Recommended Posts

So a 50% bad/no go systemic fault. Nope, that's not a design flaw at all.

 

(So here's what happened, class. Turn to page 12 of your Fluid Dynamics books. ?)

 

Any open-loop system that will be doing resistive work which also contains a sublimate (<89% liquid-state) or stable (>90% liquid-state) fluid under pressure must be designed to account for any expelling shock that is exerted in that system if rapid decompression of that high-pressure fluid is anticipated to occur. If not, safeguards should either be a first order priority to eliminate unintended expelling shocks OR that system should immediately be converted to a closed loop to prevent leakage or explosive decompression that could result in destruction of equipment, facilities, and/or personnel.

 

In layman's terms: Boeing's Engineers (or the Suppliers) forgot that they were dealing with sublimate superfluids under extreme pressures. Their new RCS valves could NOT resist the pressures in the lines holding the hydrazine fuel, so those valves leaked that crap all over the place. Soon as they primed 'em it was all over. 50% systemic failure rate. The valves were moved out of their "install position" and into the "in-use/closed" position, but they couldn't cope with the pressure completely. The "surge pressure" (aka the expelling shock force) did it's deed. Sputtering like an overfilled coffee maker.

 

Everyone knows what the expelling shock force with fluids is. Ever used a garden hose with one of the "gun-style" attachments on the end, then sprayed the water? The sensation of the hose moving backwards is expelling shock force. "Surge pressure". That same force also makes the length of the hose appear to "jump".

 

Now do it at a Car Wash with one of THOSE hoses. Strong, isn't it? Those hoses jump way more. That's another example of expelling shock force.

 

NOW imagine internal valves trying to hold back a few hundred (or more) PSI. That's gonna be one hell of a jolt. RCS Valves need to be able to close the same way EVERY TIME to hold that back or things go very, very badly. Those fuel lines need to be able to take that PLUS the expelling shock force (and remember that sublimates can reliquify as they are expelled too, increasing their volume inside a space) ... you get the idea now.

 

Problem I have with it is that this is a basic thing with Fluid Dynamics. Those Engineers simply designed a [crappy] RCS Valve. Did they seriously forget basic Fluid Dynamics, or do they not CARE?!

 

Nope. I'm calling B.S. on that RIGHT now. There's NO way that simply changing the start position on those valves is going to solve this problem.

 

No forking WAY NASA should allow this to simply pass.

  • Like 2

Leaked (?) ISS schedule shows both Crew Dragon and Starliner.

 

Uncrewed: December 2018
Crewed: May-June 2019

 

Thus preserving the illusion of a horse race.

 

Crews

 

Crew Dragon Operational Mission 1: Sunita Williams, Eric Boe

 

Starliner Crew Flight Test: Doug Hurley, Behnken, and Boeing test pilot Christopher Ferguson 

 

Note the first Crew Dragon with a crew is labeled OM-1 (Operational Mission 1) and not DM-2 (Demo Mission 2) (!!), while Starliner's mission is still CFT (Crewed Flight Test.) This sort-of indicates Crew Dragon will be certified first.

 

Turning a crewed test flight into an operational mission had been discussed several months ago, but it was to be Starliner and not Crew Dragon.

 

 

 

Edited by DocM
  • Thanks 1

Better dates from NASA

 

https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2018/08/02/nasas-commercial-crew-program-target-test-flight-dates-3/

 

Targeted Test Flight Dates

 

Boeing OFT (uncrewed): late 2018/early 2019
Boeing CFT (crewed): mid-2019

 

SpaceX DM-1 (uncrewed): November 2018
SpaceX DM-2 (crewed): April 2019

 

Barring anything unforseen, it looks like SpaceX gets the US flag and Shuttle model trophies left by the last Shuttle crew for its first successor.

 

763486116_CommercialCrew1stflag-800.thumb.jpg.71f3dfd8fb260f65dcfcbfbada2554e8.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Whoa....

 

While the dates above are posted at the top of the page, all Boeing Starliner mission info has been removed from NASA's 'Launches and Landings' list.

 

Nothing there but SpaceX Crew Dragon DM-1 & DM-2, ISS Expeditions and science launches.

 

https://www.nasa.gov/launchschedule/

  • Sad 1

Ruh-roh ... 

 

'whelp. I wouldn't be surprised if Starliner got canned and they're going all in with Orion JUST to give it an actual mission set.

 

Between the RCS Valves/plumbing problem, the Atlas V "black zones" issue (that still isn't sorted), the Abort Engines thing that'd likely detonate the upper stage of the Atlas upon use (and crush the capsule from below), and the lack of info from the Russians on the RD-180 data to get it human-rated ...

 

... Starliner's a "no-go".

 

Betcha. :no: 

PCM = Post Certification Mission

 

Crew Dragon DM-2: Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken

 

Crew Dragon PCM-1: Victor Glover and Mike Hopkins

 

Starliner CFT: Eric Boe, Nicole Aunapu Mann, Chris Ferguson (Boeing test pilot)

 

Starliner PCM-1: Josh Cassada and Sunita "Suni"  Williams

 

1533312012876.jpg?ve=1&tl=1&text=big-top

 

 

 

Edited by DocM

From the AMA

 

Quote

 

hristinaremter  USA:  is there a bathroom on the new commercial flights? dragon and starliner crew


NASA: For Dragon, yes. -Bob

 

 

Quote

 

rhoracio: big congratulations to you all!  Q: would you please explain does SpaceX'es helmet visor open?


NASA: The visor does open. We normally have it open on our way to the pad, but closed for launch and for entry. -Bob

 

NASA: Yes. There's two push buttons about where your chin is. They allow it to pop open whenever you need it to. - Doug

 


1361793097_SpaceX_visor(1).thumb.jpg.a392d75646f2b6ff471a3c72e2657a27.jpg

 

1ED24D5E-F1CA-448F-A9B9-D3ADD5D78515.thumb.jpeg.a68872b6e265856316bc359f57fab605.jpeg

 

post-10859-0-69828800-1533341300.jpeg

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...

Simulator, and a closeup. In the low center there's a T handle for manual SuperDraco aborts - pull & twist. On an arm rest is a keypad.

 

The suit's umbilical connects to a port on the right thigh. No tangle of plumbing.

 

control1.thumb.jpg.55d00d03830be8c75a06f6074f379735.jpg

 

Crew_Dragon_control.thumb.jpg.648298a79a2339fc6558922ee1a4e66f.jpg

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!