The poor Core Modern UI apps and the UI itself are really the only issues grating on many people's nerves.

Out of your list, only SMB3 & Graphic Hardware Acceleration apply to me & are noticable. You need a fast system to take advantage of that though. SMB3 copying to a 5400RPM SATA2 drive over a 100Mbit router won't make a difference, SMB2 should easy hit 100Mbit. The login is nice, but not really broken in 7. Also not sure about PIN logging in, I use fingerprint myself which worked since forever. Explorer ribbon is nice, but big and cluttery. Glad its changable. Multi-monitor worked fine since XP, what more do you need? Yes I presume Metro would make multi-monitor less efficient. My USB3 drives remained the same speed, maybe due to specific USB3 win drivers? Secure Boot only ALLOWS windows right now, so its just angering anyone who uses linux/dual boots. Glad my system isn't UEFI. I only have a singular windows system, so settings roam means nothing, as well as windows to go, as I'm a consumer thats not in an enterprise. My 3TB drives and my friends 4TB drive had no problem working in his windows 7 system - how large of discs are we talking?

I did not know about storage spaces though. sounds cool. Something I have to look further into, with that flexibility I want to know what happens if a USB drive gets pulled by accident or a large capacity drive dies. Also, are they dedicated to that system now?

Keyboard enhancements intrigue me.. Because I install keyboard software now to use the special keys. As you said, wait and see.

So as you can see, as a basic user, 2 things stuck out to me when you listed 15+ relevant enhancements. herein where windows don't sell

I honestly think the main reason for the slow uptake for Windows 8 has more to do with the price of computers more than the interface. People might dislike the Modern interface but they would adjust in time. However, the price of computers have jumped alarmingly since the release of Windows 8, mainly because of the touchscreens. When people can get touchscreen tablets for $199, they don't see the value in getting a Windows 8 touchscreen for many times that.

I don't think it is modern, it looks almost like an updated version of Windows 3.1 but bland.

I don't think it is modern

I don't think that's the official name for it either. As far as I know, it's just called the "Windows 8" interface. Personally, I will continue to go with 'Metro'. Although I like David Pogue's idea of calling it TileWorld.

By the way, the graph in the OP is actually outdated. Here it is with two more data points:

post-5569-0-63248000-1362331250.jpg

Again, someone at MS incorrectly believes desktop computing is diminishing or losing significance. They are just ... wrong.
This. Microsoft should understand that the desktop UI is still by far the most appropriate for serious work sitting at a desktop with large monitors and high-performance, high-precision input devices like a keyboard and a mouse. It's great that they developed an alternative for small mobile touch screens, but someone there seems to think that this new UI can meet all needs. It does not.
  • Like 3

Out of your list, only SMB3 & Graphic Hardware Acceleration apply to me & are noticable. You need a fast system to take advantage of that though. SMB3 copying to a 5400RPM SATA2 drive over a 100Mbit router won't make a difference, SMB2 should easy hit 100Mbit. The login is nice, but not really broken in 7. Also not sure about PIN logging in, I use fingerprint myself which worked since forever. Explorer ribbon is nice, but big and cluttery. Glad its changable. Multi-monitor worked fine since XP, what more do you need? Yes I presume Metro would make multi-monitor less efficient. My USB3 drives remained the same speed, maybe due to specific USB3 win drivers? Secure Boot only ALLOWS windows right now, so its just angering anyone who uses linux/dual boots. Glad my system isn't UEFI. I only have a singular windows system, so settings roam means nothing, as well as windows to go, as I'm a consumer thats not in an enterprise. My 3TB drives and my friends 4TB drive had no problem working in his windows 7 system - how large of discs are we talking?

I did not know about storage spaces though. sounds cool. Something I have to look further into, with that flexibility I want to know what happens if a USB drive gets pulled by accident or a large capacity drive dies. Also, are they dedicated to that system now?

Keyboard enhancements intrigue me.. Because I install keyboard software now to use the special keys. As you said, wait and see.

So as you can see, as a basic user, 2 things stuck out to me when you listed 15+ relevant enhancements. herein where windows don't sell

Here's a good Neowin clip on how 8 is improving large disk support, https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-details-how-windows-8-will-handle-large-hard-disk-drives

For UASP, you do need a current chipset with UASP support and a USB device with a controller that supports it. It's new, but shortly all chipsets and externals will support it. I know Intels H77 and Z77 fully support it as do Lacie's current Porsche line of externals and Theremaltake's current external enclosures. You won't get much with an older slow drive though in any case. Fast HDs with lots of cache SSDs, and Flash drives (Mushkin's Ventura Pro's support it as do Lacie's rugged thumb drive.)

I forgot to mention File History (Time Machine, lol), but I had to use it yesterday and it worked well. And FAST. Of course my File history drive is a 2TB SATA restoring 350G to a USB UASP external. Sustained 97MBs. Not too shabby considering both are pretty old HDs. I do miss the system imaging but never really like MS' implementation so I'm good. Gonna give Macrium a try.

Even if you only have one device, if you ever have to rebuild, it's nice to have most of your basic settings there already, to my surprise this included wifi settings across devices. That was cool. I love the PIN. I use a long complex password, it's nice after to put it in once, to go to a 4 digit pin. Very nice. If you're going to install an FP reader, obviously this is of not value to you but that's not very common in the enterprise, let alone your average Joe.

I hear what you're saying about UEFI and Linux et. al., I, at this time have no interest in that and neither do most average users. It's a Windows and Mac world. FWIW, I would not consider anyone wanting to dual boot Linux a basic user.

Enthusiasts, who drive desktop computing IMO, will appreciate the improved TRIM support, I'm not sure SMB 3 is relevant to a home network really. But it is important in the corporate environment as is Windows To Go. Many, many consumers take screenshots of apps/games and now this is native. I'm all for fewer third-party apps for core and basic functionality (the opposite of where MS is going, lol).

As for storage spaces, I have not actually used them but I imagine you lose whatever data I on that drive but it should keep working. I'm guessing there will be an Action Center notification. I believe you can choose a config with redundancy.

Your summation that there really is no reason to upgrade is valid. But it is clearly a worth upgrade. At $14.99 or $39.99 with Free Media Center it was a no-brainer despite how irritating Metro is/was. Now though, not so much. I don't think I could justify a downgrade other than the fact that you do have to pay another $5 for Start8 but there are free alternatives.

People buying new PCs (not a lot) will take what they get. But the millions of installed base that aren't or won't upgrade is huge. Getting them on board would be a big win for MS. But right now they're punch drunk from the ass whippin' iPad and Android are giving them. They're stumblin' all over the place. Not finishing or polishing things off ... smh

I don't think that's the official name for it either. As far as I know, it's just called the "Windows 8" interface. Personally, I will continue to go with 'Metro'. Although I like David Pogue's idea of calling it TileWorld.

By the way, the graph in the OP is actually outdated. Here it is with two more data points:

TileWorld! I love it. It's a shame because Win 8 has much potential, but also sacrifices too much, that's the main reason I've stayed with Win 7.

I've only upgraded 1 laptop (1.9 GHz Turion x2, 2GB, nVidia 7150 Go) and it runs great on it. We leave it on the dining room table for a quick glance on weather, email and news. But any time any one has picked it up and tried to use it for prolonged multitasking using Metro / Desktop; they've been very frustrated, even though they understand the UI tricks on getting around; it just takes longer and is more tedious. Windows 8 really should have had two separate UI modes; but MS is arrogant and did not want to give users choice.

Microsoft forked themselves with this one. I"m sure Windows 9 will correct a bunch of the issues people are having. *ducks*

You can't really correct anything with Windows 9 because this was completely wrong IDEA on how to move Windows forward and it's now too late..

Now they have to push Metro and everything they imagined because it's the only thing they can do.. so I don't see how Windows 9 can fix anything..

Actually they are saying these days that Windows 9 might completely remove desktop.. now that would be even more insane idea.

Having the tablet and desktop OS in one is terrible idea that was executed even worse. There's a reason why Balmer himself said "This was the riskiest move Microsoft made pretty much ever".. Well, it has failed. The whole strategy is beyond stupid.

They should have pushed Metro OS/Surface separately, desktop Windows improved and not completely turned upside down.

But I can't say I care too much about them.. Microsoft has become largely irrelevant in the future of computing and is growing more so with every passing month.

  • Like 3

People are now going mobile. Mobile computing is where it's at now.

Desktop computing is now considered ancient. tablets and mobile phones are the computers of today.

Desktop computers are best suited for offices.

Not this crap again.

:rolleyes:

Fanbois will always defend the indefensible regardless of facts. For those not so short-sighted, we can now just revel in the warm glow that is; "I told you so."

these are not facts.these are stats from webpages this company tracks. they are still tracking sites that are irrelevant today that were popular years ago, for example digg.this skews the results bigtime. and not only that, using percentages to gage how well sales are is not a comparison on actual sales numbers. %1 of a million is more than %50 of 100.

if you want facts, then here are the facts. they sold 40 million copies in a month, then added another 20 million the next month. so 60 million copies sold in 2 months.

of course, most of the haters will resort back to some silly stats from web tracking,and twist the results because they are wrong,and the product is a success. listen,people can whine and pout all they want, but Microsoft is in the business of making money, not making a bunch of people on message forums happy that don't make a blip on their radar. Consumers don't want outdated desktop crap. They're speaking with their wallets. They want touch,easy simple interfaces. Microsoft is being generous still including the legacy desktop, but in the future,youre going to have to dig deeper and deeper to pull it up. Maybe the desktop will become an addon,or even a wrapper, kind of like what you do to run old dos stuff.

You can't really correct anything with Windows 9 because this was completely wrong IDEA on how to move Windows forward and it's now too late..

Now they have to push Metro and everything they imagined because it's the only thing they can do.. so I don't see how Windows 9 can fix anything..

Actually they are saying these days that Windows 9 might completely remove desktop.. now that would be even more insane idea.

Having the tablet and desktop OS in one is terrible idea that was executed even worse. There's a reason why Balmer himself said "This was the riskiest move Microsoft made pretty much ever".. Well, it has failed. The whole strategy is beyond stupid.

They should have pushed Metro OS/Surface separately, desktop Windows improved and not completely turned upside down.

But I can't say I care too much about them.. Microsoft has become largely irrelevant in the future of computing and is growing more so with every passing month.

Give it a few years, and you'll see why Microsoft changed. It takes more time than 5 months. There is no more long term viability in the point and click desktop. None. To *not* change would have been the more insane idea, especially after the kickback Microsoft got from Windows 7 powered tablets and devices, or are you forgetting that?

Give it a few years, and you'll see why Microsoft changed. It takes more time than 5 months. There is no more long term viability in the point and click desktop. None. To *not* change would have been the more insane idea, especially after the kickback Microsoft got from Windows 7 powered tablets and devices, or are you forgetting that?

Again with the same argument with point and click being dead? Really?

Why can't you guys just face up to facts. Windows 8 on the desktop is just a mess. It is not "Just as good" as Windows 7.

I have just installed a second monitor, now (without applications like Start8) I keep activating the charms bar every few minutes.

And I bet you all the fanboys will tell me to "Learn how to use your mouse. Microsoft is sooooooooooo perfect, it is obviously you that is the problem".

Come on. The attitude here is just so ridiculous. I have said numerous times I use and actually LIKE Windows 8. There are a few things I hate about it. YET, people still attack me saying "Learn how to use your mouse, it is not Microsoft's fault you cannot use your mouse correctly".

I do not remember having hot corners in Windows 7 with dual screens......

Give it a few years, and you'll see why Microsoft changed. It takes more time than 5 months. There is no more long term viability in the point and click desktop. None. To *not* change would have been the more insane idea, especially after the kickback Microsoft got from Windows 7 powered tablets and devices, or are you forgetting that?

Yes, and enterprise computing across the globe, that made Microsoft who it is, and is their cash Enterprise Agreement Cow along with the Desktop Office Productivity Suite which funds everything else, ceased to exist upon the release of Windows 8 Modern UI. Absolutely.

While Mobile computing IS the emerging market that MS needs to get into to continue to grow revenue, it has not supplanted the world's productive desktops.

When Newegg.com, ASUS, AMD, NVIDIA, Gigabyte, et. al. go out of business, I might consider the over the top statement you made.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!