Poll: Are you going to install the Windows 10 preview, and if yes how?


  

152 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you going to install the Windows 10 preview, and if yes how?

    • Yes, as primary OS on my primary PC.
      46
    • Yes, as secondary OS on my primary PC.
      16
    • Yes, on a secondary PC.
      20
    • Yes, in a virtual machine.
      55
    • Maybe when the OS has matured some more.
      4
    • No.
      11


Recommended Posts

As for myself: I am going to install Windows 10 preview in a virtual machine and watch its progress as Microsoft updates the preview. The main reason? We're using Windows 7 at work and will at some point need an upgrade path. Windows 8.x has been deemed unsuitable by the powers that be; Windows 10 on the other hand looks promising.

You're not able to upgrade from on TP to another, right? I'm installing it on a VM anyway, so it doesn't matter to me.

The way I understand it they're going to have a form of rolling release for the Win10 preview - new features being added on a monthly or bi-monthly basis via Windows Update.

As always I'll install it on my main everyday laptop and reinstall each time a new build "appears" :)..

 

Do we have an actual time the links will be active? I finish work soon so I'm hoping it's out before I have to go to sleep tonight.

 

I miss the Microsoft beta program. I was in the private MS betas for Vista, Windows 7 and office 2010. Used to get all the good stuff...not anymore :(

Anyone who doesn't install it as primary OS, throwing all caution to the wind, is not a real man :D

 

(honestly, these previews are very stable, I've done it for 7 and 8, see no reason not to do it)

If you are interested, you could try to upgrade on-line from Win7, MS had first planned it for testers but I heard they are going to release the tool public so anybody could take a shot if they like to.

 

The MS paper said that you would need to upgrade from a retail-activated 7, X86/X64. any SKU, installed on bare-metal. Don't know if it would work if other than that.

 

Naturally, if you use win7 as main OS and wish to try on it, it's your decision,..... and your own risks. :)

As I have done with every pre-release (or otherwise public in-development build) since Vista, I'll be installing the Windows 10 TP over my current Windows 8.1 install.

 

I figure there's no possible way it could be worse than the Vista beta(s) were which tbh were pretty much like the final build in relation to stability and perf.

  • Like 1

As I have done with every pre-release (or otherwise public in-development build) since Vista, I'll be installing the Windows 10 TP over my current Windows 8.1 install.

 

I figure there's no possible way it could be worse than the Vista beta(s) were which tbh were pretty much like the final build in relation to stability and perf.

Aren't you afraid that everything could change during those 6 whole months before the public release? Also what was that thing about just scratching the surface? Whose Surface was it? :o

As for myself: I am going to install Windows 10 preview in a virtual machine and watch its progress as Microsoft updates the preview. The main reason? We're using Windows 7 at work and will at some point need an upgrade path. Windows 8.x has been deemed unsuitable by the powers that be; Windows 10 on the other hand looks promising.

 

Same, but i get Windows 8, would hate to deploy it and teach people it!

I'll install it on my main PC, dual-booting with Win 7 (as I now dual boot 7 & 8). At first I thought about installing it in a VM, but since the Win 8 DP was reasonably stable and I installed that on actual hardware, I see no reason I wouldn't do it for the Technical Preview. 

 

Can't wait to play with the snaps and virtual desktops. :D

Yup. Will be here as with every release since 2000. 

 

In the past it has always been the poor old laptop that suffered the indignity of being butchered for the job, but as it's pretty vital to a job i'm working on at the mo, it'll be Virtualbox for me this time round.

My Primary PC (or laptop) is my work laptop so I can't afford that risk. I remember having a lot of issues with Win 8 preview around things like .net and some other stuff not installing which then prevented me from using things like Vcenter which was a must.

 

Id love to do it though as I think its the only way to get a good grip on how the OS works.

I'm sure I'll install it on a vm and some real hardware that I've been meaning to do a clean install in, then I have something to do with while I am backing up my main system to reformat that :)

 

Ok maybe I will actually test compatibility of a few things first but I expect to reformat the main system this weekend. Not quite sure about my server just yet, I did upgrade my DC to 2012 and 2012 release previews but technical preview might be a little too adventurous for all my 2012r2 vms.

My Primary PC (or laptop) is my work laptop so I can't afford that risk. I remember having a lot of issues with Win 8 preview around things like .net and some other stuff not installing which then prevented me from using things like Vcenter which was a must.

 

Id love to do it though as I think its the only way to get a good grip on how the OS works.

Yeah but that was mainly to do with the early stages of the Modern UI right? :P But I agree that a work laptop must be properly operational!

Yeah but that was mainly to do with the early stages of the Modern UI right? :p But I agree that a work laptop must be properly operational!

 

Actually no, I can't remember the exact details but trying to add .net via the add features menu would give me errors, took me a while to get it working properly so I ended up connecting to servers instead of using remote access for a lot of things. I'm one of the rare people who like Windows 8 and not looking forward to Win 10 bringing back a slightly more traditional start menu :(

I consider my home PC my secondary PC as opposed to my work laptop, which will stay with Windows 8.1.  I'm planning on formatting it over the weekend.  I also work with Sharp Aquos Boards, which are 60", 70" and 80" touch panels and I want to install it on one of our PCs to see how it works at that scale.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!