Recommended Posts

xWhiplash - I was referring to desktop applications - not games.  Games on Steam is an entirely different metric; Steam basically replaced XP as the Lowest Target Platform.  (Further, Steam works on even Windows 10's Technical Preview just fine - I have no problems with games on Steam at all.)  Desktop application support, however, is not the same issue; there, the issue is very much LACK of application software for average users.  Lots of choice there for experts and professionals - for average folks, not so much.

I am referring to software for average people that is not really there on the desktop.  Also, how much IS CS2?  How easy is CS2 for average folks to use?  There IS less average-folks software for the desktop these days - and it's not even Windows desktops alone feeling the lack; it's also on the Apple side of things as well.  That is the bigger problem.

 

What are you talking about?  You CAN use a browser to use Facebook, or twitter, or email, or anything the average people needs.  Why does there HAVE to be dedicated programs for everything?  Their browser will allow them to use social media without having to have several apps.

 

So what does the average person need that they CANNOT do on a desktop through a browser or something else?  What "average programs" are NEEDED on the desktop?

 

The average user uses Office - there is Office 2013 on the desktop.

 

Facebook, twitter, ...?  You have your browser for that.

 

Angry Birds?  It is on Steam.

 

What is SOOOOOO NEEDED for average users that they cannot use on the desktop?  Anything I can do on my iPad I can do on my desktop.  I can use Facebook much more easily.

 

What "apps" is the desktop lacking that make it obsolete/dying?

 

The desktop has MORE choices.  

I could never use a tablet at work for my order entry system or embroidery digitizing software. However, at home, virtually anything I do on the PC i can do on my tablet. Still though, there are things that I undeniably need a desktop for. Using Lightroom, Photoshop, Logic Pro, iTunes, and so on. I don't see any tablets coming close to that kind of productivity in the near future. However, for common use at home like email, web surfing, you tubing, gaming, etc. the tablet is more than sufficient.

Surface disagrees

I never said otherwise.  I'm referring to OTHER uses in terms of software for average folks (photo editing, audio or video editing, etc.).  There used to be desktop-application software for all of it that wasn't overly cumbersome for average folks to use - where is such software today?  If we want more professional photo-editors, audio and video editors, etc., comfortable with the desktop, wouldn't it make a great deal of sense for there to be software FOR the desktop that they can learn and use?  (It's the same issue that software-development faced two decades ago.)

What are you talking about? You CAN use a browser to use Facebook, or twitter, or email, or anything the average people needs. Why does there HAVE to be dedicated programs for everything? Their browser will allow them to use social media without having to have several apps.

So what does the average person need that they CANNOT do on a desktop through a browser or something else? What "average programs" are NEEDED on the desktop?

The average user uses Office - there is Office 2013 on the desktop.

Facebook, twitter, ...? You have your browser for that.

Angry Birds? It is on Steam.

What is SOOOOOO NEEDED for average users that they cannot use on the desktop? Anything I can do on my iPad I can do on my desktop. I can use Facebook much more easily.

What "apps" is the desktop lacking that make it obsolete/dying?

The desktop has MORE choices.

Desktops are limited by mouse input. You really want to play angry birds with a mouse?! Are you kidding?

I never said otherwise.  I'm referring to OTHER uses in terms of software for average folks (photo editing, audio or video editing, etc.).  There used to be desktop-application software for all of it that wasn't overly cumbersome for average folks to use - where is such software today?  If we want more professional photo-editors, audio and video editors, etc., comfortable with the desktop, wouldn't it make a great deal of sense for there to be software FOR the desktop that they can learn and use?  (It's the same issue that software-development faced two decades ago.)

 

Premiere Elements and Photoshop elements are still available.  Pixelmator is available on OS X and it is far cheaper than Photoshop Elements and has much more features.  Audio editing there is Audacity which is free.

 

Desktops are limited by mouse input. You really want to play angry birds with a mouse?! Are you kidding?

 
It is just as easy to play it with a mouse.  Just Click, Drag, and Let Go.  Same if you use your finger.

I was considering making this a thread, since it includes feedback a bit different, but meh

 

I want to defend the Start Menu a little. It is like a bush; it can look and work great, but if you don't maintain it, it just goes wild and sprawls. 95% of the time I fix someone's computer, at work or outside, their start menu is a hideous list of every application having its own cascading menu with stupid shortcuts like "manual" and "uninstall" or "visit our website lulz"... and all of that is justifiably horrible and completely unworkable.

 

HOWEVER, if you do maintain it, it works. In a way, this mirrors the library (Documents etc) concept. In theory, it works, but every program handles it differently, so you end up with 5 subfolders in Documents for game settings. I keep my start menu clean, move every program into its group (Office, Coding, Games, Hardware, etc) and delete the junk links, and it quickly becomes a fast and compact way to access any application. The problem is that this uptake is significant. That said, given that you can quickly pull up an Uninstall list, I don't know why you can't similarly quickly access a list of installed programs, grouped. Many Linux interface designs utilize this concept much better than the Start Menu.

 

At its root, the same problem occurs with the Start Screen; junk links and maintenance to keep things ordered. It just feels like Windows lacks a way to accurately list installed applications.

 

This is a very good point, and ties into why I prefer the Screen so much. Yes, you had to maintain the Menu, right from the beginning, to prevent it from becoming a convoluted mess. But the tools are very inadequate for Menu maintenance - you either have to dig into the menu settings, or deep into the folder structure of your hard drive. It may work, but you have to put far too much work into it IMO to get it work.

 

The Screen is much easier to maintain - everything is alphabetized from the get-go in All Apps with other sort options available. Furthermore after 8,1 nothing is pinned to the Screen by default on installation. Organization is done within the screen itself, pinning/unpinning items and drag & drop. Much easier to play with layouts to find the best one for your needs.

  • Like 2

Desktops are limited by mouse input. You really want to play angry birds with a mouse?! Are you kidding?

 

I played all the way through Angry Birds Starwars on my couch computer with a mouse. It was just fine.

I played all the way through Angry Birds Starwars on my couch computer with a mouse. It was just fine.

 

Agree.  My entire argument was anything that can be done on tablets, can be done on Desktops even for the average user.

 

And like you guys said, the average user does not need all the features from Photoshop CC.  Paint.NET and Photoshop Elements have basically stayed pretty much the same in years.  That does mean desktop programs have "stalled".  It is just they have no need for the professional features.  

  • Like 3

This is a very good point, and ties into why I prefer the Screen so much. Yes, you had to maintain the Menu, right from the beginning, to prevent it from becoming a convoluted mess. But the tools are very inadequate for Menu maintenance - you either have to dig into the menu settings, or deep into the folder structure of your hard drive. It may work, but you have to put far too much work into it IMO to get it work.

 

The Screen is much easier to maintain - everything is alphabetized from the get-go in All Apps with other sort options available. Furthermore after 8,1 nothing is pinned to the Screen by default on installation. Organization is done within the screen itself, pinning/unpinning items and drag & drop. Much easier to play with layouts to find the best one for your needs.

 

The start menu, really, isn't that hard to maintain.  I do love how you and Dot Matrix use the term "deep into..." and "convoluted mess"... kinda of like you two are on a long and arduous quest to find the missing sacred calculator program.

 

The all apps is a mess...way too much mouse travel...looking forward to being able to create folders and pop programs into them...like I'm able to with 7.

  • Like 2

Excuse me but you should read the whole thing before replying. I bet you've been wanting to use that GIF for months.

 

Nope.. you try to run Photoshop on 2gb RAM....  

 

Seems that you have NOT tried it... 

 

Not believe me, install Photoshop (Not Photoshop Express) on PC/tablet with 2gb RAM and see for yourself.

 

It loads up slow as hell. That's why this app requires more RAM to load quick enough for you.

 

Plus AutoCAD is same as Photoshop.  It takes forever to load up unless you have massive RAM in it.

 

 

That's why these apps won't run well on tablets unless you have enough RAM in the tablets...

 

 

I used AutoCAD at work... their desktop computers has lot of RAM because of this app which help you work smoothly and quickly instead of getting the app freeze or slowdowns.

Nope.. you try to run Photoshop on 2gb RAM....  

 

Seems that you have NOT tried it... 

 

Not believe me, install Photoshop (Not Photoshop Express) on PC/tablet with 2gb RAM and see for yourself.

 

It loads up slow as hell. That's why this app requires more RAM to load quick enough for you.

 

Plus AutoCAD is same as Photoshop.  It takes forever to load up unless you have massive RAM in it.

 

 

That's why these apps won't run well on tablets unless you have enough RAM in the tablets...

 

 

I used AutoCAD at work... their desktop computers has lot of RAM because of this app which help you work smoothly and quickly instead of getting the app freeze or slowdowns.

 

Agreed.  The desktop can do pretty much whatever the general user can do.  Tablets can not do what professionals do, especially when you have 32GB of RAM and use it for these kinds of programs.

I have never said otherwise.  (The same argument applies to even laptops and notebooks - they don't have the screen size, or sheer computing power, of desktops, yet they run the same OS and the same software for the most part.)

So, what separates tablets and slates from laptops and notebooks, then?  Basically, the same thing that separates notebooks from desktops - capabilities.

That is, in fact, Microsoft's point - it is ALL about capabilities.  The line is NOT as wide as all too many of us think, and with time, the line gets narrower, and, depending on the hardware, can go away altogether - it certainly is starting to merely between desktops and larger notebooks, and between tablets, slates and smaller notebooks.

I have never said otherwise.  (The same argument applies to even laptops and notebooks - they don't have the screen size, or sheer computing power, of desktops, yet they run the same OS and the same software for the most part.)

So, what separates tablets and slates from laptops and notebooks, then?  Basically, the same thing that separates notebooks from desktops - capabilities.

That is, in fact, Microsoft's point - it is ALL about capabilities.  The line is NOT as wide as all too many of us think, and with time, the line gets narrower, and, depending on the hardware, can go away altogether - it certainly is starting to merely between desktops and larger notebooks, and between tablets, slates and smaller notebooks.

 

You did say desktop development has stalled, which is not true and I explained why in my posts.  Most of the modern / iOS apps can be done in some way on the desktop.  Either through a browser (Facebook, twitter), or with more powerful software (Paint.NET, Pixelmator).

 

In fact, OS X is much better for the general user.  There is iMovie, iPhoto, Pixelmator, Garageband, ...  These are all very easy to use compared to the Windows alternatives.

 

But in no way are these programs "stalled".  Like you said, the general user does not need dozens of advanced features and tools.  Not including them to fit your user base does NOT equal stalled development.

 

Stalled development would mean that they are UNABLE to program new features.  Photoshop CC has some pretty cool features that I like to use on a daily basis.

 

After Effects CC included Cinema 4D Lite which was pretty cool.  Doesn't seem to be stalled to me.

 

Visual Studio is always getting better and better.  It doesn't seem to be stalled to me.

  • Like 2

The StartScreen mostly maintains itself - mini-Start (from 9901 and earlier) does the same thing (understandable, since it's based on it).

 

That is something the current (992x) version does not do yet - and something the original Start menu flat-out lacked.

 

Did I or didn't I refer to Start menu maintenance as "scutwork" and "busywork" all too often?  It's basically something you do during slow periods to avoid goofing off - fun it definitely isn't.

 

And do you ever think that those same OS X applications you named will ever appear on iOS, and if not, WHY not?

 

And the very point you made about all of them certainly applies to Windows - there ARE no Windows desktop equivalents on the desktop.  (There used to be, but all are gone.)

 

Instead, the average user is "making do" with browser-based (or tablet-based) equivalents - how much loyalty is such a user going to have to the desktop, then?

 

The line is indeed blurring between tablets and notebooks - it's all about capabilities.  I'm not implying that it will catch up to the high end - there simply isn't enough physical space to allow that.  However, it CAN catch up to the middle end of even the desktop space (except for display capabilities) - and with docks and other accessories, it can catch up even there.

The StartScreen mostly maintains itself - mini-Start (from 9901 and earlier) does the same thing (understandable, since it's based on it).

 

That is something the current (992x) version does not do yet - and something the original Start menu flat-out lacked.

 

Did I or didn't I refer to Start menu maintenance as "scutwork" and "busywork" all too often?  It's basically something you do during slow periods to avoid goofing off - fun it definitely isn't.

 

And do you ever think that those same OS X applications you named will ever appear on iOS, and if not, WHY not?

 

And the very point you made about all of them certainly applies to Windows - there ARE no Windows desktop equivalents on the desktop.  (There used to be, but all are gone.)

 

Instead, the average user is "making do" with browser-based (or tablet-based) equivalents - how much loyalty is such a user going to have to the desktop, then?

 

The line is indeed blurring between tablets and notebooks - it's all about capabilities.  I'm not implying that it will catch up to the high end - there simply isn't enough physical space to allow that.  However, it CAN catch up to the middle end of even the desktop space (except for display capabilities) - and with docks and other accessories, it can catch up even there.

 

That does not mean that the classic desktop environment is broken or stalled.  Any developer can make a very very very very easy to use photo or video editor on Windows.  It does not HAVE to be a modern app for development to work.  

 

So you are saying the desktop CANNOT have these kinds of programs?  But they can have BETTER programs?  That makes no sense.  Complain to company X for not making program Y more general user friendly.  

 

Paint.NET and Photoshop Elements still exist on Windows.  Photoshop Elements is very general user friendly.

 

No, I don't think iOS will ever get desktop apps that have the EXACT SAME features.  I doubt we will ever see After Effects, or 3DS Max, or Blender, or Premiere Pro on iOS that offer the exact same features.  I do not even think they could offer plug in support due to the nature of the mobile platform and having apps separate.  They would have to open it up like a desktop environment to allow these things.

 

There are no tablets out there that have 32GB of RAM, which my desktop has.

  • Like 2

That does not mean that the classic desktop environment is broken or stalled. Any developer can make a very very very very easy to use photo or video editor on Windows. It does not HAVE to be a modern app for development to work.

So you are saying the desktop CANNOT have these kinds of programs? But they can have BETTER programs? That makes no sense. Complain to company X for not making program Y more general user friendly.

Paint.NET and Photoshop Elements still exist on Windows. Photoshop Elements is very general user friendly.

No, I don't think iOS will ever get desktop apps that have the EXACT SAME features. I doubt we will ever see After Effects, or 3DS Max, or Blender, or Premiere Pro on iOS that offer the exact same features. I do not even think they could offer plug in support due to the nature of the mobile platform and having apps separate. They would have to open it up like a desktop environment to allow these things.

There are no tablets out there that have 32GB of RAM, which my desktop has.

The thing we lose sight of as power users is that managing a desktop is too complex for normal users. Normal users ruin a single application at a time, often full screen. The 'modern' environment, or tablet environment works very well for these users.

Case in point, my father has no problem with his iPhone or iPad, but his desktop on his computer is a complete mess because it requires a concerted effort to keep it tidy. The idea of finding stuff in his start menu is not an intuitive experience for him. He is closer to the norm than I am.

Power users are a very small proportion of computer users these days. Microsoft realises this (their consumer software is for the masses, remember) and Windows is evolving to cater for the masses.

  • Like 3

Exactly.  While I am (by definition) a power user, the folks I support are not.  (And I assume that the "ruin" is a Freudian slip, Fahim?)

 

And I don't want the folks I support to lose sight of what the desktop application is capable of - which is all too likely TO happen if they don't use desktop applications.

 

Besides, experts and professionals retire - who will replace them?

I didn't say that it had to be a Modern app - but it doesn't have to be browser-based, either.

The point I am making is that despite it being so *easy*, by and large is ISN'T being done in terms of desktop software - the question I am asking, naturally, is "why not"?

everyday-user applications are leaving OS X - for iOS.  OS X is becoming an even more "niche" OS than it had been 

Do you have any examples? If anything, I see more and more apps that had been iOS-only also being 'ported' to OS X (and clearly vice versa). But what apps are leaving OS X for iOS?  :huh:

I could never use a tablet at work for my order entry system or embroidery digitizing software. However, at home, virtually anything I do on the PC i can do on my tablet. Still though, there are things that I undeniably need a desktop for. Using Lightroom, Photoshop, Logic Pro, iTunes, and so on. I don't see any tablets coming close to that kind of productivity in the near future. However, for common use at home like email, web surfing, you tubing, gaming, etc. the tablet is more than sufficient.

 

PhotoShop has been upgraded to support touch in one of the major upgrades last fall/early winter, along with several of their other CC apps, Lr has not been upgraded with the new touch support, but is expected in the next update, so yes, for the majority of you PhotoShop stuff you can in fact use a tablet today, and that's with the the full PhotoShop CC version. Lr is even more suited for tablets and once they add the touch support to it you can so all the Lr work on a tablet just fine.

 

as for iTunes, I see no reason why you can't use it or alternatives fully on a tablet, I also don't see why you would use it instead of better alternatives, on windows. but even so you can use it fully on a tablet.

Nope.. you try to run Photoshop on 2gb RAM....  

 

Seems that you have NOT tried it... 

 

Not believe me, install Photoshop (Not Photoshop Express) on PC/tablet with 2gb RAM and see for yourself.

 

It loads up slow as hell. That's why this app requires more RAM to load quick enough for you.

 

Plus AutoCAD is same as Photoshop.  It takes forever to load up unless you have massive RAM in it.

 

 

That's why these apps won't run well on tablets unless you have enough RAM in the tablets...

 

 

I used AutoCAD at work... their desktop computers has lot of RAM because of this app which help you work smoothly and quickly instead of getting the app freeze or slowdowns.

 

well my tablet has 4gb and runs PS CC just fine. hoping the touch update is released for Lr soon as well since i'd love to do my Lr'ing on the tablet at least partly, but the GUI has some quirks currently that don't work with touch.

well my tablet has 4gb and runs PS CC just fine. hoping the touch update is released for Lr soon as well since i'd love to do my Lr'ing on the tablet at least partly, but the GUI has some quirks currently that don't work with touch.

 

Try it with 20+ layers..  not smoothly for 4gb

 

You can not do that heavy work with 20 plus layers... that's the reason you need massive RAM for that.

 

4gb RAM or less is okay for simple users who do the quick work such as crop, add text, etc. That's no problem for a few layers.

 

You have CC version...  I have license version and CC but not on same system though.

 

I don't care about the touch version. I prefer desktop version with a keyboard and mouse.

the touch version IS the desktop version...

 

and it works fine with tons of layers on 4gb. sure a workstation is better, hence "workstation" for some thing a tablet is better though, had I had a SP3binstead of the miix2 I would be mostly using PS on it since it would effectively be a Quinton with touch that you can take everywhere. on screen digitizer is awesome.

 

and seeing as I subscribe to the photographer CC sub, I have the full PS CC version.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!