Disable the Windows Store in Windows 8 and Windows 8.1


Recommended Posts

Thanks. I was thinking the same, but was wondering why he didn't specifically limit the scope of his warning to exclude the official deactivation method.

 

Dunno. I'll chalk it up to being a little lax on a forum, no big deal. 

Using group policy to disable the store will hurt the system? If so, why is this option included in the OS?

 

I was mainly referring to the part about disabling random services. Hiding the store icon using group policy on your own machine is just silliness. Just unpin it if you really don't want to try any of the great apps on offer. The point of group policy is to allow IT admins to force settings on users on their domains. There's no reason to force something on yourself, just do it the normal way!

 

Also, if you completely disable the store, how will you install OS updates like 8.1?

  • Like 2

I was mainly referring to the part about disabling random services. Hiding the store icon using group policy on your own machine is just silliness. Just unpin it if you really don't want to try any of the great apps on offer. The point of group policy is to allow IT admins to force settings on users on their domains. There's no reason to force something on yourself, just do it the normal way!

 

Also, if you completely disable the store, how will you install OS updates like 8.1?

Whether or not one should use group policy is up to them. I just wanted to be sure that there wasn't something wrong with this option.

 

That is a valid question. If I were to disable the store via Group Policy how would the update be pushed? Or even more directly, how is an update like this pushed out in the enterprise setting? Surely, the individual employees wouldn't be using personal Microsoft accounts to request an update for their work issued machine...

I remember the old days when some netscape zealots came up with a way to completely strip ie out of windows 98 or 95, can't remember which version.

 

I wonder if it would be possible to do something similar to windows 8.x, strip out all of the offending metro junk before the os is even installed or run a program to rip all the junk out directly after the install, it would definitely make for a much less user-hostile experience with windows 8.x and might free up some resources in the process.

 

Edit: Ahh here it is http://www.litepc.com/98lite.html

 

Whether or not one should use group policy is up to them. I just wanted to be sure that there wasn't something wrong with this option.

 

That is a valid question. If I were to disable the store via Group Policy how would the update be pushed? Or even more directly, how is an update like this pushed out in the enterprise setting? Surely, the individual employees wouldn't be using personal Microsoft accounts to request an update for their work issued machine...

 

For 8 to 8.1 it's a new OS, so the usual OS upgrade tools, same way they went from 7 to 8. For the upcoming 8.1 Update 1, it's essentially a roll up hotfix, so WSUS.

those like me who don't need it? I have no need for it. I'm just a simple consumer user

Chrisj1968, you certainly do not want to disable the Task Scheduler. I did not know about Task Scheduler's dependency on System Events Broker at the time of writing this topic . . . My apologies to anyone who decided to disable the service based on my original post.

http://blogs.technet.com/b/askpfeplat/archive/2013/07/15/why-you-shouldn-t-disable-the-task-scheduler-service-in-windows-7-and-windows-8.aspx

If you have not already done so, please do not disable System Events Broker. If you have disabled the service based on my original post, you can enable it by setting the value of the Start key located at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services\SystemEventsBroker to 3.

those like me who don't need it? I have no need for it. I'm just a simple consumer user

 

 It's the scheduler for the entire operating system, you absolutely need it.  

 

If you want to use a car analogy, it's like randomly removing belts from your car because you only use the car for commuting.

Chrisj1968, you certainly do not want to disable the Task Scheduler. I did not know about Task Scheduler's dependency on System Events Broker at the time of writing this topic . . . My apologies to anyone who decided to disable the service based on my original post.

http://blogs.technet.com/b/askpfeplat/archive/2013/07/15/why-you-shouldn-t-disable-the-task-scheduler-service-in-windows-7-and-windows-8.aspx

If you have not already done so, please do not disable System Events Broker. If you have disabled the service based on my original post, you can enable it by setting the value of the Start key located at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services\SystemEventsBroker to 3.

 

Shouldn't that be 2?

  • 2 weeks later...

The default is 3.

 

Actually, it's 2. It don't think it makes a difference since the task scheduler is going to force start the service if it's manual or delayed start.

Actually, it's 2. It don't think it makes a difference since the task scheduler is going to force start the service if it's manual or delayed start.

Where are you getting this information? A fresh Windows 8 installation has the Registry values for System Events Broker and Time Broker set to 3. The Services snap-in lists the default setting for System Events Broker and Time Broker as Manual (Trigger Start).

Where are you getting this information? A fresh Windows 8 installation has the Registry values for System Events Broker and Time Broker set to 3. The Services snap-in lists the default setting for System Events Broker and Time Broker as Manual (Trigger Start).

 

I checked two installs, one is automatic the other is manual trigger. I guess something changes it as needed (Office, most likely)

 

It doesn't matter, they are dependent services, they will always start unless disabled, there's no point wasting time on it.

  • 9 months later...
  • 4 months later...

For everyone reading, I have a warning

Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should you disable System Events Broker!!

It is NOT just part of the store, but as It turns out a core part of windows. Disabling it has resulted in ALL driver installations failing (from "invalid data"), ALL networked computers becoming inaccessible, as well as completely breaking Task Scheduler. Those are only the issues I've found so far, there's bound to be more stuff going on in the background that has been broken

I'm also finding that it is practically impossible to re-enable System Events Broker, even after changing the registry key back to default it still refuses to start. I've spent the last day an a half trying to fix this. I also strongly suggest removing the suggestion of disabling it from the OP.

This was on windows 8.1 64 bit. If anyone disabled their system events broker, and was able to fix it, please let me know how.

Seems to me this is way too much work for something that is easily ignored and never opened 

 

 

I see no valid reason to ever need to go through all this effort, corporate environments already have the needed tools to bypass the Store, so again pointless and likely prone to end up breaking more that doing any real good 

so many posts in this thread saying that you shouldnt do this, that it shouldnt matter, that it doesnt take any resources. i dont understand why people who dont want to do it and will not do it would be posting in this thread. its like everyone has to share their opinion no matter how pointless it is. kind of like an athiest wandering into a church, standing in front of everyone, and yelling about how bad the people there are and how great he is.

  • 5 months later...

Can you please tell me how to undo this. No matter what i change the registry values to, it will not let me enable windows store again. I even imported the original values but nothing is working including all of the apps.

Refresh your PC from settings.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!