Common sense fixes to Windows 8


Recommended Posts

How does that automatically click the Desktop tile?

Holy crap people, I have said many times before I like Windows 8, actually prefer it. But I just have THOSE TWO.....TWO issues. Yet I am still being attacked and being called whiney?

Why the heck do we even have ANY sort of product reviews then? If we cannot say our opinions, NO REVIEWS should be allowed to exist.

Click on desktop tile to stare at wallpaper?

Click on your desktop application (such as my computer/some browser/word etc) instead. Use common sense.

By the way, and just fyi in case someone wasn't aware of this, both WIN+1-9 as well as WIN+ALT+1-9 work from the Start Screen despite the fact that the task bar isn't visible at the time. So, if you have the File Explorer as the first item on the task bar, you could, right from the Start Screen, press WIN+ALT+1 then 'D', then Enter, to get to your pinned documents folder (for example). :)

EDIT: Ugh...actually....it seems that this doesn't work unless you've already been to the Desktop at least once after booting. :pinch:

Click on desktop tile to stare at wallpaper?

Click on your desktop application (such as my computer/some browser/word etc) instead. Use common sense.

Sigh.....Do you just forget how to use the computer? So let me get this straight. If I click the Desktop tile, I am stuck staring at a blank wallpaper?! There is NOTHING I can do about it?! What did you do in Windows 7? When I click my desktop tile, I am able to see all my desktop shortcuts and folders (something the Start Screen cannot do). For example. I do not need to have every program of Office clogging up my desktop, so I have a Microsoft Office folder on my desktop. I put all the shortcuts needed in there.

SO yes, I click Desktop tile, but then I click a desktop icon.....I like having things organized this way. If you do not, that is fine. But I do. It might not be a better solution for you, that is fine. But this way is much more productive for me.

I do not think I am the one that needs to use common sense. If you would realize people have things set up differently, you would not simply say things like that. I can fit much more icons on my desktop than the Start Screen can hold WITHOUT needing to scroll for ages.

I keep things nice and organized on the desktop with shortcuts and folders (in cases for suites like Office and Adobe CS6). Again, if you want all of your icons visible and scroll and scroll and scroll through dozens and dozens of icons, that is fine. But I prefer my way.

Sigh.....Do you just forget how to use the computer? So let me get this straight. If I click the Desktop tile, I am stuck staring at a blank wallpaper?! There is NOTHING I can do about it?! What did you do in Windows 7? When I click my desktop tile, I am able to see all my desktop shortcuts and folders (something the Start Screen cannot do). For example. I do not need to have every program of Office clogging up my desktop, so I have a Microsoft Office folder on my desktop. I put all the shortcuts needed in there.

SO yes, I click Desktop tile, but then I click a desktop icon.....I like having things organized this way. If you do not, that is fine. But I do. It might not be a better solution for you, that is fine. But this way is much more productive for me.

I do not think I am the one that needs to use common sense. If you would realize people have things set up differently, you would not simply say things like that. I can fit much more icons on my desktop than the Start Screen can hold WITHOUT needing to scroll for ages.

I keep things nice and organized on the desktop with shortcuts and folders (in cases for suites like Office and Adobe CS6). Again, if you want all of your icons visible and scroll and scroll and scroll through dozens and dozens of icons, that is fine. But I prefer my way.

So, you're double clicking into various folders and icons, yet are bothered by a *single* click into the desktop?

Sigh.....Do you just forget how to use the computer? So let me get this straight. If I click the Desktop tile, I am stuck staring at a blank wallpaper?! There is NOTHING I can do about it?! What did you do in Windows 7? When I click my desktop tile, I am able to see all my desktop shortcuts and folders (something the Start Screen cannot do). For example. I do not need to have every program of Office clogging up my desktop, so I have a Microsoft Office folder on my desktop. I put all the shortcuts needed in there.

SO yes, I click Desktop tile, but then I click a desktop icon.....I like having things organized this way. If you do not, that is fine. But I do. It might not be a better solution for you, that is fine. But this way is much more productive for me.

I do not think I am the one that needs to use common sense. If you would realize people have things set up differently, you would not simply say things like that. I can fit much more icons on my desktop than the Start Screen can hold WITHOUT needing to scroll for ages.

I keep things nice and organized on the desktop with shortcuts and folders (in cases for suites like Office and Adobe CS6). Again, if you want all of your icons visible and scroll and scroll and scroll through dozens and dozens of icons, that is fine. But I prefer my way.

In Windows 7, how did you reach that MSOffice shortcuts folder once you had other programs running say browser, media player etc. which covered that portion of your desktop? Your habit is the least efficient method of accessing program shortcuts. You might want to re-think them.

So, you're double clicking into various folders and icons, yet are bothered by a *single* click into the desktop?

Hmm let's see here. Click desktop and have the ability to have around 100 desktop icons (note I said ability, I do not actually have 100s of desktop icons) without scrolling, or stay in the Start Screen and do the grouping thing and have to scroll when there are more than 16 tiles. I made four groups in the Start Screen, and I already need to scroll. So I said forget it and remained doing what I have for years.

It is actually faster for me to double click a folder "Microsoft Office" and open up Word than it is to scroll through a sea of tiles to find it (needle in a haystack type of thing).

Yes I am bothered with having to click the Desktop tile. Because I have to do it.....every.....single.....time. As I said, I switch between OS X and Windows quite often. So having to click it 3-6 times a day (when I only am able to use my computer for 6 hours) is very very very irritating.

In Windows 7, how did you reach that MSOffice shortcuts folder once you had other programs running say browser, media player etc. which covered that portion of your desktop? Your habit is the least efficient method of accessing program shortcuts. You might want to re-think them.

Ah typical response. Windows 8 is the god of all operating systems. "You are using it wrong" or "your methods are wrong". Yep, we just ignore the issues and tell our customers/clients "Change the way you use your computer". You would get fired for doing that.

Hmm lets see here. Minimize the application that is blocking the desktop icon I need, double click, open Word. OR. Windows key, have my full monitor filled up, scroll scroll scroll until you find Word in your sea of icons, then click it.

Again, what does it damn matter to you what I am doing? All I am asking for is a simple check box to boot into desktop. Yet, even though I prefer Windows 8, I am still being attacked about my methods or procedures.

Hmm let's see here. Click desktop and have the ability to have around 100 desktop icons (note I said ability, I do not actually have 100s of desktop icons) without scrolling, or stay in the Start Screen and do the grouping thing and have to scroll when there are more than 16 tiles. I made four groups in the Start Screen, and I already need to scroll. So I said forget it and remained doing what I have for years.

It is actually faster for me to double click a folder "Microsoft Office" and open up Word than it is to scroll through a sea of tiles to find it (needle in a haystack type of thing).

Yes I am bothered with having to click the Desktop tile. Because I have to do it.....every.....single.....time. As I said, I switch between OS X and Windows quite often. So having to click it 3-6 times a day (when I only am able to use my computer for 6 hours) is very very very irritating.

Ah typical response. Windows 8 is the god of all operating systems. "You are using it wrong" or "your methods are wrong". Yep, we just ignore the issues and tell our customers/clients "Change the way you use your computer". You would get fired for doing that.

Hmm lets see here. Minimize the application that is blocking the desktop icon I need, double click, open Word. OR. Windows key, have my full monitor filled up, scroll scroll scroll until you find Word in your sea of icons, then click it.

Again, what does it damn matter to you what I am doing? All I am asking for is a simple check box to boot into desktop. Yet, even though I prefer Windows 8, I am still being attacked about my methods or procedures.

again, you can GROUP icons on Start (and even name those groups) to make them easier to find. Hell, you don't even have to pin all your apps. Muscle memory takes care of having to "search for a needle in a haystack".

It sounds to me like you're clinging to habits that should have been left behind long ago, and are blaming Microsoft for your woes.

Desktop shortcuts? Get rid of those, you're just torturing yourself by having to dig through all your open windows, and all those folders you say you have, to get to what you need.

In Windows 7, how did you reach that MSOffice shortcuts folder once you had other programs running say browser, media player etc. which covered that portion of your desktop? Your habit is the least efficient method of accessing program shortcuts. You might want to re-think them.

I had Office pinned to the taskbar or Start Menu. I take full advantage of app pinning, that's why it's there. It was a highly requested feature, so that users don't have to hunt all over or be bothered with extra clicking around to find what they need.

Sorry BajiRav, I thought I quoted one of Whiplash's posts, didn't mean to come back at you.

here is an example. When I walk someone over the phone to open Gotoassist on an XP computer, I do the following if the icon is not located on the desktop. I have them click start / all programs and then "Right click" on accessories and tell them to left click sort by name. This way it alphabetizes the list so they can find the citrix folder. Most of the time after using the words "right click and then left click" I get the following question when I ask them to "open" the citrix folder..... "Which mouse button do I use, the right or the left"

If they know how to use a keyboard and are using Vista or higher, tell them to Winkey + citrix and hit Enter.

Ah typical response. Windows 8 is the god of all operating systems. "You are using it wrong" or "your methods are wrong". Yep, we just ignore the issues and tell our customers/clients "Change the way you use your computer". You would get fired for doing that.

Hmm lets see here. Minimize the application that is blocking the desktop icon I need, double click, open Word. OR. Windows key, have my full monitor filled up, scroll scroll scroll until you find Word in your sea of icons, then click it.

Your methods are clumsy. They get the job done in a round-about way.

The Start menu and Start screen both accept keyboard input for searching and launching - the latter since Vista came out. Launching Word involves hitting the Windows key, typing in Word, and hitting Enter - many users only need to type in "w" before hitting Enter. In this case, 8 takes about the same amount of time and effort for launching a program.

It sounds to me like you're clinging to habits that should have been left behind long ago, and are blaming Microsoft for your woes.

Says you.... Why is almost every response along the lines of "you're using it wrong!".

Says you.... Why is almost every response along the lines of "you are using it wrong".

Are you really going to justify keeping shortcuts on the desktop?

Ah typical response. Windows 8 is the god of all operating systems. "You are using it wrong" or "your methods are wrong". Yep, we just ignore the issues and tell our customers/clients "Change the way you use your computer". You would get fired for doing that.

Hmm lets see here. Minimize the application that is blocking the desktop icon I need, double click, open Word. OR. Windows key, have my full monitor filled up, scroll scroll scroll until you find Word in your sea of icons, then click it.

Again, what does it damn matter to you what I am doing? All I am asking for is a simple check box to boot into desktop. Yet, even though I prefer Windows 8, I am still being attacked about my methods or procedures.

Uh...forget Windows 8, you are doing it wrong even on Windows 7/Vista/XP/2000/98/ or whatever the hell you were using before Windows 8. Your defensive reaction to my post only highlights your own inability to understand where the problem lies.

btw, it's actually fastest to have your MSOffice folder or individual programs pinned to taskbar (or *shockingly* even start screen).

Says you.... Why is almost every response along the lines of "you're using it wrong!".

Microsoft made things easier to access with app pinning, but somehow it's their fault for because he wants to do things the hard way?

Are you really going to justify keeping shortcuts on the desktop?

Uh...forget Windows 8, you are doing it wrong even on Windows 7/Vista/XP/2000/98/ or whatever the hell you were using before Windows 8. Your defensive reaction to my post only highlights your own inability to understand where the problem lies.

btw, it's actually fastest to have your MSOffice folder or individual programs pinned to taskbar (or *shockingly* even start screen).

So....wait. Ever since Windows 98, you were not supposed to EVER use desktop shortcuts? Then what they heck are desktop shortcuts supposed to be? If Microsoft never wanted us to use them, why the hell do they provide it?

It is faster if you only have a few application. I have a lot of applications and I use them a lot for my various jobs and processes. Having to scroll through the start screen is more annoying then a very quick double click.

Again, this is what I prefer. What right do you have (MS still gives the option to make desktop shortcuts, so it seems to me if you want to MS has no problem with me doing this) to tell me I cannot use desktop shortcuts and my methods are messy or wrong? I find the start screen messy and wrong FOR MY NEEDS. But you do not see my saying things like you guys are. When I use desktop shortcuts, I do NOT need to scroll in order to click what I need. With the ability to support 100s of icons on the desktop, and across multiple monitors, no scrolling is needed.

Again. What.....does....it....matter....to....you if there is a simple check box in the control panel to boot to desktop? Geez. But instead you guys avoid the question and attack my methods. Fine, tell me I am sticking to the old days. But Desktop Shortcuts functionality still exist, so I fail to see how my methods are wrong. With an option, again, what does it matter to you have I have it enabled and you do not?

TELL ME how it affects you if they provide just one little, simple check box "Boot directly to desktop?"

You asked why I prefer to be booted directly to the desktop, and I told you. My methods are not wrong or messy. I have my own way of organizing things and I prefer my way. And MS still provide desktop shortcuts as a functionality, so tell me again how I am wrong by using functionality in Windows?

  • Like 2

TELL ME how it affects you if they provide just one little, simple check box "Boot directly to desktop?"

Doesn't really affect anyone at all; but it does empower people to do things how Microsoft doesn't want it to be done. If Microsoft no longer wanted people to use the desktop to create shortcuts; they would remove that feature; as with any feature Microsoft no longer wants to support.

Using desktops shortcuts may have been a totally acceptable method during the 9x and XP days; but there are better ways to deal with shortcuts now. Just because you feel it works for you doesn't mean it's right. Just means it works for you.

Microsoft is trying to push people towards the perfered method; kicking and screaming every step of the way.

Doesn't really affect anyone at all; but it does empower people to do things how Microsoft doesn't want it to be done.

Using desktops shortcuts may have been a totally acceptable method during the 9x and XP days; but there are better ways to deal with shortcuts now. Just because you feel it works for you doesn't mean it's right. Just means it works for you.

Microsoft is trying to push people towards the perfered method; kicking and screaming every step of the way.

Then why is there still functionality to make desktop shortcuts? Geez all I am saying here is that a boot directly to desktop checkbox is needed. Why do I need it? Because I do not use the Start Screen. I use Desktop Shortcuts. The Start Screen is of NO use to me. The ONLY thing I use it for is clicking Desktop.

If we were never supposed to use desktop shortcuts even back in Windows 98, MS should have removed that functionality. The fact that the functionality still exists in Windows 8 means people can use it. How is it wrong to use desktop shortcuts? The functionality still exists. I am using something that Windows 8 clearly allows. So again, how is it such a HORRIBLE....HORRIBLE process that I keep using desktop shortcuts?

My god you guys are acting like I am just sitting here punching kittens for the fun of it. If Microsoft does not want users to use desktop shortcuts anymore, REMOVE THE FUNCTIONALITY.

It is NOT WRONG or INCORRECT to use a functionality provided in a program/OS. You do not use it? Great! But it is available, therefore it is not incorrect to use it.

Also, I am just going off the comments of you guys. Does it say....ANYWHERE....in Windows 8 that Desktop Shortcuts are now a no-no? Does it bring up a popup every time you make one that says they are now a no-no? I had no idea until you guys said something that desktop shortcuts are so.... HORRIBLY.....HORRIBLY....wrong to use. Apparently they are just as bad to use as somebody sitting here punching a kitten for fun.

There is windowed search in Windows 8. Have you forgotten about the Search Bar in Explorer?

Also, don't judge Windows 8 until you've used it via touch, then you'll see why things are the way they are.

If it were a suitable desktop OS as you so frequently claim, you wouldn't have to use it on a touchscreen to find it useful.

Sigh.....Do you just forget how to use the computer? So let me get this straight. If I click the Desktop tile, I am stuck staring at a blank wallpaper?! There is NOTHING I can do about it?! What did you do in Windows 7? When I click my desktop tile, I am able to see all my desktop shortcuts and folders (something the Start Screen cannot do). For example. I do not need to have every program of Office clogging up my desktop, so I have a Microsoft Office folder on my desktop. I put all the shortcuts needed in there.

SO yes, I click Desktop tile, but then I click a desktop icon.....I like having things organized this way. If you do not, that is fine. But I do. It might not be a better solution for you, that is fine. But this way is much more productive for me.

I do not think I am the one that needs to use common sense. If you would realize people have things set up differently, you would not simply say things like that. I can fit much more icons on my desktop than the Start Screen can hold WITHOUT needing to scroll for ages.

I keep things nice and organized on the desktop with shortcuts and folders (in cases for suites like Office and Adobe CS6). Again, if you want all of your icons visible and scroll and scroll and scroll through dozens and dozens of icons, that is fine. But I prefer my way.

How about pinning your office programs to start screen or even taskbar (use win+1/2/3 etc)?

You can double click on a folder ON desktop to view office shortcuts (...who the hell does that?!) but you cant click once on desktop tile or directly click on the ms word?

hell...make a batch file that starts up word, excel, pp, outlook, visio all in one click and pin that to start screen.

Hmm let's see here. Click desktop and have the ability to have around 100 desktop icons (note I said ability, I do not actually have 100s of desktop icons) without scrolling, or stay in the Start Screen and do the grouping thing and have to scroll when there are more than 16 tiles. I made four groups in the Start Screen, and I already need to scroll. So I said forget it and remained doing what I have for years.

It is actually faster for me to double click a folder "Microsoft Office" and open up Word than it is to scroll through a sea of tiles to find it (needle in a haystack type of thing).

Yes I am bothered with having to click the Desktop tile. Because I have to do it.....every.....single.....time. As I said, I switch between OS X and Windows quite often. So having to click it 3-6 times a day (when I only am able to use my computer for 6 hours) is very very very irritating.

Ah typical response. Windows 8 is the god of all operating systems. "You are using it wrong" or "your methods are wrong". Yep, we just ignore the issues and tell our customers/clients "Change the way you use your computer". You would get fired for doing that.

Hmm lets see here. Minimize the application that is blocking the desktop icon I need, double click, open Word. OR. Windows key, have my full monitor filled up, scroll scroll scroll until you find Word in your sea of icons, then click it.

Again, what does it damn matter to you what I am doing? All I am asking for is a simple check box to boot into desktop. Yet, even though I prefer Windows 8, I am still being attacked about my methods or procedures.

Here's a pro tip: type wo and press enter.

How about pinning your office programs to start screen or even taskbar (use win+1/2/3 etc)?

You can double click on a folder ON desktop to view office shortcuts (...who the hell does that?!) but you cant click once on desktop tile or directly click on the ms word?

hell...make a batch file that starts up word, excel, pp, outlook, visio all in one click and pin that to start screen.

Here's a pro tip: type wo and press enter.

.....

So instead of using desktop shortcuts (which I guess is like a feature you guys consider to be sooooooooooo unbelievably horrible), you suggest I resort to creating a batch file?! No thanks.

Show me where in an official statement from Microsoft, in the Windows 8 documentation somewhere, that desktop shortcuts are now such a big no-no.

DO not like how I use it? FINE. But to sit here and tell me they should not be used is just ridiculous. I like how I use them. If you do not, then again, fine. Everybody uses their computers differently.

For gods sake, did I ONCE say I am unable to click using the start screen? NO. I prefer desktop shortcuts. I prefer the Start Menu where everything was nice and organized in collapsible folders. Word is pinned to my taskbar already. But in the cases where I need OneNote or Access, I open the folder that has every office icon in there. MUCH better than throwing everything in the start screen where it is visible whether you need it once in a blue moon or need it every day.

.....

So instead of using desktop shortcuts (which I guess is like a feature you guys consider to be sooooooooooo unbelievably horrible), you suggest I resort to creating a batch file?! No thanks.

Show me where in an official statement from Microsoft, in the Windows 8 documentation somewhere, that desktop shortcuts are now such a big no-no.

DO not like how I use it? FINE. But to sit here and tell me they should not be used is just ridiculous. I like how I use them. If you do not, then again, fine. Everybody uses their computers differently.

For gods sake, did I ONCE say I am unable to click using the start screen? NO. I prefer desktop shortcuts. I prefer the Start Menu where everything was nice and organized in collapsible folders. Word is pinned to my taskbar already. But in the cases where I need OneNote or Access, I open the folder that has every office icon in there. MUCH better than throwing everything in the start screen where it is visible whether you need it once in a blue moon or need it every day.

But if your machine is cluttered as much as you say it is with multiple Windows, desktop icons and rummaging through the All Apps menu are a cumbersome experience. There are better ways to launch the apps you need in a timely manner. Microsoft has developed multiple quick and easy ways to launch stuff, and you're fighting tooth and nail every bit of it.

You complain that upon Start, you need to click into the desktop, click into this, and click into that. Why not upon Start, just start typing the name of the app you need, hit 'Enter', and go from there? You're hands are already (presumably) still on the keyboard from logging in, and it would save you massive amounts of your time. This is the UX Microsoft is trying to gear users toward. Desktop icons haven't been really needed since the XP days.

But if your machine is cluttered as much as you say it is with multiple Windows, desktop icons and rummaging through the All Apps menu are a cumbersome experience. There are better ways to launch the apps you need in a timely manner. Microsoft has developed multiple quick and easy ways to launch stuff, and you're fighting tooth and nail every bit of it.

You complain that upon Start, you need to click into the desktop, click into this, and click into that. Why not upon Start, just start typing the name of the app you need, hit 'Enter', and go from there? You're hands are already (presumably) still on the keyboard from logging in, and it would save you massive amounts of your time.

Nope, they are not. I am the sole person on my computer, so I have it auto log in to my account. My hands are nowhere near the keyboard right at boot.

The point is, it is not cluttered at all with desktop shortcuts. I can throw stuff I need once in a blue moon in a folder and open that folder whenever I need it. Contrast that to the Start Screen where everything is just THERE no matter if you need it every day or not.

Contrast that to the Start Screen where everything is just THERE no matter if you need it every day or not.

Not true at all. You're free to unpin anything and everything from it that you don't want there. You know that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The very fact that a TPM (v2.0 specifically which is part of the issue I suspect) is now a baseline for any supported Windows installation will naturally mean other vendors will start to leverage it as they know it'll be there. It's called progress, and it's always been the way. A TPM isn't a windows thing, it's just a module designed to securely store keys. Secure boot isn't a Windows thing (although MS are the TCA as I recall hence the upheaval this year as the 2011 certs expire), it's just a way to verify a bootloader is signed. Windows simply leverages them.
    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
    • Save 74% on this Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle by Steven Parker Today on offer via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, you can save 74% on the Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle. This comprehensive 2026 CompTIA training bundle is created for aspiring IT professionals who want a faster, clearer way to earn multiple industry-recognized certifications while building practical, job-ready skills. Designed around real-world expectations, the curriculum guides you from foundational IT concepts to hands-on technical mastery across A+, Network+, Security+, Cloud+, Server+, and Pentest+ domains. You'll develop the confidence to troubleshoot systems, secure networks, manage cloud and on-prem environments, and tackle complex technical challenges with a methodical approach that employers value. By focusing on practical application and exam-aligned content, this bundle helps you stand out in the job market, prove your capabilities, and prepare for roles such as IT technician, network specialist, cybersecurity analyst, and system administrator with clarity and confidence. Certificate of Completion only. You will not receive official CompTIA certificates upon completion of each course. It's only designed to help you prepare for the covered certification exams. You need to take and pass the exams to get certified. Courses included in this bundle A Plus Certification - CompTIA A+ 220-1202 Training Master hardware, software, networking, and security essentials Covers the full Core 1 & Core 2 scope with inclusive materials that reflect real-world IT work CompTIA Cloud+ (CV0-004) Comprehensive pathway to mastering essential cloud concepts & acing the certification exam Practical skills in cloud architecture, security, and DevOps CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Training Course Design, configure, manage & secure modern networks Covers OSI & DoD models, IP addressing, subnetting, routing technologies, VLANs, wireless networking, structured cabling, and robust disaster recovery planning CompTIA Server+ (SK0-005) Master server management, administration, and security Practical skills for server hardware installation, disaster recovery & enhancing data security CompTIA Pentest+ Course (PT0-003) Gain demonstrable capabilities in penetration testing, security testing & risk assessment Hands-on pentest labs online and real-world deliverables CompTIA Security+ Certification Course (SY0-071) Essential skills in security concepts, threats & risk management Compliance considerations & authentication mechanisms, with a practical lens to implement them in real-world networks CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst CySA+ (CS0-004) Hands-on experience in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment & incident response Effective security measures that protect networks & data Tangible outcomes you'll achieve Validated hands-on skills across operating systems, networks, cloud, and security Confidence to pass multiple certification exams on or before your target dates A versatile toolkit for diagnosing, securing, and optimizing IT environments Ability to communicate technical concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders Who is this course for Aspiring IT technicians and support professionals who want a clear, practical pathway to multiple industry‑recognized CompTIA certifications IT learners looking to build real‑world skills in hardware, networking, cloud, security, servers, and penetration testing Those aiming to qualify for roles like help desk technician, junior network engineer, system administrator, security analyst, or cloud administrator by earning key certificates efficiently About Vision Training Systems Since 2012 and more than 100,000 students, Vision Training Systems has been delivering expertly crafted online IT training courses to help you earn industry-recognized certifications like CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Cisco CCNA, Project Management, CEH V13, Microsoft Azure, AWS, and more. Plus dive into the world of AI, IT Leadership, and core soft skills needed to excel in an IT Career. Whether you’re launching your IT career or looking to grow into a senior role, our flexible, on-demand platform empowers you with the skills and certifications employers demand. Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop or mobile Maximum number of device(s): 1 Available to BOTH new and existing users Certificate of Completion ONLY Experience level required: all levels Closed captioning NOT available NOT downloadable for offline viewing Here's the deal The Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle normally costs $199, but you can pick it up for just $40, that's a saving of $159. For terms, specs and license info, click the link below. Deal Price $40.00 with code SAVE20 (was $199) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!