Recommended Posts

Video games have changed.

It's not about high scores, or gameplay.

It's not even about graphics, multiplayer, or innovation.

It's an endless series of micro transactions,

bought by children and fanboys.

Video games, and its vast consumption of human time,

has become a rational, well-oiled business transaction.

Video games have changed.

ID-tagged gamers carry ID-tagged consoles,

that use ID-tagged games.

Season-passes inside their games

enhance and regulate their experience.

Lending games control.. Used games control..

Single player control.. ESPN control.

Everything is monitored, and kept under control.

Video games have changed.

The age of entertainment is now the age of control,

averting piracy from smart people.

And he who controls the activation codes, controls games.

Video games have changed.

When the battlefield is under total control,

consolewars becomes routine.

Why should a gaming console be a fashion statement?

It use to be that video games were unlike anything in our households so they stand out in order for others to identify them.

Video games have changed.

It's not about high scores, or gameplay.

It's not even about graphics, multiplayer, or innovation.

It's an endless series of micro transactions,

bought by children and fanboys.

Video games, and its vast consumption of human time,

has become a rational, well-oiled business transaction.

Video games have changed.

ID-tagged gamers carry ID-tagged consoles,

that use ID-tagged games.

Season-passes inside their games

enhance and regulate their experience.

Lending games control.. Used games control..

Single player control.. ESPN control.

Everything is monitored, and kept under control.

Video games have changed.

The age of entertainment is now the age of control,

averting piracy from smart people.

And he who controls the activation codes, controls games.

Video games have changed.

When the battlefield is under total control,

consolewars becomes routine.

It use to be that video games were unlike anything in our households so they stand out in order for others to identify them.

LONG LIVE THE 16 BIT ERA!

turtles-in-time-snes-shredder-fight-boss-battle.jpg

What do you use in your PhD for and what have you read? If you are using OpenGL on Windows you are essentially just interfacing through a wrapper of DirectX (makes it usable), if you are using it on OSX or a Linux distribution the story gets interesting pretty quick.

OpenGL and DirectX are two entirely different rendering pipelines on Windows, each with their own quirks and differences. In no shape, way, or form is OpenGL a wrapper over DirectX.

Used games are basically gone. Paying almost full price for another to play a game I lend them unless I let them use my account... The complacency is being shown by those who are accepting this DRM tactic and not voicing their frustration and disappointment about such tactics being thrust upon the consumer.

If Sony shows to do the same thing, you will hear the same cry as we are expressing now. But since we do not know, we are not voicing it. But we do know what MS has planned, and many of us are not happy with the new business model.

Why are we ignoring the little fact they said they're working on systems to let you lend games between accounts. Kind of like ebooks. Oh yeah... Agenda...

Why are we ignoring the little fact they said they're working on systems to let you lend games between accounts. Kind of like ebooks. Oh yeah... Agenda...

It's a real concern though for people like me who occasionally rent or borrow from public library. MS is not helping by not communicating openly.

Major Nelson flat out said no to the 24 hour thing, though did allude to there still being some sort of time frame. He also said Xbox One will also support 3D and 4k. Check the transcript of his yahoo chat from the other day on his blog :)

  • Like 1

Yea I guess they will have to do similar stuff for other regions otherwise it will just like Xbox 360.

The difference is i think Sony will be a fiercer competitor next gen. Sony was not ready with the PS3. It was released 1 year later than 360 while the 360 already had a big library of titles avalaible. Also if we are to believe the devs it was hard to develop and port for.

The PS4 will be released at the same time as the 360 and with almost the same arch. It looks like it will be far easier to port games between the One and PS4 and to develop for the PS4. Most big companies will be fully multiplatform next gen and there should not be a noticeable difference between the One and the PS4 version of a multiplatform title. The first party exclusive titles will be a major selling point.

MS did not need the multimedia features of the 360 to succeed. Here in Quebec, Canada (french canada) people bought the 360 as a game console only and it was clearly the most popular console for almost the entire gen. The PS3 is clearly catching up tough. I see more and more people with the PS3.

The multimedia features might help the One in USA but it wont be that much of an help outside of USA and specially in japan unless MS is tailoring content for people outside of USA (unlike the 360). I own a 360 and owned an XBox (did not own a PS2 or PS3) and to be honest the lack of success of MS in japan and the lack of japanese titles support is really starting to bother me a lot. I really like the changes Sony did with the PS4 controller (my dislike of the PS2 and PS3 controllers was a big reason i went with the XBox). I really like the fact the PS4 will be as much powerful as the One and with the same arch should get proper support from western companies since it sells well enough in those region. Also i really don't like having to pay for gold yet having access to only a fraction of the multimedia content.

I really wish MS would put more focus on gaming. I can understand the excitement about the One in USA. But as a french canadian i can't help but feel more positive about the PS4 since Sony did put more focus on gaming than Microsoft did when they announced the PS4. I intend to play some crazy japanese games again next gen. The choice will be easy for me. I did not see anything in MS press conference that will help the One be more popular than the 360 outside of USA and the PS3 worldwide is really catching up lately and i don't see the trend reversing.

The difference is i think Sony will be a fiercer competitor next gen. Sony was not ready with the PS3. It was released 1 year later than 360 while the 360 already had a big library of titles avalaible. Also if we are to believe the devs it was hard to develop and port for.

The PS4 will be released at the same time as the 360 and with almost the same arch. It looks like it will be far easier to port games between the One and PS4 and to develop for the PS4. Most big companies will be fully multiplatform next gen and there should not be a noticeable difference between the One and the PS4 version of a multiplatform title. The first party exclusive titles will be a major selling point.

MS did not need the multimedia features of the 360 to succeed. Here in Quebec, Canada (french canada) people bought the 360 as a game console only and it was clearly the most popular console for almost the entire gen. The PS3 is clearly catching up tough. I see more and more people with the PS3.

The multimedia features might help the One in USA but it wont be that much of an help outside of USA and specially in japan unless MS is tailoring content for people outside of USA (unlike the 360). I own a 360 and owned an XBox (did not own a PS2 or PS3) and to be honest the lack of success of MS in japan and the lack of japanese titles support is really starting to bother me a lot. I really like the changes Sony did with the PS4 controller (my dislike of the PS2 and PS3 controllers was a big reason i went with the XBox). I really like the fact the PS4 will be as much powerful as the One and with the same arch should get proper support from western companies since it sells well enough in those region. Also i really don't like having to pay for gold yet having access to only a fraction of the multimedia content.

I really wish MS would put more focus on gaming. I can understand the excitement about the One in USA. But as a french canadian i can't help but feel more positive about the PS4 since Sony did put more focus on gaming than Microsoft did when they announced the PS4. I intend to play some crazy japanese games again next gen. The choice will be easy for me. I did not see anything in MS press conference that will help the One be more popular than the 360 outside of USA and the PS3 worldwide is really catching up lately and i don't see the trend reversing.

Well said from a gamers point if view. I tried to highlight in another topic these consoles are going head to head this gen, no early start for the Xbox and Sony are far better prepared for this launch. Heck they showed first in Feb.

What do you use in your PhD for and what have you read? If you are using OpenGL on Windows you are essentially just interfacing through a wrapper of DirectX (makes it usable), if you are using it on OSX or a Linux distribution the story gets interesting pretty quick.

This has to be one of the most ignorant things I ever have seen... he must be a troll.

Video games have changed.

It's not about high scores, or gameplay.

It's not even about graphics, multiplayer, or innovation.

It's an endless series of micro transactions,

bought by children and fanboys.

Video games, and its vast consumption of human time,

has become a rational, well-oiled business transaction.

Video games have changed.

ID-tagged gamers carry ID-tagged consoles,

that use ID-tagged games.

Season-passes inside their games

enhance and regulate their experience.

Lending games control.. Used games control..

Single player control.. ESPN control.

Everything is monitored, and kept under control.

Video games have changed.

The age of entertainment is now the age of control,

averting piracy from smart people.

And he who controls the activation codes, controls games.

Video games have changed.

When the battlefield is under total control,

consolewars becomes routine.

It use to be that video games were unlike anything in our households so they stand out in order for others to identify them.

Nice MGS4 references :D

Not ignoring anything. I'm not pleased with the killing off of lending/trading/renting of games to friends, family, and such. It's a horrible system that only hurts us, the consumer. And those who are trying to find the good in this, are the ones who give this type of idea power and push companies to continue to hurt the consumer. There is NO reason you should accept this, as a consumer.

These companies want you to think they are hurting. In reality, they are still making HUGE profits. The nickle and diming of customers is only going to get worse if people allow these little steps to continue.

If you grew up gaming, you can easily see each step that has continued to put more and more restrictions to how we own and play the games we buy.

Seems like you're still ignoring the thing you said you're not ignoring.

They said there will be systems in place for lending games. i.e. same systems as exists for e-books already. meaning it gets activated on your friends account while it's marked as lent out on yours and you can't use it while he's "lending" it.

Honestly though, games today are so cheap people should just buy them instead of lending.

Seems like you're still ignoring the thing you said you're not ignoring.

They said there will be systems in place for lending games. i.e. same systems as exists for e-books already. meaning it gets activated on your friends account while it's marked as lent out on yours and you can't use it while he's "lending" it.

Honestly though, games today are so cheap people should just buy them instead of lending.

How are these systems going to work for companies that rent games, if its not as easy as put a game in an envelope and post then there's a good chance Xbox One or PS4 games if Sony go that route won't get purchased for rental purposes.

Your 'games are cheap' comment is ignorant, ?40/$60 isn't cheap if you don't know you are going to like the game or not. I can get nearly 4 months of unlimited game rental for the price of one game, game rental places buy hundreds of copies of every game for most platforms, that is money publishers/developers won't get if consoles block used/rental games as I'm not blowing ?40 on a game that I don't have a demo for.

The difference is i think Sony will be a fiercer competitor next gen. Sony was not ready with the PS3. It was released 1 year later than 360 while the 360 already had a big library of titles avalaible. Also if we are to believe the devs it was hard to develop and port for.

The PS4 will be released at the same time as the 360 and with almost the same arch. It looks like it will be far easier to port games between the One and PS4 and to develop for the PS4. Most big companies will be fully multiplatform next gen and there should not be a noticeable difference between the One and the PS4 version of a multiplatform title. The first party exclusive titles will be a major selling point.

MS did not need the multimedia features of the 360 to succeed. Here in Quebec, Canada (french canada) people bought the 360 as a game console only and it was clearly the most popular console for almost the entire gen. The PS3 is clearly catching up tough. I see more and more people with the PS3.

The multimedia features might help the One in USA but it wont be that much of an help outside of USA and specially in japan unless MS is tailoring content for people outside of USA (unlike the 360). I own a 360 and owned an XBox (did not own a PS2 or PS3) and to be honest the lack of success of MS in japan and the lack of japanese titles support is really starting to bother me a lot. I really like the changes Sony did with the PS4 controller (my dislike of the PS2 and PS3 controllers was a big reason i went with the XBox). I really like the fact the PS4 will be as much powerful as the One and with the same arch should get proper support from western companies since it sells well enough in those region. Also i really don't like having to pay for gold yet having access to only a fraction of the multimedia content.

I really wish MS would put more focus on gaming. I can understand the excitement about the One in USA. But as a french canadian i can't help but feel more positive about the PS4 since Sony did put more focus on gaming than Microsoft did when they announced the PS4. I intend to play some crazy japanese games again next gen. The choice will be easy for me. I did not see anything in MS press conference that will help the One be more popular than the 360 outside of USA and the PS3 worldwide is really catching up lately and i don't see the trend reversing.

Well said!

Microsoft got quite a bit of praise back with the 360 because they focused on games, rather than trying to push out a Bluray player within their console. Sony's PS3 offered so many features too, but when it came down to the price tag, it was way too high. Overall, it seemed to leave a bad taste in your mouth where you were paying way too much for a device that did all of these things when all you wanted to do was play some video games.

Fast forward to today, and now we have Microsoft trying to be the jack of all trades here, introducing existing technology into a device where many products already exist, and in an arguably better state already. It's like they're trying to solve problems people already have answers to. Even Sony's inclusion of the Bluray wasn't a totally bad idea, considering how much Bluray players were at the time and that it was still quite new technology where not many had it sitting in their living rooms yet.

I can't help but facepalm at the fact that, while Sony's reveal conference wasn't very good, Microsoft literally took ZERO notes from them, apparently having learned not a damn thing. That's what has me annoyed more than anything. It feels like Microsoft isn't even paying attention to the competition at all, deciding to do whatever they want just because they have the Xbox name. Sorry guys, but Sony did that once before, and it didn't exactly work out for them. Why the HELL would it work out for Microsoft?

Ge4jAR3.gif

Well said!

Microsoft got quite a bit of praise back with the 360 because they focused on games, rather than trying to push out a Bluray player within their console. Sony's PS3 offered so many features too, but when it came down to the price tag, it was way too high. Overall, it seemed to leave a bad taste in your mouth where you were paying way too much for a device that did all of these things when all you wanted to do was play some video games.

Fast forward to today, and now we have Microsoft trying to be the jack of all trades here, introducing existing technology into a device where many products already exist, and in an arguably better state already. It's like they're trying to solve problems people already have answers to. Even Sony's inclusion of the Bluray wasn't a totally bad idea, considering how much Bluray players were at the time and that it was still quite new technology where not many had it sitting in their living rooms yet.

I can't help but facepalm at the fact that, while Sony's reveal conference wasn't very good, Microsoft literally took ZERO notes from them, apparently having learned not a damn thing. That's what has me annoyed more than anything. It feels like Microsoft isn't even paying attention to the competition at all, deciding to do whatever they want just because they have the Xbox name. Sorry guys, but Sony did that once before, and it didn't exactly work out for them. Why the HELL would it work out for Microsoft?

You're making the assumption that they aren't focused on games when they are. When they announced the Xbox reveal back in April they specifically stated it was going to be about the console and their vision for it as a whole and that E3 would be about the games. They've said multiple times since then and since the reveal that E3 is going to pretty much entirely be about the games. So just wait 2 weeks and then judge them on that facet. I'd also love to know what you're considering as "existing technology" that they're implementing into the Xbox in a worse state than what people have because as far as I can tell, it's all better than a lot of the other standalone products, even more so because it is integrated.

In general I think a lot of people are making the false assumption that because Microsoft is focusing on an entire entertainment experience that somehow they are less focused on games when there is really no evidence of that at this time.

  • Like 1

In general I think a lot of people are making the false assumption that because Microsoft is focusing on an entire entertainment experience that somehow they are less focused on games when there is really no evidence of that at this time.

I think it is very safe to say that Sony is more focused however.

From the pretty well documented differences each company is handling the independent developers, to the fact Sony made it much clearer in their reveal games were the front and center focus, even if MS is also focusing on games as we all know they are, at this point in time Sony seems to have more of a focus.

Perhaps this fact will change with E3, but I also think Sony is going to keep the hype machine rolling as well, so wether or not both companies wind up giving the same focus towards games, the overall consensus is right now Sony is giving a stronger focus. This will no doubt go a long way.

As it has already been pointed out, some gamers went with the 360 this last generation as it was the more attractive console for several reasons from a practical standpoint. A year head start, a lower price tag, some killer launch titles, MS had everything going for them and Sony did not. Even with that said, Sony managed to hang in there this generation. It is no doubt well documented they lost the United States, but the United States is not the end all be all. However for MS, they are making that pretty apparent it clearly is the region they care about the most. A decent amount of these new features of the XBox 1 will be limited to the US initially.

So while MS still may wind up dominating sales in the US because of their focus, this generation there is a much more undefined line as to which console should be purchased. The PS4 is looking very attractive to a few people who purchased 360's this last generation if games are what they care about most.

This generation is going to wind up being perhaps the tightest one we have experienced yet to be truthful. The WiiU is already out of the running for several reasons, and only those such as myself who still enjoy playing 1st party Nintendo games will own one. The rest of the market is Sony's and MS's. And this time around Sony is ready. And they also (currently) have the perception of being more focused on the gamer.

I for one think it is an absolute great thing. Neither company is going to be able to rest on their laurels, they both need to step it up, and all signs are already pointing to the fact they are doing just that. So I hope I am 100% right. That there is no clear cut winner in any territory. We all will benefit as a result.

In general I think a lot of people are making the false assumption that because Microsoft is focusing on an entire entertainment experience that somehow they are less focused on games when there is really no evidence of that at this time.

And this is my point: if that's something they truly cared about, SHOW it. It's like they haven't learned a single thing by watching Sony. Microsoft appears to be a horse with blinders on, running straight forward and seemingly out of touch with what their competition is doing along with what their fan base actually wants or cares to see.

What's worse is there are awful rumors flying now, which stemmed from Microsoft opening their mouth when they apparently haven't finalized many of the details between user accounts, games, used games, sharing, and how that all is supposed to work, what it means, and so forth. Instead, they throw out some rough idea with nothing solid to go on. They seem to have done a great job in making contradictory statements too. "Always on" not a requirement, except for all these instances where you'd need online authentication to do basic things you weren't required to do previously on the console...

It's like they're trying to give "clear" answers, but when people push to try and understand what they're getting at, they back off and claim they don't have enough information. As a consumer, that's just incredibly frustrating! It's like the more you find out about the new Xbox, the less you actually know about it...

And this is my point: if that's something they truly cared about, SHOW it. It's like they haven't learned a single thing by watching Sony. Microsoft appears to be a horse with blinders on, running straight forward and seemingly out of touch with what their competition is doing along with what their fan base actually wants or cares to see.

What's worse is there are awful rumors flying now, which stemmed from Microsoft opening their mouth when they apparently haven't finalized many of the details between user accounts, games, used games, sharing, and how that all is supposed to work, what it means, and so forth. Instead, they throw out some rough idea with nothing solid to go on. They seem to have done a great job in making contradictory statements too. "Always on" not a requirement, except for all these instances where you'd need online authentication to do basic things you weren't required to do previously on the console...

It's like they're trying to give "clear" answers, but when people push to try and understand what they're getting at, they back off and claim they don't have enough information. As a consumer, that's just incredibly frustrating! It's like the more you find out about the new Xbox, the less you actually know about it...

Well like I said, they stated clearly that they weren't focusing on games at this reveal and that they were going to do so at E3 so I believe they are going to show it very soon, but I do agree that they aren't handling other PR aspects particularly gracefully (i.e. answers without more questions would be nice).

  • Like 1

4:23

Comment From blame space

Which areas of the Xbox One will you be focusing on at your E3 presentation?

4:24 phptlmby6larryb8l7d.png

Major Nelson (Larry Hryb): Games. Games. GAMES :)

Come on man, wasn't that **** obvious? You think they are going to show their whole hand now and have nothing for E3?

Do people really think for a moment, that this isn't a full on gmaing machine, that can also do a load of media stuff?

If people are confused, then it's because they are stupid.

I think it was Penny Arcde that did a whole article on being confused as to what this box is supposed to be.

Derp!

  • Like 1

I think it is very safe to say that Sony is more focused however.

From the pretty well documented differences each company is handling the independent developers, to the fact Sony made it much clearer in their reveal games were the front and center focus, even if MS is also focusing on games as we all know they are, at this point in time Sony seems to have more of a focus.

Perhaps this fact will change with E3, but I also think Sony is going to keep the hype machine rolling as well, so wether or not both companies wind up giving the same focus towards games, the overall consensus is right now Sony is giving a stronger focus. This will no doubt go a long way.

As it has already been pointed out, some gamers went with the 360 this last generation as it was the more attractive console for several reasons from a practical standpoint. A year head start, a lower price tag, some killer launch titles, MS had everything going for them and Sony did not. Even with that said, Sony managed to hang in there this generation. It is no doubt well documented they lost the United States, but the United States is not the end all be all. However for MS, they are making that pretty apparent it clearly is the region they care about the most. A decent amount of these new features of the XBox 1 will be limited to the US initially.

So while MS still may wind up dominating sales in the US because of their focus, this generation there is a much more undefined line as to which console should be purchased. The PS4 is looking very attractive to a few people who purchased 360's this last generation if games are what they care about most.

This generation is going to wind up being perhaps the tightest one we have experienced yet to be truthful. The WiiU is already out of the running for several reasons, and only those such as myself who still enjoy playing 1st party Nintendo games will own one. The rest of the market is Sony's and MS's. And this time around Sony is ready. And they also (currently) have the perception of being more focused on the gamer.

I for one think it is an absolute great thing. Neither company is going to be able to rest on their laurels, they both need to step it up, and all signs are already pointing to the fact they are doing just that. So I hope I am 100% right. That there is no clear cut winner in any territory. We all will benefit as a result.

Some of that is true, but I don't believe that the hype train is even rolling for Sony, so they need to get it going. They had their reveal in February and there was little fanfare following it. News about the PS4 pretty much dropped off the planet until the day before the Xbox reveal and now it's still most about Xbox, good or bad.

Sony and MS are on even ground right now though I think. I doubt that changes much through the next lifecycle like you say, and that's not a bad thing.

Well like I said, they stated clearly that they weren't focusing on games at this reveal and that they were going to do so at E3 so I believe they are going to show it very soon, but I do agree that they aren't handling other PR aspects particularly gracefully (i.e. answers without more questions would be nice).

People keep bringing this up, but just because they said that doesn't mean it was the right move. They showed barely any games at all, and no gameplay. They tout these 15 new exclusives coming over the next year but couldn't even offer up some names, logos, anything at all? I understand E3 is only a few weeks a way but first impressions can mean a lot and after what MS showed us I'm already seeing a somewhat negative impact amongst some of my friends. All we can do now is wait and hope that E3 wows us a lot more and clarifies a lot of the unanswered questions that have been circulating the past couple days.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!