Windows 8 adoption rate almost at a standstill, far behind Windows 7


Recommended Posts

That's an interesting theory. And would have been ingenious. Only if Windows 8 is supposed to be consumer oriented, someone forgot to tell the core app people. Xbox Music and Video apps can only be a part of Willy Wonka's grand domination scheme. The Zune guys must've been in a corner for a timeout as well. :)

If it weren't for all the great enterprise features I would agree with you. Or if there had been a GPO for enterprise to bypass the Start Page.

I didn't understand what you said about Xbox and Zune. I'm saying Windows 8 is consumer-oriented because its main push is the Windows Store, its new app model and UI paradigm, which are clearly designed for consumer tablets, and are rather impediments than an improvement for business users. I'm not aware of which enterprise features you speak of, but it seems to me like the focus of this new version clearly goes against entreprise users.

I didn't understand what you said about Xbox and Zune. I'm saying Windows 8 is consumer-oriented because its main push is the Windows Store, its new app model and UI paradigm, which are clearly designed for consumer tablets, and are rather impediments than an improvement for business users. I'm not aware of which enterprise features you speak of, but it seems to me like the focus of this new version clearly goes against entreprise users.

He meant if it was only consumer-oriented then at least the basic music/video apps would have been as good as Zune. As it stands today, both Xbox music and video are horrible pos.

  • Like 2

"Tinkertoys", huh? Is that why businesses are adopting them en masse? Is that why I have a buddy working for a small business who develops ONLY iOS apps for business use? Is that why schools are using them as education assets? And is that why many people can find that all they need is an iPad for their needs?

I've seen no evidence of them being adopted in those numbers by businesses or schools

I didn't understand what you said about Xbox and Zune. I'm saying Windows 8 is consumer-oriented because its main push is the Windows Store, its new app model and UI paradigm, which are clearly designed for consumer tablets, and are rather impediments than an improvement for business users. I'm not aware of which enterprise features you speak of, but it seems to me like the focus of this new version clearly goes against entreprise users.

Well I think that's coming from a position of ignorance because its not since vista that we have had so many new features for enterprise. Starting with hardware independent backups a feature which Acronis and the like have been trying to make work for years and charging a fair bit for.

With windows 8 you can quite literally image a drive from a netbook and restore it to a core i7 desktop. As long as you don't mix x86 and x64 your images are totally hardware independent.

There are major shortfalls with the store specifically the inability to use WSUS to update applications you don't own (without using a replay attack to capture the appx)

He meant if it was only consumer-oriented then at least the basic music/video apps would have been as good as Zune. As it stands today, both Xbox music and video are horrible pos.

Because they don't support your pirated movie and music collection ? Xbox Video is awesome with Tagged MP4 displays the posters and metadata.

Because they don't support your pirated movie and music collection ? Xbox Video is awesome with Tagged MP4 displays the posters and metadata.

I buy and rip Blu-rays to keep on my NAS, MKV has far better support for Video, Audio, Subtitles, etc.. than MP4. Am I a pirate too?

Because they don't support your pirated movie and music collection ? Xbox Video is awesome with Tagged MP4 displays the posters and metadata.

Wow, just wow! :rolleyes:

All my videos in "Xbox Video" are actually my home videos (most being AVCHD over last 4-5 years, rest are mp4s from my iPhone/WP). So yeah - Xbox video is a big pile of ****.

My music collection is mostly mp3s with about 10% m4as and all properly tagged. I have no problem using it with either Zune or WMP.

I frequently rent movies on my Xbox and I expected it to work better when they expanded it to Windows.

If you actually used these apps instead of attacking complete strangers without any reason, then you might come to a realization that I am not alone in complaining about these apps. They are horrible, slow and overall put metro design language in a bad light.

...and yes if the apps were actually good, they would work with the devices charm on a reliable basis. They don't and the easier way for me to play my home movies/photos on my TV(through Xbox) is still good old WMP sharing. That says a lot about their overall quality.

did extremetech make that chart? I wonder where they got there data from. maybe I didn't read properly I actually just skimmed article. I wonder where they got their data from.

It's in the second paragraph, you lazy man.

Because they don't support your pirated movie and music collection ? Xbox Video is awesome with Tagged MP4 displays the posters and metadata.

Wow dude. I love Windows 8 but even I can admit that the music and video apps blow chunks compared to Zune.

MP4 supports SSA subtitles and DTS-HD?

It has its own loseless audio codec and subtitle format. Do some research as to the container Dolby uses for that codec :rolleyes:

You took the streams out of the correct container to begin with.

Touch is "new" in the sense that we finally have "pure" technology to take advantage of it, such as smartphones, tablets, and now Windows 8, which at the earliest came about in 2007 after the iPhone explosion.

Motion is a completely new consumer piece with the introduction of Microsoft's Kinect 3 years ago.

Wacom tech is finding itself on more and more devices - go back 10 years, and you wouldn't find them in the average consumer's house. Today you can.

Voice control is now a new household name thanks to Apple's Siri, released just 2 years ago.

This isn't even touching the experimental technologies being developed this very second, such as augmented reality. Shall I go on?

Voice is a simply more *accepted* thanks to Siri - it was usable on PCs and Macs prior to Siri. In fact the tech used by Siri came from Dragon Systems (now distributed by *catchall* company NUANCE), and has been bundled with any Windows or Mac version of Naturally Speaking for over a decade. More accepted, but not new.

humanz - can't be taken seriously? Really? All because of the ONLY UI feature Windows 8 lacks compared to Windows 7? I use Windows 8 for everything I used Windows 7 for. So do all other users of Windows 8 - on new and existing hardware. It isn't how YOU would use Windows; however, defining it as unusable for that reason is "opinion" - not fact. In fact, it flies in the face of logic. How often per day does Dot Matrix post here? How often a day do I post on Neowin? Neither of us run Windows 7 bare-metal. (I have a single recently created Windows 7 x64 VM - for testing of IE10 for Windows 7.) I run many MANY applications on it - both ModernUI and Win32. I game on it and TEST games and other software on it. If it were as bad as you said, neither Dot OR I could do that - yet we both do. Further I have far older hardware than Dot Matrix, with most of it dating back Windows Vista - if not XP. (Only my GPU is of recent vintage.)

  • Like 2

Further I have far older hardware than Dot Matrix, with most of it dating back Windows Vista - if not XP. (Only my GPU is of recent vintage.)

Most of my hardware is from the same era... my processor is 7 years old.

Further I have far older hardware than Dot Matrix, with most of it dating back Windows Vista - if not XP. (Only my GPU is of recent vintage.)

What is the big deal about that hardware? Back then there was AMD quadcore, Intel Core 2 duo and Core 2 Quad. Still PLENTY of CPU power for today's Operating system and future ones as well.

My Main 4 monitor workstation was built 4 years ago in 2008.

i7 920

12 GB (upgraded from 6)

Still chews through anything like butter and will for years to come.

What is the big deal about that hardware? Back then there was AMD quadcore, Intel Core 2 duo and Core 2 Quad. Still PLENTY of CPU power for today's Operating system and future ones as well.

My Main 4 monitor workstation was built 4 years ago in 2008.

i7 920

12 GB (upgraded from 6)

Still chews through anything like butter and will for years to come.

Warwagon, if you have 12GB of RAM you're still ahead of the average desktop by a longshot and it runs fine because it can keep the OS in memory regardless of how many apps you're running unless one is Photoshop with large image.

Like it or love it, you should all do what I'm doing today. Take off work, plug in your replacement Xbox Wireless Controller and Receiver for PC you got today, and dominate the Dark Side with the #1 Modern UI app available, Pinball FX 2 with the Star Wars table Pack.

May the force be with you all, if not the Start Menu!

Warwagon, if you have 12GB of RAM you're still ahead of the average desktop by a longshot and it runs fine because it can keep the OS in memory regardless of how many apps you're running unless one is Photoshop with large image.

Like it or love it, you should all do what I'm doing today. Take off work, plug in your replacement Xbox Wireless Controller and Receiver for PC you got today, and dominate the Dark Side with the #1 Modern UI app available, Pinball FX 2 with the Star Wars table Pack.

May the force be with you all, if not the Start Menu!

Well I had 6 and that worked great for me The only reason I added another 6 was because I use virtual Machines with Vmware to reference previous version of windows for customer support. I was referencing your CPU. A person can always add more ram.

Well I had 6 and that worked great for me The only reason I added another 6 was because I use virtual Machines with Vmware to reference previous version of windows for customer support. I was referencing your CPU. A person can always add more ram.

Are you telling me you have such disdain for Metro that you would rather run VMware on Win 7, than Hyper-V in Windows 8? I'd have to say pay the $5 and get Start8.

If you have VMware in your Datacenter, I can understand. We are a VMware DC but I have set the direction to move to a Hyper-V and Win Datacenter 2k12 environment. That plan began 2 years ago and with the recent improvements (to Hyper-V), will come to fruition over the next 18 months.

While I think management which led to the Windows 8, let's call it chaos, at the moment, leaves a lot to be desired and managers to be fired, the Server Group are my heroes. Freeing us from the exorbitant VMware and Citrix annual support tax. Second only to Oracle that the SQL Group saved us from years ago.

  • Like 3

Let's face the reality. Unless buying new machine which may include the Windows 8, most consumers won't simply upgrade to the latest product when available. If I can work on Windows 7, why should I bother about 8? We won't go ahead and buy a new TV or car or handphone or backpack when new model is available isn't it?

And I said that I understood that. However, such a decision is indeed part of what I referred to as *inertia* - a consumer or business won't replace anything unless forced to.

Upgrades (of anything) have to be seen as worthwhile to the person upgrading.

Windows 8 faces hurdles unlike previous versions of Windows - and yes, the UI change is a very large part of that. (I stated that back at the release of the Consumer Preview, so it's definitely NOT news to me.)

However, unlike Dot Matrix, I am also quite aware that resistance to UI change is far from unique to Windows, and that the resistance TO such a change is almost never logical.

But I also am NOT going to let the very defenders OF that UI blow smoke and say things that are not only not true, but are provably not true - and use them to bolster their OPINION - which they are trying to posit as fact.

What is the big deal about that hardware? Back then there was AMD quadcore, Intel Core 2 duo and Core 2 Quad. Still PLENTY of CPU power for today's Operating system and future ones as well.

My Main 4 monitor workstation was built 4 years ago in 2008.

i7 920

12 GB (upgraded from 6)

Still chews through anything like butter and will for years to come.

Warwagon, the point I am making by presenting the data is that Windows 8 does not require all brand-new hardware.

My desktop is, in fact, OF that vintage; the CPU is an Intel Q6600 - specifically, the dual-dual known as Kentsfield. (Two E6600 Conroe CPUs sharing a die - which AMD made scathing jokes about.)

My motherboard is the ASUS P5G41-M LX2/GB. (MicroATX motherboard built around Intel's G41 chipset. It is quite capable of swallowing any LGA775 CPU, from Celeron DC to the Yorkfield-based dual-dual Intel quad-cores; however, the 4 GB and DDR2 RAM limitations of the G41 chipset are a definite holdback. I bought the motherboard for reason of price. However, I also bought the motherboard prior to even the early rumors of Windows 8.)

Only my GPU - Visiontek's HD5450 iSilence - is of recent vintage. (Even that is a compromise - if you are familiar with AMD GPU naming, you'll recognize the HD5450 as a Mobility part in discrete-desktop clothing. Like my motherboard, it is a price-driven compromise.)

The point I have been trying to make is that, unlike most previous versions of Windows, Windows 8 may be more CAPABLE of using newer hardware than Windows 7, but it no more required it any more than Vista did, in all reality.

All I have been asking is that Windows 8 be evaluated on its merits as an operating system. If Windows 8 doesn't meet your needs, that's fine - Windows 7 isn't going anywhere. (Again, that isn't anything new, and especially from me - I pointed that out during both the Consumer and Release Previews of Windows 8.)

Why is getting to the nuts and bolts of the issues regarding the UI changes between 7 and 8 worse than pulling teeth?

There are reasons TO recommend Windows 8 - especially if you can use one (or better yet, the majority) of the changes, enhancements, and improvements compared to Windows 7 - especially changes that Windows 7 will never see. However, the two biggest reasons why folks that haven't upgraded by now likely won't (except in extremis) are due to the lack of the Start menu (because it's like a calling-card to all too many folks due to it being rather obvious) and the price - look at how many folks are claiming poverty, even when it doesn't really fly.

My scorn isn't over folks not upgrading - but over the smoke-blowing as to why they aren't upgrading.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!