Windows 8 adoption rate almost at a standstill, far behind Windows 7


Recommended Posts

I stopped reading after "In the month of February, according to Net Applications,"...........

It's the same as "analists came to the conclusion" or alike.

We get it, everybody hates W8..........

One of the main reasons imho:

- no new W8 pc/laptops/tablets for sale atm. It's hard to find one of the announced hardware in the shops.

- the economy stupid!

- W7 is good enough for a lot of people for now. See previous reason.

I have 2 monitors, and I've never had issues hitting them. The mouse should catch, if you hit it right.

Nathan Lineback also wrote:

Back in the Windows 3.x and classic MacOS days there were many utilities that made use of "throwing" the mouse cursor to a corner of the screen. Because such an action lacks visibility, this was never popular and usually only used for invoking screen savers or advanced menus.

The whole concept of using corners falls flat on its face when viewing a desktop through something like a virtual machine window with seamless mouse integration, or through remote desktop software. The corners just don't exist, you have to aim the mouse over a few small pixels inside your window.

One of the main reasons imho:

- no new W8 pc/laptops/tablets for sale atm. It's hard to find one of the announced hardware in the shops.

- the economy stupid!

- W7 is good enough for a lot of people for now. See previous reason.

I think the economy is usually overlooked but things are still somewhat bleak and money is still tight. People are hanging on to what they have, either xp or 7.

  • 3 months later...

Up about .80% over the last month, the highest it's ever been. The haters must be real proud of themselves, they've created a monster storm of Win 8 hate based on nonsense, and then sit back and say 'see nobody likes it' when the sales aren't that good. The fact that you can install a free start menu program in like 2 minutes, yet they holler about the issue, shows that this is a bunch of silliness. Yea yea you shouldn't be forced to use metro, well people shouldn't be forced to use the start menu who don't want it too. blah.

  • 1 year later...

Up about .80% over the last month, the highest it's ever been. The haters must be real proud of themselves, they've created a monster storm of Win 8 hate based on nonsense, and then sit back and say 'see nobody likes it' when the sales aren't that good. The fact that you can install a free start menu program in like 2 minutes, yet they holler about the issue, shows that this is a bunch of silliness. Yea yea you shouldn't be forced to use metro, well people shouldn't be forced to use the start menu who don't want it too. blah.

How many years has the start menu existed? And how much more useful is it than the crappy Metro UI? A lot less useful.

 

People hate Windows 8 because it takes longer to do things than Windows XP or 7 (Unless you are gifted with a touchscreen which changes everything).

 

Yes I said it, Windows 8 is useless on non-touchscreen computers. Why? Because Metro is made for touchscreen, every part of its design.

 

You shouldn't have to install a program to use a start menu, Microsoft should have defaulted non-touchscreen computers to use the start menu, and touchscreen devices to use Metro.

 

I think you could agree.

How many years has the start menu existed? And how much more useful is it than the crappy Metro UI? A lot less useful.

 

People hate Windows 8 because it takes longer to do things than Windows XP or 7 (Unless you are gifted with a touchscreen which changes everything).

 

Yes I said it, Windows 8 is useless on non-touchscreen computers. Why? Because Metro is made for touchscreen, every part of its design.

 

You shouldn't have to install a program to use a start menu, Microsoft should have defaulted non-touchscreen computers to use the start menu, and touchscreen devices to use Metro.

 

I think you could agree.

 

Nothing takes longer to do on Windows 8, don't be ridiculous.

Care to back this brief, bland statement?

 

I use Windows 7 all day at work, come home and use Windows 8. My usage pattern is identical. You were the one who made some "brief, bland statement" about Windows 8 taking longer, except that you never provided evidence.

 

There are in fact a number of things that I can do faster in Windows 8 than Windows 7.

 

Examples:

 

The items exposed directly in the explorer ribbon are faster to access.

The services tab in the task manager having the ability to restart services.

The startup tab in the task manager existing period, reducing the need to use msconfig, not to mention msconfig has less detail.

  • Like 2

 

 

 

I use Windows 7 all day at work, come home and use Windows 8. My usage pattern is identical. You were the one who made some "brief, bland statement" about Windows 8 taking longer, except that you never provided evidence.

 

There are in fact a number of things that I can do faster in Windows 8 than Windows 7.

 

Examples:

 

The items exposed directly in the explorer ribbon are faster to access.

The services tab in the task manager having the ability to restart services.

The startup tab in the task manager existing period, reducing the need to use msconfig, not to mention msconfig has less detail.

 

There we go, I like the presented evidence!

Personally what will appear in 'Threshold' should have been in Windows 8 right form the outset especially when it comes to windowed metro applications - if they standardised on a single set of applications which could be run in full screen or windowed mode along with the existence of the start menu then I'd say that 95% of complaints would never have been made (the remaining 5% will complain no matter what you do) - there would't be a situation of the win32 applications not sharing the settings with their metro counter part and vice versa; the existence of two competing control panels, two competing update managers etc. All of that should have been replaced with single versions of each application running in either full screen or windowed mode based on what the end user wanted. Honestly, why does it take a disaster before Microsoft realise that what they did was stupid? are all their developers getting high on their own BS that they have lost contact with what the average person actually expects from their computer?

^^ What the above poster said. In contrast, Apple has nailed the user experience in OSX Yosemite. There is 1 single control panel/settings and update mechanism is common for installed store apps and the OS.

I disliked Windows 8 once I came to know that Microsoft had removed Wireless network management feature. It was very useful. Now everytime I change wifi settings network name jumps 1 number. Currently I am on Network 8

^^ What the above poster said. In contrast, Apple has nailed the user experience in OSX Yosemite. There is 1 single control panel/settings and update mechanism is common for installed store apps and the OS.

I disliked Windows 8 once I came to know that Microsoft had removed Wireless network management feature. It was very useful. Now everytime I change wifi settings network name jumps 1 number. Currently I am on Network 8

As opposed  to ALL networks (regardless of how you connect) being managed in one place?

 

If you only connect wirelessly (or only connect wired), I can see why you like the "one place" thinking.

 

However, unless you have a laptop or notebook that NEVER uses a wired connection, that is highly improbable.

 

Do you think that desktops ONLY use wired connections?

 

While a wired connection may be preferable for a desktop, it's not always practical.  (I have had to set up wireless connections for desktops, under every flavor of Windows from XP forward.  Having to deal with wireless connectivity in XP, VIsta, or even 7 is MUCH different than connecting in a wired fashion; having it be in a different place atop that is adding insult to injury.)

 

  With Windows 8 forward, what differences there are are in the connection wizard itself - however, all connections - wired or wireless - are in the same place, and even MANAGED in the same place.  If you are using a portable - of any sort - and have metered AND unmetered connections to choose from - in a Dunkin Donuts for example - you can now choose HOW to connect.  You can also set up connect-by-location connections.  It no longer matters how - just where.

 

Folks are sticking to what is familiar - no shame in that.  However, to pretend that it is ANYTHING else is blowing smoke, and should cease.

How many years has the start menu existed? And how much more useful is it than the crappy Metro UI? A lot less useful.

 

People hate Windows 8 because it takes longer to do things than Windows XP or 7 (Unless you are gifted with a touchscreen which changes everything).

 

Yes I said it, Windows 8 is useless on non-touchscreen computers. Why? Because Metro is made for touchscreen, every part of its design.

 

You shouldn't have to install a program to use a start menu, Microsoft should have defaulted non-touchscreen computers to use the start menu, and touchscreen devices to use Metro.

 

I think you could agree.

 

I disagree.

 

Things took far longer in XP and even slightly longer in 7 than they do in 8. Abandoning the Start Menu was a godsend for me, and when it comes back, I'm desperately hoping its only an option. I don't ever want to have to navigate multiple layers of menus to find what I need again. That design concept should have been replaced in Windows 98, rather than in Windows 8.

 

Windows 8 is designed to work with a touchscreen, but it is in no way "unusable" with a mouse and keyboard. Touch is clearly designed as a supplemental input method, with mouse and keyboard still perfectly functional. I use my mouse with no problems in both Metro and desktop. Well, apart from the elements that were added to Update 1 that were supposed to make things better with the mouse. They actually just get in the way. Especially in remote desktop apps - that titlebar "helpfully" drops down so I close the entire remote session instead of just the program running within the session.

 

Improve the options to let people choose one interface or a hybrid, but both should remain.

Folks are sticking to what is familiar - no shame in that.  However, to pretend that it is ANYTHING else is blowing smoke, and should cease.

 

Defend Windows 8 as much as you can, but the true story is reflected in the original article. Microsoft blew it by making half assed decisions and they are paying the price by slowly loosing marketshare.

 

The point is, if Apple's OSX app store starts driving more and more business, they might even release OSX for normal PCs in future. (A distant possibility)

 

Windows 9 must be what normal consumers (Not geeks like you and me) like and want. Not something which is some upper management's wet dream.

 

I for one think Steven Sinofsky was completely innocent and he clearly knew that Microsoft's vision during Windows 8 development was not an optimum one. But he took the entire flak and was made to resign. I blame Julie Larsen-Green for this entire Windows 8 fiasco. But she got promoted.  :laugh:

 

Flame suit on !!!

 

The point is, if Apple's OSX app store starts driving more and more business, they might even release OSX for normal PCs in future. (A distant possibility)

 

 

Mmmm, no.  Apple is a hardware company and that would drive away sales of their own machines.

 

Maybe, one day. if Apple decides to become a software company in the future.  Unlikely though.

Defend Windows 8 as much as you can, but the true story is reflected in the original article. Microsoft blew it by making half assed decisions and they are paying the price by slowly loosing marketshare.

 

The point is, if Apple's OSX app store starts driving more and more business, they might even release OSX for normal PCs in future. (A distant possibility)

 

Windows 9 must be what normal consumers (Not geeks like you and me) like and want. Not something which is some upper management's wet dream.

 

I for one think Steven Sinofsky was completely innocent and he clearly knew that Microsoft's vision during Windows 8 development was not an optimum one. But he took the entire flak and was made to resign. I blame Julie Larsen-Green for this entire Windows 8 fiasco. But she got promoted.  :laugh:

 

Flame suit on !!!

sanke - it's STILL blowing smoke.

 

You (like every other critic) are insisting on non-change - and there's nothing wrong with that; haven't I pointed out since the Developer Preview that all too many folks are change-averse?

 

I don't have a problem with being change-averse - however, I don't want folks blowing smoke and insisting that it is anything else BUT that.

 

Further, not moving is easy - it costs nothing to not move.

I don't really see people leaving windows 7 until the next advancement in computer hardware itself. Since PC's over the past few years haven't really gotten that much faster when it comes to OEM desktops. So in general the only people who do upgrade are those people who love new tech, An that's only a small percent.

No reason to upgrade when everything on your current system works great.

Couldn't have said it better myself!  On an existing system there is nothing compelling about Win 8 to drive adoption.  New portable or tablet systems - sure.  New desktop systems - NOPE, why have to train/teach a new OS when Win 7 works so well?

Mmmm, no.  Apple is a hardware company and that would drive away sales of their own machines.

 

Maybe, one day. if Apple decides to become a software company in the future.  Unlikely though.

adrynalyne - it's not as if Apple is trying all that hard to block OS X from being installed on non-Apple hardware.

 

Further, how many folks running OS X download at least SOME applications from the MAS (whether free or fee)?

 

The MAS is the obvious model that the Windows (App) Store chose - as there are both free AND paid apps there; further, the MAS does NOT block you from installing Mac software the traditional way - any more than the Windows (App) Store does.

 

Instead of comparing Windows 8+ to Android or iOS, Windows 8+ should be compared to OS X - in particular, OS X Lion and later.

 

Windows RT can (and possibly should) be compared to IOS - however, comparing Windows 8+ to iOS does a disservice to the Microsoft operating system.

 

Further, Windows 8+ and OS X Lion and later CAN co-exist, and on the same (non-Apple) hardware.  I'm not the only person running Windows and OS X side-by-side on the same hardware - not even on Neowin.  (Yes - in my case, it's Windows 8.1 and Mavericks, which I am about to update to Yosemite.)

 

I'm not change-averse - and that is by choice.

 

My issue is not with being change-averse - it's with those trying to blow smoke and claim they aren't when the evidence says otherwise.

did extremetech make that chart? I wonder where they got there data from. maybe I didn't read properly I actually just skimmed article. I wonder where they got their data from.

Net Applications. The results were mirrored by the number of apps in Windows Store, as tracked by MetroStore Scanner.

 

I'm not sure why OS X is discussed here. That's not why Windows 8 is having a hard time. OS X is a small, also almost non-growing OS. I think it's just a combination of Windows 8 not being so much better than Windows 7 for desktops that people bother, combined with the entire desktop platform having a hard time right now.

Going even further I would predict that even Win 9 will not drive new adoption.  Taken as a whole there really isn't much more you can do with the standard user interface until there's some big change in how we interact with our computers.  I think MS has to go the "software-as-a-service" route sooner rather than later.  Sell the package dirt cheap and if the product is good you can count on guarenteed annual revenue for decades to come - why go through the jumble of creating a new "version" every 2 or 3 years?  Realistically, MS could still be updating and adding features to Win 7 if it wasn't for their trying to drive new sales by forced obsolescence of a perfectly functional product.  Just imagine if they had gone saas with Win XP - they would have banked over a decade of continuous revenue off that single product!

sanke - it's STILL blowing smoke.

 

You (like every other critic) are insisting on non-change - and there's nothing wrong with that; haven't I pointed out since the Developer Preview that all too many folks are change-averse?

 

So me switching to OSX from Windows 8 is not change averse? I am the biggest fan of changes if they are functional. The disjoint start screen and dual control panel is not functional change.

 

However, Windows 8.1 Update 1 is tolerable. 

 

There should not be a change for the sake of it. Microsoft promising to bring back Start menu in future is the very proof that the change was not good.

 

BTW this was not just blowing smoke by me. When so many people blow smoke, it causes fire. lol Microsoft's bottom is over it and that's why all the backtracking. Like you, even I want Microsoft to succeed. Hopefully they will. But my only wish is that app store is not shoved on my face like it is now with Windows 8.1

 

Frankly, the Modern UI is getting stale and boring these days.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Indeed - drives me mad - usually because Refresh is hidden in the full menu.
    • Firefox has had rounded corners for many years. I take it you're not a fan of modern browsers?
    • The problem is in the fundamentals of how businesses are allowed to operate and the change should happen in the basics and certain consumer friendly and moral practices should be enforced by law. This would fix so many things, not just this ages old default browser issue which is a tiny drop in the backut that includes a flood of privacy and other issues.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!