Poll: Are you going to install the Windows 10 preview, and if yes how?


  

152 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you going to install the Windows 10 preview, and if yes how?

    • Yes, as primary OS on my primary PC.
      46
    • Yes, as secondary OS on my primary PC.
      16
    • Yes, on a secondary PC.
      20
    • Yes, in a virtual machine.
      55
    • Maybe when the OS has matured some more.
      4
    • No.
      11


Recommended Posts

I will wait for the consumer preview.  I'll have more fun playing with an (almost) feature complete version than what is effectively an early beta.  (this is not a shot at the tech preview or Win10, mind you.  I'm super excited; looks like 2015 will be a year for a new phone and a new Surface!)

Virtual machine, I would never rely on a build that's still got a year to cook for my primary OS. Definitely going to mess with it, looks excellent so far, but it's pretty much guaranteed to have bugs, not everything will run properly, stuff is going to change/features missing yet, etc etc. This system is a big source of income for me.. it must be stable.

I'll be installing it as the primary os on my laptop, though I did a full backup of the current win 8.1 just in case. I haven't had any major problems with pre releases OS's from MS since the Vista beta days, hoping that continues to be the case here.

I will use Hyper-V to test it out.


I'll be installing it as the primary os on my laptop, though I did a full backup of the current win 8.1 just in case. I haven't had any major problems with pre releases OS's from MS since the Vista beta days, hoping that continues to be the case here.

I just find it funny how people install as primary OS a preview that is not even complete yet with all the remaining features and improvements. Good Luck to you.

I'm gonna throw it on my laptop to see how it runs on older hardware. 

 

Studio XPS 16.  C2D 2.4GHz, 4GB, 120 GB SSD, ATI GPU.

 

Should be alright.  I'm really looking forward to trying it out.

Going in a VM for now until it's good to go as my main OS next year.   No rush to mess with things and 8.1 is running smooth for me.

Just curious, is this open to the public? Or will I need some sort of paid Microsoft subscription?

 

it is a tech preview... but public preview is coming in mid 2015.

 

Not sure about subscription... So far I know, it would be free for the users of Windows 8.x

I'll be sticking it on my work laptop, but will probably wait until the release of Yosemite and then reload everything :)

Aren't you afraid that everything could change during those 6 whole months before the public release? Also what was that thing about just scratching the surface? Whose Surface was it? :o

Oh yes that's my biggest fear in life. I wake up in cold sweats at night worrying about the possibility of changes to my computer.

 

/s

It'll be going on a secondary HDD like every pre-release build since Vista.. Never trust a secondary partition on the same HDD as your primary OS.

 

This is going to be a much earlier build than usual previews usually are, you be careful out there!

  • 2 weeks later...

Secondary OS on my desktop, and only OS on my notebook - alongside, and replacing, 8.1 update 1 respectively.

 

What makes it interesting is the notebook install - not the desktop install; the interesting part is that the notebook is older than the desktop.  Most notebooks have issues with the wireless adapter NOT working - and this was a clean install, on an old (Vista-era!) notebook, with a likewise-old dual-N wireless adapter.  Despite the trainload of old hardware, I had no trouble whatever.  Either my luck was incredibly good, or Microsoft got a lot of backward-compatibility right with the Technical Preview.

Installed it on VMWare Player, works quite well for a Tech Preview. Not impressed with it so far, I don't like the direction Windows is heading in since Windows 8 and there's little in this preview to make me change my mind. I'll definitely be installing newer builds and see how it evolves.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!