Tech issues solved added in tech forums


Recommended Posts

So members will be given a Pavlov type reward to become better posters.  Oh, okay, sounds very forward thinking and will separate the useful posters from the non useful.  And that will drive up the number of members on Neowin.  Just filter out those who are not "useful" members. They are not doing Neowin any good.  /s

By that logic, Neowin has been heavily filtering out users that don't post often until now. Has it?

We have removed the post count in the post view and replaced it with Best Answers.

 

We are after all first and foremost a tech community that relies on peer support. MVC's have been recognised for this fact, whether it be for the guides they submit or the help they give in the tech sections.

 

We want to build on that and reward those members that help the most, that could mean that the member is recognised as a Most Valued Contributor, or a free subscription handed out.

 

Post count remains in the profile view and hover card, and the stars are still present.

 

We hope you like this update, and we'll also be adding a leaderboard that shows which members help out the most later.

 

attachicon.gifSNAG-0005.png

 

Best Answers are enabled in all Tech and Support sections.

This one made me laugh, about 35 of thse are ninja'd :p

By that logic, Neowin has been heavily filtering out users that don't post often until now. Has it?

 

I don't know, have they?  You are the one stating how helpful having a reward system is for useful posters.

The post count being gone doesn't bother me one iota (really have no idea what mine is). But like others I think "0 best answers" should be hidden. Doesn't seem fair on those who don't hang around the support sections.

  • Like 2

Honest Opinion, and I'll let it go after this..

 

This wasn't as much as Neowin doing as much as Stardocks. . It well known that Stardock is a huge supporter of this site.. they even secured Neowin.com for Neowin.. I bet they now have a very large say so on what goes on around here.. It would be in their best interest to turn the forum focus more to a tech community to drive traffic for advertising reasons. They probably could care less about the media\general sections.. They want the members to start churning higher quality post focused in the tech forums.. 

 

So, is this Neowins community or Stardocks? 

I assure you that Neowin has remained autonomous ever since Stardock's involvement. Stardock has helped Neowin with legal representation and funding (to buy server hardware). They haven't told us to do anything so Neowin is still very much our community. We want an increase in the overall quality of posts across the site. And we want to encourage and reward members for helping one another in the support forums. That doesn't mean we're ignoring the non-tech areas of the site. I'm most active in the Gamers' Hangout and Media forums. And I still plan to be most active there. I will, however, start helping people again with software/hardware problems.

 

Whereas post counts are largely irrelevant...I have to agree with the rebuttals on this thread.

 

This is...largely...a pointless change. One brought about because why again? So people can find out who posts the "best answers". What signals a best answer? The one that solves the OPs issue or the one that aligns with the OPs opinion?

 

If Neowin was purely a tech forum, this would make sense. You would have your group of "gurus" that pride themselves in solving head scratchers and people who come to get help. If I was needing help, I would want the guy who posts all the best answers and in such an environment the person who solves the problem would get the best answer increment.

 

...but Neowin is much more. News, entertainment, random discussion, hangouts, etc. you name it.

 

@Neobond , how in the world are you going to implement and govern a "best answers" system outside a help site that isn't driven based on opinion? I personally think your staff and yourself are confused on what you were going for. It sounds like you really wanted a "reputation" system where we can see who is considered the most "helpful" or just a great community member which has 0 to do with post count (and wouldn't go so far to replace it).

 

Would love to hear some feedback or a reply.

We want to encourage members to help one another as well as reward members that do. We also want to increase the overall quality of posts in all areas of the site. The best answers feature was recently added to Invision Power Board. It's a great feature that makes it easy for people to find a solution to a problem. It's not necessarily a reputation system, more of a nod to those who are helpful. After all, it takes more effort to help someone than to simply add a reply.

 

I'm not sure how I feel about this.  Those that provide helpful answers should be recognized for their efforts.  On the other hand those that are active in other areas of the site should feel some sort of feedback themselves.  A post count does indicate how active a member is in the community and has a certain appearance of respect or seniority (not always certainly).

 

As far as what happens in the random posts type threads wouldn't it be expected to see "trivial activity"?   I've thought the random threads were for fun.

 

 

Since change is important maybe consider changing Neowin name to NeoBook or FaceWin.  /s

 

 

P.S  Hoping for a Best Answer nod for this post.   ;)

The number of stars you have gives a general idea of your "activity" and your join date tells you how long you've been a member here. That's enough information for someone to get a rough idea. If you've been active, then people will recognize you by your name, avatar or signature (assuming you don't change them often). The number of best answers is an indication of how helpful someone is. Participating in the community is great but helping people with their problems requires a little more work. And we'd like to give credit where it's due.

 

I understand that some of you are a little resistant to the changes and that's perfectly fine. I'm here to flesh things out with you and explain, to the best of my ability, why we implemented them.

Or by making it configurable from the User CP.

Yes, options. Much like Stardock offers..

 

Miss the start screen? Stardock brings it back! Miss the post count being visible on a members post? Stardock, please bring it back. 

Yes, options. Much like Stardock offers..

 

Miss the start screen? Stardock brings it back! Miss the post count being visible on a members post? Stardock, please bring it back. 

 

The Neowin logo at the top will change soon, "in partnership with Stardock".

 

UXaPKzY.png

The post count being gone doesn't bother me one iota (really have no idea what mine is). But like others I think "0 best answers" should be hidden. Doesn't seem fair on those who don't hang around the support sections.

If you choose not to help other members with their problems, then it's your choice. We're not forcing anyone to go to the support forums and reach a certain number of best answers. The main reason we implemented this change is to recognize the efforts of helpful members. That doesn't mean anyone who doesn't offer help is a bad member. Take a look at mine, I have "0" best answers. And it doesn't bother me. It won't stop me from helping people either.

 

Pretty pointless change for anyone who's not acting as 24/7 tech support around here, tbh.

You don't need to act as 24/7 tech support. I've seen members that post once or twice a month and they've helped people with issues. The point of replacing the post count with the best answers count is to recognize the efforts of those that went out of their way to help their fellow member. It doesn't have any negative effect on people that don't frequent the support forums.

 

You know how you can stop all of this? By having both :D

Or by making it configurable from the User CP.

What is the benefit of having the post count visible when we want to focus on quality over quantity? As I said earlier, the number of stars you have gives you a general idea of someone's activity. We want to emphasize that being a good member isn't dependent on the number of posts you have or how long you've been a member. A welcoming community is a good community.

 

As for making it configurable, we're not going to do that. This is something that we want to be seen by every member, the same way MVCs have a different badge than regular members. The point is to reward those that help other members.

If you choose not to help other members with their problems, then it's your choice. We're not forcing anyone to go to the support forums and reach a certain number of best answers. The main reason we implemented this change is to recognize the efforts of helpful members. That doesn't mean anyone who doesn't offer help is a bad member. Take a look at mine, I have "0" best answers. And it doesn't bother me. It won't stop me from helping people either.

 

You don't need to act as 24/7 tech support. I've seen members that post once or twice a month and they've helped people with issues. The point of replacing the post count with the best answers count is to recognize the efforts of those that went out of their way to help their fellow member. It doesn't have any negative effect on people that don't frequent the support forums.

 

What is the benefit of having the post count visible when we want to focus on quality over quantity? As I said earlier, the number of stars you have gives you a general idea of someone's activity. We want to emphasize that being a good member isn't dependent on the number of posts you have or how long you've been a member. A welcoming community is a good community.

 

As for making it configurable, we're not going to do that. This is something that we want to be seen by every member, the same way MVCs have a different badge than regular members. The point is to reward those that help other members.

Then what is the reward for being active? a paying active member at that?

Yes, options. Much like Stardock offers..

 

Miss the start screen? Stardock brings it back! Miss the post count being visible on a members post? Stardock, please bring it back. 

(Y) For options.

 

 

What is the benefit of having the post count visible when we want to focus on quality over quantity? As I said earlier, the number of stars you have gives you a general idea of someone's activity. We want to emphasize that being a good member isn't dependent on the number of posts you have or how long you've been a member. A welcoming community is a good community.

 

As for making it configurable, we're not going to do that. This is something that we want to be seen by every member, the same way MVCs have a different badge than regular members. The point is to reward those that help other members.

I meant an option to remove the best answer feature as it certainly doesn't help in most cases and kinda makes those with a low best answer count look bad in all honesty. 

The Neowin logo at the top will change soon, "in partnership with Stardock".

 

UXaPKzY.png

They keep denying any involvement from them. If someone invest money in you, they are going to want something back in return.. Securing the .Com domain, investing money to own 40%.. They didn't do this for free. The have invested capital.. 

 

I believe Stardock was very much involved with some of the forums changes around here.. As they should be, since they have so much invested.. However, I don't like them

  • Like 2

And if you didn't notice I was making a sarcastic remark.  It smacks of elitism and that is a form of filtering.  IMHO

I don't understand how you go from valuing helpfulness with filtering out users. Those who never cared about it can just keep on not caring.

The Neowin logo at the top will change soon, "in partnership with Stardock".

 

UXaPKzY.png

No it won't. (N)

 

A bit off topic, but I notice the mods are all using their real names now.

 

What gives?

Most, if not all, of our news staff use their real names. It's a mixture of consistency and appearing more "human". We also want to show a little more responsibility for our actions as it's tied to our real names and not a username.

 

Then what is the reward for being active? a paying active member at that?

That's an odd question. We are active because we want to be, not because of a reward. We get enjoyment and satisfaction from participating in discussions and talking with familiar people. We have a sense of community unlike any other on the Internet. Seriously, I consider Neowin to be my home on the Internet. I've spent years being an active member and not once have I asked myself "What's the reward for being active?" The entire experience is the reward. The opportunity to be here and to discuss things with you guys (and girls) is the reward.

 

Someone's post count is not a reward for their activity but merely an indication. I feel like a broken record when I say this but the number of stars you have gives a general idea of your activity. The post count and the stars is redundant, but that's not why we removed it. We want people to feel welcome here and we want to increase the overall quality of the posts on the site. As the famous saying goes, "Quality over quantity."

 

(Y) For options.

 

 

I meant an option to remove the best answer feature as it certainly doesn't help in most cases and kinda makes those with a low best answer count look bad in all honesty. 

Removing it defeats the purpose of giving credit where it's due. We want other members to see that X member is helpful. A low best answer count doesn't look bad to me. Mine is 0 just like most people. It's a new change and eventually, people's best answer count will go up. Even if someone has 1 or 2, they deserve recognition.

 

They keep denying any involvement from them. If someone invest money in you, they are going to want something back in return.. Securing the .Com domain, investing money to own 40%.. They didn't do this for free. The have invested capital.. 

 

I believe Stardock was very much involved with some of the forums changes around here.. As they should be, since they have so much invested.. However, I don't like them

Listen, I know that you're a little frustrated with the changes but I assured you that Neowin has remained autonomous ever since Stardock acquired a 40% stake. I know this because I'm a Supervisor. I'm privy to certain information that members aren't. I talk with the other Supervisors and Admins about the direction of the site among other things. I've been a staff member since September 2009 and I have never come across a request from Stardock of any kind for the staff. When I think of Stardock, I think of them as the publisher for a game I enjoy playing (Sins of a Solar Empire).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!