Recommended Posts

Video games have changed.

It's not about high scores, or gameplay.

It's not even about graphics, multiplayer, or innovation.

It's an endless series of micro transactions,

bought by children and fanboys.

Video games, and its vast consumption of human time,

has become a rational, well-oiled business transaction.

Video games have changed.

ID-tagged gamers carry ID-tagged consoles,

that use ID-tagged games.

Season-passes inside their games

enhance and regulate their experience.

Lending games control.. Used games control..

Single player control.. ESPN control.

Everything is monitored, and kept under control.

Video games have changed.

The age of entertainment is now the age of control,

averting piracy from smart people.

And he who controls the activation codes, controls games.

Video games have changed.

When the battlefield is under total control,

consolewars becomes routine.

Why should a gaming console be a fashion statement?

It use to be that video games were unlike anything in our households so they stand out in order for others to identify them.

Video games have changed.

It's not about high scores, or gameplay.

It's not even about graphics, multiplayer, or innovation.

It's an endless series of micro transactions,

bought by children and fanboys.

Video games, and its vast consumption of human time,

has become a rational, well-oiled business transaction.

Video games have changed.

ID-tagged gamers carry ID-tagged consoles,

that use ID-tagged games.

Season-passes inside their games

enhance and regulate their experience.

Lending games control.. Used games control..

Single player control.. ESPN control.

Everything is monitored, and kept under control.

Video games have changed.

The age of entertainment is now the age of control,

averting piracy from smart people.

And he who controls the activation codes, controls games.

Video games have changed.

When the battlefield is under total control,

consolewars becomes routine.

It use to be that video games were unlike anything in our households so they stand out in order for others to identify them.

LONG LIVE THE 16 BIT ERA!

turtles-in-time-snes-shredder-fight-boss-battle.jpg

What do you use in your PhD for and what have you read? If you are using OpenGL on Windows you are essentially just interfacing through a wrapper of DirectX (makes it usable), if you are using it on OSX or a Linux distribution the story gets interesting pretty quick.

OpenGL and DirectX are two entirely different rendering pipelines on Windows, each with their own quirks and differences. In no shape, way, or form is OpenGL a wrapper over DirectX.

Used games are basically gone. Paying almost full price for another to play a game I lend them unless I let them use my account... The complacency is being shown by those who are accepting this DRM tactic and not voicing their frustration and disappointment about such tactics being thrust upon the consumer.

If Sony shows to do the same thing, you will hear the same cry as we are expressing now. But since we do not know, we are not voicing it. But we do know what MS has planned, and many of us are not happy with the new business model.

Why are we ignoring the little fact they said they're working on systems to let you lend games between accounts. Kind of like ebooks. Oh yeah... Agenda...

Why are we ignoring the little fact they said they're working on systems to let you lend games between accounts. Kind of like ebooks. Oh yeah... Agenda...

It's a real concern though for people like me who occasionally rent or borrow from public library. MS is not helping by not communicating openly.

Major Nelson flat out said no to the 24 hour thing, though did allude to there still being some sort of time frame. He also said Xbox One will also support 3D and 4k. Check the transcript of his yahoo chat from the other day on his blog :)

  • Like 1

Yea I guess they will have to do similar stuff for other regions otherwise it will just like Xbox 360.

The difference is i think Sony will be a fiercer competitor next gen. Sony was not ready with the PS3. It was released 1 year later than 360 while the 360 already had a big library of titles avalaible. Also if we are to believe the devs it was hard to develop and port for.

The PS4 will be released at the same time as the 360 and with almost the same arch. It looks like it will be far easier to port games between the One and PS4 and to develop for the PS4. Most big companies will be fully multiplatform next gen and there should not be a noticeable difference between the One and the PS4 version of a multiplatform title. The first party exclusive titles will be a major selling point.

MS did not need the multimedia features of the 360 to succeed. Here in Quebec, Canada (french canada) people bought the 360 as a game console only and it was clearly the most popular console for almost the entire gen. The PS3 is clearly catching up tough. I see more and more people with the PS3.

The multimedia features might help the One in USA but it wont be that much of an help outside of USA and specially in japan unless MS is tailoring content for people outside of USA (unlike the 360). I own a 360 and owned an XBox (did not own a PS2 or PS3) and to be honest the lack of success of MS in japan and the lack of japanese titles support is really starting to bother me a lot. I really like the changes Sony did with the PS4 controller (my dislike of the PS2 and PS3 controllers was a big reason i went with the XBox). I really like the fact the PS4 will be as much powerful as the One and with the same arch should get proper support from western companies since it sells well enough in those region. Also i really don't like having to pay for gold yet having access to only a fraction of the multimedia content.

I really wish MS would put more focus on gaming. I can understand the excitement about the One in USA. But as a french canadian i can't help but feel more positive about the PS4 since Sony did put more focus on gaming than Microsoft did when they announced the PS4. I intend to play some crazy japanese games again next gen. The choice will be easy for me. I did not see anything in MS press conference that will help the One be more popular than the 360 outside of USA and the PS3 worldwide is really catching up lately and i don't see the trend reversing.

The difference is i think Sony will be a fiercer competitor next gen. Sony was not ready with the PS3. It was released 1 year later than 360 while the 360 already had a big library of titles avalaible. Also if we are to believe the devs it was hard to develop and port for.

The PS4 will be released at the same time as the 360 and with almost the same arch. It looks like it will be far easier to port games between the One and PS4 and to develop for the PS4. Most big companies will be fully multiplatform next gen and there should not be a noticeable difference between the One and the PS4 version of a multiplatform title. The first party exclusive titles will be a major selling point.

MS did not need the multimedia features of the 360 to succeed. Here in Quebec, Canada (french canada) people bought the 360 as a game console only and it was clearly the most popular console for almost the entire gen. The PS3 is clearly catching up tough. I see more and more people with the PS3.

The multimedia features might help the One in USA but it wont be that much of an help outside of USA and specially in japan unless MS is tailoring content for people outside of USA (unlike the 360). I own a 360 and owned an XBox (did not own a PS2 or PS3) and to be honest the lack of success of MS in japan and the lack of japanese titles support is really starting to bother me a lot. I really like the changes Sony did with the PS4 controller (my dislike of the PS2 and PS3 controllers was a big reason i went with the XBox). I really like the fact the PS4 will be as much powerful as the One and with the same arch should get proper support from western companies since it sells well enough in those region. Also i really don't like having to pay for gold yet having access to only a fraction of the multimedia content.

I really wish MS would put more focus on gaming. I can understand the excitement about the One in USA. But as a french canadian i can't help but feel more positive about the PS4 since Sony did put more focus on gaming than Microsoft did when they announced the PS4. I intend to play some crazy japanese games again next gen. The choice will be easy for me. I did not see anything in MS press conference that will help the One be more popular than the 360 outside of USA and the PS3 worldwide is really catching up lately and i don't see the trend reversing.

Well said from a gamers point if view. I tried to highlight in another topic these consoles are going head to head this gen, no early start for the Xbox and Sony are far better prepared for this launch. Heck they showed first in Feb.

What do you use in your PhD for and what have you read? If you are using OpenGL on Windows you are essentially just interfacing through a wrapper of DirectX (makes it usable), if you are using it on OSX or a Linux distribution the story gets interesting pretty quick.

This has to be one of the most ignorant things I ever have seen... he must be a troll.

Video games have changed.

It's not about high scores, or gameplay.

It's not even about graphics, multiplayer, or innovation.

It's an endless series of micro transactions,

bought by children and fanboys.

Video games, and its vast consumption of human time,

has become a rational, well-oiled business transaction.

Video games have changed.

ID-tagged gamers carry ID-tagged consoles,

that use ID-tagged games.

Season-passes inside their games

enhance and regulate their experience.

Lending games control.. Used games control..

Single player control.. ESPN control.

Everything is monitored, and kept under control.

Video games have changed.

The age of entertainment is now the age of control,

averting piracy from smart people.

And he who controls the activation codes, controls games.

Video games have changed.

When the battlefield is under total control,

consolewars becomes routine.

It use to be that video games were unlike anything in our households so they stand out in order for others to identify them.

Nice MGS4 references :D

Not ignoring anything. I'm not pleased with the killing off of lending/trading/renting of games to friends, family, and such. It's a horrible system that only hurts us, the consumer. And those who are trying to find the good in this, are the ones who give this type of idea power and push companies to continue to hurt the consumer. There is NO reason you should accept this, as a consumer.

These companies want you to think they are hurting. In reality, they are still making HUGE profits. The nickle and diming of customers is only going to get worse if people allow these little steps to continue.

If you grew up gaming, you can easily see each step that has continued to put more and more restrictions to how we own and play the games we buy.

Seems like you're still ignoring the thing you said you're not ignoring.

They said there will be systems in place for lending games. i.e. same systems as exists for e-books already. meaning it gets activated on your friends account while it's marked as lent out on yours and you can't use it while he's "lending" it.

Honestly though, games today are so cheap people should just buy them instead of lending.

Seems like you're still ignoring the thing you said you're not ignoring.

They said there will be systems in place for lending games. i.e. same systems as exists for e-books already. meaning it gets activated on your friends account while it's marked as lent out on yours and you can't use it while he's "lending" it.

Honestly though, games today are so cheap people should just buy them instead of lending.

How are these systems going to work for companies that rent games, if its not as easy as put a game in an envelope and post then there's a good chance Xbox One or PS4 games if Sony go that route won't get purchased for rental purposes.

Your 'games are cheap' comment is ignorant, ?40/$60 isn't cheap if you don't know you are going to like the game or not. I can get nearly 4 months of unlimited game rental for the price of one game, game rental places buy hundreds of copies of every game for most platforms, that is money publishers/developers won't get if consoles block used/rental games as I'm not blowing ?40 on a game that I don't have a demo for.

The difference is i think Sony will be a fiercer competitor next gen. Sony was not ready with the PS3. It was released 1 year later than 360 while the 360 already had a big library of titles avalaible. Also if we are to believe the devs it was hard to develop and port for.

The PS4 will be released at the same time as the 360 and with almost the same arch. It looks like it will be far easier to port games between the One and PS4 and to develop for the PS4. Most big companies will be fully multiplatform next gen and there should not be a noticeable difference between the One and the PS4 version of a multiplatform title. The first party exclusive titles will be a major selling point.

MS did not need the multimedia features of the 360 to succeed. Here in Quebec, Canada (french canada) people bought the 360 as a game console only and it was clearly the most popular console for almost the entire gen. The PS3 is clearly catching up tough. I see more and more people with the PS3.

The multimedia features might help the One in USA but it wont be that much of an help outside of USA and specially in japan unless MS is tailoring content for people outside of USA (unlike the 360). I own a 360 and owned an XBox (did not own a PS2 or PS3) and to be honest the lack of success of MS in japan and the lack of japanese titles support is really starting to bother me a lot. I really like the changes Sony did with the PS4 controller (my dislike of the PS2 and PS3 controllers was a big reason i went with the XBox). I really like the fact the PS4 will be as much powerful as the One and with the same arch should get proper support from western companies since it sells well enough in those region. Also i really don't like having to pay for gold yet having access to only a fraction of the multimedia content.

I really wish MS would put more focus on gaming. I can understand the excitement about the One in USA. But as a french canadian i can't help but feel more positive about the PS4 since Sony did put more focus on gaming than Microsoft did when they announced the PS4. I intend to play some crazy japanese games again next gen. The choice will be easy for me. I did not see anything in MS press conference that will help the One be more popular than the 360 outside of USA and the PS3 worldwide is really catching up lately and i don't see the trend reversing.

Well said!

Microsoft got quite a bit of praise back with the 360 because they focused on games, rather than trying to push out a Bluray player within their console. Sony's PS3 offered so many features too, but when it came down to the price tag, it was way too high. Overall, it seemed to leave a bad taste in your mouth where you were paying way too much for a device that did all of these things when all you wanted to do was play some video games.

Fast forward to today, and now we have Microsoft trying to be the jack of all trades here, introducing existing technology into a device where many products already exist, and in an arguably better state already. It's like they're trying to solve problems people already have answers to. Even Sony's inclusion of the Bluray wasn't a totally bad idea, considering how much Bluray players were at the time and that it was still quite new technology where not many had it sitting in their living rooms yet.

I can't help but facepalm at the fact that, while Sony's reveal conference wasn't very good, Microsoft literally took ZERO notes from them, apparently having learned not a damn thing. That's what has me annoyed more than anything. It feels like Microsoft isn't even paying attention to the competition at all, deciding to do whatever they want just because they have the Xbox name. Sorry guys, but Sony did that once before, and it didn't exactly work out for them. Why the HELL would it work out for Microsoft?

Ge4jAR3.gif

Well said!

Microsoft got quite a bit of praise back with the 360 because they focused on games, rather than trying to push out a Bluray player within their console. Sony's PS3 offered so many features too, but when it came down to the price tag, it was way too high. Overall, it seemed to leave a bad taste in your mouth where you were paying way too much for a device that did all of these things when all you wanted to do was play some video games.

Fast forward to today, and now we have Microsoft trying to be the jack of all trades here, introducing existing technology into a device where many products already exist, and in an arguably better state already. It's like they're trying to solve problems people already have answers to. Even Sony's inclusion of the Bluray wasn't a totally bad idea, considering how much Bluray players were at the time and that it was still quite new technology where not many had it sitting in their living rooms yet.

I can't help but facepalm at the fact that, while Sony's reveal conference wasn't very good, Microsoft literally took ZERO notes from them, apparently having learned not a damn thing. That's what has me annoyed more than anything. It feels like Microsoft isn't even paying attention to the competition at all, deciding to do whatever they want just because they have the Xbox name. Sorry guys, but Sony did that once before, and it didn't exactly work out for them. Why the HELL would it work out for Microsoft?

You're making the assumption that they aren't focused on games when they are. When they announced the Xbox reveal back in April they specifically stated it was going to be about the console and their vision for it as a whole and that E3 would be about the games. They've said multiple times since then and since the reveal that E3 is going to pretty much entirely be about the games. So just wait 2 weeks and then judge them on that facet. I'd also love to know what you're considering as "existing technology" that they're implementing into the Xbox in a worse state than what people have because as far as I can tell, it's all better than a lot of the other standalone products, even more so because it is integrated.

In general I think a lot of people are making the false assumption that because Microsoft is focusing on an entire entertainment experience that somehow they are less focused on games when there is really no evidence of that at this time.

  • Like 1

In general I think a lot of people are making the false assumption that because Microsoft is focusing on an entire entertainment experience that somehow they are less focused on games when there is really no evidence of that at this time.

I think it is very safe to say that Sony is more focused however.

From the pretty well documented differences each company is handling the independent developers, to the fact Sony made it much clearer in their reveal games were the front and center focus, even if MS is also focusing on games as we all know they are, at this point in time Sony seems to have more of a focus.

Perhaps this fact will change with E3, but I also think Sony is going to keep the hype machine rolling as well, so wether or not both companies wind up giving the same focus towards games, the overall consensus is right now Sony is giving a stronger focus. This will no doubt go a long way.

As it has already been pointed out, some gamers went with the 360 this last generation as it was the more attractive console for several reasons from a practical standpoint. A year head start, a lower price tag, some killer launch titles, MS had everything going for them and Sony did not. Even with that said, Sony managed to hang in there this generation. It is no doubt well documented they lost the United States, but the United States is not the end all be all. However for MS, they are making that pretty apparent it clearly is the region they care about the most. A decent amount of these new features of the XBox 1 will be limited to the US initially.

So while MS still may wind up dominating sales in the US because of their focus, this generation there is a much more undefined line as to which console should be purchased. The PS4 is looking very attractive to a few people who purchased 360's this last generation if games are what they care about most.

This generation is going to wind up being perhaps the tightest one we have experienced yet to be truthful. The WiiU is already out of the running for several reasons, and only those such as myself who still enjoy playing 1st party Nintendo games will own one. The rest of the market is Sony's and MS's. And this time around Sony is ready. And they also (currently) have the perception of being more focused on the gamer.

I for one think it is an absolute great thing. Neither company is going to be able to rest on their laurels, they both need to step it up, and all signs are already pointing to the fact they are doing just that. So I hope I am 100% right. That there is no clear cut winner in any territory. We all will benefit as a result.

In general I think a lot of people are making the false assumption that because Microsoft is focusing on an entire entertainment experience that somehow they are less focused on games when there is really no evidence of that at this time.

And this is my point: if that's something they truly cared about, SHOW it. It's like they haven't learned a single thing by watching Sony. Microsoft appears to be a horse with blinders on, running straight forward and seemingly out of touch with what their competition is doing along with what their fan base actually wants or cares to see.

What's worse is there are awful rumors flying now, which stemmed from Microsoft opening their mouth when they apparently haven't finalized many of the details between user accounts, games, used games, sharing, and how that all is supposed to work, what it means, and so forth. Instead, they throw out some rough idea with nothing solid to go on. They seem to have done a great job in making contradictory statements too. "Always on" not a requirement, except for all these instances where you'd need online authentication to do basic things you weren't required to do previously on the console...

It's like they're trying to give "clear" answers, but when people push to try and understand what they're getting at, they back off and claim they don't have enough information. As a consumer, that's just incredibly frustrating! It's like the more you find out about the new Xbox, the less you actually know about it...

And this is my point: if that's something they truly cared about, SHOW it. It's like they haven't learned a single thing by watching Sony. Microsoft appears to be a horse with blinders on, running straight forward and seemingly out of touch with what their competition is doing along with what their fan base actually wants or cares to see.

What's worse is there are awful rumors flying now, which stemmed from Microsoft opening their mouth when they apparently haven't finalized many of the details between user accounts, games, used games, sharing, and how that all is supposed to work, what it means, and so forth. Instead, they throw out some rough idea with nothing solid to go on. They seem to have done a great job in making contradictory statements too. "Always on" not a requirement, except for all these instances where you'd need online authentication to do basic things you weren't required to do previously on the console...

It's like they're trying to give "clear" answers, but when people push to try and understand what they're getting at, they back off and claim they don't have enough information. As a consumer, that's just incredibly frustrating! It's like the more you find out about the new Xbox, the less you actually know about it...

Well like I said, they stated clearly that they weren't focusing on games at this reveal and that they were going to do so at E3 so I believe they are going to show it very soon, but I do agree that they aren't handling other PR aspects particularly gracefully (i.e. answers without more questions would be nice).

  • Like 1

4:23

Comment From blame space

Which areas of the Xbox One will you be focusing on at your E3 presentation?

4:24 phptlmby6larryb8l7d.png

Major Nelson (Larry Hryb): Games. Games. GAMES :)

Come on man, wasn't that **** obvious? You think they are going to show their whole hand now and have nothing for E3?

Do people really think for a moment, that this isn't a full on gmaing machine, that can also do a load of media stuff?

If people are confused, then it's because they are stupid.

I think it was Penny Arcde that did a whole article on being confused as to what this box is supposed to be.

Derp!

  • Like 1

I think it is very safe to say that Sony is more focused however.

From the pretty well documented differences each company is handling the independent developers, to the fact Sony made it much clearer in their reveal games were the front and center focus, even if MS is also focusing on games as we all know they are, at this point in time Sony seems to have more of a focus.

Perhaps this fact will change with E3, but I also think Sony is going to keep the hype machine rolling as well, so wether or not both companies wind up giving the same focus towards games, the overall consensus is right now Sony is giving a stronger focus. This will no doubt go a long way.

As it has already been pointed out, some gamers went with the 360 this last generation as it was the more attractive console for several reasons from a practical standpoint. A year head start, a lower price tag, some killer launch titles, MS had everything going for them and Sony did not. Even with that said, Sony managed to hang in there this generation. It is no doubt well documented they lost the United States, but the United States is not the end all be all. However for MS, they are making that pretty apparent it clearly is the region they care about the most. A decent amount of these new features of the XBox 1 will be limited to the US initially.

So while MS still may wind up dominating sales in the US because of their focus, this generation there is a much more undefined line as to which console should be purchased. The PS4 is looking very attractive to a few people who purchased 360's this last generation if games are what they care about most.

This generation is going to wind up being perhaps the tightest one we have experienced yet to be truthful. The WiiU is already out of the running for several reasons, and only those such as myself who still enjoy playing 1st party Nintendo games will own one. The rest of the market is Sony's and MS's. And this time around Sony is ready. And they also (currently) have the perception of being more focused on the gamer.

I for one think it is an absolute great thing. Neither company is going to be able to rest on their laurels, they both need to step it up, and all signs are already pointing to the fact they are doing just that. So I hope I am 100% right. That there is no clear cut winner in any territory. We all will benefit as a result.

Some of that is true, but I don't believe that the hype train is even rolling for Sony, so they need to get it going. They had their reveal in February and there was little fanfare following it. News about the PS4 pretty much dropped off the planet until the day before the Xbox reveal and now it's still most about Xbox, good or bad.

Sony and MS are on even ground right now though I think. I doubt that changes much through the next lifecycle like you say, and that's not a bad thing.

Well like I said, they stated clearly that they weren't focusing on games at this reveal and that they were going to do so at E3 so I believe they are going to show it very soon, but I do agree that they aren't handling other PR aspects particularly gracefully (i.e. answers without more questions would be nice).

People keep bringing this up, but just because they said that doesn't mean it was the right move. They showed barely any games at all, and no gameplay. They tout these 15 new exclusives coming over the next year but couldn't even offer up some names, logos, anything at all? I understand E3 is only a few weeks a way but first impressions can mean a lot and after what MS showed us I'm already seeing a somewhat negative impact amongst some of my friends. All we can do now is wait and hope that E3 wows us a lot more and clarifies a lot of the unanswered questions that have been circulating the past couple days.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!