Recommended Posts

xWhiplash - I was referring to desktop applications - not games.  Games on Steam is an entirely different metric; Steam basically replaced XP as the Lowest Target Platform.  (Further, Steam works on even Windows 10's Technical Preview just fine - I have no problems with games on Steam at all.)  Desktop application support, however, is not the same issue; there, the issue is very much LACK of application software for average users.  Lots of choice there for experts and professionals - for average folks, not so much.

I am referring to software for average people that is not really there on the desktop.  Also, how much IS CS2?  How easy is CS2 for average folks to use?  There IS less average-folks software for the desktop these days - and it's not even Windows desktops alone feeling the lack; it's also on the Apple side of things as well.  That is the bigger problem.

 

What are you talking about?  You CAN use a browser to use Facebook, or twitter, or email, or anything the average people needs.  Why does there HAVE to be dedicated programs for everything?  Their browser will allow them to use social media without having to have several apps.

 

So what does the average person need that they CANNOT do on a desktop through a browser or something else?  What "average programs" are NEEDED on the desktop?

 

The average user uses Office - there is Office 2013 on the desktop.

 

Facebook, twitter, ...?  You have your browser for that.

 

Angry Birds?  It is on Steam.

 

What is SOOOOOO NEEDED for average users that they cannot use on the desktop?  Anything I can do on my iPad I can do on my desktop.  I can use Facebook much more easily.

 

What "apps" is the desktop lacking that make it obsolete/dying?

 

The desktop has MORE choices.  

I could never use a tablet at work for my order entry system or embroidery digitizing software. However, at home, virtually anything I do on the PC i can do on my tablet. Still though, there are things that I undeniably need a desktop for. Using Lightroom, Photoshop, Logic Pro, iTunes, and so on. I don't see any tablets coming close to that kind of productivity in the near future. However, for common use at home like email, web surfing, you tubing, gaming, etc. the tablet is more than sufficient.

Surface disagrees

I never said otherwise.  I'm referring to OTHER uses in terms of software for average folks (photo editing, audio or video editing, etc.).  There used to be desktop-application software for all of it that wasn't overly cumbersome for average folks to use - where is such software today?  If we want more professional photo-editors, audio and video editors, etc., comfortable with the desktop, wouldn't it make a great deal of sense for there to be software FOR the desktop that they can learn and use?  (It's the same issue that software-development faced two decades ago.)

What are you talking about? You CAN use a browser to use Facebook, or twitter, or email, or anything the average people needs. Why does there HAVE to be dedicated programs for everything? Their browser will allow them to use social media without having to have several apps.

So what does the average person need that they CANNOT do on a desktop through a browser or something else? What "average programs" are NEEDED on the desktop?

The average user uses Office - there is Office 2013 on the desktop.

Facebook, twitter, ...? You have your browser for that.

Angry Birds? It is on Steam.

What is SOOOOOO NEEDED for average users that they cannot use on the desktop? Anything I can do on my iPad I can do on my desktop. I can use Facebook much more easily.

What "apps" is the desktop lacking that make it obsolete/dying?

The desktop has MORE choices.

Desktops are limited by mouse input. You really want to play angry birds with a mouse?! Are you kidding?

I never said otherwise.  I'm referring to OTHER uses in terms of software for average folks (photo editing, audio or video editing, etc.).  There used to be desktop-application software for all of it that wasn't overly cumbersome for average folks to use - where is such software today?  If we want more professional photo-editors, audio and video editors, etc., comfortable with the desktop, wouldn't it make a great deal of sense for there to be software FOR the desktop that they can learn and use?  (It's the same issue that software-development faced two decades ago.)

 

Premiere Elements and Photoshop elements are still available.  Pixelmator is available on OS X and it is far cheaper than Photoshop Elements and has much more features.  Audio editing there is Audacity which is free.

 

Desktops are limited by mouse input. You really want to play angry birds with a mouse?! Are you kidding?

 
It is just as easy to play it with a mouse.  Just Click, Drag, and Let Go.  Same if you use your finger.

I was considering making this a thread, since it includes feedback a bit different, but meh

 

I want to defend the Start Menu a little. It is like a bush; it can look and work great, but if you don't maintain it, it just goes wild and sprawls. 95% of the time I fix someone's computer, at work or outside, their start menu is a hideous list of every application having its own cascading menu with stupid shortcuts like "manual" and "uninstall" or "visit our website lulz"... and all of that is justifiably horrible and completely unworkable.

 

HOWEVER, if you do maintain it, it works. In a way, this mirrors the library (Documents etc) concept. In theory, it works, but every program handles it differently, so you end up with 5 subfolders in Documents for game settings. I keep my start menu clean, move every program into its group (Office, Coding, Games, Hardware, etc) and delete the junk links, and it quickly becomes a fast and compact way to access any application. The problem is that this uptake is significant. That said, given that you can quickly pull up an Uninstall list, I don't know why you can't similarly quickly access a list of installed programs, grouped. Many Linux interface designs utilize this concept much better than the Start Menu.

 

At its root, the same problem occurs with the Start Screen; junk links and maintenance to keep things ordered. It just feels like Windows lacks a way to accurately list installed applications.

 

This is a very good point, and ties into why I prefer the Screen so much. Yes, you had to maintain the Menu, right from the beginning, to prevent it from becoming a convoluted mess. But the tools are very inadequate for Menu maintenance - you either have to dig into the menu settings, or deep into the folder structure of your hard drive. It may work, but you have to put far too much work into it IMO to get it work.

 

The Screen is much easier to maintain - everything is alphabetized from the get-go in All Apps with other sort options available. Furthermore after 8,1 nothing is pinned to the Screen by default on installation. Organization is done within the screen itself, pinning/unpinning items and drag & drop. Much easier to play with layouts to find the best one for your needs.

  • Like 2

Desktops are limited by mouse input. You really want to play angry birds with a mouse?! Are you kidding?

 

I played all the way through Angry Birds Starwars on my couch computer with a mouse. It was just fine.

I played all the way through Angry Birds Starwars on my couch computer with a mouse. It was just fine.

 

Agree.  My entire argument was anything that can be done on tablets, can be done on Desktops even for the average user.

 

And like you guys said, the average user does not need all the features from Photoshop CC.  Paint.NET and Photoshop Elements have basically stayed pretty much the same in years.  That does mean desktop programs have "stalled".  It is just they have no need for the professional features.  

  • Like 3

This is a very good point, and ties into why I prefer the Screen so much. Yes, you had to maintain the Menu, right from the beginning, to prevent it from becoming a convoluted mess. But the tools are very inadequate for Menu maintenance - you either have to dig into the menu settings, or deep into the folder structure of your hard drive. It may work, but you have to put far too much work into it IMO to get it work.

 

The Screen is much easier to maintain - everything is alphabetized from the get-go in All Apps with other sort options available. Furthermore after 8,1 nothing is pinned to the Screen by default on installation. Organization is done within the screen itself, pinning/unpinning items and drag & drop. Much easier to play with layouts to find the best one for your needs.

 

The start menu, really, isn't that hard to maintain.  I do love how you and Dot Matrix use the term "deep into..." and "convoluted mess"... kinda of like you two are on a long and arduous quest to find the missing sacred calculator program.

 

The all apps is a mess...way too much mouse travel...looking forward to being able to create folders and pop programs into them...like I'm able to with 7.

  • Like 2

Excuse me but you should read the whole thing before replying. I bet you've been wanting to use that GIF for months.

 

Nope.. you try to run Photoshop on 2gb RAM....  

 

Seems that you have NOT tried it... 

 

Not believe me, install Photoshop (Not Photoshop Express) on PC/tablet with 2gb RAM and see for yourself.

 

It loads up slow as hell. That's why this app requires more RAM to load quick enough for you.

 

Plus AutoCAD is same as Photoshop.  It takes forever to load up unless you have massive RAM in it.

 

 

That's why these apps won't run well on tablets unless you have enough RAM in the tablets...

 

 

I used AutoCAD at work... their desktop computers has lot of RAM because of this app which help you work smoothly and quickly instead of getting the app freeze or slowdowns.

Nope.. you try to run Photoshop on 2gb RAM....  

 

Seems that you have NOT tried it... 

 

Not believe me, install Photoshop (Not Photoshop Express) on PC/tablet with 2gb RAM and see for yourself.

 

It loads up slow as hell. That's why this app requires more RAM to load quick enough for you.

 

Plus AutoCAD is same as Photoshop.  It takes forever to load up unless you have massive RAM in it.

 

 

That's why these apps won't run well on tablets unless you have enough RAM in the tablets...

 

 

I used AutoCAD at work... their desktop computers has lot of RAM because of this app which help you work smoothly and quickly instead of getting the app freeze or slowdowns.

 

Agreed.  The desktop can do pretty much whatever the general user can do.  Tablets can not do what professionals do, especially when you have 32GB of RAM and use it for these kinds of programs.

I have never said otherwise.  (The same argument applies to even laptops and notebooks - they don't have the screen size, or sheer computing power, of desktops, yet they run the same OS and the same software for the most part.)

So, what separates tablets and slates from laptops and notebooks, then?  Basically, the same thing that separates notebooks from desktops - capabilities.

That is, in fact, Microsoft's point - it is ALL about capabilities.  The line is NOT as wide as all too many of us think, and with time, the line gets narrower, and, depending on the hardware, can go away altogether - it certainly is starting to merely between desktops and larger notebooks, and between tablets, slates and smaller notebooks.

I have never said otherwise.  (The same argument applies to even laptops and notebooks - they don't have the screen size, or sheer computing power, of desktops, yet they run the same OS and the same software for the most part.)

So, what separates tablets and slates from laptops and notebooks, then?  Basically, the same thing that separates notebooks from desktops - capabilities.

That is, in fact, Microsoft's point - it is ALL about capabilities.  The line is NOT as wide as all too many of us think, and with time, the line gets narrower, and, depending on the hardware, can go away altogether - it certainly is starting to merely between desktops and larger notebooks, and between tablets, slates and smaller notebooks.

 

You did say desktop development has stalled, which is not true and I explained why in my posts.  Most of the modern / iOS apps can be done in some way on the desktop.  Either through a browser (Facebook, twitter), or with more powerful software (Paint.NET, Pixelmator).

 

In fact, OS X is much better for the general user.  There is iMovie, iPhoto, Pixelmator, Garageband, ...  These are all very easy to use compared to the Windows alternatives.

 

But in no way are these programs "stalled".  Like you said, the general user does not need dozens of advanced features and tools.  Not including them to fit your user base does NOT equal stalled development.

 

Stalled development would mean that they are UNABLE to program new features.  Photoshop CC has some pretty cool features that I like to use on a daily basis.

 

After Effects CC included Cinema 4D Lite which was pretty cool.  Doesn't seem to be stalled to me.

 

Visual Studio is always getting better and better.  It doesn't seem to be stalled to me.

  • Like 2

The StartScreen mostly maintains itself - mini-Start (from 9901 and earlier) does the same thing (understandable, since it's based on it).

 

That is something the current (992x) version does not do yet - and something the original Start menu flat-out lacked.

 

Did I or didn't I refer to Start menu maintenance as "scutwork" and "busywork" all too often?  It's basically something you do during slow periods to avoid goofing off - fun it definitely isn't.

 

And do you ever think that those same OS X applications you named will ever appear on iOS, and if not, WHY not?

 

And the very point you made about all of them certainly applies to Windows - there ARE no Windows desktop equivalents on the desktop.  (There used to be, but all are gone.)

 

Instead, the average user is "making do" with browser-based (or tablet-based) equivalents - how much loyalty is such a user going to have to the desktop, then?

 

The line is indeed blurring between tablets and notebooks - it's all about capabilities.  I'm not implying that it will catch up to the high end - there simply isn't enough physical space to allow that.  However, it CAN catch up to the middle end of even the desktop space (except for display capabilities) - and with docks and other accessories, it can catch up even there.

The StartScreen mostly maintains itself - mini-Start (from 9901 and earlier) does the same thing (understandable, since it's based on it).

 

That is something the current (992x) version does not do yet - and something the original Start menu flat-out lacked.

 

Did I or didn't I refer to Start menu maintenance as "scutwork" and "busywork" all too often?  It's basically something you do during slow periods to avoid goofing off - fun it definitely isn't.

 

And do you ever think that those same OS X applications you named will ever appear on iOS, and if not, WHY not?

 

And the very point you made about all of them certainly applies to Windows - there ARE no Windows desktop equivalents on the desktop.  (There used to be, but all are gone.)

 

Instead, the average user is "making do" with browser-based (or tablet-based) equivalents - how much loyalty is such a user going to have to the desktop, then?

 

The line is indeed blurring between tablets and notebooks - it's all about capabilities.  I'm not implying that it will catch up to the high end - there simply isn't enough physical space to allow that.  However, it CAN catch up to the middle end of even the desktop space (except for display capabilities) - and with docks and other accessories, it can catch up even there.

 

That does not mean that the classic desktop environment is broken or stalled.  Any developer can make a very very very very easy to use photo or video editor on Windows.  It does not HAVE to be a modern app for development to work.  

 

So you are saying the desktop CANNOT have these kinds of programs?  But they can have BETTER programs?  That makes no sense.  Complain to company X for not making program Y more general user friendly.  

 

Paint.NET and Photoshop Elements still exist on Windows.  Photoshop Elements is very general user friendly.

 

No, I don't think iOS will ever get desktop apps that have the EXACT SAME features.  I doubt we will ever see After Effects, or 3DS Max, or Blender, or Premiere Pro on iOS that offer the exact same features.  I do not even think they could offer plug in support due to the nature of the mobile platform and having apps separate.  They would have to open it up like a desktop environment to allow these things.

 

There are no tablets out there that have 32GB of RAM, which my desktop has.

  • Like 2

That does not mean that the classic desktop environment is broken or stalled. Any developer can make a very very very very easy to use photo or video editor on Windows. It does not HAVE to be a modern app for development to work.

So you are saying the desktop CANNOT have these kinds of programs? But they can have BETTER programs? That makes no sense. Complain to company X for not making program Y more general user friendly.

Paint.NET and Photoshop Elements still exist on Windows. Photoshop Elements is very general user friendly.

No, I don't think iOS will ever get desktop apps that have the EXACT SAME features. I doubt we will ever see After Effects, or 3DS Max, or Blender, or Premiere Pro on iOS that offer the exact same features. I do not even think they could offer plug in support due to the nature of the mobile platform and having apps separate. They would have to open it up like a desktop environment to allow these things.

There are no tablets out there that have 32GB of RAM, which my desktop has.

The thing we lose sight of as power users is that managing a desktop is too complex for normal users. Normal users ruin a single application at a time, often full screen. The 'modern' environment, or tablet environment works very well for these users.

Case in point, my father has no problem with his iPhone or iPad, but his desktop on his computer is a complete mess because it requires a concerted effort to keep it tidy. The idea of finding stuff in his start menu is not an intuitive experience for him. He is closer to the norm than I am.

Power users are a very small proportion of computer users these days. Microsoft realises this (their consumer software is for the masses, remember) and Windows is evolving to cater for the masses.

  • Like 3

Exactly.  While I am (by definition) a power user, the folks I support are not.  (And I assume that the "ruin" is a Freudian slip, Fahim?)

 

And I don't want the folks I support to lose sight of what the desktop application is capable of - which is all too likely TO happen if they don't use desktop applications.

 

Besides, experts and professionals retire - who will replace them?

I didn't say that it had to be a Modern app - but it doesn't have to be browser-based, either.

The point I am making is that despite it being so *easy*, by and large is ISN'T being done in terms of desktop software - the question I am asking, naturally, is "why not"?

everyday-user applications are leaving OS X - for iOS.  OS X is becoming an even more "niche" OS than it had been 

Do you have any examples? If anything, I see more and more apps that had been iOS-only also being 'ported' to OS X (and clearly vice versa). But what apps are leaving OS X for iOS?  :huh:

I could never use a tablet at work for my order entry system or embroidery digitizing software. However, at home, virtually anything I do on the PC i can do on my tablet. Still though, there are things that I undeniably need a desktop for. Using Lightroom, Photoshop, Logic Pro, iTunes, and so on. I don't see any tablets coming close to that kind of productivity in the near future. However, for common use at home like email, web surfing, you tubing, gaming, etc. the tablet is more than sufficient.

 

PhotoShop has been upgraded to support touch in one of the major upgrades last fall/early winter, along with several of their other CC apps, Lr has not been upgraded with the new touch support, but is expected in the next update, so yes, for the majority of you PhotoShop stuff you can in fact use a tablet today, and that's with the the full PhotoShop CC version. Lr is even more suited for tablets and once they add the touch support to it you can so all the Lr work on a tablet just fine.

 

as for iTunes, I see no reason why you can't use it or alternatives fully on a tablet, I also don't see why you would use it instead of better alternatives, on windows. but even so you can use it fully on a tablet.

Nope.. you try to run Photoshop on 2gb RAM....  

 

Seems that you have NOT tried it... 

 

Not believe me, install Photoshop (Not Photoshop Express) on PC/tablet with 2gb RAM and see for yourself.

 

It loads up slow as hell. That's why this app requires more RAM to load quick enough for you.

 

Plus AutoCAD is same as Photoshop.  It takes forever to load up unless you have massive RAM in it.

 

 

That's why these apps won't run well on tablets unless you have enough RAM in the tablets...

 

 

I used AutoCAD at work... their desktop computers has lot of RAM because of this app which help you work smoothly and quickly instead of getting the app freeze or slowdowns.

 

well my tablet has 4gb and runs PS CC just fine. hoping the touch update is released for Lr soon as well since i'd love to do my Lr'ing on the tablet at least partly, but the GUI has some quirks currently that don't work with touch.

well my tablet has 4gb and runs PS CC just fine. hoping the touch update is released for Lr soon as well since i'd love to do my Lr'ing on the tablet at least partly, but the GUI has some quirks currently that don't work with touch.

 

Try it with 20+ layers..  not smoothly for 4gb

 

You can not do that heavy work with 20 plus layers... that's the reason you need massive RAM for that.

 

4gb RAM or less is okay for simple users who do the quick work such as crop, add text, etc. That's no problem for a few layers.

 

You have CC version...  I have license version and CC but not on same system though.

 

I don't care about the touch version. I prefer desktop version with a keyboard and mouse.

the touch version IS the desktop version...

 

and it works fine with tons of layers on 4gb. sure a workstation is better, hence "workstation" for some thing a tablet is better though, had I had a SP3binstead of the miix2 I would be mostly using PS on it since it would effectively be a Quinton with touch that you can take everywhere. on screen digitizer is awesome.

 

and seeing as I subscribe to the photographer CC sub, I have the full PS CC version.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
    • Welcome to Neowin! Enjoy your stay!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      272
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!