Explosion at Boston Marathon *NSFW IMAGES*


Recommended Posts

BBC News:

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick said Boston would be "open" on Tuesday but that there would be "a heightened law enforcement presence".

"There will be random checks of backpacks and other parcels. We are also asking that everyone be on a state of heightened vigilance," he said.

What's the legality of that from a civil rights perspective? It's one thing to deploy sniffer dogs on the streets if there is the possibility of further attacks but it strikes me as a huge invasion of privacy to search backpacks and parcels at random, especially when we know it's not going to be random. Does anyone really think the police are going to search through the bags of pensioners or are they going to target Muslims and white supremacists?

BBC News:

What's the legality of that from a civil rights perspective? It's one thing to deploy sniffer dogs on the streets if there is the possibility of further attacks but it strikes me as a huge invasion of privacy to search backpacks and parcels at random, especially when we know it's not going to be random. Does anyone really think the police are going to search through the bags of pensioners or are they going to target Muslims and white supremacists?

The authorities have stated they will/have taken all backpacks and bags left behind as "evidence" and will search through them. They've heightened security at major cities and areas. They could enlist TSA at major events..and who says they won't?

They could enlist TSA at major events..and who says they won't?

Oh that's just great...because you know the TSA have such an amazing track record.

Oh wait they fail their own tests 90%+ of the time most recent one being: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/mar/8/tsa-fails-undercover-inspector-sneaks-mock-bomb-ne/

^ Not been following the thread, I take it? :p

I have not either, so can someone summarize it who has? I have an ear infection so my tolerance for going through posts is at a pretty low point, and I tried and read some pretty off kilter comments, so I would love to hear why what could just be a random person watching from a rooftop is suspicious. And note, I am not saying they very well could not be suspicious, just saying it could just be someone getting a birds eye view of the marathon itself.

Great because you know the TSA has such a great track record.

Oh wait they fail their own tests 90%+ of the time most recent one being: http://www.washingto...s-mock-bomb-ne/

Exactly. But the people want to feel safe so why not bring them in to "protect"? The DoHS is talking highly of themselves to convince people they are protected... never let a disaster go unused.

I suspect it was North Korea maybe?

.. No, just no. What possible reason could NK have for something like this? It would completely compromise the legitimacy and recognition they're trying to achieve with all their saber rattling.

  • Like 3

It wasn't NK... It was either some disgruntled person or persons (angry with the gov't) or a local terrorist cell from some foreign group. The fact that no one has "claimed" it yet leads me to think the former is more likely. Claims from the likes of al-qaeda don't usually take long to surface.

Boston was targeted as being lax in the 2001 attacks. The BM is a beloved event there (I grew up in Boston - my place of employment is still up there) and this will have some lasting, ripple effects.

[edit]

For those who DON'T know... yesterday was Patriots Day in Boston. It's a local holiday (I actually had off from work). So this was planned for good (well you know what I mean) effect on the run of the BM and with lots of people out and about on the holiday.

Boston was targeted as being lax in the 2001 attacks. The BM is a beloved event there (I grew up in Boston - my place of employment is still up there) and this will have some lasting, ripple effects.

The only way to truly defeat terrorism is to carry on as normal. It's a lesson we in the UK understood well back in the 70's and 80's at the height of the IRA's bombings, but we seem to have forgotten it in the wake of religious extremist terrorism. :(

  • Like 5

The only way to truly defeat terrorism is to carry on as normal. It's a lesson we in the UK understood well back in the 70's and 80's at the height of the IRA's bombings, but we seem to have forgotten it in the wake of religious extremist terrorism. :(

I thoroughly agree with this.

I don't think many American politicians realise that they lost by responding they way they did..

  • Like 2

The only way to truly defeat terrorism is to carry on as normal. It's a lesson we in the UK understood well back in the 70's and 80's at the height of the IRA's bombings, but we seem to have forgotten it in the wake of religious extremist terrorism.

I had this conversation earlier... Spot on!

The only way to truly defeat terrorism is to carry on as normal. It's a lesson we in the UK understood well back in the 70's and 80's at the height of the IRA's bombings, but we seem to have forgotten it in the wake of religious extremist terrorism. :(

I remember those well (from afar) and they were terrible times. :( It seems like an IRA bombing was in the news at least once/week in the '70s.

The only way to truly defeat terrorism is to carry on as normal. It's a lesson we in the UK understood well back in the 70's and 80's at the height of the IRA's bombings, but we seem to have forgotten it in the wake of religious extremist terrorism. :(

Pretty much this. Our politicians may like to claim we've defeated terrorism by killing OBL, by invading Iraq, by bringing those responsible to justice etc etc

And sure we may have done all of those, but in reality the terrorists won a long time ago. We live in fear of the next attack, have given up some of our civil liberties in exchange for "security", the TSA, spent trillions on two wars and in reality we're not really any safer...just more afraid.

The only thing 9/11 proved is that a bunch of moronic ****heads could bring the worlds largest economic and military power to a halt (and into a state of extreme fear) in a couple of hours.

I don't think many American politicians realise that they lost by responding they way they did..

Exactly. People were united in solidarity behind the United States after 9/11, yet the response?invading Iraq and Afghanistan; implementing the Patriot Act; illegal detention at Guantanamo Bay; the CIA's use of extraordinary rendition and torture, etc?turned the international community against it. That's why people are observing how the US responds to the Boston Marathon Bombing, both in terms of media coverage and the reaction from politicians and law enforcement.

Already we've seen a lot of misinformation from the media - for instance, it was confirmed by Reuters that "no additional explosive devices have been discovered other than the two that detonated" and that there have only been three confirmed fatalities, not the twelve fatalities reported by the New York Post. And as mentioned earlier, the police will be searching bags and parcels at random - something that seems to contravene civil liberties. The initial indications are not good.

Terrorists succeed when society compromises its values.

^^ Stepped up patrols with guards, bomb sniffing dogs, check points. Major cities and major events rethinking their security, major cities on alert. This is what they want/ed and it's what they got. Now they have us living in fear again. And we we are scared, we look at the Government to help. And or, accept what new laws/regulations/restrictions are put on the table.

?They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.?

Ben Franklin

^^ Stepped up patrols with guards, bomb sniffing dogs, check points. Major cities and major events rethinking their security, major cities on alert. This is what they want/ed and it's what they got. Now they have us living in fear again. And we we are scared, we look at the Government to help. And or, accept what new laws/regulations/restrictions are put on the table.

?They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.?

Ben Franklin

I am not sure I fully understand you. Increased security at large events is exactly what should happen, why do you look at it as fear instead of precautionary? Terrorists look for opportunities to cause the most destruction (high populated areas). People still attend huge events, people still fly in airplanes, etc. Sure alot of things changed after 9/11 as far as security but how is that any different than a company who gets hacked adding additional security for the future? Just looking to get your perspective.

The only way to truly defeat terrorism is to carry on as normal. It's a lesson we in the UK understood well back in the 70's and 80's at the height of the IRA's bombings, but we seem to have forgotten it in the wake of religious extremist terrorism. :(

which is kind if weird, since the IRA had a lot more bombings and a lot more successful than the extremists today. heck has there even been a successful Muslim extremist terrorist attack on British soil ? which is even weirder since the muslim extremist are willing to sacrifice themselves, the IRA preferred living to bomb another day.

  • Like 1

I am not sure I fully understand you. Increased security at large events is exactly what should happen, why do you look at it as fear instead of precautionary? Terrorists look for opportunities to cause the most destruction (high populated areas). People still attend huge events, people still fly in airplanes, etc. Sure alot of things changed after 9/11 as far as security but how is that any different than a company who gets hacked adding additional security for the future? Just looking to get your perspective.

What's to understand? I'm just saying what's going to happen after an event like this and yes, what should. But then after the dust settles we still look at the Government to keep us safe and overlook new laws/legislation that restrict our rights even more.

which is kind if weird, since the IRA had a lot more bombings and a lot more successful than the extremists today. heck has there even been a successful Muslim extremist terrorist attack on British soil ? which is even weirder since the muslim extremist are willing to sacrifice themselves, the IRA preferred living to bomb another day.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings

which is kind if weird, since the IRA had a lot more bombings and a lot more successful than the extremists today. heck has there even been a successful Muslim extremist terrorist attack on British soil ? which is even weirder since the muslim extremist are willing to sacrifice themselves, the IRA preferred living to bomb another day.

Sure, after 9/11 there was 7/7 London attack in 2005 where several suicide bombers attacked the London Subway and buses. Not as many victims as 9/11, but still a hell of a lot of people died.

So that was one attack, vs how many a year from the IRA.

seems terrorist are getting worse and people are getting more scared. granted with attacks such as the Trade center bombings, the stakes for each attack is potentially higher, but these are also very rare attacks that also have a much higher risk of discovery.

^^ Stepped up patrols with guards, bomb sniffing dogs, check points. Major cities and major events rethinking their security, major cities on alert. This is what they want/ed and it's what they got. Now they have us living in fear again. And we we are scared, we look at the Government to help.

Exactly. By having the police out in force in unrelated cities it reinforces the message that the general public is at risk. The UK did a similar thing back in 2003 when Tony Blair ordered the military?including tanks?to guard Heathrow Airport after receiving a terrorist threat, a decision that received widespread criticism. There is no strategic value in deploying tanks to deal with terrorist threats, just as there is no strategic value to lining up police cars in Times Square following a bombing in Boston. The purpose is to show the public that the government and police forces are taking no chances?to serve as positive PR?when the only thing it achieves is scaring the public.

Exactly. People were united in solidarity behind the United States after 9/11, yet the response?invading Iraq and Afghanistan; implementing the Patriot Act; illegal detention at Guantanamo Bay; the CIA's use of extraordinary rendition and torture, etc?turned the international community against it. That's why people are observing how the US responds to the Boston Marathon Bombing, both in terms of media coverage and the reaction from politicians and law enforcement.

Already we've seen a lot of misinformation from the media - for instance, it was confirmed by Reuters that "no additional explosive devices have been discovered other than the two that detonated" and that there have only been three confirmed fatalities, not the twelve fatalities reported by the New York Post. And as mentioned earlier, the police will be searching bags and parcels at random - something that seems to contravene civil liberties. The initial indications are not good.

Terrorists succeed when society compromises its values.

I might be wrong but were you not complaining about lax security in first few pages of the thread? If yes, don't you think you are contradicting yourself by worrying about civil liberties now?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!