Recommended Posts

three weeks later after everyone has dispersed and the field has settled down.........

 

post-546174-0-61203200-1434061718.jpg

 

2 extra shots...hard landing...

 

post-546174-0-19650100-1434062151.jpg

 

back home...

 

post-546174-0-60585800-1434062183.jpg

 

 

  • Like 1

yeah Sam is awesome. If you look on the ESA youtube page she has posted a lot of videos and they recently also did a 3D tour of the Columbus Module.

 

http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Human_Spaceflight/International_Space_Station/Highlights/International_Space_Station_panoramic_tour

 

That is the link to the 3D tour of the Columbus Module. You can click on the Red Circles on it to get more information and even links to a few of Sam's Videos.

  • Like 1

Today's news.......

 

This video is of the departure of the capsule...it actually shows how the docking adapter works and shows the separation......good video...

 

Expedition 43 welcomed home....

 

And it would't be a good day unless I posted something..........different.........."SpaceSquatch".............. :woot:

 

post-546174-0-49437900-1434211480.jpg

 

http://www.space.com/29658-astronaut-statues-invade-seattle-museum-art.html

 

 

 

Ah right I understand more now how the latch system works I always wondered how they removed the spike [if I might call it that] used to latch onto the station

Pretty neat eh!......cheers

  • Like 1

The Bigelow expandable module will be launched on a SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 to the ISS this year..TBA......So here is a bit of info on the unit....

 

Video showing design and use...

 

Picture of packed unit for launch...

post-546174-0-93805700-1434223094.jpg

 

Prototype space station....

post-546174-0-83926800-1434223137.jpg

 

and an infographic......

post-546174-0-25796500-1434223207.jpg

 

http://spaceref.biz/company/bigelow/2015-could-be-a-milestone-year-for-bigelow-aerospace.html

 

http://www.space.com/28855-inflatable-space-station-habitat-bigelow.html

 

http://www.parabolicarc.com/2015/03/12/54848/

 

BEAM goes up on CRS-8, currently scheduled for September 2.

BEAM 2 will be equipped for use as an EVA airlock on Bigelow's Alpha Station propulsion/docking module. Prop/docking module at left in the photo & BEAM 2 in the patent drawing at the bottom. BEAM 2 is already under construction.

yru3yhaj.jpg

US20120318926A1-20121220-D00000.png

  • Like 1

Is there much difference in landing force of the Russian technique of solid ground with boosters versus the US water and parachute type and whats the advantage and disadvantages of both?

It depends on the spacecraft.

The Soyuz single parachute landing comes down at about 7.2 m/s then the solids fire for a 1.5 m/s touchdown, but on some flights the solid landing rockets have failed resulting in a hard landing and injuries. Astronauts have described this as like being in a car crash.

Soyuz then falls over on its side, or rolls down a hill, but the real excitement has come when it has overshot the landing zone and gone into a body of water. Soyuz 23 landed on a frozen lake, which . didn't go particularly well. The parachute filled with water, causing the escape hatch to be submerged. They weren't found until the next day.

A nominal US Orion water splashdown is at 7.6 m/s, and at worst about 11 m/s with only 2 parachutes open. The harnesses holds the spacecraft so the lower edge slices into the water for a much softer splashdown.

Dragon 2's 3 parschute water splashdown is at 4.9 m/s, a lot gentler, and it too lands lower edge first to further soften the solashdown.

Dragon 2's Soyuz-style 3 parachute landing fires the SuperDraco liquid thrusters at about 10 meters, then it comes to a near hover before gently settling on its 4 legs. Like a helicopter.

Full propulsive Dragon 2 landings (no parachutes) would start the SuperDracos at about 7,000 feet at low throttle and decelerate to also do a helicopter style landing.

If the SuprrDraco engines don't fire properly at 7,000 feet the parachutes are a backup and Dragon 2 can do a land touchdown without them. It would come down on the rear legs first then settle on the front legs.

Yup. Dragon 2 has four landing modes.

What happens with these inflatable modules if they get pierced by micro-metrorites or debris?

They're actually expandable rather than inflatable. Inflatable hints at a balloon which they really aren't. The Bigelow station modules have a wall thickness of .4 to .45 meter and they have a metal core.

NASA tests proposed ISS module designs by firing up to a 17 mm metal sphere at them at a velocity of 7,000 m/s (15,600 mph) using their (totally outrageous) Hypervelocity Gun.

Your typical ISS module wall ends up with an 8-10 cm hole blasted through most of its metal & fabric layers, usually stopping at the last layer.

The Bigelow module wall stopped the projectile cold in its outer layers, and it remained airtight. They kept trying but ended up breaking not the module wall but the Hypervelocity Gun.

  • Like 1

Better yet, because its mostly hydrogen-rich polymers the structure is a good radiation shield. For the DS (deep space) versions they can add water layers to enhance the shield. Add a boron compound to the water layers and it's a good neutron shield too.

  • Like 1

So much for a smooth Soyuz landing....

http://www.spacedaily.com/m/reports/Hard_landing_as_three_astronauts_return_to_Earth_from_ISS_999.html

'Hard landing' as three astronauts return to Earth from ISS

By Anna SMOLCHENKO

Moscow (AFP) June 11, 2015

>

Both Russian mission control and NASA reported no glitches, but Shkaplerov, the commander of the Soyuz spacecraft, said their landing was "hard and quick."

"For some reason, we were spinning," he said in comments broadcast on national television and cited by Russian journalists. No other details were provided.

The 43-year-old cosmonaut added however that "everything worked accurately."

>

DocM...you are right...check out the pictures I posted...one was a bad flare...the other was a very large dust cloud...if it wasn't for the form fitting seats, someone may have had a back injury.....Cheers..

 

Found it...

post-546174-0-72242300-1434252755.jpg

 

We have talked about space junk, micro meteoroids, frozen loose materials but not asteroids. Well, they are not really an issue yet due to the low earth orbit but we do have the occasional shower, about a dozen a year, a lot of which are predictable and if an issue arises, the station can lower or raise position. Drills are held for such an event with spare oxygen tanks, and a getaway vehicle if needed. The ISS is the size of a football field with solar panels of approximately one acre. This would be more likely, by area, than the station itself, which has a small cross section. But...stuff happens....

 

While talking about flying large rocks...we have asteroids of many sizes and some traveling at amazing speeds...some are deemed near earth objects that need attention....NASA has an updated list so you can see what disaster is in the making.......(joking...I think...you decide)

 

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/

 

Asteroid naming conventions....There are strict rules on naming. Once one is found, it is given a place holder number and the red tape begins...they generally require standard for the naming but you can put in suggestions...general rules....

 

 

 

When an asteroid is first discovered, it is given a provisional designation like "1999 RQ36."  The first four digits tell you what year it was discovered.  The last four characters tell you when in that year it was discovered. 1999 RQ36 was the 916th object observed in the first half of September, 1999.

Once the asteroid's orbit is precisely known, it is issued an official sequential number.  1999 RQ36 was the 101,955th asteroid to receive a number, so it is now formally known as 101955. Only about 5% of numbered asteroids have been given names.

When asteroids are discovered, they are initially named with numbers and letters encoding when they were first spotted.  The Minor Planet Center at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory gives them these alphanumeric codes.

The asteroid's discoverer can propose to the International Astronomical Union to give the asteroid a formal name.  The International Astronomical Union has established rules to guide the selection of names for objects located in different parts of the solar system.  Here are the guidelines for naming (101955) 1999 RQ36:

Proposed names must be:

no more than 16 characters long (including any spaces or punctuation);
preferably one word;
pronounceable (in some language);
written using Latin characters (transliterations of names from languages not written using Latin characters are acceptable);
non-offensive;
not identical with or even too similar to an existing name of a minor planet or natural planetary satellite.
In addition, because (101955) 1999 RQ36 is a near-Earth object, its name should be from mythology, but the name should not be one associated with creation or underworld themes because those themes are used for other types of bodies in the solar system. The mythological name can come from any culture from any part of the world. In very rare cases, this definition has been stretched to include fictional mythological characters. There are some exceptions to these rules, and entries of names that are not mythological will not be disqualified. However, the International Astronomical Union is likelier to approve a name that is from mythology than one that is not.

http://www.planetary.org/get-involved/contests/osirisrex/guidelines.html

 

The reason I chose this topic was because of a very special naming.....

 

post-546174-0-48361900-1434333782.jpg

 

 

The legacy of Leonard Nimoy has reached the Final Frontier: on June 2, a 6-mile-wide (9.6 km) asteroid was named 4864 Nimoy in his honor. The asteroid travels within the main asteroid belt

  • Like 1

DocM...you are right...check out the pictures I posted...one was a bad flare...the other was a very large dust cloud...if it wasn't for the form fitting seats, someone may have had a back injury.....Cheers..

 

Found it...

attachicon.gifTMA15M.jpg

 

Wow. Hard landing indeed ... glad they're all okay. Spinning and a hard landing indicates they came in a little hot .. not something you want on a ground-based capsule landing that isn't using much in the way of impact absorption.

 

I've been a big fan of Soyuz over the years, but I'm starting to rethink my position. Yikes. Too many problems lately.

  • Like 1

Which is why the Commercial Crew Program is so important. So much has come out of it for relatively low cost as compared to other programs. This is why it is so easy to pick out the "corruptables in the House and Senate". Common sense will dictate and we know what will happen when a "death" occurs due to short sightedness.....Cheers...... :)

  • Like 1

I think even if the CCP gets blown out, SpaceX will continue on. It's not like they need the permission of the U.S. Government, or (really) the money anymore. Not with the success they've already had. Dragon 2 is almost ready for flight, and the hard parts in its' Dev Cycle are finished. They'll have plenty of customers, including the U.S. Government if everything goes to plan.

  • Like 1

I think even if the CCP gets blown out, SpaceX will continue on. It's not like they need the permission of the U.S. Government, or (really) the money anymore. Not with the success they've already had. Dragon 2 is almost ready for flight, and the hard parts in its' Dev Cycle are finished. They'll have plenty of customers, including the U.S. Government if everything goes to plan.

In fact, they have so much commercial work out there to pay the bills, it almost seems like they are the ones helping others right now. As Elon has said in the past, before the onslaught of work...That SpaceX would continue at a slower pace if necessary, but would continue.....Which is why I really hope they put it up on their own shortly and 'buzz" the station with a photo op.....basically tells Boeing .....The new kids are in town, and there not going away!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!