Recommended Posts

No, its his opinion, He is not telling people not to be gay. Tolerance doesn't mean you have to like anyone. He is allowed his opinion, he's not stopping anyone or campaigning against them.

In fact he broke his silence and he said he loved all men and women. He is not a homophobe, you are to quick to point the finger..

And when have I forced my sexual preference on anyone javik? You make bold claims without anything to back it up.

People seem to forget that KingCracker.. that he didn't really force his opinion on anyone - people are calling this man a homophobe when he isn't ..he simply doesn't agree with the homosexual lifestyle..and he's allowed to feel that way, it doesn't make him a homophobe

  • Like 3

My only opinion on the matter is this. I am not offended by a strangers opinion of my sexual orientation, but care more about the teenagers and adolescents who struggle to become ok with theirs. It is perhaps the most disappointing that a well known television personality, has the potential to negatively influence others' views, and foster negative opinions about something that is not a choice.

 ..he simply doesn't agree with the homosexual lifestyle..and he's allowed to feel that way, it doesn't make him a homophobe

 

That is by very definition homophobia.

 

Racism, sexism, homophobia and transphobia are far more reaching than simply just being members of the KKK or WBC, or throwing around slurs.

 

The man views homosexuals in a negative light, that makes him a homophobe.

That is by very definition homophobia.

 

Racism, sexism, homophobia and transphobia are far more reaching than simply just being members of the KKK or WBC, or throwing around slurs.

 

The man views homosexuals in a negative light, that makes him a homophobe.

No you can have gay friends but not necessarily agree with their sexuality. It doesn't make you a homophobe at all.

No you can have gay friends but not necessarily agree with their sexuality. It doesn't make you a homophobe at all.

 

It's telling that you're using a permutation of the "I have friends that are black..." defence here.

 

It absolutely is homophobia.

you mean further than a homosexual relationship? Because it's already been shown in Canada to at least slip to polygamy. Does it then slip to incest? I don't know. Seems crazy at the moment.. But so did legalized gay marriage 20 years ago.

 

Are you citing one or two cases, or the majority?  Unless it's the latter (and you're going to have to prove it), then your argument is invalid.

It's telling that you're using a permutation of the "I have friends that are black..." defence here.

 

It absolutely is homophobia.

Afraid not, people do say that they have black friends and do indeed have them. saying that doesn't make them racist either.

I used to have black friends, but I moved and lost touch now most of my friends are white. Am I a racist? Nope sorry.

No you can have gay friends but not necessarily agree with their sexuality. It doesn't make you a homophobe at all.

 

He doesn't like city folk... it looks at them funny and calls them names...

 

I don't think he'd take kindly to a homosexual, even if they were wearing an adorable camo top... :P

He said, and I quote:

"The first thing you see coming out of them is gross sexual immorality. They will dishonor their bodies with one another. Degrade each other... ...Women with women, men with men, they committed indecent acts with one another. And they received in themselves the penalty for their perversion. They are full of murder, envy, strife, hatred. They are insolent, arrogant God-haters. They are heartless, they are faithless, they are senseless, they are ruthless. They invent ways of doing evil."

- Phil Robertson

Afraid not, people do say that they have black friends and do indeed have them. saying that doesn't make them racist either.

I used to have black friends, but I moved and lost touch now most of my friends are white. Am I a racist? Nope sorry.

 

The fact you felt the need to add the second line is also incredibly telling symptom of ingrained prejudice.

 

I advise you to research what constitutes discrimination (specifically homophobia in this case) and ingrained bias/prejudice, there are plenty of academic studies on the topic.

Afraid not, people do say that they have black friends and do indeed have them. saying that doesn't make them racist either.

I used to have black friends, but I moved and lost touch now most of my friends are white. Am I a racist? Nope sorry.

 

Way to completely miss the point... People use "I have black friends" to 'prove' they aren't racist.

The corollary?

"No you can have black friends and not necessarily agree with interracial marriage.   It doesn't make you a racist."

"No you can have black friends and not necessarily agree with desegregation.           It doesn't make you a racist."

"No you can have black friends and not necessarily agree with civil rights.                  It doesn't make you a racist."

 

"No you can have gay   friends and not necessarily agree they deserve equal rights.  It doesn't make you a homophobe."

"No you can have gay   friends and not necessarily agree with their sexuality.            It doesn't make you a homophobe."

- KingCracker

  • Like 3

He doesn't like city folk... it looks at them funny and calls them names...

 

I don't think he'd take kindly to a homosexual, even if they were wearing an adorable camo top... :p

He said, and I quote:

"The first thing you see coming out of them is gross sexual immorality. They will dishonor their bodies with one another. Degrade each other... ...Women with women, men with men, they committed indecent acts with one another. And they received in themselves the penalty for their perversion. They are full of murder, envy, strife, hatred. They are insolent, arrogant God-haters. They are heartless, they are faithless, they are senseless, they are ruthless. They invent ways of doing evil."

- Phil Robertson

 

Well, Phil Robertson is homophobic. I don't think that stating P.R. is homophobic proves that KingCracker is. Unless he has an irrational aversion to LBGTQ people, he isn't homophobic. I have a co-worker who doesn't particularly approve of the lifestyle but who really does have a number of gay friends. His belief is that he shouldn't be going out of his way to passing judgement or condemn people for their lifestyle because that isn't a Christian thing to do and only God really has the right to judge people.

 

Disclaimer: I'm not religious.

 

EDIT: to add to the story a bit: the co-worker (mentioned above) and I actually stayed with a gay friend of ours this past August (in the city of Love). I was sort of expecting him to be awkward, avoid broaching certain topics, etc. But, he was cool the entire time regardless of his religious beliefs. And, it isn't as if the conversation topics didn't fall to sexuality either. I feel that goes a long way to show you can have a disagreement without being homphobic.

It's telling that you're using a permutation of the "I have friends that are black..." defence here.

 

It absolutely is homophobia.

 

His argument may have been a logical fallacy but so is yours: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy

When people opposed interracial marriages they did it from a position of political and economic power, not morality. Gay marriage is different.

 

Yeah, and Hitler didn't kill the Jews because of their ethnicity, they just happened to be Jewish ;)

 

It just amazes me at how someone can say something so glaring false, and odds with the overwhelming facts of history.

 

Morality was absolutely used as a reason for the ban of interracial marriage. Even today, you can still find many "debates" on the morality of interracial marriage.

 

Here are the arguments against interracial marriage... Notice any similarities between these and the arguments against gay marriage?

 

Here are four of the arguments they used:

1) First, judges claimed that marriage belonged under the control of the states rather than the federal government.

2) Second, they began to define and label all interracial relationships (even longstanding, deeply committed ones) as illicit sex rather than marriage.

3) Third, they insisted that interracial marriage was contrary to God's will, and

4) Fourth, they declared, over and over again, that interracial marriage was somehow "unnatural."

On this fourth point--the supposed "unnaturality" of interracial marriage--judges formed a virtual chorus. Here, for example, is the declaration that the Supreme Court of Virginia used to invalidate a marriage between a black man and a white woman in 1878:

The purity of public morals," the court declared, "the moral and physical development of both races?.require that they should be kept distinct and separate? that connections and alliances so unnatural that God and nature seem to forbid them, should be prohibited by positive law, and be subject to no evasion.

The fifth, and final, argument judges would use to justify miscegenation law was undoubtedly the most important; it used these claims that interracial marriage was unnatural and immoral to find a way around the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of "equal protection under the laws."

http://hnn.us/article/4708

  • Like 2

 

Yeah, and Hitler didn't kill the Jews because of their ethnicity, they just happened to be Jewish ;)

 

It just amazes me at how someone can say something so glaring false, and odds with the overwhelming facts of history.

 

Morality was absolutely used as a reason for the ban of interracial marriage. Even today, you can still find many "debates" on the morality of interracial marriage.

 

Here are the arguments against interracial marriage... Notice any similarities between these and the arguments against gay marriage?

 

 

they could claim what they wanted to. damned be if they could find ONE part of the scripture that actually said such a thing. any 'debates' on interracial marriages are almost definitely to center around the children not feeling like part of one community or the other.. NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MARRIAGE ITSELF.

Way to completely miss the point... People use "I have black friends" to 'prove' they aren't racist.

The corollary?

"No you can have black friends and not necessarily agree with interracial marriage.   It doesn't make you a racist."

"No you can have black friends and not necessarily agree with desegregation.           It doesn't make you a racist."

"No you can have black friends and not necessarily agree with civil rights.                  It doesn't make you a racist."

 

"No you can have gay   friends and not necessarily agree they deserve equal rights.  It doesn't make you a homophobe."

"No you can have gay   friends and not necessarily agree with their sexuality.            It doesn't make you a homophobe."

- KingCracker

So?

His argument may have been a logical fallacy but so is yours: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy

 

I don't really think that's an appropriate labeling of such a fallacy in this case, as determining an individual's prejudices are relevant to assessing the validity of their view of what constitutes prejudice.

I don't really think that's an appropriate labeling of such a fallacy in this case, as determining an individual's prejudices are relevant to assessing the validity of their view of what constitutes prejudice.

Like I said earlier and its true, you can have gay friends and respect them even if you don't agree with their sexuality. Being tolerate doesn't mean you have to kiss their ass people are allowed to have an opinion as long as someone doesn't preach hate or do hate crimes then its all good in my book.

Like I said earlier and its true, you can have gay friends and respect them even if you don't agree with their sexuality. Being tolerate doesn't mean you have to kiss their ass people are allowed to have an opinion as long as someone doesn't preach hate or do hate crimes then its all good in my book.

Thanks for helping me discover a new quote

 

"Being tolerate doesn't mean you have to kiss their ass; just not to kick it"

  • Like 1

Like I said earlier and its true, you can have gay friends and respect them even if you don't agree with their sexuality. Being tolerate doesn't mean you have to kiss their ass people are allowed to have an opinion as long as someone doesn't preach hate or do hate crimes then its all good in my book.

 

Being tolerant doesn't mean you aren't homophobic.

I don't really think that's an appropriate labeling of such a fallacy in this case, as determining an individual's prejudices are relevant to assessing the validity of their view of what constitutes prejudice.

 

You can't use a logical fallacy to determine the prejudices of someone. O_o that's a misinterpretation of the entire point of the particular logical fallacy as a concept anyway. The point of the friend argument as a logical fallacy is to show that the premise doesn't prove you not prejudice. It's makes absolutely no statement on whether you are or are not prejudice despite it being rather popular for people to use it as an argument otherwise.

Being tolerant doesn't mean you aren't homophobic.

If you have gay friends it does, if a homophobe had gay friends wouldn't that be like a neo nazi or a kkk member having a black friend? Disagreeing with homosexuality doesn't make one a homophobe, its when that person goes out of their way to avoid them, preach hate and or do hate crimes which makes them a homophobe.

When someone says something like " i wouldn't have a gay friend because im afraid they would hit on me" that makes them a homophobe.

 

Yeah, and Hitler didn't kill the Jews because of their ethnicity, they just happened to be Jewish ;)

 

It just amazes me at how someone can say something so glaring false, and odds with the overwhelming facts of history.

 

Morality was absolutely used as a reason for the ban of interracial marriage. Even today, you can still find many "debates" on the morality of interracial marriage.

 

Here are the arguments against interracial marriage... Notice any similarities between these and the arguments against gay marriage?

 

 

1. True

2. True

3. True for judeo/christain religions.

4. depends on your definition of unnatural.

 

the only problem with gay marriage is:

a) marriage is a religious sacrament.

b) it's being administered by the state.

 

my solution is to get rid of all legal marriage. why is the government even administering something so personal? what truly valid reason does the government have to know who you regularly sleep with?

they could claim what they wanted to. damned be if they could find ONE part of the scripture that actually said such a thing. any 'debates' on interracial marriages are almost definitely to center around the children not feeling like part of one community or the other.. NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MARRIAGE ITSELF.

 

Claim what they want to? You obviously know something about claiming whatever you want to :)

 

You said people didn't oppose interracial marriage from a position of morality. Yet, that was their primary position.

 

You were spectacularly wrong, and to just ignore it is very telling of how you form your opinions.

1. True

2. True

3. True for judeo/christain religions.

4. depends on your definition of unnatural.

 

the only problem with gay marriage is:

a) marriage is a religious sacrament.

b) it's being administered by the state.

 

my solution is to get rid of all legal marriage. why is the government even administering something so personal? what truly valid reason does the government have to know who you regularly sleep with?

 

But what is unnatural? I mean we see homosexuality even in the animal kingdom in almost ever species. Regarding your lost point, I suppose it would be for tax purposes, but that could be easily reformed.

Claim what they want to? You obviously know something about claiming whatever you want to :)

 

You said people didn't oppose interracial marriage from a position of morality. Yet, that was their primary position.

 

You were spectacularly wrong, and to just ignore it is very telling of how you form your opinions.

 

let me rephrase that. no one could validly oppose interracial marriage from a religious morality... quite unlike homosexual acts which the bible calls an abomination.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!