Recommended Posts

This is just bonkers...can"t beleive that I'm even posting this...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NASA has officially ticked me off.

  • Like 1

It wasn't that big of a deal, in of itself ... but to the sensitivities of the "power players" it was a big deal. Appearances are everything and Elon sometimes forgets that.

 

Not even being the Devil's Advocate -- I'm a supporter of SpaceX and Elon Musk, and I agree that this is B.S. of the highest order and that this whole thing has been completely blown out of proportion -- just stating things as I perceive them.

 

Remember the thing about anything and everything OldSpace can possibly do to paint SpaceX (and Elon Musk, by inference) in a negative light they'll do it and go all in on it; the "dirty tricks, underhandedness and sabotage"?? I believe that applies now.

 

So what we've got here is probably the meeting of those two things. Elon forgetting about perceptions and doing something ill-advised; and the demonic (no other word FOR it) levels of underhandedness that OldSpace will resort to in gaslighting a situation into something way more than it actually is if it serves their interests.

 

/sigh ...

 

This probably won't end well.

  • Like 2

Mean while up in Canada....."and the problem is?"   even California, where it took place....at the end of the show, only tried it once prior and did not inhale.....NASA needs to grow a set. That "thinking" is not acceptable in today's world.

 

  • Like 1

Here are a few articles...

 

NASA concerned about culture of “inappropriateness” at SpaceX

https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/11/nasa-plans-invasive-review-of-spacex-after-musk-smoked-weed/

 

NASA will review workplace safety at SpaceX and Boeing because Elon Musk smoked marijuana

https://www.theverge.com/2018/11/20/18105149/nasa-spacex-boeing-elon-musk-marijuana-safety-commercial-crew?utm_campaign=theverge&utm_content=chorus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

 

NASA to launch safety review of SpaceX and Boeing after video of Elon Musk smoking pot rankled agency leaders

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2018/11/20/nasa-launch-safety-review-spacex-boeing-after-video-elon-musk-smoking-pot-rankled-agency-leaders/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e51870030a57

 

NASA reviews safety at SpaceX and Boeing after Elon Musk smokes pot on video

https://www.geekwire.com/2018/nasa-orders-safety-review-spacex-boeing-elon-musk-smokes-pot-video/

 

comments speak for themselves....

 

along with this...

Tesla’s Elon Musk hailed by astrophysicist: ‘He will transform civilization as we know it’

https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-elon-musk-neil-degrasse-tyson-he-will-transform-civilization/

 

NASA will have repercussions due to this...make no mistake.

  • Like 1

Let me guess....rocket mafia... and Shelby has to be involved in this as it has his M.O. all over it.

 

 

There are a lot of unhappy people over this "situation" and the NASA administrator just got thrown under the bus...with the deputy looking pretty good in this one.

  • Like 2

An NSF top poster reports it was Sen. Richard Shelby, who went ballistic after  NASA's Stephen Jurczyk commented about  retiring SLS in favor of BFR and New Glenn. 

 

https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=46837.msg1878938#msg1878938

 

  • Like 1

Of course OldSpace's political support is butthurt over some actual good decision-making.

 

Yeah, it's a helluva lot of money that won't be paid out from the continued supply, logistics & mfg chains if that work is stopped ... but the climate of political retribution simply because someone is doing something better sends the wrong message entirely and is a terrible precedent.

 

:no: Corruption. That's the only thing this can be called. There's NOBODY that will take these pricks to task over it. Messing with OldSpace (including their political support base) IS messing with the Military/Industrial base as well -- and nobody, NOBODY will do it. You can't separate the two. They really answer to no one.

 

/sigh ...

 

This precedent leads down a really unfortunate road, and it makes me sad.

 

We're forked.

OTOH,

 

https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2018/11/21/nasas-commercial-crew-program-target-test-flight-dates-5/

 


NASAs Commercial Crew Program Target Test Flight Dates

Marie Lewis Posted on November 21, 2018

The next generation of American spacecraft and rockets that will launch astronauts to the International Space Station are nearing the final stages of development and evaluation. NASAs Commercial Crew Program will return human spaceflight launches to U.S. soil, providing safe, reliable and cost-effective access to low-Earth orbit on systems that meet our safety and mission requirements.

To meet NASAs requirements, the commercial providers must demonstrate that their systems are ready to begin regular flights to the space station. Two of those demonstrations are uncrewed flight tests, known as Orbital Flight Test for Boeing, and Demo-1 for SpaceX. After the uncrewed flight tests, both companies will carry out spacecraft abort tests to demonstrate their crew escape capability during an actual on-pad, or ascent emergency. The final test flights for each company will be crew flight tests to the space station prior to being certified by NASA for crew rotation missions. The following target dates reflect the current schedule as of Tuesday, Nov. 20.

Test Flight Planning Dates:

Boeing Orbital Flight Test (uncrewed): March 2019

Boeing Pad Abort Test: Between OFT and CFT

Boeing Crew Flight Test (crewed): August 2019

SpaceX Demo-1 (uncrewed): January 7, 2019

SpaceX In-Flight Abort Test: Between Demo-1 and Demo-2

SpaceX Demo-2 (crewed): June 2019

SpaceX also completed a pad abort test in 2015. Following the test flights, NASA will review the performance data and resolve issues as necessary to certify the systems for operational missions.  Boeing, SpaceX and the Commercial Crew Program are actively working to be ready for the operational missions; however, as with all human spaceflight development, learning from each test and adjusting as necessary to reduce risk to the crew may override planning dates.

Anticipated Readiness Dates for Operational Missions:
First operational mission: August 2019
Second operational mission: December 2019

  • Like 1
2 hours ago, Unobscured Vision said:

Of course OldSpace's political support is butthurt over some actual good decision-making.

 

Yeah, it's a helluva lot of money that won't be paid out from the continued supply, logistics & mfg chains if that work is stopped ... but the climate of political retribution simply because someone is doing something better sends the wrong message entirely and is a terrible precedent.

 

:no: Corruption. That's the only thing this can be called. There's NOBODY that will take these pricks to task over it. Messing with OldSpace (including their political support base) IS messing with the Military/Industrial base as well -- and nobody, NOBODY will do it. You can't separate the two. They really answer to no one.

 

/sigh ...

 

This precedent leads down a really unfortunate road, and it makes me sad.

 

We're forked.

I don't think we're forked.  NASA would be stupid to give up on SpaceX over this (although it is part of the Government, and stupid seems to be what government is good at).  Elon Musk will get his funding from NASA or somewhere else.  I don't see them being able to stop Elon at this point if they wanted to.  Too many of us are on board with SpaceX.  Too many other companies see $$$$$ when they see what Elon's plans are.  I'd love to see SpaceX schedule their own launch and send Dragon up to do some of their own testing instead of waiting on NASA.  Send up a big middle finger to them - "We'll do it with or without you!".

 

Emotions are telling me SpaceX/Musk should go nuclear on Shelby and Boeing.  Call em out, make em look like fools.

 

That all said, this all could have been avoided pretty easily.  Don't do stupid things on camera.  Don't say stupid things on twitter.

9 hours ago, bguy_1986 said:

I don't think we're forked.  NASA would be stupid to give up on SpaceX over this (although it is part of the Government, and stupid seems to be what government is good at).  Elon Musk will get his funding from NASA or somewhere else.  I don't see them being able to stop Elon at this point if they wanted to.  Too many of us are on board with SpaceX.  Too many other companies see $$$$$ when they see what Elon's plans are.  I'd love to see SpaceX schedule their own launch and send Dragon up to do some of their own testing instead of waiting on NASA.  Send up a big middle finger to them - "We'll do it with or without you!".

That's simply not possible.

 

NASA (and by default, the US Government) holds all of the cards regarding the underlying IP and patents on the Merlin engines. Sure, they're a long, long way from what they were -- the LEM descent engine design -- but it could be argued that the Government still technically has ownership of that IP and SpaceX is a licensee of that technology no matter how evolved it is from the original. SpaceX would be prevented from using the Merlin engines.

 

If in the extremely unlikely event that SpaceX were to "pack up" and move operations & hardware outside of the United States they would find themselves targeted by elements and assets that are extremely good at what they do. Depending on which jurisdiction they moved to, of course. It's unlikely SpaceX could even do business with anyone after such a move -- their liquid assets frozen, no trained workforce to assemble new rockets, and so forth ... no. Just, no. It wouldn't work. It couldn't work.

 

9 hours ago, bguy_1986 said:

Emotions are telling me SpaceX/Musk should go nuclear on Shelby and Boeing.  Call em out, make em look like fools.

Won't work. Too much political strength to make something like that happen currently.

9 hours ago, bguy_1986 said:

That all said, this all could have been avoided pretty easily.  Don't do stupid things on camera.  Don't say stupid things on twitter.

True, to a point -- ill-advised activities lead to consequences, I agree completely. But Elon is Elon and does things "the Elon way", and is unlikely to change for anyone or anything. I'm not Elon so I can't speak for him, but I think that this is going to blow over --- this particular incident anyway. What I'm concerned about are the precedents that this matter is setting. It gives politicians free reign to persecute for no reason and cannot be allowed to occur.

  • Like 1

One quibble:

 

the IP developed under the COTS, Commercial Cargo and Commercial Crew programs Space Act Agreements (SAA) is largely retained by the companies.

 

https://www.nasa.gov/commercial-orbital-transportation-services-cots/

 

Quote

The funded SAAs thus allowed for commercial partners to broadly retain intellectual property rights, another incentive for them.

 

Few exceptions. 

 

Merlin was being developed by Tom Mueller in his garage when Elon Musk took a look, then offered him the VP of Propulsion job. 

 

SpaceX developed a large face-shutoff pintile injector for Merlin internally, something normally used on small engines. Many boomskis. 

 

SpaceX developed the PICA-X (1, 2 & 3), SIRCA-X and SPAM heat shields under SAA's. They are developing a version of the TUFROC heat shield under another SAA for Starship.

 

Friction stir welding? AIUI, they built their own machine.

 

Etc.

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1
On 11/21/2018 at 10:40 PM, Unobscured Vision said:

That's simply not possible.

 

NASA (and by default, the US Government) holds all of the cards regarding the underlying IP and patents on the Merlin engines. Sure, they're a long, long way from what they were -- the LEM descent engine design -- but it could be argued that the Government still technically has ownership of that IP and SpaceX is a licensee of that technology no matter how evolved it is from the original. SpaceX would be prevented from using the Merlin engines.

...

Thanks.  Did not know all that.  I assumed Merlin was all SpaceX.

It is for the most part. And as @DocM said, the IP is theirs because they developed it past the originating technology.

 

It would, however, be a real [snip]-show if SpaceX were to decide to relocate to non-U.S. territory. I doubt it would ever happen, tbh.

My take...IP depends on conditions of employment for ownership of the "upgrades" and present "state". SpaceX or Tom/team.

 

As far as relocation..short to mid term...not going to happen. Long term...Mars regional transport office in New Berlin (Star Trek). /s

 

As a side note...remember that Elon is South African/Canadian/American....decisions will not be determined by residence..but business opportunity, the world is a big vibrant place and he knows how to use it.

 

The Senate will eventually stop shooting itself in the foot...one only has so many toes....😎

22 minutes ago, DocM said:

The instigator of this is 84 years old and his current  Senate term ends in 2022.

Seems like an eternity...but I think he'll get some "blow back" on this one eventually...hopefully not everyone in the senate is that stupid.

  • Like 1
23 minutes ago, Draggendrop said:

Seems like an eternity...but I think he'll get some "blow back" on this one eventually...hopefully not everyone in the senate is that stupid.

He's been at it from the beginning, and seniority protects congresscritters like Shelby.

 

This 2014 Innerspace article shows how far back his animosity against Musk & SpaceX goes

 

http://innerspace.net/congress-2/richard-shelbys-war-against-spacex/

 

Quote

 

Richard Shelby’s War Against SpaceX

 

Last week, a U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee passed an FY 2015 bill for NASA, one with ominous portents for the Commercial Crew program.  As pointed out in several media sources, the bill contains a “poison pill” provision which appears to be deliberately calculated to increase the administrative costs of the program to contractors, with SpaceX in particular being the prime target.

>

>

While Senator Shelby claims the language is not seeking to target SpaceX, and he is only concerned with “transparency,” his record strongly suggests otherwise.

 

Senator Shelby’s animosity towards SpaceX is no secret, and has been on full display in multiple Senate hearings, including the most recent March 5th hearing featuring testimony by both Elon Musk and ULA President Michael Gass. It goes much further than that however, stretching back to the very first Falcon 9 launch in June of 2010 as then reported by Politico:

 

“Belated progress for one so-called commercial provider must not be confused with progress for our nation’s human spaceflight program. As a nation, we cannot place our future spaceflight on one fledgling company’s definition of success.”

 

And before that

 

“this commercial provider cannot deliver the trash from the space station much less take humans into space and back,”

 

Four trips to ISS later, it might be time to revise and amend his remarks, but somehow that does not seem likely.  

>

Given the close relationship between Shelby and ULA, again on display during the March 5 hearing, it seems rather implausible that the language could have ended up in the bill over the latter’s strongly voiced opposition.  Or is it really all just about the Space Launch System, and the growing fear that as the NRC Mars report pointed out again last week, there is simply no way the nation can afford a SLS flight rate high enough to ensure safety without massive and highly unlikely increases in NASA’s budget?

>

 

 

Yes!

 

I rest my case.

 

 

yikes...

 

time for a comedy routine.....

 

 

saw this on a retweet from Marco Langbroek while looking for payload positional goodies like the X-37B...it's been up almost 420 days now...

FAA Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test draft environmental assessment... (PDF)

 

Quote

2.1.1 ABORT TEST OVERVIEW

 

As part of SpaceX’s commercial crew certification process with NASA, SpaceX proposes to conduct an abort test. The abort test is currently scheduled for 2019. The abort test would involve observation, photography, and debris management associated with the breakup of the Falcon 9 first and second stages. 

The purpose of the abort test is to demonstrate the Dragon launch abort system and to facilitate meeting NASA’s human certification plan requirements. The launch scenario where an abort is initiated during the ascent trajectory at the maximum dynamic pressure (known as max Q) is a design driver for the launch abort system. It dictates the highest thrust and minimum relativen acceleration required between Falcon 9 and the aborting Dragon. As the in‐flight abort would occur during the first stage portion of the launch trajectory, the second stage of Falcon 9 would be simplified (see Section 2.1.3). 

The abort test would be conducted from LC-39A. The integration and processing flow of Dragon and Falcon 9 would be similar to that of a standard Dragon launch. Dragon would be integrated vertically with the trunk and then rotated to horizontal position and mated to the second stage of Falcon 9 while in the transporter‐erector. The vehicle would then be rolled out to the pad and moved to a vertical position. The abort test would start with a nominal launch countdown and release at T-0. The Falcon 9 with the Dragon attached would follow a standard ISS trajectory with the exception of launch azimuth to approximately Mach 1. The Falcon 9 would be configured to shut down and terminate thrust, targeting the abort test shutdown condition (simulating a loss of thrust scenario). Dragon would then autonomously detect and issue an abort command, which would initiate the nominal startup sequence of Dragon’s SuperDraco engine system. Concurrently, Falcon 9 would receive a command from Dragon to terminate thrust on the nine first stage Merlin 1D (M1D) engines. Dragon would then separate from Falcon 9 at the interface between the trunk and the second stage, with a frangible nut system. Under these conditions, the Falcon 9 vehicle would become uncontrollable and would break apart. SpaceX would not attempt first stage booster flyback to KSC, CCAFS, or a droneship, nor would they attempt to  fly the booster to orbit. 


Dragon would fly until SuperDraco burnout and then coast until reaching apogee, at which point the trunk would be jettisoned. Draco thrusters would be used to reorient Dragon to entry attitude. Dragon would descend back toward Earth and initiate the drogue parachute deployment sequence at approximately 6 miles altitude and main parachute deployment at approximately 1 mile altitude. Dragon recovery operations would be very similar to actions for normal Dragon reentry and recovery (USAF 2013), although Dragon recovery during the abort test would occur approximately 9–42 miles from shore, and normal Dragon recovery is approximately 200 miles offshore (see Section 2.8.1). The recovery vessel would recover all parachutes deployed by Dragon, as possible, including the two drogue and four main parachutes. Recovery of the drogue parachute assembly would be attempted if the recovery team can get a visual fix on the splashdown location. However, because the drogue parachute assembly is deployed at a high altitude, it is difficult to locate. In addition, because of the size of the assembly and the density of the material, the drogue parachute assembly becomes saturated within approximately one minute of splashing down and begins to sink. This makes recovering the drogue parachute assembly difficult and unlikely.

2.1.2 DRAGON TEST VEHICLE 

SpaceX has developed Dragon to deliver cargo and experiments to the ISS and Low Earth Orbit (Dragon-1) and to transport astronauts to the ISS (Dragon-2) (Figure 2-1). Dragon weighs approximately 17,000 pounds without cargo and is approximately 17 feet tall with a base width of 13 feet. Dragon-2 is composed of the capsule for pressurized crew and cargo, the unpressurized cargo module or “trunk,” and a nosecone. Other primary structures include a welded aluminum pressure vessel, primary heat shield support structure, and back shell thermal protection system support structure. The thermal protection structure supports secondary structures including the SuperDraco engines, propellant tanks, pressurant tanks, parachute system, and necessary avionics. The Dragon test vehicle is intended to represent the final flight configuration of Dragon-2. Systems, subsystems, and components critical to the success of in-flight abort would be in the final configuration. Non-critical systems would either be eliminated or simplified to reduce the complexity of the ground refurbishment process to conduct the abort test. Dragon would contain approximately 5,650 pounds of hypergolic propellant, including approximately 3,500 pounds of dinitrogen tetroxide (NTO) and 2,150 pounds of monomethylhydrazine (MMH). Dragon would contain approximately 2,400 pounds of residual propellant after the abort test.
>

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      471
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!