Recommended Posts

This kind of stuff is one of the reasons you cant trust what actors say on talk shows or whatever.   To many interviewers with the bait questions and if you answer it truthfully there will be all kinds of backlash.  I guess he should of just lied or said move on to the next question.  I dont beleive the same way at all but I respect someone who doesn't back down on their beliefs so easily and was truthful about it.

 

On a side note I have 2 gay aunts and they were outraged that he was suspended over stating beliefs when ASKED even if it was saying he thought what they do was a sin. 

On a side note I have 2 gay aunts and they were outraged that he was suspended over stating beliefs when ASKED even if it was saying he thought what they do was a sin. 

 

:rofl:, nice appeal to authority there

So much for freedom of speech or expression in America.

 

Now I know what they mean by the word Abomination = ObamaNation.

 

 

retarded post is retarded....this has nothing to do with freedom of speech and even more so it has nothing to do with Obama. How you make that jump is just asinine and shows pure ignorance on your part. 

 

.....................

 

 

 

On another note, ratings will prob end up jumping on this and in the end will be a win for both sides.

 

That's not how free speech works, "freedom of speech" protects you from the gov infringing on your Right to say what you want, not from private companies who you work for and who's businesses are affected. 

 

 

Being fired/suspended for beliefs is OK? If a gay person who had to actively tell everyone and the media that he was gay and as a result, was fired, or refused service from a restaurant/shop, then you would probably say that's not fair etc. etc. Right?

Being fired/suspended for beliefs is OK? If a gay person who had to actively tell everyone and the media that he was gay and as a result, was fired, or refused service from a restaurant/shop, then you would probably say that's not fair etc. etc. Right?

:facepalm; Why is it so difficult for people to understand this ?

godhatesfags != imgay

Now if he asked his boss if he would like to (insert expletive here) he wouldn't be fired for being gay but for being a tool.

Employment Discrimination is fireing anyone because they are gay,old,female,jewish etc.

This isn't the above. You have no case.

I hope he sticks to his beliefs. I hate it when people say they believe in something and then when there is a flap like this, they backtrack. Not that I believe what he believes, but at least grow a pair and stand up for what you believe.

Being fired/suspended for beliefs is OK? If a gay person who had to actively tell everyone and the media that he was gay and as a result, was fired, or refused service from a restaurant/shop, then you would probably say that's not fair etc. etc. Right?

 

 

Whether or not it was right for A&E to fire him has nothing to do with "Freedom of Speech". They are two separate issues. If you work for a business and you make public comments that could potentially hurt said business, that business can do with you as they please. Lastly, just because you can say something does not in anyway mean you are not responsible for what you say. He was not fired because of beliefs, he was fired because of what he said could affect a business and that is within their Right to protect. 

Being fired/suspended for beliefs is OK? If a gay person who had to actively tell everyone and the media that he was gay and as a result, was fired, or refused service from a restaurant/shop, then you would probably say that's not fair etc. etc. Right?

 

Your scenario is about someone who was coerced against their will into going to the media...  :huh:. Also, you can't refuse someone a service based on sexual orientation or religion. Just like how you can't refuse to hire people based on their sexual orientation or religion. You are making false analogies. Neither of this things is the same as getting fired from a place of business for making potentially offensive comments. If you are public figure and you are interviewing for the purpose of promoting your show (i.e. your place of work), you can't say whatever you want without repercussions. Just like how if you are at physically at work you can't say whatever you want without repercussion. The case is cut and dry because of that.

 

Think about it, if I attend a conference, do I get to say and do whatever I want in the presentation I'm presenting at said conference because I'm not in my place of employment? No, I don't. I'm representing my place of employment if it is work related and I can't just go around doing whatever I want regardless of whether I'm being paid to attend the conference or not. I can't just say "well, it is my religious opinion so you are discriminating against me and I can do what I want."

I don't know if they realize this or not, but they are just making him an even bigger "star" than he is already. Not only will people who have never heard of him know who he is now, but he'll be a poster child for the many Americans who believes as he does but refuse to speak out.

I don't know if they realize this or not, but they are just making him an even bigger "star" than he is already. Not only will people who have never heard of him know who he is now, but he'll be a poster child for the many Americans who believes as he does but refuse to speak out.

I would argue the opposite, that very few people (apart from those that watch the show) will remember this even happened next week. It's not actually a big deal, just a fresh talking point until the next one.

Your scenario is about someone who was coerced against their will into going to the media...  :huh:. Also, you can't refuse someone a service based on sexual orientation or religion. Just like how you can't refuse to hire people based on their sexual orientation or religion. You are making false analogies. Neither of this things is the same as getting fired from a place of business for making potentially offensive comments. If you are public figure and you are interviewing for the purpose of promoting your show (i.e. your place of work), you can't say whatever you want without repercussions. Just like how if you are at physically at work you can't say whatever you want without repercussion. The case is cut and dry because of that.

 

:ermm: My scenario was someone who actively decided on their own to "come out" knowing that the media would make waves about him or her. They were not pressured to say anything, but they did anyways and they still retain a job after that while the public tolerates all these stories. Meanwhile, this guy from A&E makes a statement on his beliefs and gets fired/suspended by doing so. Your double-standard makes not sense. Are you going to say that you would defend a gay person over a religious person if he was fired?

 

 

 

Think about it, if I attend a conference, do I get to say and do whatever I want in the presentation I'm presenting at said conference because I'm not in my place of employment? No, I don't. I'm representing my place of employment if it is work related and I can't just go around doing whatever I want regardless of whether I'm being paid to attend the conference or not. I can't just say "well, it is my religious opinion so you are discriminating against me and I can do what I want."

 

Going to a conference represents the company, he represented himself and himself only. He didn't even say anything about his family, yet GLAAD attacked them. (again you and practically everyone else here are ignoring that, as you refuse to believe A&E and GLAAD have taken the best response). 

 

 

Now the media has accused him of being racist tv.yahoo.com/blogs/tv-news/-duck-dynasty--star-phil-robertson-digs-his-hole-a-little-deeper-by-also-stinging-african-americans-173821415.html

 

However, he only said that those African Americans that he met where friendly and happily singing and humming. He never said they weren't treated badly.

 

Also, if you read the comment on that site and others, people who are gay and are African American* have come out and defended him and his freedom to speech without it resulting in a loss of a job (and presumably income)

 

*I personally believe that African American is a racist term towards them, and they (like everyone else) should be called Americans, we need to work together as one not divided. 

The Robertson's official statement...

 

We want to thank all of you for your prayers and support.  The family has spent much time in prayer since learning of A&E's decision.  We want you to know that first and foremost we are a family rooted in our faith in God and our belief that the Bible is His word.  While some of Phil?s unfiltered comments to the reporter were coarse, his beliefs are grounded in the teachings of the Bible. Phil is a Godly man who follows what the Bible says are the greatest commandments: ?Love the Lord your God with all your heart? and ?Love your neighbor as yourself.? Phil would never incite or encourage hate.We are disappointed that Phil has been placed on hiatus for expressing his faith, which is his constitutionally protected right.We have had a successful working relationship with A&E but, as a family, we cannot imagine the show going forward without our patriarch at the helm.  We are in discussions with A&E to see what that means for the future of Duck Dynasty.   Again, thank you for your continued support of our family.

 

http://duckcommander.com/news/robertson-family-offical-statement

A nearly 70 year old hunter from the south had some disparaging comments on homosexuality? Quick, get him a beer and ask him his opinions on black people!

 

If you're going to put people like this in the spotlight don't be shocked when they shoot from the hip without a PR guy there. Get over it.

Questions for the ones in this thread that are against what he "said":

1.) Did you take time to actually read the full interview?

2.) Have you ever watched more than one episode?

About #1, the same condensed, out-of-context version is going from site to site. He never once compared homosexuality to beastialty or went into one long rant. He also made it pretty clear he was just voicing his opinion and didn't imply/force it on anyone. Read the full article before commenting. It's very clear a good chunk of people here and elsewhere didn't read it.

About #2, there have been episodes to feature people who are clearly gay. Not once did he talk down to them, but he clearly knew and treated them with respect. Not to mention that John Luke is possibly a closet gay or bisexual at the least. He's a little too obvious in some episodes more than others and that's his grandson.

To those saying nobody but Chriatians are complaining about him being fired, go look at any Robertson family members or A&E's Facebook and twitter accounts. Robertsons got atheists and gays openly support Phil. I have 2 gay nephews ###### about it myself and an atheist friend who isn't thrilled.

Seriously, a good chunk of you don't have a clue what he actually said.

Phil Robertson released his own statement responding to the controversy.


 


?I myself am a product of the 60s; I centered my life around sex, drugs and rock and roll until I hit rock bottom and accepted Jesus as my Savior. My mission today is to go forth and tell people about why I follow Christ and also what the Bible teaches, and part of that teaching is that women and men are meant to be together."


 


?However, I would never treat anyone with disrespect just because they are different from me. We are all created by the Almighty and like Him, I love all of humanity. We would all be better off if we loved God and loved each other.?


:ermm: My scenario was someone who actively decided on their own to "come out" knowing that the media would make waves about him or her. They were not pressured to say anything, but they did anyways and they still retain a job after that while the public tolerates all these stories. Meanwhile, this guy from A&E makes a statement on his beliefs and gets fired/suspended by doing so. Your double-standard makes not sense. Are you going to say that you would defend a gay person over a religious person if he was fired?

 

If that's your scenario then you worded that really poorly, because you said "had to" as if the hypothetical person were being forced to. I don't actually have a double standard, you are just arbitrarily making assumptions about how I would feel if it was a LBGTQ person (or how I feel in the first place for that matter). If a public figure (LBGTQ or not) comes out and makes untactful statements, etc. and then loses their job, I really don't care either way. Similar, I don't care whether this guy loses his job or not. That's my honest opinion. 

 

The problem I have is that you treating this as a religious issue and freedom of speech issue when it is not, it is a publicity issue. You have to placate your viewership otherwise the network will do damage control. I'll even offer you an alternative scenario that would likely result in suspension that has a hypothetical gay minister in it. Imagine if you were one of those celebrity ministers on radio/tv and then you came out and said you were gay all of a sudden, do you think you would keep your talk radio show or retain your contract? Probably not because you aren't placating your base and you are generating bad publicity from your viewership.

 

 

Going to a conference represents the company, he represented himself and himself only. He didn't even say anything about his family, yet GLAAD attacked them. (again you and practically everyone else here are ignoring that, as you refuse to believe A&E and GLAAD have taken the best response). 

 

He was by definition representing his show and the network. He's a public figure under contract for a hit television series. Do you think GQ Magazine did an article on him just because they wanted to know about him because he is an interesting person out of the blue? Of course not, they interviewed him because he is famous for Duck Dynasty. Anything he says on *any* interview always represents and reflects the show and the network. 

 

I don't particular care what GLAAD or A&E said or did. Don't misconstrue my arguments (strawman me).  As far as I'm concerned, GLAAD is completely irrelevant and A&E just did some form of damage control. The only arguments I made were to point out that this is not illegal and is not free speech issue and that you aren't even allowed to go around saying what you want without consequences when you are representing an entity that you work for.

 

 

Now the media has accused him of being racist tv.yahoo.com/blogs/tv-news/-duck-dynasty--star-phil-robertson-digs-his-hole-a-little-deeper-by-also-stinging-african-americans-173821415.html

 

However, he only said that those African Americans that he met where friendly and happily singing and humming. He never said they weren't treated badly.

 

Also, if you read the comment on that site and others, people who are gay and are African American* have come out and defended him and his freedom to speech without it resulting in a loss of a job (and presumably income)

 

*I personally believe that African American is a racist term towards them, and they (like everyone else) should be called Americans, we need to work together as one not divided. 

 

I'm sure the media has called him racist. They want their ratings. Saying things like LBGTQ and African Americans have come out to defend him is just an appeal to authority (logical fallacy). An arguments for/against X isn't suddenly better or worse because of the person who said it...

 

I personally believe that "race" relations are a joke in this country (and throughout the world). We continue to lump people by their skin color regardless of the fact that race itself is a social construct and has no genetic basis. But the reality is that we live in a racist world and that isn't going to go away just because we refer to to everyone as solely "Americans" in some attempt to blanket away differences or a sense of misplaced justice. Perhaps people don't want their differences washed away because for whatever reason they take pride in their ethnicity, ancestry, and cultural differences. The same as people who take pride in their sexual orientation, gender, and the types of people they identify with. It isn't an easy problem to solve and there isn't any easy answer.

  • Like 2

Questions for the ones in this thread that are against what he "said":

1.) Did you take time to actually read the full interview?

2.) Have you ever watched more than one episode?

About #1, the same condensed, out-of-context version is going from site to site. He never once compared homosexuality to beastialty or went into one long rant. He also made it pretty clear he was just voicing his opinion and didn't imply/force it on anyone. Read the full article before commenting. It's very clear a good chunk of people here and elsewhere didn't read it.

About #2, there have been episodes to feature people who are clearly gay. Not once did he talk down to them, but he clearly knew and treated them with respect. Not to mention that John Luke is possibly a closet gay or bisexual at the least. He's a little too obvious in some episodes more than others and that's his grandson.

To those saying nobody but Chriatians are complaining about him being fired, go look at any Robertson family members or A&E's Facebook and twitter accounts. Robertsons got atheists and gays openly support Phil. I have 2 gay nephews ****ed about it myself and an atheist friend who isn't thrilled.

Seriously, a good chunk of you don't have a clue what he actually said.

 

The reality is that most people in this thread were arguing solely that it isn't a freedom of speech issue so none of this stuff you are saying is even relevant. Stop strawmanning the viewpoints of everyone to be the against him, yada yada yada.

 

Making an argument of authority doesn't make your argument valid. Whether you are homosexual or not is not relevant to your argument.

 

Man people are terrible at making valid arguments  :pinch:. 

  • Like 2

Being fired/suspended for beliefs is OK? If a gay person who had to actively tell everyone and the media that he was gay and as a result, was fired, or refused service from a restaurant/shop, then you would probably say that's not fair etc. etc. Right?

For a regular worker no, but for a person who by his role represents the company, like an actor always does, yes.

But as was said before, he wasn't fired for his belief, he was fired for his ridiculously offensive statement that homosexuality leads to bestiality and worse.

It's funny how they say they base their belief on the bible. When all the anti gay stuff is Old Testament stuff. And when you point out all the stupid facts and stuff you're supposed to do according to the Old Testament Christians point out that Jesus removed all the sins by sacrificing himself and supposedly the Christian version of god is a nice forgiving one as opposed to the vengeful Old Testament one. But apparently Jesus selectively chose what sins he forgave I guess...

  • Like 2

in short... He should have a right to say what he said without being penalized for it. period.

 

as he even said while he's against supporting gays etc he won't treat them badly or anything and i am sure plenty of people feel that way including myself as there is a lot of people to where it's against their religious beliefs and he should NOT be penalized for that.

 

hell, it's like they (the gays etc) want their rights etc but when someone even slightly speaks against them they want them crucified basically instead of letting him say what he wants to as it's not like it's going to hurt them all THAT much at the end of the day.

 

the media etc is out of line nowadays as they support anything that used to be bad and are against the stuff that's been good like traditional family values etc. it's like the media has a forced to SUPPORT gays mentality and won't accept any other views and if you are of a different view they want you penalized for it. also, everyone is wayyyy to sensitive nowadays and you can get in trouble for saying basically petty crap.

 

besides... i am confident that of the 14million or so viewers that show see's per week that the vast majority are more inline with his type of views. even on the small chance they offend a small amount of people watching the show, they can just simply not watch the show anymore if what he said is that big of a deal to them.

 

 

 

Jesus removed all the sins by sacrificing himself and supposedly the Christian version of god is a nice forgiving one as opposed to the vengeful Old Testament one. But apparently Jesus selectively chose what sins he forgave I guess...

 

homosexuality is a mortal sin basically and it IS forgivable if they repent of their ways as you can't keep continuing to live that way.

 

but at the end of the day... only god can judge them.

 

But as was said before, he wasn't fired for his belief, he was fired for his ridiculously offensive statement that homosexuality leads to bestiality and worse.

 

well if people keep accepting more and more sinful actions... where does it end?

 

i think that's kind of what he was meant by that comment.

in short... He should have a right to say what he said without being penalized for it. period.

 

as he even said while he's against supporting gays etc he won't treat them badly or anything and i am sure plenty of people feel that way including myself as there is a lot of people to where it's against their religious beliefs and he should NOT be penalized for that.

 

hell, it's like they (the gays etc) want their rights etc but when someone even slightly speaks against them they want them crucified basically instead of letting him say what he wants to as it's not like it's going to hurt them all THAT much at the end of the day.

 

the media etc is out of line nowadays as they support anything that used to be bad and are against the stuff that's been good like traditional family values etc. it's like the media has a forced to SUPPORT gays mentality and won't accept any other views and if you are of a different view they want you penalized for it. also, everyone is wayyyy to sensitive nowadays and you can get in trouble for saying basically petty crap.

 

besides... i am confident that of the 14million or so viewers that show see's per week that the vast majority are more inline with his type of views. even on the small chance they offend a small amount of people watching the show, they can just simply not watch the show anymore if what he said is that big of a deal to them.

 

 

 

 

homosexuality is a mortal sin basically and it IS forgivable if they repent of their ways as you can't keep continuing to live that way.

 

but at the end of the day... only god can judge them.

 

 

In short you're wrong, when you work for or represent a business and you say something that could have an effect on said business, then you have to face that fact that what you say could have consequences, period.

 

As for homosexuality being a mortal sin, that's subjective, period.

As for homosexuality being a mortal sin, that's subjective, period.

 

well according to the catholic church it is (which is the true church of Christ). that's pretty credible if you ask me.

 

that's something that they can never change either no matter how low society goes.

 

 

 

In short you're wrong, when you work for or represent a business and you say something that could have an effect on said business, then you have to face that fact that what you say could have consequences, period.

 

Sure, but A&E ain't going to get in THAT much trouble over it as they could just simply say he does not represent A&E's views etc and that would be it and those who want him fired from the show probably don't even watch the show anyways as with 14million viewers the show clearly has a following and, like i have said, i am willing to bet most have similar views to himself or not that much different that watch the show anyways. or the ones who don't like it can simply not watch the show.

 

but with the promotion of the gay agenda in full swing nowadays (roughly the last decade or so) it's not surprising people get in trouble over petty stuff since like i say the media etc in general is against the traditional ways.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you have entire racks of servers and that minor module cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to, your access layer switches. This should be a 10g switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports and should be a fully managed switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. if your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!