Recommended Posts

hmmmz seems like everybody is now trying to make their own IE 6.05...

asking myself why and for what?? you all could help working on my project since its not in beta statium no more and with a couple of people working together it soon be way better but if you all want to work on your own i cant help it..

but if this all keeps up with more and mor people trying to make their own project im gonna take mine of and save my traffic and time...

dont get me wrong now but would you like it?

greetz

@Illusion: Menus aint working.. I click 'File' or 'Help' or 'Tools', any of them really - and nothing happens.. WASSU-WID-DAT?! :blink:

Like I said it's an early beta and I haven't finished the menus yet, I was simply releasing it to see if there was enough interest in it for me to bother completing it since getting it as close to the real thing without it looking generic is quite a bit of work.. I liked Apache-User's take on it but the graphics were just a little bit off from the real 4051 IE.. so I came up with this one using the real graphics.. but I don't know.. I think I might scrap it though and leave the 4051 IE making up to Apache-User :unsure:

hmmmz seems like everybody is now trying to make their own IE 6.05...

asking myself why and for what?? you all could help working on my project since its not in beta statium no more and with a couple of people working together it soon be way better but if you all want to work on your own i cant help it..

but if this all keeps up with more and mor people trying to make their own project im gonna take mine of and save my traffic and time...

dont get me wrong now but would you like it?

greetz

well I wanna help .. give us the details of ur work ..and we can start from there ..

Myeh...it will just work better. For one, BrowserBob has sucky menu possibilities. Second, some things I have to manipulate with System.Drawing I can't do with BrowserBob. Finally, I can't get the hang of BrowserBob (it might be good for newbies and intermediate users, but it's horrible for visual tools developers) and the free version sucks.

Illusion456 nice job with your Longhorn IE! Please update it soon. Thanks! :woot: :woot:

BTW can I please get your visual style. From this shot :

Well, I ended up killing the 4015 IE project, just don't have enough time for it and it's not something that I would really use anyway, and it seemed to make a few people get their panties in a wad because more than one person was working on one LOL :D who knows :rolleyes:

I'll send ya a link to the visual style I was using though.

Illusion456 nice job with your Longhorn IE! Please update it soon. Thanks!  :woot:  :woot:

BTW can I please get your visual style. From this shot :

Well, I ended up killing the 4015 IE project, just don't have enough time for it and it's not something that I would really use anyway, and it seemed to make a few people get their panties in a wad because more than one person was working on one LOL :D who knows :rolleyes:

I'll send ya a link to the visual style I was using though.

Could you please send me a link to your VS too? Thanks. :)

@Apache-User

Sadly I am still part of the crowd that can't use your custom browser. Its a pity because it looks very nice. - I have two PC's in my house, one of which uses Windows XP professional with SP1 - when you did your revision 2 of this browser it worked on that PC, but from version 3 onwards it no longer works on XP Pro ? - I also have MCE SP1 which your browser has never worked with at all.

Is there anyway you can get your next build to work with WinXP MCE SP1 ?

If there is anything you need to help make the broswer more compatible with these builds just let me know !

Cat.

All I have is this zip :

Longhorn IE

"Error 404 -- URL not found

Please check the URL (misspellings, capitalization, etc.) and try again, or if you came to this page via a link, you might try using your browser's Reload (or Refresh) button on that page in case the link has changed. If you are still getting this error after a reload, please notify the maintainer of that page notifying them of the invalid link." 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • LibreWolf 152.0-1 by Razvan Serea LibreWolf is an independent “fork” of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy security and user freedom. It is the community run successor to LibreFox. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. LibreWolf features: Latest Firefox — LibreWolf is compiled directly from the latest build of Firefox Stable. You will have the the latest features, and security updates. Independent Build — LibreWolf uses a build independent of Firefox and has its own settings, profile folder and installation path. As a result, it can be installed alongside Firefox or any other browser. No phoning home — Embedded server links and other calling home functions are removed. In other words, minimal background connections by default. User settings updates Extensions firewall: limit internet access for extensions. Multi-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac/and soon Android) Community-Driven Dark theme (classic and advanced) LibreWolf privacy features: Delete cookies and website data on close. Include only privacy respecting search engines like DuckDuckGo and Searx. Include uBlockOrigin with custom default filter lists, and Tracking Protection in strict mode, to block trackers and ads. Strip tracking elements from URLs, both natively and through uBO. Enable dFPI, also known as Total Cookie Protection. Enable RFP which is part of the Tor Uplift project. RFP is considered the best in class anti-fingerprinting solution, and its goal is to make users look the same and cover as many metrics as possible, in an effort to block fingerprinting techniques. Always display user language as en-US to websites, in order to protect the language used in the browser and in the OS. Disable WebGL, as it is a strong fingerprinting vector. Prevent access to the location services of the OS, and use Mozilla's location API instead of Google's API. Limit ICE candidates generation to a single interface when sharing video or audio during a videoconference. Force DNS and WebRTC inside the proxy, when one is being used. Trim cross-origin referrers, so that they don't include the full URI. Disable link prefetching and speculative connections. Disable disk cache and clear temporary files on close. Disable form autofill. Disable search and form history...and more. LibreWolf 152.0-1 changelog: Upstream release, see the Firefox 152.0 Release Notes Notable changes: The AppImages are now built on Codeberg along with the other releases We have decided to wait a bit longer to enable the settings redesign, due to use being aware of multiple upstream issues Download: LibreWolf 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: LibreWolf Home Page | Addons | Screenshot | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • hahahahah wow hahahah you sure got me there hahahahahah, you know that bad performance is always due to poor optimization by the developers, right???
    • "I know for a fact I'll never own one of these." This is why choice is better than government regulation. Globaly Android has something like 72% of the smartphone market. Granted the vast majority of that is low end phones. Apple can and should charge whatever they want. The market will decide if it is too much.
    • I dont mind the AI stuff the time its released its going to be super mature. My hope is the AI can optimise or at least work out if things could be and the devs prompted. This would help offset sloppy copy/paste and asset flips resulting is rushed bloated games.
    • its an online game, the better part of it, piracy is not the problem. If that was so, it wouldnt release 1 year after for PCs, the piracy will be there Its probably some contract with the console brands
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      559
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      72
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      64
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!