Recommended Posts

1) It depends on whose definition of animal you subscribe to. Some describe animal as any living thing that is not a human or plant. 2) By definition we are not the only sentient species.

 

What we are are mammals. The only ones with no inherent protection from the elements like most animals.

 

None of which create an exception to the scenario presented.

 

Generally people incorrectly say animals when what they mean to say is non-human animals.  It is generally accepted when a person says animal they really mean non-human animal.  It doesn't change the fact that we're animals, and it doesn't help you to differentiate us from other animals by saying that we are mammals, as all mammals are animals.

Fill in the blank:

No, calling someone who is ______ a ______ is absolutely not ad hominem, it's a valid descriptor of what that person is. See how that works with all pejoratives?

 

So you're saying someone with homophobic views is not a homophobe?

 

This is going exactly down the route set out in the tone argument article.

Excellent and thoughtful post. I'm also for gay marriage and rights from a legal standpoint. I think if two law abiding people want to live together and partner, they should be given the same legal and financial rights as a heterosexual couple doing the same. Though I would prefer those rights be given to civil unions as I do believe marriage is or should be between a man and a woman. For that I am considered homophobic. So be it.

 

I honestly could not agree more.  Marriage is an institution of religion; civil union is societal recognition of a binding agreement.  However, if a church, such as the Presbyterians, decide to sanction gay marriages and perform the rites accordingly, I have not issue with that either.  My real concern is forcing churches to go against their established doctrine and charter to perform gay marriages.

So you're saying someone with homophobic views is not a homophobe?

 

This is going exactly down the route set out in the tone argument article.

 

I'm saying have you stopped beating your wife? I hope you appreciate where I went with that.

 

I'm stating that you can't call someone homophobic without actually establishing that they actually are through logical argument. This is easily done with the Duck Dynasty guy because of a plethora of statements he has made. It's not so easily done with a number of the folk who have been participating in this thread. If you don't show evidence that someone is homophobic yet call them a bigot/homophobic then you are simply name calling and making ad hominem arguments.

I'm saying have you stopped beating your wife? I hope you appreciate where I went with that.

 

I'm stating that you can't call someone homophobic without actually establishing that they actually are through logical argument. This is easily done with the Duck Dynasty guy because of a plethora of statements he has made. It's not so easily done with a number of the folk who have been participating in this thread. If you don't show evidence that someone is homophobic yet call them a bigot/homophobic then you are simply name calling and making ad hominem arguments.

 

Equally, you cannot say someone isn't homophobic while holding homophobic views just because they are (or claim to be) tolerant and not bigoted with those views - which is what has been occurring en masse in this thread.

 

As I said earlier, some posters in this thread are clearly bigoted, others are merely prejudiced.

 

The problem with your posts in this situation is they serve to provide cover, (but not ammunition) for those that try to hide away and rationalise their prejudice, and that is harmful.

Equally, you cannot say someone isn't homophobic while holding homophobic views just because they are (or claim to be) tolerant and not bigoted with those views - which is what has been occurring en masse in this thread.

 

As I said earlier, some posters in this thread are clearly bigoted, others are merely prejudiced.

 

The problem with your posts in this situation is they serve to provide cover, (but not ammunition) for those that try to hide away and rationalise their prejudice, and that is harmful.

So people can't have gay friends but oppose gay marriage and things of that nature?  :rolleyes: If someones a homophobe they wouldn't have gay friends. And if you look at is newest statement he says he loves all men and women, and so because he says he thinks a vagina is more desirable than a mans anus, that makes him a homophobe? I agree I think a vagina more desirable than a mans anus, does that mean im a homophobe too??  It seems like a one sided argument when it comes to tolerance. If you don't hold a favorable view of gay marriage and the lot then you are not to be tolerated and you're a homophobe.. Why not respect all views and let people hold their own opinions instead of trying to shame them. You can say that Christians are shaming gays but if you're not christian than who cares what they think is a sin or not since you don't believe in it. 

Equally, you cannot say someone isn't homophobic while holding homophobic views just because they are (or claim to be) tolerant and not bigoted with those views - which is what has been occurring en masse in this thread.

 

As I said earlier, some posters in this thread are clearly bigoted, others are merely prejudiced.

 

You have to provide evidence of an assertion before you make a statement about someone. It isn't enough to just make the statement. The burden of proof is on the person making the assertion that someone IS something.

 

Someone simply stating that they don't agree with an LBGTQ lifestyle doesn't provide evidence that they are homophobic. It doesn't show that they have an aversion/hatred/antipathy to LBGTQ persons.

 

A simple analogy would be this: if a parent doesn't agree with the serial murdering acts of their child, that doesn't mean they have hatred and antipathy for their child.

  • Like 2

So people can't have gay friends but oppose gay marriage and things of that nature?  :rolleyes: If someones a homophobe they wouldn't have gay friends. And if you look at is newest statement he says he loves all men and women, and so because he says he thinks a vagina is more desirable than a mans anus, that makes him a homophobe? I agree I think a vagina more desirable than a mans anus, does that mean im a homophobe too??  It seems like a one sided argument when it comes to tolerance. If you don't hold a favorable view of gay marriage and the lot then you are not to be tolerated and you're a homophobe.. Why not respect all views and let people hold their own opinions instead of trying to shame them. You can say that Christians are shaming gays but if you're not christian than who cares what they think is a sin or not since you don't believe in it. 

 

Tolerance and prejudice are independant concepts, please educate yourself on this matter as this is well documented and has been explained to you multiple times already.

 

You have to provide evidence of an assertion before you make a statement about someone. It isn't enough to just make the statement.

 

Someone simply stating that they don't agree with an LBGTQ lifestyle doesn't provide evidence that they are homophobic. It doesn't show that they have an aversion/hatred/antipathy to LBGTQ persons.

 

A simple analogy would be this: if a parent doesn't agree with the serial murdering acts of their child, that doesn't mean they have hatred and antipathy for their child.

 

So then you would then agree with the statement that racial segregation is not racist? Since such a postion is not "an aversion/hatred/antipathy" of a race, rather just that you might not "agree" with the view of race mixing.

So then you would then agree with the statement that racial segregation is not racist? Since such a postion is not "an aversion/hatred/antipathy" of a race, rather just that you might not "agree" with the view of race mixing.

 

Yes, I would agree with that. Racial segregation is just a concept about segregating humans into groups based upon race.

 

Where racism comes into play is in the reasons and motivations of why people want to be racially segregated (i.e. taking a position) and that's typically aversion/hatred/antipathy/fear.

 

I'm not really sure how that's relevant though since no-one is taking the position that they want to be segregated from LBGTQ people... I'm trying to frame the analogy and it simply doesn't appear to be relevant.

Yes, I would agree with that. Racial segregation is just a concept about segregating humans into groups based upon race.

 

Where racism comes into play is in the reasons and motivations of why people want to be racially segregated (i.e. taking a position) and that's typically aversion/hatred/antipathy/fear.

 

I'm not really sure how that's relevant though since no-one is taking the position that they want to be segregated from LBGTQ people... I'm trying to frame the analogy and it simply doesn't appear to be relevant.

 

Interesting. Would you mind providing some example reasons/motivations a person that does not agree with a LBG lifestyle might have that are not homophobic?

 

Aditionally, what are your thoughts on scientific racism?

Interesting. Would you mind providing some example reasons/motivations a person that does not agree with a LBG lifestyle might have that are not homophobic?

 

Aditionally, what are your thoughts on scientific racism?

 

Scroll back about fifty posts to where I talked about my co-worker and my visit to the city of love.

 

I think eugenics and the like are nonsense. I wouldn't believe in persecuting people or treating them as lesser even if they was a scientific basis for all of that anyway. In the same way as I don't think the ability to abstractly reason gives one the right do as they want with other species.

Scroll back about fifty posts to where I talked about my co-worker and my visit to the city of love.

 

I think eugenics and the like are nonsense. I wouldn't believe in persecuting people or treating them as lesser even if they was a scientific basis for all of that anyway. In the same way as I don't think the ability to abstractly reason gives one the right do as they want with other species.

 

That doesn't answer my question and you're making the same mistake KingCracker does, confusing the notion of prejudice (In this case, homophobia) with intolerance/bigotry.

That doesn't answer my question and you're making the same mistake KingCracker does, confusing the notion of prejudice (In this case, homophobia) with intolerance/bigotry.

 

You'll have to be more specific about what doesn't answer your question. The motivation was religion in the the story I gave.

 

Also, the words are synonyms:

 

 

big?ot?ry
Bigoted attitudes; intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself

 

EDIT: ah, I misunderstood what words you were saying were different. Can you be more specific on exactly what you are talking about. What is my mistake with the terms prejudice and intolerance exactly? I don't recall using either term...

You'll have to be more specific about what doesn't answer your question. The motivation was religion in the the story I gave.

 

Also, the words are synonyms:

 

 

EDIT: ah, I misunderstood what words you were saying were different. Can you be more specific on exactly what you are talking about. What is my mistake with the terms prejudice and intolerance exactly? I don't recall using either term...

 

The motivation was religion yes, but being religiously motivated does not make a prejudiced view not so.

 

The mistake stems from the statement that a view is not homophobic (prejudiced) if the person who holds it is tolerant (not bigoted with said view) of the relevant group.

The motivation was religion yes, but being religiously motivated does not make a prejudiced view not so.

 

The mistake stems from the statement that a view is not homophobic (prejudiced) if the person who holds it is tolerant (not bigoted with said view) of the relevant group.

 

You have a very liberal definition of prejudice (i.e. not agreeing with something someone does). Personally, I'd go with 3 and 4 which fall directly inline with what I said about hatred/antipathy/etc. previously:

 

1.
a. An adverse judgment or opinion formed beforehand or without knowledge or examination of the facts.
b. A preconceived preference or idea.
2. The act or state of holding unreasonable preconceived judgments or convictions. See Synonyms at predilection.
3. Irrational suspicion or hatred of a particular group, race, or religion.
4. Detriment or injury caused to a person by the preconceived, unfavorable conviction of another or others.

 

 

You have a very liberal definition of prejudice (i.e. not agreeing with something someone does). Personally, I'd go with 3 and 4 which fall directly inline with what I said about hatred/antipathy/etc. previously:

 

You cannot say I have a liberal definition and then ignore half of the examples in one single dictionary definition. Especially when the latter examples fail to address or explain the existance of ingrained prejudice. (The first two do a far better job)

 

Anyhow I'm out of this discussion for the moment, I shall return at a later time.

You cannot say I have a liberal definition and then ignore half of the examples in one single dictionary definition. Especially when the latter examples fail to address or explain the existance of ingrained prejudice. (The first two do a far better job)

 

Anyhow I'm out of this discussion for the moment, I shall return at a later time.

 

I didn't feel your definition (as I posited it) fit any of those definitions to be honest. It's not that ignored the other examples, it was just that the latter two are exactly what I've been saying for about 20 posts.

I honestly could not agree more.  Marriage is an institution of religion; civil union is societal recognition of a binding agreement.  However, if a church, such as the Presbyterians, decide to sanction gay marriages and perform the rites accordingly, I have not issue with that either.  My real concern is forcing churches to go against their established doctrine and charter to perform gay marriages.

well... they managed to bend the Boy Scout so why not aim for the church as well?

He's Baa-aack.....

A&E caves to fan pressure.

http://m.hollywoodreporter.com/entry/view/id/18327

 

They must have realized that every other family member on the show was probably gonna walk out consequences be damned if they didn't let him back on.

He's Baa-aack.....

A&E caves to fan pressure.

http://m.hollywoodreporter.com/entry/view/id/18327

 

I'd imagine this has less to do with caving to fan pressure and more to do with it having been planned from the get-go while the network evaluated the reaction to his comments. Suspending him when things look bad and then waiting until everything dies down to let him back on is simply good PR policy.

His views are his views and yes we have to respect them. 

We do not have to agree with them and it does not make him a bad person because he thinks differently.

 

He also took the time to explain why he thinks as he does. Remember : The devout Christian then paraphrased a biblical passage.

 

If we say he has no right to do so then none as the right to read the bible or follow it because everything he said was in it and since we where kids we where told the bible say's the truth and no lies. :) 

 

Now time to get flamed by every christian on the planet with what i just said !!!! But again that is free speech . I can say what ever i want but i can not say i will harm someone. That is exactly what he did. he expressed his opinion only. It does not make someone homophobic for doing so. 

 

If he would have said i don't want them beside me or live in the same town etc. or even exist. Then i would have said he his one of those homophobic. But that's not the case. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!