Boston Bombing Suspects - MIT Shooting - Manhunt

By xendrome
in Real World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Experienced

matt4444

Posted
Posted

I respect your opinion, but I would like the FBI to get him alive, so they can interrogate him and find out why he did all of this and then sentence him to life! Someone being sentenced in life in prison is better then letting them just die and not suffer at all!

and also to find out if there are other planned attacks etc

Grand Master

Atomic Wanderer Chicken

Posted
Posted

As much as I am for rights and everything, but because he is a terrorist and blew up killing three and injuring 100s of people, he should not have the right to remain silent in this case! He should be interrogated as much as possible to get answers! A judge I believe could overrule the "right to remain silent" if they wanted to, but I know nothing about law! The right to remain silent should be declared null and void if a citizen commits a terrorist act!

Grand Master

xendrome

Posted
  • Author
Posted

As much as I am for rights and everything, but because he is a terrorist and blew up killing three and injuring 100s of people, he should not have the right to remain silent in this case! He should be interrogated as much as possible to get answers! A judge I believe could overrule the "right to remain silent" if they wanted to, but I know nothing about law!

LOL no you are so totally wrong that it's not even funny at this point. And like you said "know nothing about law"

You should at least know about your own rights, please research this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_silence

Grand Master

LaP

Posted
Posted

As much as I am for rights and everything, but because he is a terrorist and blew up killing three and injuring 100s of people, he should not have the right to remain silent in this case! He should be interrogated as much as possible to get answers! A judge I believe could overrule the "right to remain silent" if they wanted to, but I know nothing about law! The right to remain silent should be declared null and void if a citizen commits a terrorist act!

And how do you actually force him to talk ?

You beat the guy to death until he talks like Joe Pesci in Casino ?

The day you go down this road is the day USA stop being USA.

Even if you void the right and charge him with contempt of court he will still remain silent.

Grand Master

neufuse Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

As much as I am for rights and everything, but because he is a terrorist and blew up killing three and injuring 100s of people, he should not have the right to remain silent in this case! He should be interrogated as much as possible to get answers! A judge I believe could overrule the "right to remain silent" if they wanted to, but I know nothing about law! The right to remain silent should be declared null and void if a citizen commits a terrorist act!

wow... just wow... you might want to brush up on your "unalienable" rights

Grand Master

presence06

Posted
Posted

Scanner confirmed.

must be on CT? I didn't hear on Cambridge one.

also looking for a white male, black backpack, white shirt and jeans, was hanging out by Starbucks that was looked at for suspicious boxes stacked. (never heard anything after they sent a crew to look)

Grand Master

+Raze Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

As much as I am for rights and everything, but because he is a terrorist and blew up killing three and injuring 100s of people, he should not have the right to remain silent in this case! He should be interrogated as much as possible to get answers! A judge I believe could overrule the "right to remain silent" if they wanted to, but I know nothing about law! The right to remain silent should be declared null and void if a citizen commits a terrorist act!

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

Grand Master

Atomic Wanderer Chicken

Posted
Posted

LOL no you are so totally wrong that it's not even funny at this point. And like you said "know nothing about law"

You should at least know about your own rights, please research this - http://en.wikipedia....ight_to_silence

I know the right to remain silent! I am saying a us citizen that has been accused of commiting a terrorist act shouldn't have that right to be silent, but have all the other rights like due process! They could be working with other terrorists!

Grand Master

xendrome

Posted
  • Author
Posted

And how do you actually void this right ?

You beat the guy to death until he talks like Joe Pesci in Casino ?

The day you go down this road is the day USA stop being USA.

Plus, beating someone to get a confession sometimes leads to a false confession so the beatings will stop. :/

Grand Master

xendrome

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I know the right to remain silent! I am saying a us citizen that has been accused of commiting a terrorist act shouldn't have that right to be silent, but have all the other rights like due process!

You can't make exceptions for the someones rights.

Grand Master

Atomic Wanderer Chicken

Posted
Posted

Well if he doesnt talk then, they can still go ahead and move forward with convicting him! I do agree everyone has the right to remain silent!

Grand Master

xendrome

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well if he doesnt talk then, they can still go ahead and move forward with convicting him!

Of course, but the defense could sit there and say nothing also. They don't have the burden of proof. the prosecution has to prove their case and I'm sure there is a ton of evidence.

  • Atomic Wanderer Chicken
  • Like 1
Grand Master

Atomic Wanderer Chicken

Posted
Posted

Of course, but the defense could sit there and say nothing also. They don't have the burden of proof. the prosecution has to prove their case and I'm sure there is a ton of evidence.

This one will be a very tough case to prove, unless he admits to commiting these acts of terror! They have lots of photographic and video evidence though!

Grand Master

xendrome

Posted
  • Author
Posted

This one will be a very tough case to prove, unless he admits to commiting these acts of terror! They have lots of photographic and video evidence though!

This is probably going to be a very EASY case to prove... remember they don't have to prove "beyond any doubt" but simply "beyond reasonable doubt" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_doubt

Grand Master

neufuse Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

This is probably going to be a very EASY case to prove... remember they don't have to prove "beyond any doubt" but simply "beyond reasonable doubt" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_doubt

Cases have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt in the past in court, only to have the jury acquit... heck the reverse is true too... barely any evidence, throw them in jail!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.