Recommended Posts

It's not like Windows suddenly broke guys. Maybe it got uglier for some people, sure, but nobody's ignoring the desktop. The desktop is still there, and will still be the stage upon which Windows 10 launches apps.

For the people who actually make a living off Windows (like myself), you'll see how small and insignificant half of the issues in this post are.

 

As I've always said, Enterprise is where the magic is. Home computing is as boring as bat ######. 

no. Windows XP through 7 had a place for a user to install total themes like i posted earlier. or.. if you wanted to just change to a set of new icons, download the icon pack, install and icons would be placed into the correct folder for icons and you would reboot, and change to the icons you liked. some people made fantastic icons.. microsoft could have learned a thing or two from some of those icon/theme developers. many were talented

 

or install a complete theme all together for:

 

Lotsabloo_HvD.jpg

this for some reason makes me want to vomit lol this reminds me of litestep back in windows 98

no. Windows XP through 7 had a place for a user to install total themes like i posted earlier. or.. if you wanted to just change to a set of new icons, download the icon pack, install and icons would be placed into the correct folder for icons and you would reboot, and change to the icons you liked. some people made fantastic icons.. microsoft could have learned a thing or two from some of those icon/theme developers. many were talented

 

or install a complete theme all together for:

Windows XP needed more work than "installing icons or themes" to run unsigned shell themes. The fact that the XP file system was so easily accessible, quickly became its greatest weakness. Personally, I'm glad Microsoft is moving away from the legacy shell. It's time for something new.

  • Like 3

Exactly, the desktop needs to remain usable by desktop users - which is why Metro with its tiles needs to be flushed down the toilet at least on the desktop, because it's a usability nightmare for desktop users.

 

As a desktop user, no they're not and no they don't. Stop confusing your personal opinion with fact.

You really expect me to take that marketing babble for full? If there was any truth in that, they would've limited their feature removal spree to internal builds, instead of publicly distributing it a preview. But no, they're proudly showing it off: "Look at our new Windows Light, now with even less features! Isn't that great?"

I'm not believing anything of that until I actually see it implemented in an actual, downloadable build.

 

The problem is that the only reason he wants it is due to aesthetics.

...

Do you really think this ridiculous attempt at talking everything down will get you Metro apologists anywhere?

No, the primary reason that speaks against Metro is that it's a usability nightmare on the desktop. This is no surprising, as Metro was only ever intended to be used on touch devices like Windows Phone, for which it was designed. When Windows Phone sales were horribly bad due to Metro (which still hasn't changed, WP share is still at ridiculously low 3% and even declined), they decided to put Metro on the desktop, throwing all desktop users in front of the bus by forcing them to use a touch UI, without alternatives.

This understandably didn't go well for them. Them January 2015 numbers just came out (January 2015 Usage), and even years after its release, adoption rates are ridculously low, only 10% for Windows 8.1 and 3% for 8.0. (Usage numbers for XP are still 19%, for comparison). People simply didn't like an usability nightmare like Metro forced upon them.

 

That Metro is an aesthetical nightmare as well is also true, but it appears only on the sidelines and is totally overshadowed by the usability nightmare of Metro on the desktop.

 

The latest build is not CP, it still Technical Preview...... It's obvious they doing the beta different from windows 8, So ya this throws your last argument out the window.

In your dreams only. I doesn't matter what they call the preview. It's a fact that they choose to show a crippled start menu with many features removed in a publicly distributed preview, rather than in an internal build. They definitely will have their reasons for doing the removal of features publicly - which is most likely that they don't intend to put them back again.

he'll probably ignore that quote again for the 11tg time....

 

 

You really expect me to take that marketing babble for full? If there was any truth in that, they would've limited their feature removal spree to internal builds, instead of publicly distributing it a preview. But no, they're proudly showing it off: "Look at our new Windows Light, now with even less features! Isn't that great?"

I'm not believing anything of that until I actually see it implemented in an actual, downloadable build.

 

Do you really think this ridiculous attempt at talking everything down will get you Metro apologists anywhere?

No, the primary reason that speaks against Metro is that it's a usability nightmare on the desktop. This is no surprising, as Metro was only ever intended to be used on touch devices like Windows Phone, for which it was designed. When Windows Phone sales were horribly bad due to Metro (which still hasn't changed, WP share is still at ridiculously low 3% and even declined), they decided to put Metro on the desktop, throwing all desktop users in front of the bus by forcing them to use a touch UI, without alternatives.

This understandably didn't go well for them. Them January 2015 numbers just came out (January 2015 Usage), and even years after its release, adoption rates are ridculously low, only 10% for Windows 8.1 and 3% for 8.0. (Usage numbers for XP are still 19%, for comparison). People simply didn't like an usability nightmare like Metro forced upon them.

 

That Metro is an aesthetical nightmare as well is also true, but it appears only on the sidelines and is totally overshadowed by the usability nightmare of Metro on the desktop.

 

In your dreams only. I doesn't matter what they call the preview. It's a fact that they choose to show a crippled start menu with many features removed in a publicly distributed preview, rather than in an internal build. They definitely will have their reasons for doing the removal of features publicly - which is most likely that they don't intend to put them back again.

 

Sometimes it's like I'm clairvoyant...

  • Like 6

You really expect me to take that marketing babble for full? If there was any truth in that, they would've limited their feature removal spree to internal builds, instead of publicly distributing it a preview. But no, they're proudly showing it off: "Look at our new Windows Light, now with even less features! Isn't that great?"

I'm not believing anything of that until I actually see it implemented in an actual, downloadable build.

 

Do you really think this ridiculous attempt at talking everything down will get you Metro apologists anywhere?

No, the primary reason that speaks against Metro is that it's a usability nightmare on the desktop. This is no surprising, as Metro was only ever intended to be used on touch devices like Windows Phone, for which it was designed. When Windows Phone sales were horribly bad due to Metro (which still hasn't changed, WP share is still at ridiculously low 3% and even declined), they decided to put Metro on the desktop, throwing all desktop users in front of the bus by forcing them to use a touch UI, without alternatives.

This understandably didn't go well for them. Them January 2015 numbers just came out (January 2015 Usage), and even years after its release, adoption rates are ridculously low, only 10% for Windows 8.1 and 3% for 8.0. (Usage numbers for XP are still 19%, for comparison). People simply didn't like an usability nightmare like Metro forced upon them.

 

That Metro is an aesthetical nightmare as well is also true, but it appears only on the sidelines and is totally overshadowed by the usability nightmare of Metro on the desktop.

 

In your dreams only. I doesn't matter what they call the preview. It's a fact that they choose to show a crippled start menu with many features removed in a publicly distributed preview, rather than in an internal build. They definitely will have their reasons for doing the removal of features publicly - which is most likely that they don't intend to put them back again.

 

You don't know what you are talking about...

 

MS has some time to finish it up before final release... They could put them back or adjust whatever it needs based on the feedback they received.  

 

So stop yapping until the final release and see if you find the features you like in it. If not, too bad and move on.

Make sure you bookmark this so that when all the features come back you can rub it in his face. 

 

Careful, this can go both sides. If they don't put back all of the features, I'll rub it in your face :p

You really expect me to take that marketing babble for full? If there was any truth in that, they would've limited their feature removal spree to internal builds, instead of publicly distributing it a preview. But no, they're proudly showing it off: "Look at our new Windows Light, now with even less features! Isn't that great?"

Do you see the absurdity in your post? The very fact that the developers didn't limit their "feature removal spree" with a public release strongly suggests that they intend to reinstate the features at a later date. They have already announced publicly that this is their intention. If the developers truly desired to permanently remove the features, they could have (and should have) done so in a build that wouldn't receive as much publicity, so as not to put the company under a microscope.

Get your facts right buddy, Before posting...Wrong info is wrong info. 

 

Ignoring the facts and parroting the same thing over and over. I guess that's your M.O.

 

You really expect me to take that marketing babble for full? If there was any truth in that, they would've limited their feature removal spree to internal builds, instead of publicly distributing it a preview. But no, they're proudly showing it off: "Look at our new Windows Light, now with even less features! Isn't that great?"

I'm not believing anything of that until I actually see it implemented in an actual, downloadable build.
 


Do you really think this ridiculous attempt at talking everything down will get you Metro apologists anywhere?

No, the primary reason that speaks against Metro is that it's a usability nightmare on the desktop. This is no surprising, as Metro was only ever intended to be used on touch devices like Windows Phone, for which it was designed. When Windows Phone sales were horribly bad due to Metro (which still hasn't changed, WP share is still at ridiculously low 3% and even declined), they decided to put Metro on the desktop, throwing all desktop users in front of the bus by forcing them to use a touch UI, without alternatives.

This understandably didn't go well for them. Them January 2015 numbers just came out (January 2015 Usage), and even years after its release, adoption rates are ridculously low, only 10% for Windows 8.1 and 3% for 8.0. (Usage numbers for XP are still 19%, for comparison). People simply didn't like an usability nightmare like Metro forced upon them.
 
That Metro is an aesthetical nightmare as well is also true, but it appears only on the sidelines and is totally overshadowed by the usability nightmare of Metro on the desktop.
 


In your dreams only. I doesn't matter what they call the preview. It's a fact that they choose to show a crippled start menu with many features removed in a publicly distributed preview, rather than in an internal build. They definitely will have their reasons for doing the removal of features publicly - which is most likely that they don't intend to put them back again.

this for some reason makes me want to vomit lol this reminds me of litestep back in windows 98

I can't find the op. That is pretty cool. Are those object desktop apps that do those themes? Certainly more attractive than the drab single color flat appearance of a Windows 10.

The guts of Windows are stil the same and no attempt has been made AFAICT to fix them.

 

Let's take the screen resolution as one example - 

 

- there is still no per-monitor dpi support, a very basic requirement. Instead there's the very confusing screen resolution 'apply to all monitors' nonsense.

- when I make text bigger/smaller, why the hell do I need to sign out and login again?

- why do we still have 2 menus for 'screen resolution' and 'personalize'. Why can't we have a sane 'Display Prefs' dialog box. Why haven't any of the settings screen been updated?

 

Also, mixing Metro style dialogs in the regular UI (like file picker, network dialog) was a usability nightmare and frankly shoddy work with no design, its as if they just gave up. There is no sign of that getting fixed in Win 10 either.

 

And I really like how people are saying 'no issues, everything runs' as a positive now ?!!! Of course everything is going to run, there's hardly anything new in the underlying OS. If stuff breaks, that's a cause for concern, like 9879 and the explorer.exe crashes. But there's no reason to celebrate that the current build is stable when it cuts so many features. 

 

I mean, are we at the stage where we are happy for minor things like new icons?!

  • Like 1

The guts of Windows are stil the same and no attempt has been made AFAICT to fix them.

 

Let's take the screen resolution as one example - 

 

- there is still no per-monitor dpi support, a very basic requirement. Instead there's the very confusing screen resolution 'apply to all monitors' nonsense.

- when I make text bigger/smaller, why the hell do I need to sign out and login again?

- why do we still have 2 menus for 'screen resolution' and 'personalize'. Why can't we have a sane 'Display Prefs' dialog box. Why haven't any of the settings screen been updated?

 

Also, mixing Metro style dialogs in the regular UI (like file picker, network dialog) was a usability nightmare and frankly shoddy work with no design, its as if they just gave up. There is no sign of that getting fixed in Win 10 either.

 

And I really like how people are saying 'no issues, everything runs' as a positive now ?!!! Of course everything is going to run, there's hardly anything new in the underlying OS. If stuff breaks, that's a cause for concern, like 9879 and the explorer.exe crashes. But there's no reason to celebrate that the current build is stable when it cuts so many features. 

 

I mean, are we at the stage where we are happy for minor things like new icons?!

Oh none of that is important, as has been made abundantly clear by some in this thread. 

 

The only thing that matters is getting rid of metro and tiles. 

 

Remember, tiles are so utterly revolting that some poor people become physically ill at the sight of them, resolution scaling be damned.  

 

 

On your last few points:

- What is this metro file picker UI in the regular desktop?

 

- Personalise and screen resolution are fairly intuitive groupings IMO. I don't really see a problem. What I'd much rather see is a 'Display Preferences' that controls resolution, colour calibration and other relevant things in one location. 

(On the topic of colour calibration - now that is a usability nightmare. Applying .icc colour profiles is a stupidly convoluted process. That sort of thing is hopefully fixed in the new control panel)

  • Like 3

Oh none of that is important, as has been made abundantly clear by some in this thread. 

 

The only thing that matters is getting rid of metro and tiles. 

 

Remember, tiles are so utterly revolting that some poor people become physically ill at the sight of them, resolution scaling be damned.  

 

 

On your last few points:

- What is this metro file picker UI in the regular desktop?

 

- Personalise and screen resolution are fairly intuitive groupings IMO. I don't really see a problem. What I'd much rather see is a 'Display Preferences' that controls resolution, colour calibration and other relevant things in one location. 

(On the topic of colour calibration - now that is a usability nightmare. Applying .icc colour profiles is a stupidly convoluted process. That sort of thing is hopefully fixed in the new control panel)

 

The Windows team writes huge blog posts on things like better scaling and 4K support in Windows, yet they still haven't implemented per monitor dpi and I doubt they ever will.

 

The file picker is e.g. when you select 'open with' for a file in Explorer and 'choose default program'. A Metro dialog box then comes up. It is all very weird.

The Windows team writes huge blog posts on things like better scaling and 4K support in Windows, yet they still haven't implemented per monitor dpi and I doubt they ever will.

 

The file picker is e.g. when you select 'open with' for a file in Explorer and 'choose default program'. A Metro dialog box then comes up. It is all very weird.

 

Oh that dialogue box  :rofl:

The Windows team writes huge blog posts on things like better scaling and 4K support in Windows, yet they still haven't implemented per monitor dpi and I doubt they ever will.

 

The file picker is e.g. when you select 'open with' for a file in Explorer and 'choose default program'. A Metro dialog box then comes up. It is all very weird.

That doesn't happen when using Chrome or any other program on my end, Defcon. I think it's just you. And Defcon, could you please fill in your profile and get a profile picture? Your profile looks dull when it's not filled in. So, could you please upload a profile picture and fill in your profile?

That doesn't happen when using Chrome or any other program on my end, Defcon. I think it's just you. And Defcon, could you please fill in your profile and get a profile picture? Your profile looks dull when it's not filled in. So, could you please upload a profile picture and fill in your profile?

Click on any file without a program associated with it (ie rename a notepad file from *.txt to *.randomextension) and you'll get the modern UI dialog. 

 

Are you going to lecture me about not having a filled out profile or are you just weird to defcon? 

The guts of Windows are stil the same and no attempt has been made AFAICT to fix them.

 

Let's take the screen resolution as one example - 

 

- there is still no per-monitor dpi support, a very basic requirement. Instead there's the very confusing screen resolution 'apply to all monitors' nonsense.

- when I make text bigger/smaller, why the hell do I need to sign out and login again?

- why do we still have 2 menus for 'screen resolution' and 'personalize'. Why can't we have a sane 'Display Prefs' dialog box. Why haven't any of the settings screen been updated?

 

Also, mixing Metro style dialogs in the regular UI (like file picker, network dialog) was a usability nightmare and frankly shoddy work with no design, its as if they just gave up. There is no sign of that getting fixed in Win 10 either.

 

And I really like how people are saying 'no issues, everything runs' as a positive now ?!!! Of course everything is going to run, there's hardly anything new in the underlying OS. If stuff breaks, that's a cause for concern, like 9879 and the explorer.exe crashes. But there's no reason to celebrate that the current build is stable when it cuts so many features. 

 

I mean, are we at the stage where we are happy for minor things like new icons?!

Because - at a minimum - everything that ran in the old version HAS to run in the new version?

 

If application breakage occurs between versions of an OS, that is a minus - period.  (Was it not true that the Windows 7 Consumer Preview was whacked - properly - for exactly that?  Was it not the case that the Windows 8 DEVELOPER Preview was whacked due to a mere TWO applications breaking?  And both sets of whackage happened right here on Neowin.)  In the case of 10's Technical Previews (the ones released to the Insiders) that hasn't happened.  One the gaming side, the issue is with one set of games with a common feature (all from the same developer/publisher) - on the application side, there has been zero application breakage at all.  In short, not merely a better score than the preceding OS at the same stage of development, but the best in terms of ANY Windows OS at this stage of development.

 

The fact that we (as testers) are reduced to aesthetic nitpicks is saying that Microsoft got a lot RIGHT as far as the nuts and bolts (and screws and washers) of Windows 10's construction.  (And this was supposed to be impossible.)  What worries the critics is that same issue - they can't complain that desktop-application performance is ANY worse, because, unfortunately for them, it isn't.

The absolute BEST those same critics can hope for is that Microsoft screws up in the aesthetics department, because the underlying construction is not merely as good as Windows 8.1, but even somewhat better.  (In short, we aren't talking chicken eggs on the face, but turkey eggs - or even ostrich or emu eggs (if they weren't already extinct, we'd be talking pterydacto eggs); that is a LOT of egg salad, folks.)

 

In other words, it's major face-saving time for the critics.

siah1214, on 03 Feb 2015 - 02:04, said:

Click on any file without a program associated with it (ie rename a notepad file from *.txt to *.randomextension) and you'll get the modern UI dialog. 

 

Are you going to lecture me about not having a filled out profile or are you just weird to defcon? 

yeah it happens and it's really really annoying. not nearly as annoying as the "network panel" though...it really bugs me thet they havent patched these out but I doubt they ever will now

Click on any file without a program associated with it (ie rename a notepad file from *.txt to *.randomextension) and you'll get the modern UI dialog. 

 

Are you going to lecture me about not having a filled out profile or are you just weird to defcon? 

care to explain why it is annoying? It's not annoying for me, unless it's close itself when I click anywhere

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!