Windows 8 adoption rate almost at a standstill, far behind Windows 7


Recommended Posts

To date, none of my clients like Windows 8, they all ask if I can install Windows 7 or if they can order a new computer with Windows 7. I deal with around 70 unique clients a month. I had a client today with a new Dell Ultra book who wanted to throw it out the window. Lets hope Windows Blue or Windows 9 will be better for the casual consumer.

Really? Funny, there was just one the other day... This is for all of those who claim to "need" a mouse for drawing...

Funny, nowhere in that article does it mention anything about the dethroning of the mouse. I also didn't see anything overly exciting and new. The tablet and the pen have been around a long time. I also don't recall anyone claiming a mouse was "needed" for drawing. I suppose when you make stupid statements like "zOMG all these new devices!!! They've dethroned the mouse!!!111", I can't really expect that you'd be honest enough to say "Yeah...that was my own little hyperbole".

I won't disagree that a lot of these devices, which again...have been around a long time (regardless if they're more effective or functional now as opposed to then), are certainly making their way into everyday lives. But your statement that they've completely taken over the desktop mouse, on the desktop was flat out silly.

They're "new" in the fact that they're becoming more common in the consumer space. The Surface Pro takes that a step further. How long will it be before there's Wacom tech in the touch AiO's sold?

I suppose splitting hairs that's true, or will be with the Surface Pro sporting a stylus. Many Windows Phones and Blackberries have always had them. I'm sure they're available for iPads too. They are not replacing mice, they are accompanying mobile devices. I don't disagree with what's happening in the mobile space, only that it is in parallel to the desktop space. Obviously the tablet space is the emerging market but it will level off soon enough. That's why MS can't waste a whole lot of time establishing itself there.

Funny, nowhere in that article does it mention anything about the dethroning of the mouse. I also didn't see anything overly exciting and new. The tablet and the pen have been around a long time. I also don't recall anyone claiming a mouse was "needed" for drawing. I suppose when you make stupid statements like "zOMG all these new devices!!! They've dethroned the mouse!!!111", I can't really expect that you'd be honest enough to say "Yeah...that was my own little hyperbole".

I won't disagree that a lot of these devices, which again...have been around a long time (regardless if they're more effective or functional now as opposed to then), are certainly making their way into everyday lives. But your statement that they've completely taken over the desktop mouse, on the desktop was flat out silly.

You know, you sound like all the business owners in the 70's who laughed at the mouse when it first showed up... Just saying. The Mouse wasn't "welcomed" with open arms either. Businesses clung to punch cards and the CLI, but it was an exercise in futility. The adoption of household computers and Windows 3.1 systems forced businesses out of the world of terminals and into the world of workstations. Now we're going from workstations to mobility.

You know, you sound like all the business owners in the 70's who laughed at the mouse when it first showed up... Just saying. The Mouse wasn't "welcomed" with open arms either.

Says the guy who made up a bunch of new technology (That wasn't new) and claims it's taken over the mouse. Which btw, is mainly used on desktops and laptops, not mobile devices such as tablets and mobile phones. So your whole argument becomes even more silly because you're throwing all of them in the same category across the board.

Oh btw, I use a graphics tablet and pen to draw. Have for years. If you mean to say that these devices are becoming increasingly popular and more widely available, sure...I can agree with that. But that is far from what you said.

There are no sources saying Windows 8 has "completely failed". That's just you saying that.

Vista has been consider by many to have been a failure on the desktop, the fact that windows 8 uptake is even less than Vista more than proves that windows 8 is a total failure even more than vista was.

Lol. I have never wanted a product to fail so bad in my life. Sorry MS. But you've split your users too far on this one.

  • Like 3

Says the guy who made up a bunch of new technology (That wasn't new) and claims it's taken over the mouse. Which btw, is mainly used on desktops and laptops, not mobile devices such as tablets and mobile phones. So your whole argument becomes even more silly because you're throwing all of them in the same category across the board.

Oh btw, I use a graphics tablet and pen to draw. Have for years. If you mean to say that these devices are becoming increasingly popular and more widely available, sure...I can agree with that. But that is far from what you said.

Touch is "new" in the sense that we finally have "pure" technology to take advantage of it, such as smartphones, tablets, and now Windows 8, which at the earliest came about in 2007 after the iPhone explosion.

Motion is a completely new consumer piece with the introduction of Microsoft's Kinect 3 years ago.

Wacom tech is finding itself on more and more devices - go back 10 years, and you wouldn't find them in the average consumer's house. Today you can.

Voice control is now a new household name thanks to Apple's Siri, released just 2 years ago.

This isn't even touching the experimental technologies being developed this very second, such as augmented reality. Shall I go on?

You've been quite openly hostile to the OS for some time now (yes, I'm calling you out on that), and won't even make a positive comment about it, even on front page news articles showcasing positive Windows 8 happenings.

Of course I have been pointing out the glaring and obvious flaws with windows 8 long before it was released just as countless others have also done, if you think that I am being "hostile" then that is just your opinion.

I generally stay away from most of the so-called "positive" articles on the frontpage because they simply don't interest me, the only "positive" thing that could happen to windows 8 would be if microsoft were to actually listen to the needs of their customers and fix this abomination of an OS called windows 8, I would certain comment on an article about that.

Touch is "new" in the sense that we finally have "pure" technology to take advantage of it, such as smartphones, tablets, and now Windows 8.

Motion is a completely new consumer piece with the introduction of Microsoft's Kinect 3 years ago.

Wacom tech is finding itself on more and more devices - go back 10 years, and you wouldn't find them in the average consumer's house. Today you can.

Voice control is now a new household name thanks to Apple's Siri, released just 2 years ago.

This isn't even touching the experimental technologies being developed this very second, such as augmented reality. Shall I go on?

None of those things are "new" (aside from Kinect, but even that isn't entirely new). Please stop saying "new", because they...are...not...new. These things have all been available for a long time. Some may not have been as widely available or even as functional as they are today, but they are not new. Shall I go on?

This isn't even touching the experimental technologies being developed this very second, such as augmented reality. Shall I go on?

No...please stop. We get it...you like Windows 8 and like to touch it.

On the desktop ... I much rather use keyboard/mouse then smudging up my desktop monitor or constantly raising and lowering my arms touching the screen.

  • Like 3

None of those things are "new" (aside from Kinect, but even that isn't entirely new). Please stop saying "new", because they...are...not...new. These things have all been available for a long time. Some may not have been as widely available or even as functional as they are today, but they are not new. Shall I go on?

Go back in time 10 years. I dare you to find a consumer with those technologies in their house, let alone seamlessly working with their computers at the time, as they do today.

They're "new" to the consumer.

Microsoft Voice Command was as far as I know the first consumer release voice control PPC's and Windows Mobile and was light years ahead of everyone else.

Google then came to the market and owned everyone else when it comes to voice control, if you ask me, they still do. Siri is trash and Apple's voice command was actually better.

However those are just my opinions when it comes to the voice tech.

Go back in time 10 years. I dare you to find a consumer with those technologies in their house, let alone working with their computers as they do today.

They're "new" to the consumer.

Here you go MSVC November 2003

http://en.wikipedia....t_Voice_Command

http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/press/2003/nov03/11-03voicecommandlaunch2003pr.aspx

Go back in time 10 years. I dare you to find a consumer with those technologies in their house.

They're "new" to the consumer.

http://www.pcworld.c...75/article.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Simon (I went all the way back to 1992 for this one, since you're insistent on being a jerk)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchpad (Went even FURTHER back 1982, to drill the point home)

I'll stop now, cause I think I've made my point. Or...shall I go on?

  • Like 2

Now you're just becoming offensive, lol.

>>You know, you sound like all the business owners in the 70's who laughed at the mouse when it first showed up... Just saying.<<

It showed up at Xerox/Parc when Gates and Jobs visited. It was a total paradigm shift from text-based computing to GUI. Totally non-analogous. And most of the resistance was because the Mac had no software that could do what WordPerfect and Lotus could do. So MS helped them out and made Word and Excel for the Mac. Not sure about Excel.

A more analogous comparison would be single mouse button (jobs) vs. two (gates). Gates won, but it appear in the end, MS is headed back to the future killing off the right click and in-place context menus. At least that the direction they're headed in so ultimately, Jobs will win. Two mouse buttons are too complex for most computer users ... :/ Decades, Billions of $$$ for MS and total desktop dominance for two mouse buttons later.

>>Businesses clung to punch cards and the CLI, but it was an exercise in futility.<<

Business dropped punch cards as soon as they could. Legacy apps stayed around until they could be moved off the mainframe. You do know that all file popular file systems are still based on the old mainframe? Only you had to specify how to save to DASD manually. Things NTFS and HFS do automatically now. Refrain from ethnocentrism.

>>The adoption of household computers and Windows 3.1 systems forced businesses out of the world of terminals and into the world of workstations. Now we're going from workstations to mobility.<<

Fix - The adoption of the Apple II and Mac for schools and households, then later on Windows NT. Windows 3.1 was never a workstation (It was a weak problematic client until 3.11/WfW) and was never that popular in homes. That didn't really happen until Windows 95 and went nuts with Windows XP. And businesses weren't really forced. When the technology was there and worked and made sense to deploy, they did. Some mainframe employees had to be forced though.

Anyway, all that, I'm sure I recall some of it wrong, I was mesmerized by technology back then, in jr. high, or was that elementary. Anyway, those were natural evolutions providing capabilities not available. Not replacing existing technology with something inferior (subjective).

Anyway, $$$ talks. And if enough people don't like it and don't buy it, it'll get changed/fixed (subjective). The tablet space, honestly, I think MS blew it in the consumer space and while there's a slim chance to turn it around, I don't think they have the corporate leadership to fix it.

http://www.pcworld.c...75/article.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Simon (I went all the way back to 1992 for this one, since you're insistent on being a jerk)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchpad (Went even FURTHER back 1982, to drill the point home)

I'll stop now, cause I think I've made my point. Or...shall I go on?

You failed to understand my dare. XP tablet edition PC's weren't pure touch devices, were they? XP wasn't made for a tablet device, and these devices didn't even break out into the consumer space. They were laughed at.

Maybe, just maybe, you could have gotten by had you mentioned pocket PC's, but even then, your average consumer didn't have those either.

You failed to understand my dare. XP tablet edition PC's weren't pure touch devices, were they? XP wasn't made for a tablet device, and these devices didn't even break out into the consumer space. Maybe, just maybe, you could have gotten by had you mentioned pocket PC's, but even then, your average consumer didn't have those either.

And you fail to understand when you're wrong and should stop. These devices were all available to the consumer. Contrary to what you believe. You'll also note I said "I'll stop now" since I had already wiped the floor with your silly retorts. Mentioning the PocketPC was unnecessary. You are incorrectly calling these technologies "new". If your intention is to express that these technologies are better than they were, you'd be hard pressed to find a single person here to disagree. But you are calling them new. They are not new.

Stop making a fool of yourself.

And you fail to understand when you're wrong and should stop. These devices were all available to the consumer. Contrary to what you believe. You'll also note I said "I'll stop now" since I had already wiped the floor with your silly retorts. Mentioning the PocketPC was unnecessary. You are incorrectly calling these technologies "new". If your intention is to express that these technologies are better than they were, you'd be hard pressed to find a single person here to disagree. But you are calling them new. They are not new.

Stop making a fool of yourself.

Yes. They're "new" to the consumer space. They're mainstream technologies that have now matured and broken free of the niche markets they once occupied.

Yes. They're "new" to the consumer space. They're mainstream technologies that have now matured and broken free of the niche markets they once occupied.

They are not new to the consumer space. Stop being ridiculous.

Let's face the reality. Unless buying new machine which may include the Windows 8, most consumers won't simply upgrade to the latest product when available. If I can work on Windows 7, why should I bother about 8? We won't go ahead and buy a new TV or car or handphone or backpack when new model is available isn't it?

On the desktop ... I much rather use keyboard/mouse then smudging up my desktop monitor or constantly raising and lowering my arms touching the screen.

I think Nathan Lineback said it best when he wrote:

Now I hate to burst your bubble, but touch screens are NOT new. There were amber CRTs with touch screens back in the 1980s, and other similar forms of input even earlier than that. It has been proven over and over again that touch screens make make very poor input devices for destkop computers.

  • Your arm will tire very, very quickly trying to use a touch interface on a normal vertical monitor for any length of time.
  • Touch hardware adds to the cost of a monitor, which you ultimately can not use.
  • Any person that gets their dirty, greasy finger prints on my monitor gets a FIST IN THEIR FACE!!!!!!!!!!!!

In your opinion.

And here I was thinking he was writing your opinion in his post, thanks for the clarification.

http://www.pcworld.c...75/article.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Simon (I went all the way back to 1992 for this one, since you're insistent on being a jerk)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchpad (Went even FURTHER back 1982, to drill the point home)

I'll stop now, cause I think I've made my point. Or...shall I go on?

Touch computing as we know today mainly took off with iPhone. I think one of the reason was using fingers as input instead of earlier focus on stylus.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!