Tech issues solved added in tech forums


Recommended Posts

Um. Sorry for the off topic post, but why has nearly all the staff gone from aliases to what I assume is their real names?

 

Again that is me. We don't need to hide behind a forum handles, most senior staff (and news team) use their real names already. We are happy to display who we are and use our real names in the hope that it will show that we are part of this community, we are real people and we are responsible for our actions..sure a name change won't do this on its own but its part of a bigger plan and more professional way of running the forums (after all Neowin LLC is a business, like all businesses we have standards and company image ).

 

And on a personal level if im big enough to tell members and staff what they can and can't do - like it or not, then i feel you the membership as well as staff that work under me have a right to know who i am, to me this is a full time (freely given) job and I treat it as such i have nothing to hide, every aspect of my Neowin life is online and Im proud to be associated to Neowin with my real name :)

  • Like 4

Wow.  Not sure what everyone's problem is.  Tech supported seems far more relevant than post count, which really means almost absolutely nothing except to show how much time one spends surfing Neowin.

 

It means absolutely nothing if you don't post in that part of the forum either. I'm not saying post count does either but let's be real here.

Nah, no need for a like counter. Clever trolling and well placed zingers always get lots of likes. Folks going to walk around with that as a badge or something?

Also, lots of people consider 'like' = 'I agree'.

The post count stars are still there I see. I like that.

Let me just say this before we all continue with our on lives, yes I may have overreacted a bit because I didn't agree the new feature, but now I realize that:

1) It's the admins choice what they do with their site/forum and no-one is gonna change their set ideas. 

2) It's a piece of text at the side of the post. :blush:

3) They are not getting ridding of the General Discussions/Off-Topic sections. :)

4) They let us argue our point without locking the thread. Which is good cause most forums won't let you do that. I know from experience.

5) We'll get used to it eventually, maybe. :unsure:

Rappy will be devastated..

 

In what forums is the 'best answer' feature active? Just the entire of the 'Technical help & Suppot' section? Also I'd suggest removing '0 best answers' until people gain at least 1.

 

Rappy's post's are always the best answer;)

Neowin, why did you make it harder for me to easily identity the people who camp all day in the Random Babes thread?! I have to hover now?! ppssshhh

Neowin, why did you make it harder for me to easily identity the people who camp all day in the Random Babes thread?! I have to hover now?! ppssshhh

The stars beneath the name provide an estimate of post count.

 

I also agree that it would be nice if you have a big fat "0" to not show anything at all :).  I know I'm unhelpful...don't like my nose rubbed in it though :'( ...lol

The "post not marked solved yet" will only show for the topic starter and staff.

 

Marked Solved:36

 

that to me reads that you have marked 36 questions as solved, not that you have solved 36.

 

Maybe others read it differently.

Marked Solved:36

 

that to me reads that you have marked 36 questions as solved, not that you have solved 36.

 

Maybe others read it differently.

 

 

I'll re-post my suggestion from a few pages back, maybe it can get some traction

 

How about "Solved Tech Issues" or "Tech Issues Solved". Since the button is "Marked Solved"

  • Like 3

I'll re-post my suggestion from a few pages back, maybe it can get some traction

 

How about "Solved Tech Issues" or "Tech Issues Solved". Since the button is "Marked Solved"

Cheers, I completely missed that. Updated.

I don't see this as an improvement, to be honest.

 

Post counts are a standard forum feature and indicate how active a user is - the stars perform a similar function yet are less common, so it would make more sense to drop them instead. That said, it's not really a big deal either way. However, I don't think it makes sense to highlight 'Tech Issues Solved' as there are countless cases where multiple people contribute to a solution and there isn't any single 'best answer' - even when I've helped users they often don't use the system. It's also worth pointing out that even amongst mods there are very few that have any tech issues solved despite the fact that most of them regularly help out.

 

The 'like' system is a better indicator of how useful or valued a user's contributions are. At the moment it is skewed by topics like the Random Pictures and Random Babes threads but they could simply be made to stop counting or it could be limited to certain sections of the forums. That way it would reward those who contribute to the forum and allow multiple people to be recognised when they help. Further, most active members already have established 'like' scores and so you won't see 99% of users listed as having zero likes as is the case with tech issues solved. I've always considered the 'like' scores as a more useful indicator of how much people contribute and it is definitely a more used feature.

 

I understand the motivation behind the changes but I just don't think it's the right way to go about it.

This topic is now 25 pages long and the OP has just 10 likes despite being posted by an admin...

 

Now 90%-95%++ of the site's userbase has a "0" in a key member box line?

 

That is web design failure 101. (Wasted space.)

 

So replacing a unique number with a 0 is a pretty dumb move imo.

 

(N) (N)

 

What about "Tech Issues Solved"?

How does this help us/make Neowin a better site?

 

Well, it doesn't....

 

(N) (N)

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
    • An Indian manufacturer that assembles roughly one-third of Apple's iPhones and supplies semiconductor components to Tesla confirmed Monday that attackers had stolen and publicly published a 630-gigabyte cache of confidential files — including engineering blueprints stamped "TRADE SECRET," a 52-page quality inspection document for iPhone circuit board components, and cryptographic certificates that security experts say could be weaponized in follow-on attacks. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319019/20260624/apple-tesla-supplier-tata-electronics-confirms-630-gb-data-theft-iphone-specs-dark-web.htm
    • I don't think it was ever a big question. In fact, I don't think anyone ever asked about how clocks work on Mars.
    • I don't know what the price difference is between a 5GbE and a 10GbE part, but it seems that putting a 10GbE port in might be a bit more 'standard'.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      440
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!