Recommended Posts

This would not have been a violation of his freedom of speech if A&E did not suspend his filming and GLAAD did not issue the hate speech about him and his family. Remember in the US everyone is supposed to have the same rights.

 

His freedom of speech isn't dependent on them continuing to employ him, you know.

 

Now, if they attempted to silence him, THEN they would be infringing his rights, but by firing him, they're just disassociating themselves with his bigotted views.

 

Also, you know even seem to know what your freedom of speech laws ARE, so go back to school and do some studying.

Remember he had to sign a contract agreement and he most likely violated part of the agreement. So there is no violation of a 1st amendment.

  • Like 2

Sometimes you just need to shut up about things like this. He had the right to say this, but it was completely stupid to say it in public

Kinda sad how many people in this topic have no idea what "1st Amendment rights" and "Freedom of Speech" mean, in the US at least. Anyone who isn't American or who hasn't educated themselves on the topic get a pass, but Americans, for shame.....

Kinda sad how many people in this topic have no idea what "1st Amendment rights" and "Freedom of Speech" mean, in the US at least. Anyone who isn't American or who hasn't educated themselves on the topic get a pass, but Americans, for shame.....

 

As I understand it, your first amendment rights & freedom of speech entitle you to speak freely without fear of intervention or censure from your government.  However, private speech such as this, has absolutely nothing at all to do with that and private individuals or companies have every right to disassociate themselves from you, or you from them, if you say something they don't like.

 

Ergo, TV studio can fire this jerk for flapping his yap, and it's not a rights violation to do so.

There are many aspects to freedom of speech such as it doesn't cover libel and slander and also doesn't covers people expressing to harm the government.  Freedom of speech is much more complex topic than it appears on the surface.

  • Like 2

Actually, my post was about small time actor arrogance, I've seen many acting like spoiled brats, whereas, the big names, the ones like the late Elizabeth Taylor, or Tom Cruise, (just to name 2) who have earned the right to act diva-esq show great humility and diplomacy when speaking to interviewers. You also must realise that the show is aired in other countries, UK had freedom of speech rights too, just hate speech, isn't

arrogance?  he just answered a question he was asked?  He answered it truthfully and now everybody is attaching him because people are at home crying themselves to sleep because they are offended.

 

 

give me a break!

Shame on people judging others by their looks.

 

Degrees and first jobs[edit]

After receiving his bachelor's degree in physical education and a master's in education, Robertson spent several years teaching. He said while his students claim he was an excellent teacher, spending time in a classroom brought him to the conclusion that his time and talents would be better spent in the woods.[10]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Robertson
  • Like 1

There are many aspects to freedom of speech such as it doesn't cover libel and slander and also doesn't covers people expressing to harm the government.  Freedom of speech is much more complex topic than it appears on the surface.

There are certain groups that make it a complex topic... By law, it isn't.  It's pretty actually pretty easy.

the show centers around a bunch of rednecks with too much money and not enough brains and ends in a prayer at the dinner table; who do you think the viewership is? HINT: It's not the gays.

Rednecks that pray and have too much money aren't allowed to be gay?

 

Or if you prefer:

 

What makes you an authority on what homosexuals like to watch? ;)

  • Like 2

Everyone is so overly sensitive about everything.  Who cares, grow up, move on.

 

If you don't like him don't watch his show, but don't suspend a man for stating his opinion.  

 

would you still employ a man who "in his opinion" say child porn is awesome and should be legal? Opinions very much define who the person is. 

I've watched several episodes of duck dynasty and I didn't like it because it seemed heavily scripted and everything do seem like reenactments or something.

The 1st Amendment protects him from being prosecuted for expressing his opinions and/or beliefs but it doesn't protect him from the consequences of doing so. The comments he made were intolerant and discriminatory and the network was perfectly justified in responding as it did.

  • Like 1

I've watched several episodes of duck dynasty and I didn't like it because it seemed heavily scripted and everything do seem like reenactments or something.

 

Most reality shows are now.  Like big brother (supposedly natural responses) is very much controlled by the production team.  They will tell the HG's who to vote for, and who not to vote out.  If the house turns against production, the leader of the turn is usually voted out, or put at a disadvantage in the competitions.  Also they are told who to vote for at the end of the show.

In Jersey Shore there was scripts, and situations purposely introduced (ie: free drinks, purposely bringing in ex's, etc). 

I have watched many other reality shows, but Duck Dynasty seems more unrealistic and scripted than others. American Chopper seemed more natural and authentic

Kinda sad how many people in this topic have no idea what "1st Amendment rights" and "Freedom of Speech" mean, in the US at least. Anyone who isn't American or who hasn't educated themselves on the topic get a pass, but Americans, for shame.....

More or less the exact same rights are written in almost every constitution. It really isn't that hard to understand what freedom of speech means, you don't have to be an American ;).

 

I think the only difference is that most European countries will give a somewhat broader meaning to hate speech, I'm quite sure something like the westboro baptist church would fall under the hate speech category in my country and thus be illegal.

I've watched several episodes of duck dynasty and I didn't like it because it seemed heavily scripted and everything do seem like reenactments or something.

 

Of course it's scri[ted. You're not one of those people who believe "Reality TV" is actually -real-, are you?

 

It's all pre-scripted fakery designed for pretty basic entertainment.

  • Like 1

One reason for the founding father creating free speech was for citizens to freely voice their opinions to the government without being getting interfered by a 'arbitrary' government

I have no problem with free speech, unless it involves cutting other people down.

 

Oh, and I never "chose" to be hetero. We are who we are, so why all the hate? Is that what your god teaches you? Funny, here I thought gods loved everyone. Perhaps they do, but it seems their followers haven't gotten the memo.

so you only support freedom of speech if you like it. Thats not freedom of speech then. I agree with him, being gay is wrong. Doesnt matter how you look at it. women are made for men and vice versa not men for men; thats just disgusting. Everything is just going back to the days of Sodom. Where there was prostitution and gays, and orgies. It says it all in the bible. Why was everyone against gay's then suddenly its perfectly fine and they allowed to get married, its because thats what the devil wants. For people to become corrupted.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!