Windows 8 adoption rate almost at a standstill, far behind Windows 7


Recommended Posts

I'm not the one trying to sell everyone on the idea that we should be superseding PC hardware with tinkertoys you are.

And quite poorly I might add. Considering all of these "new" devices that have allegedly "dethroned" the mouse, aren't really new at all. Lol

  • Like 3

I'm not the one trying to sell everyone on the idea that we should be superseding PC hardware with tinkertoys you are.

"Tinkertoys", huh? Is that why businesses are adopting them en masse? Is that why I have a buddy working for a small business who develops ONLY iOS apps for business use? Is that why schools are using them as education assets? And is that why many people can find that all they need is an iPad for their needs?

>>I never said keyboard.<<

You are correct you did not. Mouse & Keyboard tend to stick together.

>>but in our everyday lives, especially that of the younger generations, how many still use a mouse more than touch?<<

Everyone that wants a job using a computer. Everyone uses a mouse more than touch on a desktop computer. Even on a laptop, touch, a mouse is more efficient, even with the Start Page.

As I said, tablet computing is a complement and/or a parallel market to desktop computing. Even in school whether it's a mac or a pc a mouse and keyboard are and will be the primary input for some time to come. Your personal mobile device notwithstanding.

>>Hell, I've had my laptop for over three years now, and the other day, without thinking, I reached out to touch it.<<

You should get over that. Even with a touch desktop, how much can you actually reach out and do, your gonna draw an email? Visio diagram? Recipe, personal budget, touch is of limited value. There are niche environments where it is of great value. Kiosks and touch input is not knew, and neither are the places where it is of value.

Remember after AVATAR 3D was going to take over everything, again? Just like the 1950s. MP3 players killed walkmans, which were killed by smartphones, but headphones remain.

Yes, but we've never had anything that has really taken advantage of these technologies before. Look at touch, It was hobbled together over a Windows Embedded version that had a desktop built for the mouse.

Now we do. Hell, just the other day, the creator of the Penny Arcade comic strip had a pretty nice article about what he was able to do with a Surface Pro.

Again with the same argument with point and click being dead? Really?

Why can't you guys just face up to facts. Windows 8 on the desktop is just a mess. It is not "Just as good" as Windows 7.

I have just installed a second monitor, now (without applications like Start8) I keep activating the charms bar every few minutes.

And I bet you all the fanboys will tell me to "Learn how to use your mouse. Microsoft is sooooooooooo perfect, it is obviously you that is the problem".

Come on. The attitude here is just so ridiculous. I have said numerous times I use and actually LIKE Windows 8. There are a few things I hate about it. YET, people still attack me saying "Learn how to use your mouse, it is not Microsoft's fault you cannot use your mouse correctly".

I do not remember having hot corners in Windows 7 with dual screens......

"Not as good as Windows 7" why? The ONLY item that DIDN'T get carried over from Windows 7's UI is the Start menu. Period. (The Superbar and Taskbar pinning - both launched with Vista, and accepted with 7 - remain in Windows 8 today. The "Taskbar pin" option - in the installer for Google Chrome for Windows - has been present since version 22, and remains in version 24, the current/stable version, and it works in both 7 and 8.)

Tell me, please, O defenders of Windows 7's UI - what else is missing?

Here is the absolute reality, folks - while the Start menu is not there in Windows 8, every other UI feature from Windows 7 is either untouched or even IMPROVED in Windows 8. In fact, I have some features that I use that are, in fact, carryover from Windows 7 or older that got major enhancements in Windows 8; the biggest enhancement is, amusingly, a carryover from Windows 2000 Professional - Runboxing. One area where integration with Index Server (part of the NT core since the aforementioned Windows 2000) and Windows Search (the successor to Index Server as of XP Service Pack 2/Server 2003 Service Pack 1) is the command line. Power users - how many of you actually use it (the command line that is)? I'm not talking about just PowerShell (which is no longer the Ugly Stepchild of desktop Windows, despite being included since its birth), but even ordinary command-line usage? Are you really power users, or are you more power mousers? I willingly admit to falling into the power-mouser camp - I don't know as much about PowerShell as I should to be a true power user - yet I leverage the Runbox more than most of you, despite still using a keyboard and mouse, and in the supposedly "wrong" UI. And what is worse, most of how I use it is. in fact, carryover.

"Not as good as Windows 7" why? The ONLY item that DIDN'T get carried over from Windows 7's UI is the Start menu. Period. (The Superbar and Taskbar pinning - both launched with Vista, and accepted with 7 - remain in Windows 8 today. The "Taskbar pin" option - in the installer for Google Chrome for Windows - has been present since version 22, and remains in version 24, the current/stable version, and it works in both 7 and 8.)

Tell me, please, O defenders of Windows 7's UI - what else is missing?

Here is the absolute reality, folks - while the Start menu is not there in Windows 8, every other UI feature from Windows 7 is either untouched or even IMPROVED in Windows 8. In fact, I have some features that I use that are, in fact, carryover from Windows 7 or older that got major enhancements in Windows 8; the biggest enhancement is, amusingly, a carryover from Windows 2000 Professional - Runboxing. One area where integration with Index Server (part of the NT core since the aforementioned Windows 2000) and Windows Search (the successor to Index Server as of XP Service Pack 2/Server 2003 Service Pack 1) is the command line. Power users - how many of you actually use it (the command line that is)? I'm not talking about just PowerShell (which is no longer the Ugly Stepchild of desktop Windows, despite being included since its birth), but even ordinary command-line usage? Are you really power users, or are you more power mousers? I willingly admit to falling into the power-mouser camp - I don't know as much about PowerShell as I should to be a true power user - yet I leverage the Runbox more than most of you, despite still using a keyboard and mouse, and in the supposedly "wrong" UI. And what is worse, most of how I use it is. in fact, carryover.

The "superbar", and taskbar pinning debuted with Windows 7, not Vista.

The "superbar" and taskbar pinning, debuted with Windows 7, not Vista.

Both started in Vista (ignored, but there); usage of both exploded with the adoption of 7. Still, nobody else has named anything other than the Start menu that got axed between 7 and 8 - which was precisely my point. (The Superbar, in fact, grew out of the Quick Launch bar, which came in with XP - that also remains in Windows 8 today.)

Basically, to all too many users - despite how little they may actually use it - the Start menu is what makes Windows recognizable.

"Not as good as Windows 7" why? The ONLY item that DIDN'T get carried over from Windows 7's UI is the Start menu. Period. (The Superbar and Taskbar pinning - both launched with Vista, and accepted with 7 - remain in Windows 8 today. The "Taskbar pin" option - in the installer for Google Chrome for Windows - has been present since version 22, and remains in version 24, the current/stable version, and it works in both 7 and 8.)

Tell me, please, O defenders of Windows 7's UI - what else is missing?

Here is the absolute reality, folks - while the Start menu is not there in Windows 8, every other UI feature from Windows 7 is either untouched or even IMPROVED in Windows 8. In fact, I have some features that I use that are, in fact, carryover from Windows 7 or older that got major enhancements in Windows 8; the biggest enhancement is, amusingly, a carryover from Windows 2000 Professional - Runboxing. One area where integration with Index Server (part of the NT core since the aforementioned Windows 2000) and Windows Search (the successor to Index Server as of XP Service Pack 2/Server 2003 Service Pack 1) is the command line. Power users - how many of you actually use it (the command line that is)? I'm not talking about just PowerShell (which is no longer the Ugly Stepchild of desktop Windows, despite being included since its birth), but even ordinary command-line usage? Are you really power users, or are you more power mousers? I willingly admit to falling into the power-mouser camp - I don't know as much about PowerShell as I should to be a true power user - yet I leverage the Runbox more than most of you, despite still using a keyboard and mouse, and in the supposedly "wrong" UI. And what is worse, most of how I use it is. in fact, carryover.

Power Shell is best for Admin duties. There are things you must do in Exchange that are just a headache and a half any other way. Some global operations just aren't even possible from the GUI.

On the personal desktop, I primarily launch web sites using Win+R Website, lol. I type about 90 wpm comfortably so I do that faster than I can launch a browser and click in the address bar and type the URL. It's the drag the mouse to the address bar that slows it down. Even in 7. That's part of what make a lot of Modern UI less efficient, all the travel time before you can actually perform the action you want.

I think the only way to truly disable hibernate and recover that space is from the command line. Diskpart is still useful, but not much. I always optimize my WiFi settings with netsh, but that's a one time thing.

I also miss and update to System Image, though Windows 7's is there if you search, I haven't tried to use it. Going third party.

People who miss the Start Menu did a lot with it, including search. Those things are in 8 but arguably less efficient and to some (in my case Modern UI Search) just nerve racking. I view my and launch Favorites from Start menu (displayed as hierarchical menu, which is faster than opening the browser and going to favorites as well as my Personal Documents, Computer, and Recorded TV. All faster than opening Explorer. All that customizability, efficiency, is gone. And back again with Start8 :)

People who miss the Start Menu did a lot with it, including search. Those things are in 8 but arguably less efficient and to some (in my case Modern UI Search) just nerve racking. I view my and launch Favorites from Start menu (displayed as hierarchical menu, which is faster than opening the browser and going to favorites as well as my Personal Documents, Computer, and Recorded TV. All faster than opening Explorer. All that customizability, efficiency, is gone. And back again with Start8 :)

I used the Start Menu just like any other Windows user, but the new Start Screen didn't remove any of its functionality. Am I going to cry over the fact that I might have to make an extra click or drag my mouse an extra few pixels? No, that's what the mouse was designed to do, click and move. Not everything is going to be easily accessible in one click.

A user-friendly environment.

There is nothing user unfriendly with Metro. "Unfamiliar" (IF you haven't taken the time already to familiarize yourself with it by now), but nothing Unfriendly.

In your opinion.

Metro is a another computing environment among many. If you can't use it, or "find it hostile", than I'd hate to see you guys use an iPad or smartphone, because it's no different from that.

I used the Start Menu just like any other Windows user, but the new Start Screen didn't remove any of its functionality. Am I going to cry over the fact that I might have to make an extra click or drag my mouse an extra few pixels? No, that's what the mouse was designed to do, click and move. Not everything is going to be easily accessible in one click.

Based on your post over time, I doubt you used the start menu as more than a program launcher. I doubt anyone is crying, they're not buying it. And if you're really thinking touch will replace a mouse, you already don't mind wasting time and effort so you're probably fine making extra clicks and drags. A few pixels, that would be lest than a centimeter. Try all day long 10-13". I'm being generous by saying halfway across the screen from 20-27" monitors.

So, no, users aren't going to cry, they're just not going to boy it. Who would pay to go backwards if that's how they perceive the changes as it relates to their computing experience. Who's going to deploy it if it will generate help desk calls for silly help, or just to express irritation and request the old system back? The real world is a lot bigger than your cousin's iPad.

Metro is a another computing environment among many. If you can't use it, or "find it hostile", than I'd hate to see you guys use an iPad or smartphone, because it's no different from that.

Only iPad's and smartphone's aren't desktop computing environments.

  • Like 3

Based on your post over time, I doubt you used the start menu as more than a program launcher. I doubt anyone is crying, they're not buying it. And if you're really thinking touch will replace a mouse, you already don't mind wasting time and effort so you're probably fine making extra clicks and drags. A few pixels, that would be lest than a centimeter. Try all day long 10-13". I'm being generous by saying halfway across the screen from 20-27" monitors.

That's all the Start Menu was, an app launcher, same with the Start Screen. If you're running a 25+ inch monitor, there are ways to alleviate many irritations that you describe, such as increasing the DPI (Yes, you can even do that in Metro) and mouse tracking.

So, no, users aren't going to cry, they're just not going to boy it. Who would pay to go backwards if that's how they perceive the changes as it relates to their computing experience. Who's going to deploy it if it will generate help desk calls for silly help, or just to express irritation and request the old system back? The real world is a lot bigger than your cousin's iPad.

That describes the help desk any other time, but that hasn't stopped things from changing before, so why will it now? Support calls haven't stopped the company I work for from rescinding their system update, not sure why you see that as a valid excuse for others.

>>That's all the Start Menu was, an app launcher, same with the Start Screen. If you're running a 25+ inch monitor, there are ways to alleviate many irritations that you describe, such as increasing the DPI (Yes, you can even do that in Metro) and mouse tracking.<<

Resistance is futile, smh. I understand now. :>

>>That describes the help desk any other time, but that hasn't stopped things from changing before, so why will it now?<<

It absolutely does change things. Only you don't know it. These decisions are made for you by people a bit more experienced and responsible for these things.

>>That's all the Start Menu was, an app launcher, same with the Start Screen. If you're running a 25+ inch monitor, there are ways to alleviate many irritations that you describe, such as increasing the DPI (Yes, you can even do that in Metro) and mouse tracking.<<

Resistance is futile, smh. I understand now. :>

>>That describes the help desk any other time, but that hasn't stopped things from changing before, so why will it now?<<

It absolutely does change things. Only you don't know it. These decisions are made for you by people a bit more experienced and responsible for these things.

That sounds like the argument made by liberals - they aren't always right. There are times that a person should (in fact, MUST) make a decision for themselves.

Decrying Microsoft's decision is one thing - note that I have no opinion - one way or the other - regarding whether axing the Start menu overall was good or bad; I simply started that it had NO impact on me.

Further, most of the bring-backs ALSO contain features the Start menu ITSELF lacked when it was present; therefore, they do more than simply bring back a tossed feature.

THAT is why I asked those that stuck to Windows 7 to give me more gist than the easily-put-back Start menu.

Metro is a another computing environment among many. If you can't use it, or "find it hostile", than I'd hate to see you guys use an iPad or smartphone, because it's no different from that.

Ipads are touch devices, metro may not be user-hostile in that situation, on a regular desktop however metro is indeed user-hostile.

Metro is a another computing environment among many. If you can't use it, or "find it hostile", than I'd hate to see you guys use an iPad or smartphone, because it's no different from that.

Regardless, these are still just your opinions. Not fact. Spin it however you want. Insult as many people as you want. The true fact here, is that your opinion does not make it fact. What you believe to be user friendly is not necessarily the same as what someone else would find user friendly. You can argue until you're blue in the face that Windows 8 is the greatest thing since sliced bread, but it does not make it fact.

  • Like 2

There is nothing user unfriendly with Metro. "Unfamiliar" (IF you haven't taken the time already to familiarize yourself with it by now), but nothing Unfriendly.

This is only your opinion, an opinion that differs greatly with countless others, you do realize windows 8 has completely failed, right? perhaps you should go back and read the OP.

This is only your opinion, an opinion that differs greatly with countless others, you do realize windows 8 has completely failed, right? perhaps you should go back and read the OP.

There are no sources saying Windows 8 has "completely failed". That's just you saying that. You've been quite openly hostile to the OS for some time now (yes, I'm calling you out on that), and won't even make a positive comment about it, even on front page news articles showcasing positive Windows 8 happenings.

Market share is no indication of that. If that's the case, then Linux has completely failed too, and I guess you could add Apple Macs to that as well.

There are no sources saying Windows 8 has "completely failed". That's just you saying that. Market share is no indication of that. If that's the case, then Linux has completely failed too, and I guess you could add Apple Macs to that as well.

I'm still waiting for the sources to all of these magical "new technologies" (that have existed for years) and their sudden "dethroning" of the mouse. Just saying...

I'm still waiting for the sources to all of these magical "new technologies" (that have existed for years) and their sudden "dethroning" of the mouse. Just saying...

Really? Funny, there was just one the other day... This is for all of those who claim to "need" a mouse for drawing...

>>That sounds like the argument made by liberals - they aren't always right. There are times that a person should (in fact, MUST) make a decision for themselves.<<

I'm not sure exactly what that's in reference to. The corporate help desk and IT departments and how they decide what to and not to deploy, and Dept. Heads who demand technology changes based on their staff's productivity?

>>Further, most of the bring-backs ALSO contain features the Start menu ITSELF lacked when it was present; therefore, they do more than simply bring back a tossed feature.

THAT is why I asked those that stuck to Windows 7 to give me more gist than the easily-put-back Start menu.<<

I've only used Start8, so I'm not sure about all the additional features other than including Metro apps and allowing a delayed windows key press to open either Start Menu or Start Page. I think people want the functionality, efficiency. Not necessarily literally the old Start Menu. I don't think the absence of the Start Menu really bothers people, it's that the Modern UI doesn't meet their needs without it. Example, I have Start8 to avoid Modern UI Search. Not that I have a problem hitting the Start Button and typing my search term. That's exactly the same process as Win 7. It's what happens after that.

This isn't unique. There's Bob, WindowsMe, Vista, Windows Mobile, Active Desktop. If people don't like it, they won't buy or deploy it. If they don't buy or deploy it, Microsoft will fix it ... i.e. Windows 7. Given the importance of Windows 8, the marketing dollars spent, I doubt the Start Menu is coming back in any form, but many of the complaints will definitely be addressed. My recommendation is upgrade, and voice your complaints, unless you just really hate it. Don't buy anything you don't want.

Really? Funny, there was just one the other day... This is for all of those who claim to "need" a mouse for drawing...

Real artists have always used a stylus for drawing. Long time. Mac and PC. What do you think Wacom is known for? They're not new.

Real artists have always used a stylus for drawing. Long time. Mac and PC. What do you think Wacom is known for? They're not new.

They're "new" in the fact that they're becoming more common in the consumer space. The Surface Pro takes that a step further. How long will it be before there's Wacom tech in the touch AiO's sold?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!