Tech issues solved added in tech forums


Recommended Posts

Um. Sorry for the off topic post, but why has nearly all the staff gone from aliases to what I assume is their real names?

 

Again that is me. We don't need to hide behind a forum handles, most senior staff (and news team) use their real names already. We are happy to display who we are and use our real names in the hope that it will show that we are part of this community, we are real people and we are responsible for our actions..sure a name change won't do this on its own but its part of a bigger plan and more professional way of running the forums (after all Neowin LLC is a business, like all businesses we have standards and company image ).

 

And on a personal level if im big enough to tell members and staff what they can and can't do - like it or not, then i feel you the membership as well as staff that work under me have a right to know who i am, to me this is a full time (freely given) job and I treat it as such i have nothing to hide, every aspect of my Neowin life is online and Im proud to be associated to Neowin with my real name :)

  • Like 4

Wow.  Not sure what everyone's problem is.  Tech supported seems far more relevant than post count, which really means almost absolutely nothing except to show how much time one spends surfing Neowin.

 

It means absolutely nothing if you don't post in that part of the forum either. I'm not saying post count does either but let's be real here.

Nah, no need for a like counter. Clever trolling and well placed zingers always get lots of likes. Folks going to walk around with that as a badge or something?

Also, lots of people consider 'like' = 'I agree'.

The post count stars are still there I see. I like that.

Let me just say this before we all continue with our on lives, yes I may have overreacted a bit because I didn't agree the new feature, but now I realize that:

1) It's the admins choice what they do with their site/forum and no-one is gonna change their set ideas. 

2) It's a piece of text at the side of the post. :blush:

3) They are not getting ridding of the General Discussions/Off-Topic sections. :)

4) They let us argue our point without locking the thread. Which is good cause most forums won't let you do that. I know from experience.

5) We'll get used to it eventually, maybe. :unsure:

Rappy will be devastated..

 

In what forums is the 'best answer' feature active? Just the entire of the 'Technical help & Suppot' section? Also I'd suggest removing '0 best answers' until people gain at least 1.

 

Rappy's post's are always the best answer;)

Neowin, why did you make it harder for me to easily identity the people who camp all day in the Random Babes thread?! I have to hover now?! ppssshhh

Neowin, why did you make it harder for me to easily identity the people who camp all day in the Random Babes thread?! I have to hover now?! ppssshhh

The stars beneath the name provide an estimate of post count.

 

I also agree that it would be nice if you have a big fat "0" to not show anything at all :).  I know I'm unhelpful...don't like my nose rubbed in it though :'( ...lol

The "post not marked solved yet" will only show for the topic starter and staff.

 

Marked Solved:36

 

that to me reads that you have marked 36 questions as solved, not that you have solved 36.

 

Maybe others read it differently.

Marked Solved:36

 

that to me reads that you have marked 36 questions as solved, not that you have solved 36.

 

Maybe others read it differently.

 

 

I'll re-post my suggestion from a few pages back, maybe it can get some traction

 

How about "Solved Tech Issues" or "Tech Issues Solved". Since the button is "Marked Solved"

  • Like 3

I'll re-post my suggestion from a few pages back, maybe it can get some traction

 

How about "Solved Tech Issues" or "Tech Issues Solved". Since the button is "Marked Solved"

Cheers, I completely missed that. Updated.

I don't see this as an improvement, to be honest.

 

Post counts are a standard forum feature and indicate how active a user is - the stars perform a similar function yet are less common, so it would make more sense to drop them instead. That said, it's not really a big deal either way. However, I don't think it makes sense to highlight 'Tech Issues Solved' as there are countless cases where multiple people contribute to a solution and there isn't any single 'best answer' - even when I've helped users they often don't use the system. It's also worth pointing out that even amongst mods there are very few that have any tech issues solved despite the fact that most of them regularly help out.

 

The 'like' system is a better indicator of how useful or valued a user's contributions are. At the moment it is skewed by topics like the Random Pictures and Random Babes threads but they could simply be made to stop counting or it could be limited to certain sections of the forums. That way it would reward those who contribute to the forum and allow multiple people to be recognised when they help. Further, most active members already have established 'like' scores and so you won't see 99% of users listed as having zero likes as is the case with tech issues solved. I've always considered the 'like' scores as a more useful indicator of how much people contribute and it is definitely a more used feature.

 

I understand the motivation behind the changes but I just don't think it's the right way to go about it.

This topic is now 25 pages long and the OP has just 10 likes despite being posted by an admin...

 

Now 90%-95%++ of the site's userbase has a "0" in a key member box line?

 

That is web design failure 101. (Wasted space.)

 

So replacing a unique number with a 0 is a pretty dumb move imo.

 

(N) (N)

 

What about "Tech Issues Solved"?

How does this help us/make Neowin a better site?

 

Well, it doesn't....

 

(N) (N)

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
    • Bluestacks has been emulating Android on Windows for fifteen years. It's janky and riddled with ads though, so WSA looked like it was going to be a huge improvement over the emulator experience. Too bad Microsoft dropped the ball on that.
    • Classic. China would be nothing without Western, Japanese, and South Korean technology.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!