Disable the Windows Store in Windows 8 and Windows 8.1

By Ian W
in Microsoft (Windows)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Ian W

Posted
Posted

I have been using Windows 8 for a good while now and found that I have very little use for the Windows Store. While I am a big fan of the new toast notifications for Windows Store applications and even some applications in particular (ABC News for example), it is hard to justify their usage as I do not have a touchscreen - something that would make the experience much more enjoyable.

For these reasons and others, I have decided to disable the Windows Store services and put the resources to better use. You may also wish to do the same, so I have created this little tutorial. Note that while there are already tutorials to do this on the Internet, most of them are not as thorough as this one intends to be. See the Bleeping Computer tutorial or the How-To Geek tutorial for examples of this.

Important! Export the Windows Registry keys that you decide to modify before making changes to the Windows Registry, and create a System Restore point before continuing.

Disable access to the Windows Store via Group Policy or Windows Registry Editor

For all users:

Open the Group Policy Editor (gpedit.msc) and navigate to Computer Configuration - > Administrative Templates - > Windows Components. Open the Store entry in the right-hand pane, and enable the Turn off the Store application setting.

Alternatively, open Registry Editor (regedit.exe) and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\WindowsStore (if the WindowsStore key does not exist, create it). Create a new DWORD value in the WindowsStore key called RemoveWindowsStore. Set its value to 1.

For current user only:

Open the Group Policy Editor (gpedit.msc) and navigate to User Configuration - > Administrative Templates - > Windows Components. Open the Store entry in the right-hand pane, and enable the Turn off the Store application setting.

Alternatively, open Registry Editor and navigate to HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\WindowsStore. Create a new DWORD value called RemoveWindowsStore. Set its value to 1.

Disable the Windows Store service

Open Registry Editor and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services\WSService. Select the Start value in the right-hand pane and set its value to 4.

Disable the services associated with the Windows Store and Windows Store applications

This next step is important because, as other users have mentioned, these services are known to consume valuable system resources - a situation made worse if you are no longer able to open the Windows Store (after performing the steps above).

Disable Time Broker

In Registry Editor, navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services\TimeBroker. Select the Start value in the right-hand pane and set its value to 4.

Disable System Events Broker

The task scheduler has a dependency on the system events broker, disabling it is asking for problems - Joe User.

In Registry Editor, navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services\SystemEventsBroker. Select the Start value in the right-hand pane and set its value to 4.

Unpin the Windows Store tile from the Windows Start screen

If the Windows Store tile is pinned to the Start screen, right click the tile and select the Unpin from Start option that appears in the application bar.

  • f0rk_b0mb, chrisj1968 and topjolly
  • Like 3
Veteran

Joe User

Posted
Posted (edited)

Is it wise to disable the Time Broker and System Events Broker? While you might want to disable the store, I can't see why you would disable applications that register with the brokers.

 

I don't think "saving resources" is a valid reason, they are not resource hogs.

 

Edit: The task scheduler has a dependency on the system events broker, disabling it is asking for problems.

Edited by Joe User
Veteran

Joe User

Posted
Posted
  On 16/03/2014 at 19:59, chrisj1968 said:

I think this isn't so much important about resources but the ability to shut something down one doesn't want.

 

I can't think of a situation where anyone would want to disrupt the task scheduler.

Grand Master

Ian W

Posted
  • Author
Posted
  On 16/03/2014 at 19:40, georgevella said:

This is good if you (and everyone else who ...) believe you need the extra resources.  Personally, I don't see the benefits considering today's hardware.

  On 16/03/2014 at 19:42, Joe User said:

Is it wise to disable the Time Broker and System Events Broker? While you might want to disable the store, I can't see why you would disable applications that register with the brokers.

 

I don't think "saving resources" is a valid reason, they are not resource hogs.

 

Edit: The task scheduler has a dependency on the system events broker, disabling it is asking for problems.

The whole idea of this tutorial is that if a user does not use the Windows Store or Windows Store applications, they can be completely disabled. If a user still wishes to use Windows Store applications, he or she should not disable the Windows Store, Time Broker or System Events Broker services (something that I thought would be obvious due to the description of these services in Windows 8).

I mentioned resource usage only because several users have reported that Time Broker and System Events Broker spike the CPU or use large amounts of memory. Granted, this only happens if one uses the Windows Store or its applications, but if a user does not use the new Windows 8 application infrastructure, why leave these services running at all?

With that said, thank you very much for alerting me (and the readers of this topic) to the potential dangers of disabling System Events Broker. Would a moderator include this information in the original post, and give credit to Joe User for this?

Grand Master

zhangm Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted
  On 16/03/2014 at 20:42, Ian William said:

With that said, thank you very much for alerting me (and the readers of this topic) to the potential dangers of disabling System Events Broker. Would a moderator include this information in the original post, and give credit to Joe User for this?

 

Modified as requested.

Veteran

Joe User

Posted
Posted

After testing, I would like to let you know that disabling the System Events Broker will disable the Task Scheduler completely.

 

DO NOT DO THIS!

 

There are hundreds of applications that rely on the Task Scheduler in Windows 8.

 

If you want to remove the dependency, you can hack the registry to do it, but seriously, this is reckless advice. The average user who thinks they are optimizing their system is going to wind up with a broken Windows update, a broken Windows Media center, optimization and cleanup tasks not being run, and in the long term an unstable system.

Grand Master

Brandon Live Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Ugh, do not do any of this unless you really want to hork up your system.

 

  On 16/03/2014 at 19:31, Ian William said:

I have been using Windows 8 for a good while now and found that I have very little use for the Windows Store. While I am a big fan of the new toast notifications for Windows Store applications and even some applications in particular (ABC News for example), it is hard to justify their usage as I do not have a touchscreen - something that would make the experience much more enjoyable.

 

What does having a touchscreen have to do with the Store?

Grand Master

+LogicalApex MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted
  On 17/03/2014 at 00:46, Brandon Live said:

Ugh, do not do any of this unless you really want to hork up your system.

What does having a touchscreen have to do with the Store?

Using group policy to disable the store will hurt the system? If so, why is this option included in the OS?

Veteran

Joe User

Posted
Posted
  On 17/03/2014 at 01:13, LogicalApex said:

Using group policy to disable the store will hurt the system? If so, why is this option included in the OS?

 

I think he was referring to the second part.

Grand Master

+FloatingFatMan Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted
  On 17/03/2014 at 00:46, Brandon Live said:

Ugh, do not do any of this unless you really want to hork up your system.

 

 

What does having a touchscreen have to do with the Store?

 

Agreed completely.  If you don't want to use the store; don't. An allocated resource is not a used resource so not using it or any Modern apps isn't going to use any of your precious CPU time or RAM (unused RAM is wasted RAM).

 

Screwing around with services when you don't know what else they're used for is just asking for trouble.  Disabling the store itself in group policy is likely harmless (and would be there for enterprise reasons), but killing the brokers will just cause you grief.

Mentor

duoi Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

This is very good. I will use it because its very good. I never wanted the Microsoft Store, and I'm not sure why Microsoft included it on everyone's computer. This is a very good trick to disable the nasty old Microsoft Store that Microsoft forced on everyone. I will use it to disable my Store on my Windows 8 computer. It is a horrible Store, and I'm not sure why Microsoft forced it on everyone.

 

Regards,

Andrea Borman

Grand Master

+LogicalApex MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted
  On 17/03/2014 at 01:15, Joe User said:

I think he was referring to the second part.

Thanks. I was thinking the same, but was wondering why he didn't specifically limit the scope of his warning to exclude the official deactivation method.

Grand Master

Bryan R.

Posted
Posted
  On 17/03/2014 at 13:01, duoi said:

This is very good. I will use it because its very good. I never wanted the Microsoft Store, and I'm not sure why Microsoft included it on everyone's computer. This is a very good trick to disable the nasty old Microsoft Store that Microsoft forced on everyone. I will use it to disable my Store on my Windows 8 computer. It is a horrible Store, and I'm not sure why Microsoft forced it on everyone.

 

Regards,

Andrea Borman

...

 

No... please...

Grand Master

DConnell Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted
  On 17/03/2014 at 13:01, duoi said:

This is very good. I will use it because its very good. I never wanted the Microsoft Store, and I'm not sure why Microsoft included it on everyone's computer. This is a very good trick to disable the nasty old Microsoft Store that Microsoft forced on everyone. I will use it to disable my Store on my Windows 8 computer. It is a horrible Store, and I'm not sure why Microsoft forced it on everyone.

 

Regards,

Andrea Borman

 

How was it "forced on everyone"? You don't have to use it. You can still install traditional desktop software in exactly the same way as before. This is just another way to get software, not the only one.

Grand Master

Brandon H Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted
  On 17/03/2014 at 14:13, DConnell said:

How was it "forced on everyone"? You don't have to use it. You can still install traditional desktop software in exactly the same way as before. This is just another way to get software, not the only one.

it was a joke

 

Andrea Borman was a user that got banned a long time ago due to being annoying to everyone and obsessing about making windows act like 98

 

I'm surprised you don't remember her :p

Grand Master

DConnell Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted
  On 17/03/2014 at 14:17, Brando212 said:

it was a joke

 

Andrea Borman was a user that got banned a long time ago due to being annoying to everyone and obsessing about making windows act like 98

 

I'm surprised you don't remember her :p

 

<Gilda Radner> Nevermind . . . . </GR>  :)

Grand Master

riahc3

Posted
Posted
  On 17/03/2014 at 14:17, Brando212 said:

it was a joke

 

Andrea Borman was a user that got banned a long time ago due to being annoying to everyone and obsessing about making windows act like 98

 

I'm surprised you don't remember her :p

Im actually worried it isnt a joke:

  Quote

Member Since 17 Feb 2014

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • It's been four years, and I still don't have a strong enough reason to upgrade to Windows 11

      By Tuskd · Posted

      With the AI pivot, expect future updates to Windows 11 and later 12 to give us a lot more reasons to not upgrade or better yet, switch to Linux.
    • How to reduce the annoying Liquid Glass effects on iOS 26

      By Homunculus · Posted

      Thank you all for beta testing.
    • The $80 video game - A new frontier of cost, or a bridge too far?

      By Geezy · Posted

      Microsoft last raised game prices in 2023! Two years is not a long time!
    • AMD quietly releases a new budget-friendly AM4 processor with 3D cache

      By +Eternal Tempest · Posted

      It could be AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D that didn't meet specs, but had enough of them for a "new" sku.
    • It's been four years, and I still don't have a strong enough reason to upgrade to Windows 11

      By ThaCrip · Posted

      "don't recall the last time I clicked on the Windows icon or key to open the Start menu." While I am on Linux Mint, I just assume what I do, at least in regards to basic program loading, is got to be very close to how everyone else does it in that you either load a random program from a desktop icon or press Windows Key (or click Start Menu) and partially type in name of program, which causes it to show up and then press enter (or click it) etc. that's got to be very close to a very standard way most people load programs on a desktop PC and the like. because it's quick and to the point to get on with using your program. side note: I have a very limited amount of programs setup to start with a keyboard shortcut but I realize that obviously won't be standard, so I did not really mention that as part of the basic program loading stuff here. "I'm fine with the context menus in Windows 10" Exactly. because they are time-tested/standard. where as you can see where they are headed with Windows 11 things, while not horrible, it's a change I don't particularly like since it's a bit too different and one has to sort-of relearn (as you got to pay more attention to what icon is which, which slows you down) instead of reflexively just clicking stuff like we have done for ages. "Eh, does anyone really use this storefront?" Hell no. that's just a non-standard way to install stuff. downloading exe's from websites (and the like) has been the standard for decades. that store stuff is 'maybe' for people who are VERY tech illiterate. side note: that's one bonus to Win10's 'IoT Enterprise LTSC 2021' is that 'Store' junk is not even installed. TsarNikky said, "A result of unsupervised twenty-somethings running the development (?) and maintenance of Windows-11. With very rare exception they have no concept of how typical users interact with the OS." Yeah, assuming that's true... I wonder if these 20 somethings who grew up on smart phones instead of proper PC's have no idea what's actually been standard for a very long time now on real Desktop PC's (and the like) as you just don't screw with foundational standards of what people have been used to for decades purely for the sake of change. it makes no sense. smart phones are a straight up downgrade over proper PC's as I don't understand how people can spend any length of time online on a smart phone as they are better off on a proper desktop PC as it's just better all-around. about the only thing a smart phone is better than a PC is to look up something quick or do something quick etc. but if you are going to spend any real time online, a smart phone sucks as the small screen, typing on the on-screen keyboard etc is just flat out worse than a real desktop PC. but with all of that said... in the end, people are going to be forced to 'play-ball' with Windows 11 for better or worse if Microsoft is hardline about dumping Win10 here in October for most people (as I suspect the bulk of people will be off Win10 within roughly a couple of years or so tops after Oct 2025). but hopefully people can just sort of wing-it and stick with Win10 for a while until maybe Win12 comes along etc. but as others have said in comments in here already... Microsoft needs to be more focused on sticking with polishing the time tested stuff that's already in place (which will help keep a more reliable/snappy OS for the basics) instead of creating "features" most people don't really care about. but it makes me wonder if for some working at Microsoft, they got to keep pushing that idea that people want more "features" to justify their continued employment at Microsoft etc.

  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      CSpera earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      MIR JOHNNY BLAZE earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Wireless wookie went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      bukro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Wulle earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      612
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      286
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      178
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      151
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      116
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!