Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Circaflex said:

That was AWESOME! Here's to hoping the reshoots arent going to screw this movie over.

You shouldn't worry about the reshoots,  it's what WB does with lots of its movies if they have time to. 

 

This movie is going to be great though,  it's the dark horse for WB and the DCEU this year. 

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...

I wonder if this SS movie is going to borrow/use parts from that animated SS movie they did a year, or maybe two, years ago?    Some of the characters are different but in that version Joker was around more as a side character just screwing things up, but he wasn't the mission target or anything.  I have a feeling this is the same thing here, he'll run into the gang and screw things up even more as a crazy 3rd wheel.   I'm betting either the huntress, or something related to her, is the target/main bad guy in this.

 

Also expect any Batman parts will be in Joker/Harley flashback scenes.

  • 3 weeks later...
19 minutes ago, trag3dy said:

Once we know more about it we can start it's own thread, not enough info yet.  But it does sound like this will not be a pure Harley solo movie and more of a team up with other female characters, good and bad.  I hope they use it as a chance to bring in poison Ivy and have them be a pair like they are in the comic books right now, would give DC/WB the chance to target the LGBT group who are asking for more and more movies, and i'm down for it.

 

It could also have the birds of pray and so on, good stuff.

6 hours ago, George P said:

Once we know more about it we can start it's own thread, not enough info yet.  But it does sound like this will not be a pure Harley solo movie and more of a team up with other female characters, good and bad.  I hope they use it as a chance to bring in poison Ivy and have them be a pair like they are in the comic books right now, would give DC/WB the chance to target the LGBT group who are asking for more and more movies, and i'm down for it.

 

It could also have the birds of pray and so on, good stuff.

Yeah I read that after I posted the link. Their title was slightly misleading.

On 17/5/2016 at 4:34 AM, trag3dy said:

There's no way a movie like this would fail if the right amount of nudity is used :devil:

  • Like 2
2 hours ago, DocM said:

MayBe Birds of Prey vs Gang of Harleys (Y)

 

9d7416111af42c217ecd8a08a8117165.jpg

I don't know how well known this is for it to work, I think DC would be better off doing Harley and Poison Ivy duo vs birds of pray maybe, and make them a couple like in the comics and win over the LGBT group.

1 hour ago, DocM said:

That's possible too. Or one of her other relationships. Or pursue the storyline of her having a daughter.

The goal for DC should be to expand the universe, so anything that introduces more characters works with me.

  • 2 weeks later...
3 minutes ago, warwagon said:

can't believe this movie still isn't out yet.

Shame,  but all good things come to those who wait, so they say.  If the reviews for this are high it'll make a billion for WB for sure.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!